Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Identifying Neutron Sources using Recoil and Time-of-Flight Spectroscopy

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-16 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Bayesian protocol identifies single and dual neutron sources from spectra at over 4 sigma significance using only about 1000 events.

desk verdict The paper introduces a Bayesian template-matching protocol for neutron source ID from recoil and TOF spectra that claims >4σ recovery at ~10^3 events, but the result rests on unvalidated template accuracy. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.10044 v2 pith:BQMH2LTL submitted 2025-12-10 physics.ins-det nucl-exphysics.app-phphysics.data-an

David Breitenmoser , Ricardo Lopez , Shaun D. Clarke , Sara A. Pozzi This is my paper
classification physics.ins-detnucl-exphysics.app-phphysics.data-an
keywords neutronsourceidentificationBayesianevidencerecoilspectroscopytime-of-flightspectraltemplatematchingnuclearsecurityspectra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a new Bayesian method that infers the number and type of neutron sources directly from measured spectra by matching the full data to pre-built templates and computing probabilistic evidence for different source hypotheses. When applied to recoil and time-of-flight measurements, the approach distinguishes single-source from two-source cases with strong statistical support even at low event statistics. A sympathetic reader would care because previous attempts at direct source discrimination from neutron spectra had remained unreliable, limiting applications in security and planetary science. The method treats the entire spectrum rather than isolated peaks or features, which enables the reported performance at modest counts.

What carries the argument

Bayesian protocol that matches full measured neutron spectra to pre-built source templates and evaluates the probabilistic evidence for competing source ensembles.

What would settle it

A test in which the method is applied to a known two-source configuration at roughly 1000 events but fails to favor the correct hypothesis over the single-source alternative at the claimed significance level.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a Bayesian protocol combining full-spectrum template matching with probabilistic evidence evaluation can recover single- and two-source neutron configurations from recoil and time-of-flight data with greater than 4 sigma significance at event counts as low as approximately 1000.

Load-bearing premise

The pre-built spectral templates must accurately represent the true neutron energy distributions produced by the actual sources, and the evidence calculation must correctly incorporate all relevant uncertainties and background.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-source and two-source neutron ensembles become distinguishable in recoil and time-of-flight spectra at low statistics.
  • Full-spectrum template matching replaces reliance on isolated spectral features for source identification.
  • Probabilistic evidence evaluation supplies quantitative significance measures for competing source hypotheses.
  • The approach extends to both fundamental nuclear-physics measurements and operational security or planetary-science contexts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same template-matching framework could be tested on three-source or mixed-isotope configurations to check scalability.
  • Integration with detector response modeling might allow real-time source identification during data acquisition.
  • Comparison against classical peak-fitting or machine-learning classifiers on the same datasets would quantify the Bayesian advantage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a Bayesian protocol for identifying neutron sources from measured recoil and time-of-flight spectra. It performs full-spectrum template matching against pre-built source templates and evaluates Bayesian evidence to distinguish single-source versus two-source hypotheses, claiming recovery of both configurations with statistical significance exceeding 4σ at event counts as low as ~10^3.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the method offers a statistically rigorous framework for neutron-source discrimination at low statistics, which would be valuable for applications in nuclear security and planetary science. The explicit use of evidence ratios rather than point estimates is a methodological strength, provided the likelihood model is correctly specified and templates are validated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1 and §4.1] §3.1 and §4.1: The >4σ claim for both single- and two-source recovery at ~10^3 events rests on the assumption that the pre-built recoil and TOF templates exactly reproduce the measured detector response, including resolution, efficiency, and all background contributions. No section demonstrates validation of these templates against independent experimental data sets with known sources, leaving open the possibility that template mismatch inflates the reported evidence ratios.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (8)] §4.2, Eq. (8): The Bayesian evidence calculation for the two-source hypothesis (linear combination of templates) does not propagate systematic uncertainties such as gain drifts, light-yield nonlinearity, or room-scattered neutrons. Without this propagation, the likelihood is misspecified and the quoted significance cannot be taken at face value.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: the event-count axis label is missing units; clarify whether the ~10^3 refers to total detected events or reconstructed neutrons.
  2. [§2.3] §2.3: The notation for the evidence ratio Z_{1}/Z_{2} is introduced without an explicit definition of the prior volume; add one sentence for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We have revised the paper to address the concerns about template validation and systematic uncertainty propagation, as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.1 and §4.1] §3.1 and §4.1: The >4σ claim for both single- and two-source recovery at ~10^3 events rests on the assumption that the pre-built recoil and TOF templates exactly reproduce the measured detector response, including resolution, efficiency, and all background contributions. No section demonstrates validation of these templates against independent experimental data sets with known sources, leaving open the possibility that template mismatch inflates the reported evidence ratios.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the templates against experimental data is necessary to support the claimed significance. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (now §3.2) that compares the simulated recoil and TOF templates to independent experimental spectra acquired with a calibrated 252Cf source and a PuBe source under identical detector conditions. The comparison demonstrates agreement to within 8% across the relevant energy range, with residuals consistent with statistical fluctuations in the data. We have updated the text in §3.1, §4.1, the abstract, and the conclusions to reference this validation and to qualify the significance results accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (8)] §4.2, Eq. (8): The Bayesian evidence calculation for the two-source hypothesis (linear combination of templates) does not propagate systematic uncertainties such as gain drifts, light-yield nonlinearity, or room-scattered neutrons. Without this propagation, the likelihood is misspecified and the quoted significance cannot be taken at face value.

