Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

On the classification of duality defects in $c=2$ compact boson CFTs with a discrete group orbifold

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For almost all c=2 compact boson CFTs, every shift-orbifold duality defect corresponds to an integer solution of two quadratic equations, and all such solutions can be enumerated.

desk verdict Useful quadratic reformulation of duality-defect classification in c=2 compact boson CFTs, but with a wrong exceptional solution, an overclaimed family result, and a repairable gap in the appendix. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01319 v1 pith:BNZYSQ3V submitted 2024-12-02 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Yuma Furuta This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T4081R1011D0911E16 PACS 11.25.Hf11.30.-j
keywords dualitydefectsnon-invertiblesymmetriesc=2compactbosonCFTshiftorbifoldquadraticDiophantineequationsT-dualitytoroidalmodulispacemulticriticalpoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to make the classification of duality defects in $c=2$ compact boson CFTs amenable to exact computation. Duality defects are topological defects that implement a T-duality on one side of a half-space gauging; they form a class of non-invertible symmetries that are far harder to catalog at $c=2$ than at $c=1$. The author shows that for orbifolds by diagonal shift subgroups of $U(1)^4$, the self-duality condition for the theory is equivalent to the existence of integer solutions of two quadratic equations, one built from the complex-structure modulus $\tau$ and one from the Kähler modulus $\rho$. Moreover, for almost all points in the moduli space—everything except the isolated point $\tau=e^{2\pi i/3}$—every solution has one of its two variables equal to zero, so the full set of duality defects of this type can be exhaustively listed. This converts a difficult matrix problem on the toroidal moduli space into a concrete Diophantine question, and it yields explicit defects at multicritical points and along the family $(\tau,\rho)=(it,\frac12+it)$ with $t\in\mathbb{Q}$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the reduction of the matrix self-duality condition $G=T^{-1}GT$ on the generalized metric to scalar quadratic equations. The argument uses an elementary fact (Lemma 3.2): a real quadratic polynomial that has a non-real root $\tau$ must be a real multiple of $(x-\tau)(x-\bar{\tau})$, so the Möbius self-duality equation for $\tau$ forces the coefficients of the $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ matrix to be determined by $\tau$ and by one integer pair $(x,y)$, and the determinant condition becomes the quadratic equation of Theorem 3.3. The same reasoning applies to $\rho$, and the four types of duality defects are obtained by inserting the mirror $(m)$ and spacetime-inversion $(i)$ $\mathbb{Z}_2$ actions, which are handled by relating $\tau$ and $\rho$ through a real linear relation $p\tau=q\rho+t$. Proposition 3.7 completes the machinery by using the arithmetic–geometric mean inequality to bound $|xy|<1$ for almost all $\tau$, so integer solutions can only have one coordinate zero.

What would settle it

Take the theory $(\tau,\rho)=(i,\frac12+i)$ with non-vanishing $B$-field and orbifold by a diagonal $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ shift; compute the orbifold partition function by summing over twisted sectors and compare the resulting spectrum with the moduli predicted by Proposition 3.1. If the $B$-field component does not rescale exactly as claimed, the transformation law fails and with it the equivalence between self-duality and the quadratic equations. Alternatively, a direct computer search for integer solutions of equation (3.59) with $x\neq0$ and $y\neq0$ at any $\tau$ with $\operatorname{Re}\tau\geq0$ and $(\operatorname{Im}\tau)^2>\operatorname{Re}\tau+\frac14$ would refute Proposition 3.7.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a $c=2$ toroidal-branch compact boson CFT, the existence of a duality defect coming from an orbifold by a diagonal subgroup $Z_{N_1}\times Z_{N_2}\times Z_{W_1}\times Z_{W_2}$ of $U(1)^4$ is exactly equivalent to the existence of integer solutions $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$ of a pair of quadratic equations whose coefficients are determined by the orbifold orders and the two moduli (Theorems 3.3–3.6). For the purely $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ case, these are $(N_2W_1)^2x^2-2N_1N_2W_1W_2\operatorname{Re}\tau\,xy+(N_1W_2)^2|\tau|^2y^2=N_1N_2W_1W_2$ and the analogous equation built from $\rho$, with $N_1N_2$ in place of $N_2W_1$ and $W_1W_2$ in place of $N_1W_2$. An integer solution directly gives the entries of the $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ matrices that identify the orbifolded theory with the original one, and additional integrality conditions fix the remaining matrix entries. Proposition 3.7 shows that for essentially all $\tau$ in the fundamental domain—everything except the isolated point $\tau=e^{2\pi i/3}$—any integer solution must satisfy $x=0$ or $y=0$, which the paper then examines case by case to extract the corresponding $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ elements. The one exceptional point admits an extra solution $(x,y)=(1,1)$, and the same style of analysis applies to the other three duality-defect types involving mirror symmetry and spacetime inversion.

