Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Degrees-of-Freedom in Monostatic ISAC Channels: NLoS Exploitation vs. Reduction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.04010 v1 pith:BOO7IMNU submitted 2022-05-09 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

The Degrees-of-Freedom in Monostatic ISAC Channels: NLoS Exploitation vs. Reduction

classification cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT
keywords isacmonostaticnlossensingscenariochannelcommunicationcommunications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The degrees of freedom (DoFs) attained in monostatic integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) are analyzed. Specifically, monostatic sensing aims for extracting target-orientation information from the line of sight (LoS) channel between the transmitter and the target, since the Non-LoS (NLoS) paths only contain clutter or interference. By contrast, in wireless communications, typically, both the LoS and NLoS paths are exploited for achieving diversity or multiplexing gains. Hence, we shed light on the NLoS exploitation vs. reduction tradeoffs in a monostatic ISAC scenario. In particular, we optimize the transmit power of each signal path to maximize the communication rate, while guaranteeing the sensing performance for the target. The non-convex problem formulated is firstly solved in closed form for a single-NLoS-link scenario, then we harness the popular successive convex approximation (SCA) method for a general multiple-NLoS-link scenario. Our simulation results characterize the fundamental performance tradeoffs between sensing and communication, demonstrating that the available DoFs in the ISAC channel should be efficiently exploited in a way that is distinctly different from that of communication-only scenarios.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.