pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29163 · v1 · pith:BLA4GH5Qnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Kinetically Controlled Condensation Boundary Governing Indium Incorporation in InGaN Metal Organic Vapor Phase Epitaxy

Qihui Lin , Junlin Wu , Erqi Xu , Jiaqing Yue , Jiale Wang , Zihao Xu , Haixin Qi , Liyi Luo
show 5 more authors
Haitao Wang Jia Wang Hiroshi Amano Bo Shen Guangxu Ju
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 03:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords InGaNMOVPEindium incorporationcondensation boundaryBurton-Cabrera-Frank modelcrystal truncation roddroplet formationGaN
0
0 comments X

The pith

A kinetically controlled condensation boundary sets the maximum indium composition in InGaN at a given temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines in situ synchrotron X-ray crystal truncation rod measurements with a binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank model to track indium incorporation during InGaN growth by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy on GaN. The model separates mobile In adatoms from condensed droplets and includes coupled Ga-In kinetics, which produces the observed nonlinear dependence of indium fraction on precursor fluxes and temperature. A critical In coverage marks the highest attainable composition before droplets form; this coverage arises from the kinetic balance between adatom supply and the surface incorporation capacity. The boundary moves with temperature and Ga flux, and the model predicts its location in quantitative agreement with independent measurements. This supplies a practical way to select growth conditions that reach higher indium levels while remaining below the droplet threshold.

Core claim

The central claim is that indium incorporation during InGaN MOVPE is governed by a kinetically controlled condensation boundary whose critical In coverage is fixed by the balance between In adatom supply and the incorporation capacity of the coupled Ga-In system in the binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank model. The model distinguishes adatoms from droplets, reproduces the nonlinear composition response to flux and temperature, and quantitatively predicts the boundary location, which shifts with temperature and Ga flux and matches separate experimental checks.

What carries the argument

binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank model that distinguishes In adatoms from condensed droplets and incorporates coupled Ga-In incorporation kinetics

If this is right

  • Indium composition depends nonlinearly on precursor flux and growth temperature.
  • The condensation boundary position changes with temperature and Ga flux.
  • Quantitative model predictions of the boundary agree with independent measurements.
  • Growth conditions can be chosen to maximize In content while avoiding droplet formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kinetic-balance approach could be tested on other ternary nitrides to locate their composition ceilings.
  • Recipes that hold growth just below the predicted boundary may stabilize high-In films at higher temperatures than current practice allows.
  • Increasing Ga flux may widen the window of allowable In coverage at fixed temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank model with coupled Ga-In kinetics and explicit distinction between In adatoms and condensed droplets accurately represents the surface processes without missing rate-limiting steps or unmodeled interactions.