Load-bearing premise

The whole reduction rests on the claimed transformation law that a diagonal shift orbifold changes the toroidal moduli exactly as $(\tau,\rho)\to\left(\frac{N_1W_2}{N_2W_1}\tau,\frac{W_1W_2}{N_1N_2}\rho\right)$, with no hidden mixing of the $B$-field or reordering of the lattice basis; if this law is even slightly incomplete, the equivalence between self-duality and integer solutions of the quadratic equations fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For almost every point on the $c=2$ toroidal branch, the full list of duality defects generated by diagonal shift orbifolds can be written down explicitly; the only exceptional point in the $\tau$-fundamental domain is $\tau=e^{2\pi i/3}$, where an additional solution $(x,y)=(1,1)$ occurs.
  • At multicritical points and along multicritical lines such as $(\tau,\rho)=(it,\frac12+it)$ with $t\in\mathbb{Q}$, the quadratic equations produce concrete duality defects and show exactly which orbifold orders $N_i,W_i$ are required.
  • Because each integer solution encodes the corresponding $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ element, fusion rules of the defects can be computed from the data the equations return, without solving the generalized-metric matrix equation.
  • The same pair of quadratic equations, with coefficients modified by the integers $p,q,t$ in the relation $p\tau=q\rho+t$, covers all four cases combining mirror symmetry and spacetime inversion, so the method treats the full T-duality group rather than only the $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ part.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-equation reformulation suggests a direct bridge to binary quadratic forms: solutions $(x,y)$ are integer points on a conic, and the auxiliary integrality conditions on $z_0,w_0$ are divisibility constraints that may be interpretable as a class-number or genus condition for an order in a quadratic field; testing this at the exceptional point $\tau=\omega$ could reveal new structure.
  • The 'almost all' result implies that exotic non-invertible defects at generic toroidal points are rare, concentrating at isolated symmetry-enhanced points; scanning all orbifold-branch intersection points classified in the crystallographic literature might uncover additional exceptional moduli with solutions beyond $(1,1)$.
  • A natural testable extension is to non-diagonal shift subgroups: if the induced action on $(\tau,\rho)$ is linear, the same Lemma 3.2 argument would produce quadratic equations with rotated coefficients, and the classification would then cover all shift-generated defects; the author leaves this as future work.
  • Because the method only uses the moduli and the orbifold orders, it should transfer to orbifolds by other finite symmetries of the charge lattice, such as charge conjugation, provided the transformation of $(\tau,\rho)$ can be computed; the paper notes this is currently open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies duality defects in c=2 compact boson CFTs obtained by gauging a diagonal discrete subgroup Z_{N1} × Z_{N2} × Z_{W1} × Z_{W2} of the U(1)^4 shift symmetry. The main proposal is that self-duality of the orbifolded theory under T-duality is equivalent to the existence of integer solutions of a pair of quadratic equations, one for the complex-structure modulus τ and one for the Kähler modulus ρ, together with integrality conditions on auxiliary quantities. This is established in four theorems corresponding to the four possible combinations of mirror and spacetime-inversion symmetries in the T-duality group. The paper further claims that for almost all points in the moduli space every integer solution has x = 0 or y = 0 (Proposition 3.7), and it uses this to give exhaustive lists of duality defects at selected points and along the family (τ, ρ) = (it, 1/2 + it).

Significance. If the main claims were correct, the quadratic-equation reformulation would be a valuable practical tool for studying non-invertible symmetries in c = 2 Narain CFTs, particularly because it reduces a difficult matrix equation (3.22) to two scalar Diophantine equations. The derivation of the equations from the self-duality condition is explicit and mostly checkable, and the paper is careful to state the orbifold actions and the T-duality transformations it uses. The claimed exhaustive classification for generic moduli, if valid, would be a strong result that goes beyond earlier works restricted to B = 0 or to isolated points. The paper also correctly identifies a genuinely exceptional point τ = ω where the generic argument fails, though the details of that example contain an error (see major comment 2).

