Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improved Naive Bayes with Mislabeled Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.06292 v1 pith:BMTVK3KF submitted 2023-04-13 cs.LG stat.APstat.ME

Improved Naive Bayes with Mislabeled Data

classification cs.LG stat.APstat.ME
keywords bayesnaiveimprovedmethodclassificationdataincorrectlabeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Labeling mistakes are frequently encountered in real-world applications. If not treated well, the labeling mistakes can deteriorate the classification performances of a model seriously. To address this issue, we propose an improved Naive Bayes method for text classification. It is analytically simple and free of subjective judgements on the correct and incorrect labels. By specifying the generating mechanism of incorrect labels, we optimize the corresponding log-likelihood function iteratively by using an EM algorithm. Our simulation and experiment results show that the improved Naive Bayes method greatly improves the performances of the Naive Bayes method with mislabeled data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detecting Breast Carcinoma Metastasis on Whole-Slide Images by Partially Subsampled Multiple Instance Learning

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A Gaussian mixture MIL framework with partially subsampled instances improves metastasis prediction accuracy on breast cancer whole-slide images over prior methods.