What would settle it

An X-ray measurement of In coverage at the temperature and flux values predicted for the critical boundary that shows the observed maximum In composition lying outside the predicted coverage window would falsify the boundary claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29163 by Bo Shen, Erqi Xu, Guangxu Ju, Haitao Wang, Haixin Qi, Hiroshi Amano, Jiale Wang, Jiaqing Yue, Jia Wang, Junlin Wu, Liyi Luo, Qihui Lin, Zihao Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of InGaN growth on a vicinal surface. In and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a,b) Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We combine in situ synchrotron X-ray crystal truncation rod measurements with a binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank model to quantify indium incorporation during InGaN growth by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) on GaN(0001). By distinguishing In adatoms from condensed droplets and incorporating coupled Ga-In incorporation kinetics, the model captures the intrinsically nonlinear dependence of indium composition on precursor flux and growth temperature. The critical In coverage corresponding to the maximum attainable In composition at a given temperature is determined by a kinetic balance between In adatom supply and incorporation capacity, defining a kinetically controlled condensation boundary that shifts with temperature and Ga flux. The model quantitatively predicts this boundary, in agreement with independent measurements, and provides a predictive framework for optimizing high-In-content InGaN growth while avoiding droplet formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines in situ synchrotron X-ray crystal truncation rod measurements with a binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank model to quantify indium incorporation during InGaN MOVPE on GaN(0001). The model distinguishes In adatoms from condensed droplets, incorporates coupled Ga-In kinetics, and captures the nonlinear composition dependence on flux and temperature. It claims that the critical In coverage at maximum attainable composition is set by kinetic balance between supply and incorporation capacity, defining a kinetically controlled condensation boundary that the model quantitatively predicts in agreement with independent measurements.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a predictive framework for optimizing high-In-content InGaN growth while avoiding droplet formation. The integration of in situ X-ray CTR data with an explicit adatom/droplet kinetic model is a methodological strength, and the reported experimental agreement would constitute a concrete validation if the fitting and prediction steps are shown to be independent.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of quantitative agreement with independent measurements is unsupported because the manuscript provides no model equations, no values or fitting procedure for the free parameters (In adatom incorporation rate constants and Ga-In coupling coefficients), no error analysis, and no data-exclusion rules. Without these, the strength of the validation cannot be assessed.
  2. [Model section] Model section: the condensation boundary is defined directly from the kinetic balance inside the binary BCF model. Because the free parameters are fitted to the same X-ray composition data used to validate the boundary, the reported quantitative prediction risks being circular rather than an independent test; this directly undermines the central claim that the model 'quantitatively predicts this boundary'.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'independent measurements' are referenced but never identified or distinguished from the in situ X-ray CTR data set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the abstract and model validation. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the model details and validation procedure.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of quantitative agreement with independent measurements is unsupported because the manuscript provides no model equations, no values or fitting procedure for the free parameters (In adatom incorporation rate constants and Ga-In coupling coefficients), no error analysis, and no data-exclusion rules. Without these, the strength of the validation cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The full Model section contains the binary BCF equations, the fitted values of the In adatom incorporation rate constants and Ga-In coupling coefficients, the fitting procedure to the X-ray CTR composition data, error analysis, and data-exclusion rules. The abstract's claim of quantitative agreement refers to the model's derived condensation boundary matching separate independent measurements of droplet formation thresholds. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference the model parameters and the independence of the boundary validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model section] Model section: the condensation boundary is defined directly from the kinetic balance inside the binary BCF model. Because the free parameters are fitted to the same X-ray composition data used to validate the boundary, the reported quantitative prediction risks being circular rather than an independent test; this directly undermines the central claim that the model 'quantitatively predicts this boundary'.

    Authors: The parameters are fitted to the X-ray CTR composition versus flux and temperature. The condensation boundary is then computed from the kinetic balance using those parameters and tested against independent measurements of the droplet onset (e.g., ex situ or additional in situ data not entering the fit). This is an out-of-sample test rather than circular. We will add explicit text in the revised Model section distinguishing the fitting dataset from the boundary validation data. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation uses a binary Burton-Cabrera-Frank kinetic model to obtain the condensation boundary from explicit supply-incorporation balance equations. This boundary is then compared to independent X-ray CTR and composition measurements rather than being validated against the same fitted parameters used to define it. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, a renamed fit, or an ansatz smuggled from prior author work; the model equations and experimental agreement remain distinct. The central prediction therefore retains independent content against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of an extended BCF model whose kinetic parameters are not independently derived; no free parameters are explicitly listed but are implied by the quantitative fitting to data.

free parameters (2)
  • In adatom incorporation rate constants
    Required to set the kinetic balance that defines the condensation boundary; values must be chosen or fitted to match observed nonlinear composition dependence.
  • Ga-In coupling coefficients
    Control the coupled incorporation kinetics in the binary model; not derivable from first principles in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Burton-Cabrera-Frank framework extended to binary systems accurately describes InGaN surface kinetics during MOVPE.
    Invoked to distinguish adatoms from droplets and to derive the condensation boundary.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5712 in / 1335 out tokens · 52840 ms · 2026-06-30T03:14:44.269678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

245 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Griffin, L. J. , title =. Philos. Mag. , publisher =. 1950 , volume =

    1950

  2. [2]

    and Cabrera, N

    Burton, W. and Cabrera, N. and Frank, F. , title =. Philos. Trans. Royal. Soc. London Ser. A , year =

  3. [3]

    Verma, Ajit Ram , title =. Philos. Mag. , publisher =. 1951 , volume =

    1951

  4. [4]

    1954 , publisher=

    The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-rays , author=. 1954 , publisher=

