Results on meson-meson scattering at large $N_\text{c}$

Fernando Romero-L\'opez; Jorge Baeza-Ballesteros; Pilar Hern\'andez

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 41 references

Results on meson-meson scattering at large $N_\text{c}$

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This lattice study of meson-meson scattering at Nc=3-6 finds no tetraquark resonance in the AA channel, but a virtual bound state at Eb/Mpi=1.741(13) at Nc=3, with the expected 1/Nc suppression and visible subleading corrections.

desk verdict Solid preliminary large-Nc scattering study whose headline virtual bound state is a parametrization-dependent hint rather than an established result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19115 v1 pith:BNLVDFN3 submitted 2025-01-31 hep-lat hep-phhep-th

Jorge Baeza-Ballesteros , Pilar Hernández , Fernando Romero-López This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lathep-phhep-th PACS 12.38.Gc11.15.Pg13.75.Lb

keywords largeN_clatticeQCDmeson-mesonscatteringtetraquarkLüscherquantizationconditionpion-pionphaseshiftvirtualboundstatesubleading1/N_ccorrections

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how meson-meson scattering amplitudes behave as the number of colors $N_c$ grows, testing the large-$N_c$ limit of QCD with lattice simulations at $N_c=3,4,5,6$ in a theory with four degenerate quark flavors. The authors extract finite-volume energies from a large operator set and convert them, via Lüscher's quantization condition, into infinite-volume pion-pion phase shifts in three channels. Their central result is that the $AA$ channel shows no tetraquark resonance above threshold, but the $N_c=3$ amplitude is consistent with a virtual bound state at $E_b/M_\pi=1.741(13)$, a candidate relative of tetraquark states seen at LHCb. The results also show the expected $1/N_c$ suppression of the interactions, with subleading corrections that can be matched to chiral perturbation theory.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a modified effective range expansion with a fixed Adler zero, $k/M_\pi\,\cot\delta_0 = (M_\pi E/(E^2-2z))(B_0+B_1 k^2/M_\pi^2)$, with $z=M_\pi^2$, used to fit the finite-volume energy levels through Lüscher's quantization condition. The energies themselves come from a matrix of correlation functions built from two-pion, two-vector-meson, and local tetraquark operators, solved with a generalized eigenvalue problem; the large-$N_c$ power counting of eqs. (1)-(2), expressing the $SS$/$AA$ amplitudes as an opposite-sign $1/N_c$ term plus subleading $N_f$-dependent corrections and the $AS$ amplitude as $O(1/N_c^2)$, organizes the comparison across $N_c$.