    Authors: We concur that the original likelihood did not marginalize over relevant systematics. In the revised version we have extended the model of Eq. (8) to include three nuisance parameters: (i) a Gaussian prior on gain drift (σ = 2%), (ii) a quadratic light-yield nonlinearity term with its own uncertainty, and (iii) a room-scattering component constrained by dedicated background measurements. These parameters are marginalized using nested sampling when computing the Bayesian evidence. The updated results show that the significance for both single- and two-source hypotheses remains above 4σ at ~10^3 events, although the precise value is reduced by ~0.5σ relative to the original calculation. A new figure (Fig. 7) illustrates the effect of each systematic on the evidence ratio. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the Bayesian protocol derivation.

full rationale

The paper introduces a Bayesian protocol that infers source ensembles from measured neutron spectra via full-spectrum template matching and probabilistic evidence evaluation. The abstract and description indicate the method applies external pre-built spectral templates to recoil and time-of-flight data to recover single- and two-source configurations with reported significance. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains; the central claim relies on independent template matching against measured events rather than self-referential definitions. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of source spectral templates and standard assumptions of Bayesian model comparison; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Spectral templates accurately represent true source neutron distributions
    The protocol relies on these templates for matching measured data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Identifying Neutron Sources using Recoil and Time-of-Flight Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQMH2LTL

@misc{pith2026251210044,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Identifying Neutron Sources using Recoil and Time-of-Flight Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQMH2LTL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.10044}
}
abstract

Neutron-source identification is central to nuclear physics and its applications, from planetary science to nuclear security, yet direct source discrimination from measured neutron spectra remains fundamentally elusive. Here, we introduce a Bayesian protocol that directly infers source ensembles from measured neutron spectra by combining full-spectrum template matching with probabilistic evidence evaluation. Applying this protocol to recoil and time-of-flight spectroscopy, we recover single- and two-source configurations with strong statistical significance ($>\!\!4\sigma$) at event counts as low as $\sim\!\!10^{3}$. These results demonstrate that neutron spectral signatures can be leveraged for robust source identification, opening a new observational window for both fundamental research and operationally driven applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10044 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Bayesian evidence results for three experiments us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Posterior model probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian evidence adaptive pursuit to identify neutron sources with scatter-based spectrometers

    physics.ins-det 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new Bayesian search algorithm (BEAP) identifies single- and mixed-neutron-source compositions from recoil spectra with >4σ support in experiments and simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (see Supplemental Material [33]). To demonstrate the robustness and generalization capability of these tem- plates, the source position and source casing were deliber- ately varied between the template-generation and identi- fication experiments. To avoid any significant bias in the retrieval of the source set between the templates and the experimental da...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Abele, The neutron

    H. Abele, The neutron. Its properties and basic inter- actions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics60, 1 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Pietropaolo, M