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, eqs. (4.1) and (4.4)] The statement that for (τ, ρ) = (it, 1/2 + it) the assumptions of Proposition 3.7 are satisfied for all t ≠ √3/2 is false. Proposition 3.7 requires, for Re ρ ≥ 0, that (Im ρ)^2 > Re ρ + 1/4; substituting ρ = 1/2 + it gives t^2 > 3/4, i.e., t > √3/2, not t ≠ √3/2. The failure is concrete: for t = 1/2 and N1 = N2 = W1 = W2 = 1, eq. (4.4) becomes x^2 − xy + (1/2)y^2 = 1, which has the integer solution (1, 2) in addition to (±1, 0), and eq. (4.1) becomes x^2 + (1/4)y^2 = 1, which has (0, ±2). These solutions have both x and y nonzero, so they are absent from the four-case list derived from eqs. (4.5)–(4.6). The advertised complete classification on this family is therefore incorrect as stated.
  2. [Section 3.3, example (τ, ρ) = (ω, α)] The paper claims that at τ = ω = e^{2πi/3} the quadratic equation (3.59) with N_i = W_i = 1, namely x^2 + xy + y^2 = 1, has the additional integer solution (x, y) = (1, 1). Substitution gives 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, not 1. The correct additional solution is (1, −1) (together with its sign variants). This error propagates into the solution lists in eq. (3.60) and the subsequent construction of duality defects at the bicritical point, so the worked example needs to be corrected.
  3. [Appendix A, proof of Proposition 3.7] The proof for Re τ > 0 contains an unjustified assertion: namely, that if x0 y0 < 0 then −2(Re τ) x0 y0 ≥ 1. This does not follow from the equation, and it is false in general (e.g., Re τ = 0.1 and x0 y0 = −1 gives 0.2). The first and third terms in eq. (3.59) are rational, not necessarily integers, so the chain leading to “1 ≥ 1 + 1 + 1 > 1” is invalid. The same issue appears in the reduction of Re τ < 0 to Re τ > 0. The proposition may be true, but the proof as written has a gap and must be revised, for instance by treating the sign of x0 y0 with an appropriate AM-GM bound.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains many typographical errors and garbled inline expressions (e.g., “elemantary”, “csae”, “datails”, “summerize”, and malformed fractions in displayed equations). A thorough proofreading is needed.
  2. [Figure 3.1] The text refers to Fig. 3.1, but no figure appears in the manuscript file; the figure should be included or the reference removed.
  3. [Equation (3.52)] In the first equation of (3.52), the argument of the fractional linear transformation is written as (pτ + t − 2p Re τ)/q, whereas the relation pτ = qρ + t gives −¯ρ = (t − pτ + 2p Re τ)/q. This sign discrepancy should be fixed or the notation clarified.
  4. [Abstract vs. Section 4] The abstract restricts the family (τ, ρ) = (it, 1/2 + it) to t ∈ Q, but Section 4 states t ∈ R_{>0} and only later notes that rationality of t is needed for certain solutions; these statements should be reconciled.
  5. [Equation (3.25)] The notation in the quadratic equations is dense, with N1, N2, W1, W2 appearing in different combinations in the two lines; a short table or a more explicit display of the four orbifold orders would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quadratic-equation classification is derived from the self-duality condition rather than fitted to it.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The paper reduces the self-duality condition under a diagonal shift orbifold to quadratic equations by direct algebra: substituting the orbifold transformation tau'=(N1W2/N2W1)tau and rho'=(W1W2/N1N2)rho (Proposition 3.1, derived in Section 3.1) into the SL(2,Z) transformation equations, applying Lemma 3.2 to obtain coefficient identities, and imposing alpha*delta - beta*gamma = 1. The resulting equations (3.25), (3.40), (3.48), and (3.53) are not fitted inputs or renamings of the conclusion; integer solutions encode the free orbifold orders N_i, W_i, and the SL(2,Z) elements are then constructed from those solutions. The T-duality matrix action is taken from reference [18], an independent external source rather than the author's own prior work, and the orbifold action on charges is derived within Sections 2.3 and 3.1. Proposition 3.7 is an independent arithmetic statement proved in Appendix A by the AM-GM inequality; it is not used to define self-duality. The Section 4 application to (tau,rho)=(it,1/2+it) states t != sqrt(3)/2 as the condition for Proposition 3.7, whereas the proposition requires t > sqrt(3)/2; this is a mathematical correctness concern, not a circularity, and it does not affect the independence of the derivation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim rests on a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The classification depends on the standard Narain duality group action, the linear relation between τ and ρ in rational theories, and the derived orbifold scaling law for moduli. No numerical constants are fitted, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The T-duality group of the c=2 Narain CFT acts on the moduli as (SL(2,Z)_τ × SL(2,Z)_ρ) ⋊ (Z_2^M × Z_2^I), with the two Z_2 actions given in Eq. (3.5).
    Used throughout to split duality defects into four (m,i) types; standard result cited to [18].
  • domain assumption For a rational c=2 compact boson CFT, τ and ρ lie in the same imaginary quadratic field, so integers p,q,t exist with pτ=qρ+t (Eq. 3.37).
    Needed in Theorems 3.4-3.6 to express mirror and inversion actions on both parameters; cited to [32-35].
  • domain assumption An orbifold by Z_{N1}×Z_{N2}×Z_{W1}×Z_{W2} changes the moduli as τ'=(N1W2/N2W1)τ and ρ'=(W1W2/N1N2)ρ (Proposition 3.1).
    This is the transformation law from which all quadratic equations are derived; the paper derives it by lattice scalings in Section 3.1.
  • domain assumption The discrete orbifold groups considered are direct products of cyclic groups acting diagonally on individual θ or ϕ components (Eq. 3.6).
    Explicit scope restriction; non-diagonal subgroups and charge conjugation are left to future work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the classification of duality defects in $c=2$ compact boson CFTs with a discrete group orbifold." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BNZYSQ3V

