Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00216 v2 pith:BSPLY5SA submitted 2024-05-31 cs.AI

The Explanation Necessity for Healthcare AI

classification cs.AI
keywords levelexplanationapplicationcriticalexplainabilityhealthcaremedicalnecessity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explainability is a critical factor in enhancing the trustworthiness and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, where decisions directly impact patient outcomes. Despite advancements in AI interpretability, clear guidelines on when and to what extent explanations are required in medical applications remain lacking. We propose a novel categorization system comprising four classes of explanation necessity (self-explainable, semi-explainable, non-explainable, and new-patterns discovery), guiding the required level of explanation; whether local (patient or sample level), global (cohort or dataset level), or both. To support this system, we introduce a mathematical formulation that incorporates three key factors: (i) robustness of the evaluation protocol, (ii) variability of expert observations, and (iii) representation dimensionality of the application. This framework provides a practical tool for researchers to determine the appropriate depth of explainability needed, addressing the critical question: When does an AI medical application need to be explained, and at what level of detail?

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.