Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DALK: Dynamic Co-Augmentation of LLMs and KG to answer Alzheimer's Disease Questions with Scientific Literature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.04819 v4 pith:BPUXVDKN submitted 2024-05-08 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords dalkknowledgellmsalzheimerco-augmentationdiseasedynamicenhancing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have achieved promising performances across various applications. Nonetheless, the ongoing challenge of integrating long-tail knowledge continues to impede the seamless adoption of LLMs in specialized domains. In this work, we introduce DALK, a.k.a. Dynamic Co-Augmentation of LLMs and KG, to address this limitation and demonstrate its ability on studying Alzheimer's Disease (AD), a specialized sub-field in biomedicine and a global health priority. With a synergized framework of LLM and KG mutually enhancing each other, we first leverage LLM to construct an evolving AD-specific knowledge graph (KG) sourced from AD-related scientific literature, and then we utilize a coarse-to-fine sampling method with a novel self-aware knowledge retrieval approach to select appropriate knowledge from the KG to augment LLM inference capabilities. The experimental results, conducted on our constructed AD question answering (ADQA) benchmark, underscore the efficacy of DALK. Additionally, we perform a series of detailed analyses that can offer valuable insights and guidelines for the emerging topic of mutually enhancing KG and LLM. We will release the code and data at https://github.com/David-Li0406/DALK.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AISE-Bench: A Full-Cycle Curated Benchmark for Information Seeking on Academic Knowledge Graphs

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AISE-Bench is a real-user-query benchmark with annotated API trajectories and grounded answers that exposes LLM agents' weak performance in multi-step academic information seeking.

  2. XGraphRAG: Interactive Visual Analysis for Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A visual analytics framework helps GraphRAG developers trace suspicious retrievals through graph construction and LLM invocation stages, with a user study suggesting faster, more accurate failure diagnosis than an exi...

Pith tools