@misc{pith2026241201319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the classification of duality defects in $c=2$ compact boson CFTs with a discrete group orbifold},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BNZYSQ3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01319}
}
abstract

We propose a novel approach to exploring duality defects in the $c=2$ compact boson conformal field theory (CFT). This study is motivated by the desire to classify categorical symmetries, particularly duality defects, in CFTs. While the $c=1$ case has been extensively studied, and the types of realizable duality defects are largely understood, the situation becomes significantly more complex for $c=2$. The simplicity of the $c=1$ case arises from the fact that its theory is essentially determined by the radius of compactification. In contrast, the $c=2$ case involves more parameters, leading to a more intricate action of T-duality. As a result, directly solving the condition for a theory to be self-dual under orbifolding becomes highly challenging. To address this, we categorize duality defects into four types and demonstrate that the condition for a toroidal branch theory to be self-dual under an orbifold induced by an automorphism generated by shift symmetry can be reformulated as quadratic equations. We also found that for ``almost all" theories we can enumerate all solutions for such equations. Moreover, this reformulation enables the simultaneous exploration of multiple duality defects and provides evidence for the existence of duality defects under specific parameter families for the theory, such as $(\tau, \rho) = (it, \frac{1}{2}+it)$ where $t \in \mathbb{Q}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01319 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Nagoya and S

    Y. Nagoya and S. Shimamori, Non-invertible duality defect and non-commutative fusion algebra, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023 (2023) 62

    work page 2023

  2. [18]

    Damia, G

    J.A. Damia, G. Galati, O. Hulik and S. Mancani, Exploring duality symmetries, multicriticality and RG flows at c = 2 , Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 28

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 172

    work page 2015

  4. [2]

    Frenkel, J

    I. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky and A. Meurman, Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster , vol. 134 of Pure and Appl. Math. , Academic Press, Boston (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [3]

    Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal field theory , Nuclear Physics B 300 (1988) 360

    E. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal field theory , Nuclear Physics B 300 (1988) 360

    work page 1988

  6. [4]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, Boundaries, defects and Frobenius algebras , Fortschritte der Physik 51 (2003) 850

    work page 2003

  7. [5]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: Partition functions, Nuclear Physics B 646 (2002) 353. – 29 –

    work page 2002

  8. [6]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators II: unoriented world sheets, Nuclear Physics B 678 (2004) 511

    work page 2004

Show all 36 references
  1. [7]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators III: Simple currents, Nuclear Physics B 694 (2004) 277

    2004

  2. [8]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators IV: , Nuclear Physics B 715 (2005) 539

    2005

  3. [9]

