Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Instantons or Renormalons? A Comment on phi4_4 Theory in the MS Scheme

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.15554 v2 pith:BNVLSZZT submitted 2021-11-30 hep-th hep-ph

classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords renormalizationrenormalonscommentfunctionsgroupinstantonsschemetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We comment that the recent exact six-loop and seven-loop computations of renormalization group functions for the O(N)-symmetric four dimensional phi^4 quantum field theory show hints that the associated large order behavior is dominated by instantons rather than renormalons. This is consistent with a long-standing conjecture that renormalization group functions in the minimal subtraction (MS) renormalization scheme are not sensitive to renormalons.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Surprises in the Ordinary: $O(N)$ Invariant Surface Defect in the $\epsilon$-expansion

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors compute defect CFT data to third order in the epsilon expansion and discover approximate 'shadow' relations between surface and bulk scaling dimensions.

Pith tools