What would settle it

Rerun the $AA$-channel analysis on the same finite-volume energies using a different amplitude parametrization, for example one with a $B_2$ term or with a free Adler zero, and check whether a pole at $E_b/M_\pi\approx 1.741$ remains; if the pole moves by more than the quoted uncertainty or disappears, the virtual-bound-state claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the theory with $N_f=4$ degenerate flavors and $M_\pi\approx 590$ MeV, the $AA$-channel pion-pion amplitude has no pole above the two-pion threshold for any $N_c$ studied, and at $N_c=3$ it is consistent with a virtual bound state at $E_b/M_\pi=1.741(13)$ beneath threshold. The $SS$ and $AA$ phase shifts, after removing the leading $1/N_c$ factor, are of similar magnitude across $N_c$, with visible subleading corrections appearing as a linear dependence of the scattering length and effective range on $1/N_c$ for $N_c=4,5,6$. The $AS$ channel interacts very weakly, in line with the expected $O(1/N_c^2)$ suppression. The paper is explicit that the virtual bound state needs confirmation with other amplitude parametrizations.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the effective-range formula with the Adler zero fixed at $z=M_\pi^2$ and truncated after the $B_1$ term is the true shape of the pion-pion amplitude over the fitted range, so that the virtual bound state is a real feature of the theory and not an artifact of the fitting function.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the result is right, the $AA$ channel at $N_c=3$ has a subthreshold pole at $E_b/M_\pi=1.741(13)$, i.e. a virtual bound state rather than a resonance above threshold.
The $SS$ and $AA$ amplitudes follow the leading $1/N_c$ scaling, and the residual $N_c$ dependence can be used to determine the $N_c$ scaling of low-energy constants in one-loop chiral perturbation theory.
The absence of an above-threshold resonance in the $AA$ channel at this pion mass tells experiment and phenomenology that a tetraquark signal, if present, is a subthreshold or narrower effect in this setup.
The very weak $AS$ interactions confirm the kinematic $O(1/N_c^2)$ suppression, so that channel is a clean laboratory for $N_c$ counting rather than for resonance hunting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the virtual bound state survives alternative parametrizations, following its pole trajectory in $N_c$ would distinguish a subleading-effect state (moving toward threshold and disappearing as $N_c\to\infty$) from an intrinsic tetraquark that stays fixed.
A robust pole would also allow a compositeness analysis of its residue, separating a meson-meson molecular component from an elementary tetraquark component.
The apparent $N_c=6$ separation in the $SS$ channel, which the authors flag as 'unnaturally separated', suggests a systematic effect such as the pion-mass mismatch between ensembles; correcting for the $M_\pi$ dependence would sharpen the $N_c\to\infty$ extrapolation.
The same operator set and analysis pipeline could be applied to the matching doubly charmed channels at the physical pion mass to test whether the LHCb $T_{cs0}(2900)$ states have the same origin as the $N_c=3$ virtual state seen here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a solid, honest preliminary lattice study that reports new above-threshold phase shifts at Nc=3-6 and a candidate virtual bound state, but the bound state is a fit-dependent extrapolation below threshold and should not yet be read as a discovery. It deserves a serious referee; the full paper will need to settle the parametrization robustness and the Nc=6 outlier.

What is genuinely new: the paper extends the group's earlier threshold analysis (ref. [5]) to above-threshold energies, adds the AS channel, includes rho-rho and local tetraquark operators in the GEVP basis, and presents the first lattice hint of a virtual bound state in the AA channel at Nc=3. The operator-set comparison in Fig. 1 is a good practical check, the AIC-based averaging is standard, and the phase shifts visibly decrease with Nc after the leading 1/Nc factor is stripped, which is what large-Nc counting predicts. That is real progress.

The soft spots are the ones the authors themselves flag. The virtual bound state comes from the two-parameter modified effective range expansion, eq. (7), with the Adler zero fixed at z=Mpi^2 and higher-order terms dropped. The quoted pole sits at k^2/Mpi^2 ≈ -0.24, between the imposed zero at -0.5 and threshold, a region where no lattice eigenvalue directly constrains the amplitude. Different admissible parametrizations can move or remove a subthreshold pole, so 'indication' is the right word until the cross-check with other forms is done. This is not circularity—the phase shifts are outputs of the finite-volume fits, not inputs to them—but it is a robustness issue that the text explicitly recognizes. The Nc-scaling part is also provisional: pion masses differ slightly between ensembles, and the Nc=6 point in the SS channel looks separated from the others. The authors mention both but do not resolve them. A referee will want to see the fitted energies and the per-point fit quality, which the proceedings text does not include.

For a proceedings contribution this is the right level of caution: the claims are worded as indications, the methods are standard, and the central large-Nc pattern is stable. I would send it to peer review, ask for the numerical data and the alternative parametrization fits, and treat the bound state as a motivation for further work, not a result to quote. If I were working on large-Nc meson scattering or the LHCb tetraquark interpretation, I would cite this as a preliminary data point.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a preliminary lattice study of meson-meson scattering in a theory with N_f=4 degenerate quark flavors and N_c=3--6, at a pion mass of about 590 MeV. Finite-volume energies are extracted from a large operator basis that includes two-pion, two-vector-meson, and local tetraquark operators, and infinite-volume phase shifts are obtained via the L\"uscher quantization condition. The s-wave phase shifts in the SS and AA channels are fitted to a modified effective-range expansion with an Adler zero fixed at z=M_pi^2. The main physics results are: (i) the AA channel at N_c=3 is consistent with a virtual bound state at E_b/M_pi=1.741(13), while no tetraquark resonance is found above threshold; (ii) the amplitudes show the expected 1/N_c suppression with visible subleading corrections; and (iii) the AS channel is very weakly interacting. The paper also studies the N_c dependence of the scattering length and effective range.