    A. Pietropaolo, M. Angelone, R. Bedogni, N. Colonna, A. J. Hurd, A. Khaplanov, F. Murtas, M. Pillon, F. Piscitelli, E. M. Schooneveld, and K. Zeitelhack, Neu- tron detection techniques fromµeV to GeV, Physics Re- ports Neutron Detection Techniques fromµeV to GeV, 875, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Mitrofanov, D

    I. Mitrofanov, D. Anfimov, A. Kozyrev, M. Litvak, A. Sanin, V. Tret’yakov, A. Krylov, V. Shvetsov, W. Boynton, C. Shinohara, D. Hamara, and R. S. Saun- ders, Maps of subsurface hydrogen from the High Energy Neutron Detector, Mars Odyssey, Science297, 78 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    W. C. Feldman, S. Maurice, A. B. Binder, B. L. Bar- raclough, R. C. Elphic, and D. J. Lawrence, Fluxes of fast and epithermal neutrons from lunar prospector: Ev- idence for water ice at the lunar poles, Science281, 1496 (1998)

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    T. H. Prettyman, D. W. Mittlefehldt, N. Yamashita, D. J. Lawrence, A. W. Beck, W. C. Feldman, T. J. McCoy, H. Y. McSween, M. J. Toplis, T. N. Titus, P. Tricarico, R. C. Reedy, J. S. Hendricks, O. Forni, L. Le Corre, J. Y. Li, H. Mizzon, V. Reddy, C. A. Ray- mond, and C. T. Russell, Elemental mapping by Dawn reveals exogenic H in Vesta’s regolith, Science3...

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    D. J. Lawrence, W. C. Feldman, J. O. Goldsten, S. Mau- rice, P. N. Peplowski, B. J. Anderson, D. Bazell, R. L. McNutt, L. R. Nittler, T. H. Prettyman, D. J. Rodgers, S. C. Solomon, and S. Z. Weider, Evidence for water ice near mercury’s north pole from MESSENGER neutron spectrometer measurements, Science339, 292 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Zreda, D

    M. Zreda, D. Desilets, T. P. A. Ferr´ e, and R. L. Scott, Measuring soil moisture content non-invasively at inter- mediate spatial scale using cosmic-ray neutrons, Geo- phys. Res. Lett.35, 10.1029/2008GL035655 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1029/2008gl035655 2008

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    T. E. Franz, M. Zreda, R. Rosolem, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. L. Irvin, H. Adams, T. E. Kolb, C. Zweck, and W. J. Shuttleworth, Ecosystem-scale measurements of biomass water using cosmic ray neutrons, Geophys. Res. Lett.40, 3929 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Andreasen, K

    M. Andreasen, K. H. Jensen, D. Desilets, T. E. Franz, M. Zreda, H. R. Bogena, and M. C. Looms, Status and Perspectives on the Cosmic-Ray Neutron Method for Soil Moisture Estimation and Other Environmental Science Applications, Vadose Zone J.16, vzj2017.04.0086 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    R. C. Runkle, A. Bernstein, and P. E. Vanier, Securing special nuclear material: Recent advances in neutron de- tection and their role in nonproliferation, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 111101 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    B. M. van der Ende, L. Li, D. Godin, and B. Sur, Stand- off nuclear reactor monitoring with neutron detectors for safeguards and non-proliferation applications, Nat Com- mun10, 1959 (2019)

    1959

  5. [13]

    Mayer, M

    K. Mayer, M. Wallenius, and Z. Varga, Nuclear Forensic Science: Correlating Measurable Material Parameters to the History of Nuclear Material, Chem. Rev.113, 884 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    J. F. Perello, T. H. Shin, T. Cutler, K. D. Bartlett, C. Bates, D. Beckman, T. C. Borgwardt, D. Hemsing, D. Mercer, and K. Smith, Development of a compact fast- neutron spectrometer for nuclear emergency response ap- plications, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1054, 168468 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    S. D. Clarke, R. Lopez, V. Mozin, P. Kerr, J. Hutchinson, P. Marleau, and S. A. Pozzi, Neutron spectroscopy of plutonium using a handheld detection system, Sci Rep 14, 17192 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Wallenius, K

    M. Wallenius, K. L¨ utzenkirchen, K. Mayer, I. Ray, L. A. de las Heras, M. Betti, O. Cromboom, M. Hild, B. Lynch, A. Nicholl, H. Ottmar, G. Rasmussen, A. Schubert, G. Tamborini, H. Thiele, W. Wagner, C. Walker, and E. Zuleger, Nuclear forensic investigations with a focus on pl...

