REVIEW 1 cited by
Improved Naive Bayes with Mislabeled Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Improved Naive Bayes with Mislabeled Data
read the original abstract
Labeling mistakes are frequently encountered in real-world applications. If not treated well, the labeling mistakes can deteriorate the classification performances of a model seriously. To address this issue, we propose an improved Naive Bayes method for text classification. It is analytically simple and free of subjective judgements on the correct and incorrect labels. By specifying the generating mechanism of incorrect labels, we optimize the corresponding log-likelihood function iteratively by using an EM algorithm. Our simulation and experiment results show that the improved Naive Bayes method greatly improves the performances of the Naive Bayes method with mislabeled data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Detecting Breast Carcinoma Metastasis on Whole-Slide Images by Partially Subsampled Multiple Instance Learning
A Gaussian mixture MIL framework with partially subsampled instances improves metastasis prediction accuracy on breast cancer whole-slide images over prior methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.