Significance. If established, these results would be an important step toward understanding whether the exotic tetraquark candidates seen by LHCb survive in the large-N_c limit, and they would provide a first multi-color lattice determination of subleading 1/N_c corrections to meson-meson scattering beyond threshold. The analysis is methodologically careful in several respects: it uses a large operator set, a GEVP with AIC-based averaging, multiple moving frames and irreps, and a consistent action for valence and sea quarks. The authors are also appropriately cautious in their wording, explicitly flagging the main model-dependence. However, the headline virtual-bound-state claim currently rests on a single two-parameter fit form and is not yet supported by robustness checks.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3, Eq. (7) and Fig. 2] The virtual bound state at E_b/M_pi=1.741(13) is inferred from the modified effective-range expansion of Eq. (7) truncated after the B1 term, with the Adler zero fixed at z=M_pi^2. The pole is located at k^2/M_pi^2=-0.24, roughly halfway between the imposed zero at k^2/M_pi^2=-0.5 and the two-pion threshold, a region not directly constrained by any lattice energy level. The manuscript provides no fit-quality information (e.g., chi2/dof or the fitted energies) and no test with alternative parametrizations; the authors themselves state in Sec. 4 that the existence of the state needs to be established with other parametrizations. Because this is the sole evidence for the central result, the paper should either add such robustness tests or present the virtual bound state explicitly as a model-dependent indication rather than as a result.
[Sec. 3, Fig. 4] The linear extrapolation in 1/N_c for the scattering length and effective range uses the N_c=4--6 points while the text attributes the discrepancy between the SS and AA channels at large N_c to 'mismatches in the pion masses between ensembles'. Since M_pi enters both the ChPT normalization and the two-body kinematics, fitting in 1/N_c without including the pion-mass dependence can bias the extracted subleading coefficients. The authors note this limitation and plan a one-loop ChPT fit, but as it stands the quantitative claim about subleading corrections is not established.
[Sec. 3, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The text states that in the SS channel 'results for N_c=6 seem to be unnaturally separated from the rest, which we are currently investigating', yet this N_c=6 point is included in the linear extrapolation to N_c=infinity in Fig. 4. The sensitivity of the extrapolated values to excluding N_c=6, or to the choice of fit range, should be quantified. Without this, the claimed O(1/N_c^2) corrections are not robust against the anomalous N_c=6 behavior.

minor comments (2)

[Figures 2 and 3] The panel labels '(a) AA channel' and '(b) SS channel' appear to be swapped relative to the text, which describes figs. 2a and 2b as the SS and AA channels, respectively; the signs of the phase shifts (negative for SS, positive for AA) confirm the swap.
[Eq. (7)] The term 'pole' in 'we keep the location of the pole fixed at z=M_pi^2' is confusing, since z is an Adler zero of the parametrization, not the pole that would correspond to a bound state. Calling z an Adler zero explicitly would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the finite-volume energies are independent lattice inputs, and the virtual bound state is a fitted output whose parametrization dependence is explicitly flagged.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is data-driven rather than self-referential. Lattice correlation functions are computed with a large operator set, finite-volume energies are extracted via GEVP fits, and these energies are then converted into infinite-volume scattering amplitudes through the Lüscher quantization condition, Eq. (5), and its partial-wave form, Eq. (6). The modified effective range expansion, Eq. (7), is an assumed parametrization with the Adler zero fixed at z = M_pi^2 and higher-order terms set to zero; the parameters B0 and B1 are fitted to the finite-volume energy data. The resulting phase shifts, scattering lengths, effective ranges, and the Nc = 3 virtual bound state are all outputs of these fits, not inputs used to define the parametrization. The virtual bound state is a pole of the fitted amplitude below threshold, so it depends on the choice of parametrization, but that is a model-robustness issue rather than circularity. The paper explicitly acknowledges this: 'its existence needs to be established also with other parametrizations of the scattering amplitude' (Sec. 4), which is an honest limitation, not evidence that the claim is built into the assumptions. The self-citations to refs. [2-5] provide the simulation setup, ensembles, and a previous near-threshold analysis, but the new finite-volume spectra, phase shifts, and Nc dependence presented here are newly computed quantities. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-cited uniqueness theorem or to a renamed known result. Therefore the paper receives a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's physics content rests on standard lattice and scattering tools (Lüscher quantization, GEVP, HiRep ensembles) and on the validity of its truncated effective range parametrization. The leading numerical claim, the Nc=3 virtual bound state, is an output of a fit to that parametrization and has not been independently confirmed; it is the only new entity invoked. There are no parameter-free derivations of the central claim.