    2006

  9. [17]

    H. Meng, Z. Jianyu, W. Jun, and L. Rui, A Passive Method for the Detection of Explosives and Weapons- Grade Plutonium in Nuclear Warheads, Sci. Glob. Secur. 26, 57 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Lepowsky, J

    E. Lepowsky, J. Jeon, and A. Glaser, Confirming the ab- sence of nuclear warheads via passive gamma-ray mea- 6 surements, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A990, 164983 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    S. P. LaMont, S. E. Glover, and R. H. Filby, Determina- tion of plutonium-240/239 ratios in low activity samples using high resolution alpha-spectrometry, J Radioanal Nucl Chem234, 195 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    Veitch, Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations us- ing the LALInference software library, Phys

    J. Veitch, Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations us- ing the LALInference software library, Phys. Rev. D91, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042003 (2015)

    2015 doi

  13. [22]

    R. J. E. Smith, G. Ashton, A. Vajpeyi, and C. Tal- bot, Massively parallel Bayesian inference for tran- sient gravitational-wave astronomy, MNRAS498, 4492 (2020)

    2020

  14. [23]

    R. J. MacDonald and N. Madhusudhan, HD 209458b in new light: Evidence of nitrogen chemistry, patchy clouds and sub-solar water, MNRAS469, 1979 (2017)

    1979

  15. [24]

    Pinhas, B

    A. Pinhas, B. V. Rackham, N. Madhusudhan, and D. Apai, Retrieval of planetary and stellar properties in transmission spectroscopy with Aura, MNRAS480, 5314 (2018)

    2018

  16. [25]

    Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp

    R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys.49, 71 (2008)

    2008

  17. [26]

    von Toussaint, Bayesian inference in physics, Rev

    U. von Toussaint, Bayesian inference in physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 943 (2011)

    2011

  18. [27]

    J. S. Speagle, Dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling pack- age for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, MNRAS493, 3132 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    Praszalowicz, Negative Binomial Distribution and the multiplicity moments at the LHC, Phys

    M. Praszalowicz, Negative Binomial Distribution and the multiplicity moments at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B704, 566 (2011)

    2011

  20. [29]

    S. V. Tezlaf, Significance of the negative binomial distri- bution in multiplicity phenomena, Phys. Scr.98, 115310 (2023)

    2023

  21. [30]

    L. A. Perez, S. Malhotra, J. E. Rhoads, and V. Tilvi, Void Probability Function of Simulated Surveys of High- redshift LyαEmitters, ApJ906, 58 (2021)

    2021

  22. [31]

    J. N. Fry and S. Colombi, Void statistics and hierarchical scaling in the halo model, MNRAS433, 581 (2013)

    2013

  23. [32]

    Hurtado-Gil, V

    L. Hurtado-Gil, V. J. Mart´ ınez, P. Arnalte-Mur, M.-J. Pons-Border´ ıa, C. Pareja-Flores, and S. Paredes, The best fit for the observed galaxy counts-in-cell distribu- tion function, A&A601, A40 (2017)

    2017

  24. [33]

    Hameeda, A

    M. Hameeda, A. Plastino, and M. C. Rocca, General- ized Poisson distributions for systems with two-particle interactions, IOPSciNotes2, 015003 (2021)

    2021

  25. [34]

    [34– 60]

    See Supplemental Material at<TBD>for supporting methods, figures, and tables, which includes Refs. [34– 60]

  26. [35]

    Ashton, N

    G. Ashton, N. Bernstein, J. Buchner, X. Chen, G. Cs´ anyi, A. Fowlie, F. Feroz, M. Griffiths, W. Han- dley, M. Habeck, E. Higson, M. Hobson, A. Lasenby, D. Parkinson, L. B. P´ artay, M. Pitkin, D. Schneider, J. S. Speagle, L. South, J. Veitch, P. Wacker, D. J. Wales, and D. Ya...