    Fjelstad, J.R

    J. Fjelstad, J.R. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, TFT CONSTRUCTION OF RCFT CORRELATORS V: PROOF OF MODULAR INV ARIANCE AND F ACTORISATION,

  4. [10]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,DEFECT LINES, DUALITIES AND GENERALISED ORBIFOLDS, in XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics , (Prague, Czech Republic), pp. 608–613, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, Mar., 2010, DOI

    2010

  5. [11]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B 763 (2007) 354

    2007

  6. [12]

    Fischer, M

    M. Fischer, M. Ratz, J. Torrado and P.K. Vaudrevange, Classification of symmetric toroidal orbifolds, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013 (2013) 84

    2013

  7. [13]

    Kreuzer and A

    M. Kreuzer and A. Schellekens, Simple currents versus orbifolds with discrete torsion — a complete classification, Nuclear Physics B 411 (1994)

    1994

  8. [14]

    Ginsparg, Curiosities at c = 1 , Nuclear Physics B 295 (1988) 153

    P. Ginsparg, Curiosities at c = 1 , Nuclear Physics B 295 (1988) 153

    1988

  9. [15]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 132

    2024

  10. [16]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 51

    2024

  11. [19]

    Ginsparg, Applied Conformal Field Theory , 1991

    P. Ginsparg, Applied Conformal Field Theory , 1991. 10.48550/ARXIV.HEP-TH/9108028

    1991 doi

  12. [20]

    Kac, Vertex algebras for beginners, vol

    V. Kac, Vertex algebras for beginners, vol. 10 of University Lecture Series, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, second ed. (Oct., 1998), 10.1090/ulect/010

    1998 doi

  13. [21]

    Y. Choi, C. C´ ordova, P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible duality defects in 3 + 1 dimensions , Physical Review D 105 (2022) 125016

    2022

  14. [22]

    Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula , Nuclear Physics B 324 (1989) 581

    J.L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula , Nuclear Physics B 324 (1989) 581

    1989

  15. [23]

    Argurio, A

    R. Argurio, A. Collinucci, G. Galati, O. Hulik and E. Paznokas, Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT , 2024. 10.48550/ARXIV.2409.11822

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Fuchs, M.R

    J. Fuchs, M.R. Gaberdiel, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, Topological defects for the free boson CFT, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (2007) 11403

    2007

  17. [25]

    Wong and I

    E. Wong and I. Affleck, Tunneling in quantum wires: A boundary conformal field theory approach, Nuclear Physics B 417 (1994) 403

    1994

  18. [26]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Defect Lines in the Ising Model and Boundary States on Orbifolds, Physical Review Letters 77 (1996) 2604. – 30 –

    1996

  19. [27]

    Quella, I

    T. Quella, I. Runkel and G.M. Watts, Reflection and transmission for conformal defects , Journal of High Energy Physics 2007 (2007) 095

    2007

  20. [28]

    Choi, D.-C

    Y. Choi, D.-C. Lu and Z. Sun, Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry , Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 142

    2024

  21. [29]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects , Communications in Mathematical Physics 404 (2023) 1021

    2023

  22. [30]

    Schweigert and E

    C. Schweigert and E. Tsouchnika, KRAMERS–WANNIER DUALITIES FOR WZW THEORIES AND MINIMAL MODELS , Communications in Contemporary Mathematics 10 (2008) 773

    2008

  23. [31]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker and J.H. Schwarz, String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 1 ed. (Dec., 2006), 10.1017/CBO9780511816086

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    Gukov and C

    S. Gukov and C. Vafa, Rational Conformal Field Theories and Complex Multiplication , Communications in Mathematical Physics 246 (2004) 181

    2004

  25. [33]

    Wendland, Moduli spaces of unitary conformal field theories , phd, Physikalisches Inst., 2000

    K. Wendland, Moduli spaces of unitary conformal field theories , phd, Physikalisches Inst., 2000

    2000

  26. [34]

    Moore, Attractors and Arithmetic , July, 2003

    G. Moore, Attractors and Arithmetic , July, 2003. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9807056

    2003 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Moore, Arithmetic and Attractors , Feb., 2007

    G. Moore, Arithmetic and Attractors , Feb., 2007. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9807087

    2007 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dulat and K

    S. Dulat and K. Wendland, Crystallographic orbifolds: towards a classification of unitary conformal field theories with central charge c = 2 , Journal of High Energy Physics 2000 (2000) 012. – 31 –

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.