REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards reconciling the holographic and lattice descriptions of radially excited hadrons
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Within the framework of AdS/QCD models, the spectra of radially excited hadrons are identified with towers of Kaluza-Klein (KK) states in a putative dual theory. The infinite number of KK states is indispensable to provide correct high energy asymptotics of correlation functions in QCD. It is known, however, that the KK modes of dual theory must be qualitatively different from real hadrons. And what is more important, the radially excited states appear in lattice calculations not as "excitations" of some ground state, but rather as independent states coupled to higher dimensional QCD operators - the larger is a basis of interpolating operators, the larger set of states can be resolved. A question arises whether it is possible to reconcile the holographic and lattice descriptions of radially excited hadrons? We propose a new phenomenological "consistency test" for bottom-up holographic models: If the KK spectrum of massive 5D fields corresponding to higher dimensional operators in QCD coincides with the conventional radial KK spectrum, then the holographic KK states can be identified with real excited mesons in the large-Nc limit of QCD - as in the lattice QCD, they become a superposition of several states interpolated by operators of different canonical dimensions. We demonstrate that the Soft Wall holographic model passes this test while the Hard Wall model does not.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Engineering Confining Dilatons: A WKB Inverse Problem in Holographic QCD
A WKB inversion of power-law Regge trajectories yields a non-quadratic holographic dilaton Φ(z)=(κz)^(2−α) that the authors then test on charmonium, bottomonium, and tetraquark candidates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.