free parameters (1)

B0, B1 (eq. 7 coefficients) for each channel and Nc = Not reported in the paper; derived AA pole at Nc=3: E_b/M_pi = 1.741(13)
The phase shifts in figs. 2 and 5 are obtained by fitting these coefficients to finite-volume energies; the virtual bound state energy is a derived location of the pole of this fitted amplitude.

assumptions (5)

standard math Lüscher quantization condition, eqs. (5)-(6), maps finite-volume energies to infinite-volume phase shifts.
Used without proof, referencing refs. [21-39]; standard tool in lattice QCD.
domain assumption Single-channel elastic pi-pi scattering is valid for the energy levels used in the amplitude fits.
The paper includes rho rho and tetraquark operators, and rho rho states appear in the spectrum, but the quantization condition is applied in single-channel form. The paper does not quantify the coupled-channel corrections.
domain assumption The N_f=4 degenerate flavor theory with SU(4)_f irreps is a useful proxy for mapping to the LHCb tetraquark channels.
The physical tetraquarks have charm and strange quarks with different masses; the paper maps the SS, AA, AS irreps and connects them heuristically to the experimental candidates.
ad hoc to paper The modified effective range expansion, eq. (7), truncated after B1 with the Adler zero fixed at z = M_pi^2, describes the scattering amplitude over the fitted energy range.
Chosen by the authors as the fit ansatz; the virtual bound state is an output of this ansatz, and the paper states the state needs confirmation with other parametrizations.
domain assumption Pion masses are sufficiently matched across Nc ensembles so that Nc scaling is not contaminated by M_pi differences.
The paper itself notes inconsistencies between channels in fig. 4 could be due to pion-mass mismatches between ensembles, and plans a future one-loop ChPT fit including M_pi dependence.

invented entities (1)

AA-channel virtual bound state near E_b/M_pi = 1.741(13) at Nc=3
purpose: Explains the rapid threshold behavior of the AA phase shift and connects to tetraquark phenomenology.
It is a pole of the fitted amplitude using eq. (7), not a directly observed state. The paper explicitly says its existence must be established with other parametrizations, and it has no falsifiable handle external to this analysis yet.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Results on meson-meson scattering at large $N_\text{c}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BNLVDFN3

@misc{pith2026250119115,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Results on meson-meson scattering at large $N_\textc$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BNLVDFN3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19115}
}