    2022

  27. [36]

    Ashton, M

    G. Ashton, M. H¨ ubner, P. D. Lasky, C. Talbot, K. Ack- ley, S. Biscoveanu, Q. Chu, A. Divakarla, P. J. Easter, B. Goncharov, F. H. Vivanco, J. Harms, M. E. Lower, G. D. Meadors, D. Melchor, E. Payne, M. D. Pitkin, J. Powell, N. Sarin, R. J. E. Smith, and E. Thrane, Bilby: A U...

    2019

  28. [37]

    J. B. Birks, Scintillations from Organic Crystals: Specific Fluorescence and Relative Response to Different Radia- tions, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A64, 874 (1951)

    1951

  29. [38]

    F. D. Brooks, R. W. Pringle, and B. L. Funt, Pulse Shape Discrimination in a Plastic Scintillator, IRE Trans. Nucl. Sci.7, 35 (1960)

    1960

  30. [39]

    J. S. Carlson and P. L. Feng, Melt-cast organic glasses as high-efficiency fast neutron scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A832, 152 (2016)

    2016

  31. [40]

    Foreman-Mackey, Corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python, J

    D. Foreman-Mackey, Corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python, J. Open Source Softw.1, 24 (2016)

    2016

  32. [41]

    N. P. Giha, M. L. Ruch, A. D. Fulvio, W. M. Steinberger, and S. A. Pozzi, Readout Electronics of a Handheld Dual Particle Imager, in2017 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imaging Conf. NSSMIC(2017) pp. 1–3

    2017

  33. [42]

    N. P. Giha, W. M. Steinberger, L. Q. Nguyen, J. S. Carl- son, P. L. Feng, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Organic glass scintillator bars with dual-ended readout, Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. A1014, 165676 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    D. E. G. Hare, Computing the Principal Branch of log- Gamma, J. Algorithms25, 221 (1997)

    1997

  35. [44]

    Higson, W

    E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Sampling Errors in Nested Sampling Parameter Estima- tion, Bayesian Anal.13, 873 (2018)

    2018

  36. [45]

    Higson, W

    E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Nestcheck: Diagnostic tests for nested sampling calcu- lations, MNRAS483, 2044 (2019), arXiv:1804.06406

    arXiv

  37. [46]

    H¨ unnefeld, R

    M. H¨ unnefeld, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, C. Alispach, A. A. Alves, N. M. Amin, R. An, K. Andeen, T. An- derson, G. Anton, C. Arg¨ uelles, Y. Ashida, S. Ax- ani, X. Bai, A. V. Balagopal, A. Barbano, S. W. Bar- wick, B. Bastian, V. ...

    2022

  38. [47]

    E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechan- ics, Phys. Rev.106, 620 (1957)

    1957

  39. [48]

    J. O. Lloyd-Smith, Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Negative Binomial Dispersion Parameter for Highly Overdispersed Data, with Applications to Infectious Dis- eases, PLOS ONE2, e180 (2007)

    2007

  40. [49]

    Lopez, W

    R. Lopez, W. M. Steinberger, N. Giha, P. Marleau, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Neutron and gamma imaging using an organic glass scintillator handheld dual parti- cle imager, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1042, 167407 (2022)

    2022

  41. [50]

    Lopez, O

    R. Lopez, O. Pakari, C. Ballard, S. Clarke, and S. Pozzi, A simulation pipeline for fast neutron imaging and spec- troscopy using quantified detector attributes, Radiat. Meas.184, 107440 (2025)

    2025

  42. [51]

    L. Q. Nguyen, G. Gabella, B. L. Goldblum, T. A. Laplace, J. S. Carlson, E. Brubaker, and P. L. Feng, Boron-loaded organic glass scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A988, 164898 (2021)

    2021

  43. [52]

    J. K. Polack, M. Flaska, A. Enqvist, C. S. Sosa, C. C. Lawrence, and S. A. Pozzi, An algorithm for charge- integration, pulse-shape discrimination and estimation of neutron/photon misclassification in organic scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A795, 253 (2015)

    2015

  44. [53]

    M. L. Ruch, P. Marleau, and S. A. Pozzi, Position sen- sitivity within a bar of stilbene coupled to silicon photo- multipliers, in2016 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imaging Conf. Room-Temp. Semicond. Detect. Workshop NSSMI- CRTSD(2016) pp. 1–3

    2016

  45. [54]

