Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Model Monitoring and Robustness of In-Use Machine Learning Models: Quantifying Data Distribution Shifts Using Population Stability Index

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.00775 v1 pith:BPPBYE2C submitted 2023-02-01 cs.LG

Model Monitoring and Robustness of In-Use Machine Learning Models: Quantifying Data Distribution Shifts Using Population Stability Index

classification cs.LG
keywords robustnessemphmodelsmonitoringlearningsafetyshiftscomputer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Safety goes first. Meeting and maintaining industry safety standards for robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models require continuous monitoring for faults and performance drops. Deep learning models are widely used in industrial applications, e.g., computer vision, but the susceptibility of their performance to environment changes (e.g., noise) \emph{after deployment} on the product, are now well-known. A major challenge is detecting data distribution shifts that happen, comparing the following: {\bf (i)} development stage of AI and ML models, i.e., train/validation/test, to {\bf (ii)} deployment stage on the product (i.e., even after `testing') in the environment. We focus on a computer vision example related to autonomous driving and aim at detecting shifts that occur as a result of adding noise to images. We use the population stability index (PSI) as a measure of presence and intensity of shift and present results of our empirical experiments showing a promising potential for the PSI. We further discuss multiple aspects of model monitoring and robustness that need to be analyzed \emph{simultaneously} to achieve robustness for industry safety standards. We propose the need for and the research direction toward \emph{categorizations} of problem classes and examples where monitoring for robustness is required and present challenges and pointers for future work from a \emph{practical} perspective.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Drift Detectors cry Wolf: False Alarm Rates in continuous ML Monitoring

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    A 30-day continuous-monitoring simulation on Adult Income shows PSI false-alarm rates collapse once batches reach about 200 samples, while KS, MMD, and LSDD sit at low but irregular rates.

  2. Adversarial Evasion in Non-Stationary Malware Detection: Minimizing Drift Signals through Similarity-Constrained Perturbations

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Similarity-constrained adversarial perturbations reduce drift signals in malware classifiers while achieving evasion, with l2 regularization performing best.