abstract

We present results on the large $N_\text{c}$ scaling of meson-meson scattering amplitudes. We work in a theory with $N_\text{f}=4$ degenerate quark flavors and run lattice simulations with $N_\text{c}=3-6$ and pion mass $M_\pi\approx 590$ MeV. We focus on three different scattering channels, two of which have the same quantum numbers as some tetraquark candidates recently found at LHCb. Finite-volume energies are extracted using a large set of operators, containing two-particle operators corresponding to two pions or two vector mesons, and local tetraquark operators. Using L\"uscher's quantization condition, we constrain the infinite-volume scattering amplitudes and investigate subleading $N_\text{c}$ corrections to the large $N_\text{c}$ limit. For one of the channels, we find indications of a virtual bound state at $N_\text{c}=3$, which may be related to one of the aforementioned exotic states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19115 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Preliminary results for the CM finite-volume energy spectra of the 𝐴𝐴 channel with 𝑁c = 3. Each column corresponds to a different irrep of the cubic group and momentum frame, with the number in parenthesis indicating |𝑷| 2 in units of (2𝜋/𝐿) 2 , and each marker type refers to a different set of operators used to solve the GEVP. Horizontal segments are the free energies of two pions (solid) and two vector mesons (das… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Preliminary results for the 𝑠-wave pion-pion scattering phase shift, for different 𝑁c. Dotted lines represent inelastic thresholds, as indicated over the figures, computed using the lightest value of 𝑀𝜌 among all ensembles. Solid lines and bands are the best-fit results to eq. (7) with 𝑧 = 𝑀2 𝜋 . In figs. 2a and 2b, we present preliminary results for the pion-pion scattering phase shift in the 𝑆𝑆 and 𝐴𝐴 channels, re… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Preliminary results for the 𝑠-wave pion-pion scattering phase shift, multiplied by 𝑁c/3 to eliminate the leading 𝑁c dependence. We also analyze the sensitivity to subleading corrections by studying the 𝑁c scaling of different scattering observables. In fig. 4 we present results for the scattering length, 𝑎0, and effective range, 𝑟0, which can be related to the parameters in eq. (7). Results for the scattering length… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Preliminary results for the large 𝑁c dependence of the scattering length and effective range in the 𝑆𝑆 and 𝐴𝐴 channels, together with the LO predictions from ChPT. Results for 𝑁c = 4−6 are used to linearly extrapolate to 𝑁c → ∞. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Preliminary results scattering phase shift in the 𝐴𝑆 channel, for 𝑁c = 3 − 6. the pion masses between ensembles. To more accurately constrain the large 𝑁c limit, one would need to incorporate the pion-mass dependence, which we plan to do via a fit to one-loop ChPT. Fi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[5]

A lattice study of $\pi\pi$ scattering at large $N_\text{c}$

J. Baeza-Ballesteros, P. Hernández and F. Romero-López,A lattice study of𝜋𝜋 scattering at large N𝑐, JHEP06(2022) 049 [2202.02291]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022
[1]

’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72(1974) 461

1974
[2]

P.HernándezandF.Romero-López, Thelarge 𝑁𝑐 limitofQCDonthelattice ,Eur.Phys.J.A 57 (2021) 52 [2012.03331]

arXiv 2021
[3]

Large $N_c$ scaling of meson masses and decay constants

P. Hernández, C. Pena and F. Romero-López,Large𝑁𝑐 scaling of meson masses and decay constants,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 865 [1907.11511]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[4]

Dissecting the $\Delta I= 1/2$ rule at large $N_c$

A. Donini, P. Hernández, C. Pena and F. Romero-López,Dissecting theΔ𝐼 = 1/2 rule at large𝑁𝑐,Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 638 [2003.10293]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020
[6]

Curve collapse for the isospin-2 pion scattering length from QCD with 3, 4, and 5 colors

T. DeGrand,Curve collapse for the isospin-2 pion scattering length from QCD with 3, 4, and 5 colors, 2409.02242

work page Pith review arXiv
[7]

Pelaez and G

J.R. Pelaez and G. Rios,Nature of the f0(600) from its N(c) dependence at two loops in unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 242002 [hep-ph/0610397]

arXiv 2006
[8]

Truong,Chiral Perturbation Theory and Final State Theorem, Phys

T.N. Truong,Chiral Perturbation Theory and Final State Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.61 (1988) 2526

work page 1988

Show all 41 references

[9]

Dobado, M.J

A. Dobado, M.J. Herrero and T.N. Truong,Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory for Elastic Pion-Pion Scattering,Phys. Lett. B235 (1990) 134

1990
[10]

Witten,Baryons in the 1/n Expansion, Nucl

E. Witten,Baryons in the 1/n Expansion, Nucl. Phys. B160 (1979) 57

1979
[11]