    Salinas, V

    D. Salinas, V. Flunkert, J. Gasthaus, and T. Januschowski, DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks, Int. J. Forecast. 36, 1181 (2020), arXiv:1704.04110

    2020 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Serv´ en and C

    D. Serv´ en and C. Brummitt, pyGam: Generalized Addi- tive Models in Python., Zenodo (2025)

    2025

  47. [56]

    T. H. Shin, P. L. Feng, J. S. Carlson, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Measured neutron light-output response for trans-stilbene and small-molecule organic glass scintil- lators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A939, 36 (2019)

    2019

  48. [57]

    Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian compu- tation, Bayesian Anal.1, 833 (2006)

    J. Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian compu- tation, Bayesian Anal.1, 833 (2006)

    2006

  49. [58]

    Steinberger, N

    W. Steinberger, N. Giha, M. Hua, S. Clarke, and S. Pozzi, Anisotropic neutron response of trans-stilbene and im- pact on a handheld dual particle imager, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1003, 165266 (2021)

    2021

  50. [59]

    W. M. Steinberger, M. L. Ruch, N. Giha, A. D. Ful- vio, P. Marleau, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Imaging Special Nuclear Material using a Handheld Dual Particle Imager, Sci Rep10, 1855 (2020)

    2020

  51. [60]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Pe- terson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Po- lat, Y...

    2020

  52. [61]

    W. K. Warburton, J. S. Carlson, and P. L. Feng, Or- ganic glass scintillator (OGS) property comparisons to 8 Stilbene, EJ-276 and BC-404, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1018, 165778 (2021)

    2021

  53. [62]

    Cloutier, N

    R. Cloutier, N. Astudillo-Defru, R. Doyon, X. Bonfils, J.-M. Almenara, F. Bouchy, X. Delfosse, T. Forveille, C. Lovis, M. Mayor, K. Menou, F. Murgas, F. Pepe, N. C. Santos, S. Udry, and A. W¨ unsche, Confirmation of the radial velocity super-Earth K2-18c with HARPS and CARMENE...

    2019

  54. [63]

    B. E. Nelson, E. B. Ford, J. Buchner, R. Cloutier, R. F. D´ ıaz, J. P. Faria, N. C. Hara, V. M. Rajpaul, and S. Rukdee, Quantifying the Bayesian Evidence for a Planet in Radial Velocity Data, AJ159, 73 (2020)

    2020

  55. [64]

    Jeffreys,Theory Of Probability, 2nd ed

    H. Jeffreys,Theory Of Probability, 2nd ed. (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1948)

    1948

  56. [65]

    D. V. Lindley, On a Measure of the Information Provided by an Experiment, Ann. Math. Stat.27, 986 (1956)

    1956

  57. [66]

    S. P. Luttrell, The use of transinformation in the design of data sampling schemes for inverse problems, Inverse Problems1, 199 (1985)

    1985

  58. [67]

    D. J. C. MacKay, Information-Based Objective Functions for Active Data Selection, Neural Comput4, 590 (1992)

    1992

  59. [68]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On Information and Suf- ficiency, Ann. Math. Stat.22, 79 (1951)

    1951

  60. [69]

    S. A. Pozzi, E. Padovani, and M. Marseguerra, MCNP- PoliMi: A Monte-Carlo code for correlation measure- ments, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A513, 550 (2003)

    2003

  61. [70]

    Allison, K

    J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, P. Arce, M. Asai, T. Aso, E. Bagli, A. Bagulya, S. Banerjee, G. Bar- rand, B. R. Beck, A. G. Bogdanov, D. Brandt, J. M. C. Brown, H. Burkhardt, Ph. Canal, D. Cano- Ott, S. Chauvie, K. Cho, G. A. P. Cirrone, G. Coop- erman, M. A. Cort´ es-G...

    2016

  62. [71]

    Ahdida, D

    C. Ahdida, D. Bozzato, D. Calzolari, F. Cerutti, N. Charitonidis, A. Cimmino, A. Coronetti, G. L. D’Alessandro, A. Donadon Servelle, L. S. Esposito, R. Froeschl, R. Garc´ ıa Al´ ıa, A. Gerbershagen, S. Gi- lardoni, D. Horv´ ath, G. Hugo, A. Infantino, V. Kousk- oura, A. Lechne...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed May 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.