Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 86 references

Surface Defects in $A$-type Little String Theories

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper gives the first explicit combinatorial BPS partition function for full-type surface defects in A-type little string theories, and shows that two natural normalizations remain finite in the NS limit.

desk verdict Solid, technically dense paper: the M>1 defect partition function is genuinely new, but the headline NS-limit regularity rests on a conjectured recursive identity that has only been checked to low order. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15048 v3 pith:BTDMFWGE submitted 2024-12-19 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Baptiste Filoche , Stefan Hohenegger , Taro Kimura This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords littlestringtheorysurfacedefectinstantonpartitionfunctionNekrasov-ShatashvililimitfractionalNekrasovsubfunctionsADHMquiverorbifolddoubleellipticintegrablesystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to make surface defects in A-type little string theories tractable by writing their non-perturbative BPS partition function as an explicit combinatorial sum. The defect is a full-type surface defect induced by a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ orbifold that breaks each $U(N)$ gauge node to $U(1)^N$; for the $\widehat{A}_{M-1}$ orbifold theories the sum runs over $NM$-tuples of partitions and is, by the authors' statement, the first explicit expression. With this formula, the paper argues that the known non-perturbative symmetries of the undefected theories survive the defect, and it analyzes the NS limit (one $\Omega$-background parameter vanishing), where the raw partition function is singular. Two literature normalizations — the bulk normalization and an equal-charge normalizer — are shown to give a finite limit, governed by a conjectured recursive pole-cancellation identity. The concrete payoff would be that these defect partition functions serve as eigenfunctions of elliptic integrable systems such as the double-elliptic DELL system.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fractional Nekrasov subfunction $\mathcal{N}^{(p|N)}_{\mu\nu}(x,Q_\rho;q_1,\tilde q_2)$, a product of $\theta$ functions $\vartheta(x q_1^{-a_\nu(2)-1} q_2^{l_\mu(2)}; Q_\rho)$ over boxes whose arm and leg lengths lie in a prescribed congruence class modulo $N$, together with the projection $\omega_{p|N}$ that selects Laurent-series terms of degree $p$ mod $N$ in the orbifold expansion. The mechanism that makes the NS limit finite is the conjectured recursive identity (2.74), generalized in (2.100) and (3.35): each tuple of partitions is decomposed into a bulk part, whose boxes group vertically in stacks of $N$, plus a seed part satisfying a strict-decrease condition, and subtracting the singular bulk sub-tuples recursively leaves an $O(\epsilon_2^0)$ remainder. Resumming the recursion with complete Bell polynomials shows that the bulk instanton partition function is the minimal normalizer, and that any normalizer built from the bulk sum plus seed-sector completions is also regular. This structure is what ties the combinatorial formula to the claimed finiteness of the two NS-limit prescriptions.

