Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Factorisation schemes for proton PDFs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.18289 v2 pith:BPIXGGCR submitted 2025-01-30 hep-ph hep-th

classification hep-phhep-th
keywords schemesbeenchoicefactorisationpdfsschemeadoptedalternative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Beyond leading-order, perturbative QCD requires a choice of factorisation scheme to define the parton distribution functions (PDFs) and hard-process cross-section. The modified minimal-subtraction ($\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$) scheme has long been adopted as the default choice due to its simplicity. Alternative schemes have been proposed with specific purposes, including, recently, PDF positivity and NLO parton-shower matching. In this paper we assemble these schemes in a common notation for the first time. We perform a detailed comparison of their features, both analytically and numerically, and estimate the resulting factorisation-scheme uncertainty for LHC phenomenology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What are the consequences of independent factorization and renormalization scales?

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Independent factorization and renormalization scales are inconsistent with simultaneously preserving RG invariance, Ward identities, and PDF sum rules in generalized pole subtraction schemes.

Pith tools