    1954

  5. [5]

    Dynamical diffraction of X rays by perfect crystals , author=. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume=. 1964 , publisher=

    1964

  6. [6]

    Otte, H. M. and Crocker, A. G. , title =. Phys. Status Solidi , year =

  7. [7]

    Nagai,Haruo , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , year =

  8. [8]

    Touloulian, Y. S. and Kirby, R. K. and Taylor, R. E. and Lee, T. Y. , booktitle =. Thermophysical Properties of Matter , publisher =. 1977 , volume =

    1977

  9. [9]

    and Bennema, P

    Sunagawa, I. and Bennema, P. , title =. J. Cryst. Growth , year =

  10. [10]

    and van der Eerden, J

    van der Hoek, B. and van der Eerden, J. P. and Tsukamoto, K. , title =. J. Cryst. Growth , year =

  11. [11]

    Scattering of X-rays from crystal surfaces , author=. J. Phys. C , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  12. [12]

    Tromp, R. M. and Hamers, R. J. and Demuth, J. E. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. 1985 , volume =

    1985

  13. [13]

    Macrander, A. T. and Strege, K. E. , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , volume =. 1986 , doi =

    1986

  14. [14]

    , title =

    Robinson, Ian K. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 1986 , volume =

    1986

  15. [15]

    and Reilly, M

    Tapping, J. and Reilly, M. L. , title =. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A , publisher =. 1986 , volume =

    1986

  16. [16]

    Neumann, D. A. and Zabel, H. and Morko. Terracing in strained‐layer superlattices , journal =. 1988 , doi =

    1988

  17. [17]

    X-ray interference method for studying interface structures , author=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  18. [18]

    and van der Gon, A

    Vlieg, E. and van der Gon, A. W. Denier and Van der Veen, J. F. and Macdonald, John Emyr and Norris, C. , doi =. Surface X-ray scattering during crystal growth:. Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. 1988 , number =

    1988

  19. [19]

    1989 , edition =

    Shewmon, Paul , booktitle =. 1989 , edition =

    1989

  20. [20]

    Robinson, I. K. and Villain, J. and Vilfan, I. and Woodruff, D. P. and van Silfhout, R. G. and Bradshaw, A. M. and King, D. A. and van der Veen, J. F. and Pershan, P. and Macdonald, J. E. and Cowley, R. A. and Greaves, G. N. , title =. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. , year =

  21. [21]

    Morphological instability of a terrace edge during step-flow growth , author=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  22. [22]

    Time-resolved x-ray scattering studies of layer-by-layer epitaxial growth , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  23. [23]

    Van der Vegt, H. A. and Van Pinxteren, H. M. and Lohmeier, M. and Vlieg, E. and Thornton, J. M. C. , doi =. Surfactant-induced layer-by-layer growth of. Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. 1992 , number =

    1992

  24. [24]

    Henke, B. L. and Gullikson, E. M. and Davis, J. C. , title =. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables , year =

  25. [25]

    Michely, Thomas and Hohage, Michael and Bott, Michael and Comsa, George , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. 1993 , volume =

    1993

  26. [26]

    Tsao , title =

    Jeffrey Y. Tsao , title =. Materials Fundamentals of Molecular Beam Epitaxy , publisher =. 1993 , pages =

    1993

  27. [27]

    and Elkinani, I

    Pimpinelli, A. and Elkinani, I. and Karma, A. and Misbah, C. and Villain, J. , title =. J. Phys. Condens. Matter , publisher =. 1994 , volume =

    1994

  28. [28]

    Fluctuation and instability of steps in a diffusion field , author=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  29. [29]

    Held, G. A. and Brock, J. D. , doi =. Calculation of x-ray-diffraction profiles from vicinal surfaces , volume =. Phys. Rev. B , pages =. 1995 , number =

    1995

  30. [30]

    Simultaneous bunching and debunching of surface steps: theory and relation to experiments , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  31. [31]

    Morphological instability caused by asymmetry in step kinetics , author=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  32. [32]

    and Kirfel, A

    Waasmaier, D. and Kirfel, A. , title =. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. A , year =

