REVIEW 1 cited by
Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Computational results demonstrate that posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) dramatically outperforms algorithms driven by optimism, such as UCRL2. We provide insight into the extent of this performance boost and the phenomenon that drives it. We leverage this insight to establish an $\tilde{O}(H\sqrt{SAT})$ Bayesian expected regret bound for PSRL in finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes, where $H$ is the horizon, $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions and $T$ is the time elapsed. This improves upon the best previous bound of $\tilde{O}(H S \sqrt{AT})$ for any reinforcement learning algorithm.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Offline RL with Smooth OOD Generalization in Convex Hull and its Neighborhood
SQOG adds a noise-based smoothing loss that pulls out-of-distribution action values toward neighboring in-sample values, improving Q-estimation and offline RL performance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.