Coleman,1/N, in17th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Pointlike Structures Inside and Outside Hadrons, 3, 1980

S.R. Coleman,1/N, in17th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Pointlike Structures Inside and Outside Hadrons, 3, 1980

1980
[12]

Weinberg,Tetraquark Mesons in Large𝑁 Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys

S. Weinberg,Tetraquark Mesons in Large𝑁 Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 261601 [1303.0342]

2013 arXiv
[13]

Knecht and S

M. Knecht and S. Peris,Narrow Tetraquarks at Large N, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 036016 [1307.1273]

2013 arXiv
[14]

Cohen and R.F

T.D. Cohen and R.F. Lebed,Are There Tetraquarks at Large𝑁𝑐 in QCD(F)?,Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 016001 [1403.8090]

2014 arXiv
[15]

Bĳnens and J

J. Bĳnens and J. Lu,Meson-meson Scattering in QCD-like Theories, JHEP03(2011) 028 [1102.0172]

2011 arXiv
[16]

LHCb collaboration, A model-independent study of resonant structure in𝐵+→𝐷+𝐷−𝐾+ decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 242001 [2009.00025]. 9 Results on meson-meson scattering at large𝑁c Jorge Baeza-Ballesteros

2020
[17]

LHCb collaboration, Amplitude analysis of the𝐵+→𝐷+𝐷−𝐾+ decay, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 112003 [2009.00026]

2020
[18]

LHCb collaboration, First Observation of a Doubly Charged Tetraquark and Its Neutral Partner, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041902 [2212.02716]

2023
[19]

LHCb collaboration, Amplitude analysis of B0→D¯0Ds+𝜋- and B+→D-Ds+𝜋+ decays, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 012017 [2212.02717]

2023
[20]

Molina and E

R. Molina and E. Oset,Tcs¯(2900) as a threshold effect from the interaction of the D*K*, Ds*𝜌 channels, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 056015 [2211.01302]

2023 arXiv
[21]

Luscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

M. Luscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States,Commun. Math. Phys.105(1986) 153

1986
[22]

Luscher,Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix,Nucl

M. Luscher,Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix,Nucl. Phys. B354 (1991) 531

1991
[23]

Del Debbio, A

L. Del Debbio, A. Patella and C. Pica,Higher representations on the lattice: Numerical simulations. SU(2) with adjoint fermions,Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 094503 [0805.2058]

2010 arXiv
[24]

Del Debbio, B

L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, A. Patella, C. Pica and A. Rago,Conformal versus confining scenario in SU(2) with adjoint fermions, Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 074507 [0907.3896]

2009 arXiv
[25]

Hadron Spectrumcollaboration,Energy dependence of the𝜌 resonance in𝜋𝜋 elastic scattering from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 034505 [1212.0830]

2013 arXiv
[26]

Detmold, D.J

W. Detmold, D.J. Murphy, A.V. Pochinsky, M.J. Savage, P.E. Shanahan and M.L. Wagman, Sparsening algorithm for multihadron lattice QCD correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 034502 [1908.07050]

2021 arXiv
[27]

Dudek, R.G

J.J. Dudek, R.G. Edwards and C.E. Thomas,S and D-wave phase shifts in isospin-2 pi pi scattering from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 034031 [1203.6041]

2012 arXiv
[28]

Michael and I

C. Michael and I. Teasdale,Extracting Glueball Masses From Lattice QCD,Nucl. Phys. B 215 (1983) 433

1983
[29]

M.LuscherandU.Wolff, HowtoCalculatetheElasticScatteringMatrixinTwo-dimensional Quantum Field Theories by Numerical Simulation, Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 222

1990
[30]

Jay and E.T

W.I. Jay and E.T. Neil,Bayesian model averaging for analysis of lattice field theory results, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 114502 [2008.01069]

2021 arXiv
[31]

Luscher,Signatures of unstable particles in finite volume,Nucl

M. Luscher,Signatures of unstable particles in finite volume,Nucl. Phys. B364 (1991) 237

1991
[32]

