REVIEW 2 cited by
Model Monitoring and Robustness of In-Use Machine Learning Models: Quantifying Data Distribution Shifts Using Population Stability Index
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Model Monitoring and Robustness of In-Use Machine Learning Models: Quantifying Data Distribution Shifts Using Population Stability Index
read the original abstract
Safety goes first. Meeting and maintaining industry safety standards for robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models require continuous monitoring for faults and performance drops. Deep learning models are widely used in industrial applications, e.g., computer vision, but the susceptibility of their performance to environment changes (e.g., noise) \emph{after deployment} on the product, are now well-known. A major challenge is detecting data distribution shifts that happen, comparing the following: {\bf (i)} development stage of AI and ML models, i.e., train/validation/test, to {\bf (ii)} deployment stage on the product (i.e., even after `testing') in the environment. We focus on a computer vision example related to autonomous driving and aim at detecting shifts that occur as a result of adding noise to images. We use the population stability index (PSI) as a measure of presence and intensity of shift and present results of our empirical experiments showing a promising potential for the PSI. We further discuss multiple aspects of model monitoring and robustness that need to be analyzed \emph{simultaneously} to achieve robustness for industry safety standards. We propose the need for and the research direction toward \emph{categorizations} of problem classes and examples where monitoring for robustness is required and present challenges and pointers for future work from a \emph{practical} perspective.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
When Drift Detectors cry Wolf: False Alarm Rates in continuous ML Monitoring
A 30-day continuous-monitoring simulation on Adult Income shows PSI false-alarm rates collapse once batches reach about 200 samples, while KS, MMD, and LSDD sit at low but irregular rates.
-
Adversarial Evasion in Non-Stationary Malware Detection: Minimizing Drift Signals through Similarity-Constrained Perturbations
Similarity-constrained adversarial perturbations reduce drift signals in malware classifiers while achieving evasion, with l2 regularization performing best.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.