Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

am-ELO: A Stable Framework for Arena-based LLM Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.03475 v2 pith:BSWKFUJE submitted 2025-05-06 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords evaluationframeworkmethodratingstableabilitiesam-eloannotator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Arena-based evaluation is a fundamental yet significant evaluation paradigm for modern AI models, especially large language models (LLMs). Existing framework based on ELO rating system suffers from the inevitable instability problem due to ranking inconsistency and the lack of attention to the varying abilities of annotators. In this paper, we introduce a novel stable arena framework to address these issues by enhancing the ELO Rating System. Specifically, we replace the iterative update method with a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) approach, m-ELO, and provide theoretical proof of the consistency and stability of the MLE approach for model ranking. Additionally, we proposed the am-ELO, which modify the Elo Rating's probability function to incorporate annotator abilities, enabling the simultaneous estimation of model scores and annotator reliability. Experiments demonstrate that this method ensures stability, proving that this framework offers a more robust, accurate, and stable evaluation method for LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EpiBench: Benchmarking Multi-turn Research Workflows for Multimodal Agents

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    EpiBench is a new episodic multi-turn multimodal benchmark where even leading AI agents score only 29.23% on hard tasks requiring cross-paper evidence integration from figures and tables.

Pith tools