Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.10125 v4 pith:BP5HCYWU submitted 2023-06-16 cs.LG cs.AIeess.SPstat.AP

classification cs.LGcs.AIeess.SPstat.AP
keywords seriestimemethodsdataself-supervisedanalysisexistinglabeled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has recently achieved impressive performance on various time series tasks. The most prominent advantage of SSL is that it reduces the dependence on labeled data. Based on the pre-training and fine-tuning strategy, even a small amount of labeled data can achieve high performance. Compared with many published self-supervised surveys on computer vision and natural language processing, a comprehensive survey for time series SSL is still missing. To fill this gap, we review current state-of-the-art SSL methods for time series data in this article. To this end, we first comprehensively review existing surveys related to SSL and time series, and then provide a new taxonomy of existing time series SSL methods by summarizing them from three perspectives: generative-based, contrastive-based, and adversarial-based. These methods are further divided into ten subcategories with detailed reviews and discussions about their key intuitions, main frameworks, advantages and disadvantages. To facilitate the experiments and validation of time series SSL methods, we also summarize datasets commonly used in time series forecasting, classification, anomaly detection, and clustering tasks. Finally, we present the future directions of SSL for time series analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Next-Latent Prediction Transformers Learn Compact World Models

    cs.LG 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    NextLat augments next-token prediction with latent next-state prediction, theoretically converging latents to belief states and showing empirical gains in world modeling, reasoning, planning, and faster inference via ...

  2. HyperIMTS: Hypergraph Neural Network for Irregular Multivariate Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HyperIMTS, a hypergraph neural network with temporal and variable hyperedges, achieves the lowest forecast MSE among 27 baselines on five irregular multivariate time series datasets.

  3. Modular Foundation Models for Time-Series Perception in Digital Twins

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A gated bank of frozen self-supervised time-series encoders, aligned and aggregated by a Transformer, supports competitive multi-task perception for digital twins and hydro-generator virtual sensing.

  4. Information Subtraction: Learning Representations for Conditional Entropy

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Information Subtraction trains a generator against two mutual information estimators to represent conditional entropy H(Y|X), but the objective does not reliably remove the conditioned variable's information.

Pith tools