  33. [33]

    and Brandt, M

    Ambacher, O. and Brandt, M. S. and Dimitrov, R. and Metzger, T. and Stutzmann, M. and Fischer, R. A. and Miehr, A. and Bergmaier, A. and Dollinger, G. , title =. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B , year =

  34. [34]

    , title =

    Brandt, Oliver and Yang, Hui and Ploog, Klaus H. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 1996 , volume =

    1996

  35. [35]

    and Dow, John D

    Packard, William E. and Dow, John D. and Nicolaides, Ruth and Doverspike, Kathleen and Kaplan, Ray , title =. Superlattices Microstruct. , year =

  36. [36]

    Avery, A. R. and Dobbs, H. T. and Holmes, D. M. and Joyce, B. A. and Vvedensky, D. D. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. 1997 , volume =

    1997

  37. [37]

    and Brennan, S

    Munkholm, A. and Brennan, S. and Carr, E.C. , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , publisher =. 1997 , volume =

    1997

  38. [38]

    Kinematical bound states of steps caused by asymmetry in step kinetics , author=. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  39. [39]

    Wang, S. C. and Ehrlich, Gert , title =. Surf. Sci. , year =

  40. [40]

    , title =

    Chase, Jr., Malcolm W. , title =. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Monograph 9 , year =

  41. [41]

    Kalff, Matthias and Comsa, George and Michely, Thomas , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. 1998 , volume =

    1998

  42. [42]

    Koleske, D. D. and Wickenden, A. E. and Henry, R. L. and DeSisto, W. J. and Gorman, R. J. , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , year =

  43. [43]

    Wright,A. F. , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  44. [44]

    Liu, Shudun and Metiu, Horia , title =. Surf. Sci. , year =

  45. [45]

    Smith, A. R. and Feenstra, R. M. and Greve, D. W. and Neugebauer, J. and Northrup, J. E. , title =. Appl. Phys. A , year =

  46. [46]

    Smith, A. R. and Feenstra, R. M. and Greve, D. W. and Shin, M. -S. and Skowronski, M. and Neugebauer, J. and Northrup, J. E. , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year =

  47. [47]

    and Eastman, Jeffrey A

    Thompson, Carol and Foster, Christopher M. and Eastman, Jeffrey A. and Stephenson, G. Brian , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year =

  48. [48]

    Smith, A. R. and Feenstra, R. M. and Greve, D. W. and Shin, M. S. and Skowronski, M. and Neugebauer, J. and Northrup, J. E. , title =. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B , year =

  49. [49]

    Smith, A. R. and Ramachandran, V. and Feenstra, R. M. and Greve, D. W. and Shin, M.-S. and Skowronski, M. and Neugebauer, J. and Northrup, J. E. , title =. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A , year =

  50. [50]

    Adatom diffusion at

    Zywietz, Tosja and Neugebauer, J. Adatom diffusion at. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year =

  51. [51]

    , title =

    Bungaro, Claudia and Rapcewicz, Krzysztof and Bernholc, J. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 1999 , volume =

    1999

  52. [52]

    and Nowak, G

    Held, R. and Nowak, G. and Ishaug, B. E. and Seutter, S. M. and Parkhomovsky, A. and Dabiran, A. M. and Cohen, P. I. and Grzegory, I. and Porowski,S. , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , year =

  53. [53]

    and Tarsa, E

    Heying, B. and Tarsa, E. J. and Elsass,C. R. and Fini, P. and DenBaars, S. P. and Speck, J. S. , title =. J. Appl. Phys. , year =

  54. [54]

    , title =

    Jeong, Hyeong-Chai and Williams, Ellen D. , title =. Surf. Sci. Rep. , year =

  55. [55]

    and Brennan, S

    Munkholm, A. and Brennan, S. , title =. J. Appl. Crystallogr. , publisher =. 1999 , volume =

    1999

  56. [56]

    , title =

    Ovesson, Staffan and Bogicevic, Alexander and Lundqvist, Bengt I. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. 1999 , volume =

    1999

  57. [57]

    Smith, A. R. and Feenstra, R. M. and Greve, D. W. and Shin, M. -S. and Skowronski, M. and Neugebauer, J. and Northrup, J. E. , title =. Surf. Sci. , year =

