Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

RediSwap: MEV Redistribution Mechanism for CFMMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.18434 v1 pith:BO6QF6Y7 submitted 2024-10-24 cs.GT cs.CR

classification cs.GTcs.CR
keywords mechanismrediswapliquidityammsmaximalproviderstradesusers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) are essential to decentralized finance, offering continuous liquidity and enabling intermediary-free trading on blockchains. However, participants in AMMs are vulnerable to Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) exploitation. Users face threats such as front-running, back-running, and sandwich attacks, while liquidity providers (LPs) incur the loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR). In this paper, we introduce RediSwap, a novel AMM designed to capture MEV at the application level and refund it fairly among users and liquidity providers. At its core, RediSwap features an MEV-redistribution mechanism that manages arbitrage opportunities within the AMM pool. We formalize the mechanism design problem and the desired game-theoretical properties. A central insight underpinning our mechanism is the interpretation of the maximal MEV value as the sum of LVR and individual user losses. We prove that our mechanism is incentive-compatible and Sybil-proof, and demonstrate that it is easy for arbitrageurs to participate. We empirically compared RediSwap with existing solutions by replaying historical AMM trades. Our results suggest that RediSwap can achieve better execution than UniswapX in 89% of trades and reduce LPs' loss to under 0.5% of the original LVR in most cases.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring CEX-DEX Extracted Value and Searcher Profitability: The Darkest of the MEV Dark Forest

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CEX-DEX arbitrage on Ethereum extracted an estimated 233.8M USD in 19 months, increasingly concentrated among three searchers tied to dominant block builders.

Pith tools