Rummukainen and S.A

K. Rummukainen and S.A. Gottlieb,Resonance scattering phase shifts on a nonrest frame lattice,Nucl. Phys. B450(1995) 397 [hep-lat/9503028]

1995 arXiv
[33]

Kim, C.T

C.h. Kim, C.T. Sachrajda and S.R. Sharpe,Finite-volume effects for two-hadron states in moving frames, Nucl. Phys. B727 (2005) 218 [hep-lat/0507006]. 10 Results on meson-meson scattering at large𝑁c Jorge Baeza-Ballesteros

2005 arXiv
[34]

S. He, X. Feng and C. Liu,Two particle states and the S-matrix elements in multi-channel scattering,JHEP 07(2005) 011 [hep-lat/0504019]

2005 arXiv
[35]

Bernard, M

V. Bernard, M. Lage, U.-G. Meissner and A. Rusetsky,Resonance properties from the finite-volume energy spectrum,JHEP08 (2008) 024 [0806.4495]

2008 arXiv
[36]

Luu and M.J

T. Luu and M.J. Savage,Extracting Scattering Phase-Shifts in Higher Partial-Waves from Lattice QCD Calculations, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 114508 [1101.3347]

2011 arXiv
[37]

Briceno and Z

R.A. Briceno and Z. Davoudi,Moving multichannel systems in a finite volume with application to proton-proton fusion, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 094507 [1204.1110]

2013 arXiv
[38]

Briceno,Two-particle multichannel systems in a finite volume with arbitrary spin,Phys

R.A. Briceno,Two-particle multichannel systems in a finite volume with arbitrary spin,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 074507 [1401.3312]

2014 arXiv
[39]

Gockeler, R

M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, M. Lage, U.G. Meissner, P.E.L. Rakow, A. Rusetsky et al., Scattering phases for meson and baryon resonances on general moving-frame lattices, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 094513 [1206.4141]

2012 arXiv
[40]

Yndurain,Low-energy pion physics, hep-ph/0212282

F.J. Yndurain,Low-energy pion physics, hep-ph/0212282

arXiv
[41]

Pelaez, A

J.R. Pelaez, A. Rodas and J. Ruiz De Elvira,Global parameterization of𝜋𝜋 scattering up to 2 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 1008 [1907.13162]. 11

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [5]

A lattice study of $\pi\pi$ scattering at large $N_\text{c}$

J. Baeza-Ballesteros, P. Hernández and F. Romero-López,A lattice study of𝜋𝜋 scattering at large N𝑐, JHEP06(2022) 049 [2202.02291]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

[2] [1]

’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72(1974) 461

1974

[3] [2]

P.HernándezandF.Romero-López, Thelarge 𝑁𝑐 limitofQCDonthelattice ,Eur.Phys.J.A 57 (2021) 52 [2012.03331]

arXiv 2021

[4] [3]

Large $N_c$ scaling of meson masses and decay constants

P. Hernández, C. Pena and F. Romero-López,Large𝑁𝑐 scaling of meson masses and decay constants,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 865 [1907.11511]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[5] [4]

Dissecting the $\Delta I= 1/2$ rule at large $N_c$

A. Donini, P. Hernández, C. Pena and F. Romero-López,Dissecting theΔ𝐼 = 1/2 rule at large𝑁𝑐,Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 638 [2003.10293]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020

[6] [6]

Curve collapse for the isospin-2 pion scattering length from QCD with 3, 4, and 5 colors

T. DeGrand,Curve collapse for the isospin-2 pion scattering length from QCD with 3, 4, and 5 colors, 2409.02242

work page Pith review arXiv

[7] [7]

Pelaez and G

J.R. Pelaez and G. Rios,Nature of the f0(600) from its N(c) dependence at two loops in unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 242002 [hep-ph/0610397]

arXiv 2006

[8] [8]

Truong,Chiral Perturbation Theory and Final State Theorem, Phys

T.N. Truong,Chiral Perturbation Theory and Final State Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.61 (1988) 2526

work page 1988