  58. [58]

    and Van de Walle, C

    Stampfl, C. and Van de Walle, C. G. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , year =

  59. [59]

    G. B. Stephenson and J. A. Eastman and O. Auciello and A. Munkholm and Carol Thompson and P. H. Fuoss and P. Fini and S. P. DenBaars and J. S. Speck , title =. MRS Bull. , year =

  60. [60]

    Stephenson, G. B. and Eastman, J. A. and Thompson, Carol and Auciello, O. and Thompson, L. J. and Munkholm, A. and Fini, P. and DenBaars, S. P. and Speck, J. S. , journal =. Observation of growth modes during metal-organic chemical vapor deposition of. 1999 , number =. doi:10.1063/1.123333 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.123333 1999

  61. [61]

    Xie, M. H. and Seutter, S. M. and Zhu, W. K. and Zheng, L. X. and Wu, Huasheng and Tong, S. Y. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. 1999 , volume =

    1999

  62. [62]

    Chirita, V. and M. Cluster diffusion and surface morphological transitions on. Thin Solid Films , year =

  63. [63]

    Feenstra, R. M. and Chen, Huajie and Ramachandran, V. and Lee, C. D. and Smith, A. R. and Northrup, J. E. and Zywietz, T. and Neugebauer, J. and Greve, D. W. , title =. Surf. Rev. Lett. , year =

  64. [64]

    Non-linear evolution of step meander during growth of a vicinal surface with no desorption , author=. Eur. Phys. J. B , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  65. [65]

    Murty, M. V. Ramana and Fini, P. and Stephenson, G. B. and Thompson, Carol and Eastman, J. A. and Munkholm, A. and Auciello, O. and Jothilingam, R. and DenBaars, S. P. and Speck, J. S. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 2000 , volume =

    2000

  66. [66]

    and Neugebauer, J

    Northrup, John E. and Neugebauer, J. and Feenstra, R. M. and Smith, A. R. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 2000 , volume =

    2000

  67. [67]

    and Videcoq, A

    Pimpinelli, A. and Videcoq, A. , title =. Surf. Sci. , year =

  68. [68]

    and Wang, Kai , title =

    Reeber, Robert R. and Wang, Kai , title =. J. Mater. Res. , year =

  69. [69]

    Xie, M. H. and Seutter S. M. and Zheng, L. X. and Cheung, S. H. and Ng, Y. F. and Wu, Huasheng and Tong. S. Y , title =. MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. , year =

  70. [70]

    Margret Giesen , title =. Prog. Surf. Sci. , year =

  71. [71]

    Koleske, D. D. and Wickenden, A. E. and Henry, R. L. and Culbertson. J. C. and Twigg, M. E. , title =. J. Cryst. Growth , year =

  72. [72]

    and Dabiran,A

    Parkhomovsky, A. and Dabiran,A. M. and Benjaminsson, B. and Cohen, P. I. , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year =

  73. [73]

    Surface morphology of

    S V. Surface morphology of. Mater. Sci. Eng. B , year =

  74. [74]

    Steimer, Christoph and Giesen, Margret and Verheij, Laurens and Ibach, Harald , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 2001 , volume =

    2001

  75. [75]

    Chen, Yefan and Ko, Hang-Ju and Hong, Soon-Ku and Yao, Takafumi and Segawa, Yusaburo , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year =

  76. [76]

    and Li, L

    Cui, Y. and Li, L. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , publisher =. 2002 , volume =

    2002

  77. [77]

    Murty, M. V. Ramana and Streiffer, S. K. and Stephenson, G. B. and Eastman, J. A. and Bai, G.-R. and Munkholm, A. and Auciello, O. and Thompson, Carol , journal=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  78. [78]

    and Eng, Peter J

    Trainor, Thomas P. and Eng, Peter J. and Robinson, Ian K. , title =. J. Appl. Crystallogr. , year =

  79. [79]

    First-Principles Surface Phase Diagram for Hydrogen on. Phys. Rev. Lett. , year =

  80. [80]

    Role of hydrogen in surface reconstructions and growth of

    Chris G. Role of hydrogen in surface reconstructions and growth of. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B , year =

Showing first 80 references.