Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.00215 v3 pith:BOFFCX3N submitted 2016-07-01 stat.ML cs.AIcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords learningreinforcementboundinsightnumberoptimismposteriorpsrl
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Computational results demonstrate that posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) dramatically outperforms algorithms driven by optimism, such as UCRL2. We provide insight into the extent of this performance boost and the phenomenon that drives it. We leverage this insight to establish an $\tilde{O}(H\sqrt{SAT})$ Bayesian expected regret bound for PSRL in finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes, where $H$ is the horizon, $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions and $T$ is the time elapsed. This improves upon the best previous bound of $\tilde{O}(H S \sqrt{AT})$ for any reinforcement learning algorithm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Offline RL with Smooth OOD Generalization in Convex Hull and its Neighborhood

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SQOG adds a noise-based smoothing loss that pulls out-of-distribution action values toward neighboring in-sample values, improving Q-estimation and offline RL performance.

Pith tools