Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum computer benchmarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.12142 v1 pith:BKVE3RTP submitted 2022-05-24 quant-ph cs.ET

QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum computer benchmarking

classification quant-ph cs.ET
keywords quantumbenchmarkqpackscoresapplication-orientedbenchmarkingcomputerperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents the benchmark score definitions of QPack, an application-oriented cross-platform benchmarking suite for quantum computers and simulators, which makes use of scalable Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and Variational Quantum Eigensolver applications. Using a varied set of benchmark applications, an insight of how well a quantum computer or its simulator performs on a general NISQ-era application can be quantitatively made. This paper presents what quantum execution data can be collected and transformed into benchmark scores for application-oriented quantum benchmarking. Definitions are given for an overall benchmark score, as well as sub-scores based on runtime, accuracy, scalability and capacity performance. Using these scores, a comparison is made between various quantum computer simulators, running both locally and on vendors' remote cloud services. We also use the QPack benchmark to collect a small set of quantum execution data of the IBMQ Nairobi quantum processor. The goal of the QPack benchmark scores is to give a holistic insight into quantum performance and the ability to make easy and quick comparisons between different quantum computers

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Fidelity-per-Cost: A Metric for Evaluation of Quantum Computing Systems

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Cost-aware ranking of cloud QPUs via QFC disagrees with fidelity-only ranking; billing model, not hardware, fixes how the score scales with shot count.