What would settle it

Evaluate the left side of the recursive identity (2.74) for an $N=2$ configuration with total box number 14; if the result is not $O(\epsilon_2^0)$ — that is, if any negative power of $\epsilon_2$ remains — then the claimed regularity of both NS-limit normalizations is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the full non-perturbative BPS partition function of the $\widehat{A}_{M-1}$ little string theory with a full-type surface defect is $$$Z^{{\mathrm{inst}}$,(N,M)}_{\mathrm{def}} = \sum_{\boldsymbol{\$\lambda$}} \prod_{i,j} q_{i,j}^{k^j_i(\boldsymbol{\$\lambda$})} \prod_{l=1}^M \prod_{1\leq i,j\leq N} \frac{\mathcal{N}^{(j-i|N)}_{\$lambda^{{(i,l-1)}}$\$lambda^{{(j,l)}}$}(Q_{\hat S} $Q^{{a^l_j}}$/$Q^{{a^{l-1}}$_i},Q_\rho;q_1,\tilde q_2)}{\mathcal{N}^{(j-i|N)}_{\$lambda^{{(i,l)}}$\$lambda^{{(j,l)}}$}($Q^{{a^l_j}}$/$Q^{{a^l_i}}$,Q_\rho;q_1,\tilde q_2)},$$ with $\mathcal{N}^{(p|N)}_{\mu\nu}$ the fractional Nekrasov subfunctions built from $\theta$ functions over arm and leg lengths in fixed congruence classes modulo $N$. For $M=1$ the formula reduces to an $N$-tuple expression that matches a vertex-operator computation; for $M>1$ the expression is new. From this formula the paper derives that the defect partition function inherits the cyclic, flop, and quasi-periodic non-perturbative symmetries of the parent little string theory. In the NS limit, the raw sum is singular because boxes with equal arm and leg length produce poles in $\epsilon_2$; the paper shows that after dividing by the bulk partition function or by an equal-charge normalizer, the limit is $O(\epsilon_2^0)$, and that this regularity follows from a recursive subtraction identity that is conjectured and tested on configurations with up to twelve boxes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the conjectured recursive pole-cancellation identity holds at all orders; it has been tested only up to twelve boxes in the simplest cases, and if it fails at higher order the finite NS-limit claim is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The defect partition function for every $\widehat{A}_{M-1}$ little string theory can be expanded order by order in the fractional instanton couplings $q_{i,j}$, giving explicit numbers that any dual construction must reproduce.
  • The cyclic, flop, and quasi-periodicity symmetries of the parent little string theory become symmetries of the defect theory, so dualities of the parent theory are expected to survive the defect.
  • Both the bulk-normalized and the equal-charge-normalized defect partition functions have a finite NS limit; moreover, infinitely many other normalizers built from bulk plus seed sectors are equally regular.
  • In the bulk-decoupling limit the $N=2$ defect partition function becomes an elliptic hypergeometric function annihilated by an explicit elliptic difference operator, matching the elliptic lift of the known MacDonald-function representation.
  • The recursive pole-cancellation structure is conjecturally related to blow-up equations, which would tie the NS-limit regularity to a broader class of gauge-theory identities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjectured recursive identity holds at all orders, the explicit defect partition functions would give ready-made wavefunctions for spin generalizations of the DELL system, whose Hamiltonians the paper does not construct.
  • The zeros of the surface factor in the NS limit suggest that the limit-shape configurations of the bulk theory are modified by the defect; this could yield new universal statistics for random partitions, but the paper only notes the possibility.
  • The same orbifold technology should extend to partial defects with fewer than $N$ sectors and to other A-type nodes, which would let one probe the transition from full to partial breaking and compare with class-$S_k$ constructions.
  • A direct high-order check of the conjectured identity, or a proof via the blow-up equation, would strengthen the finite-NS-limit claim; until then, the regularity rests on checks up to twelve boxes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs surface defects in A-type little string theories (bA_{M-1} LSTs) by a Z_N orbifold that breaks U(N) to U(1)^N, and derives combinatorial expressions for the non-perturbative BPS partition function. For M=1 the result is eq. (2.46), and for general M it is eq. (3.18), which the authors claim is the first explicit defect partition function for these LSTs. The paper then studies non-perturbative symmetries inherited from the parent LSTs, the Nekrasov-Shatashvili (NS) limit with two proposed normalizations, and the bulk decoupling limit that connects to elliptic hypergeometric functions and integrable systems. The main technical engine for the NS-limit claims is a recursively conjectured pole-cancellation identity, eqs. (2.74), (2.100), and (3.35).

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a substantial new result: explicit combinatorial BPS partition functions for A-type LSTs with a full-type surface defect, including the previously unavailable M>1 case. The derivation follows a standard ADHM plus Jeffrey-Kirwan residue procedure rather than being fitted to a target, and the M=1 formula is checked against the vertex-operator result of Shiraishi in the 5d limit. The finite-order tests of the recursive pole-cancellation identity (|μ|+|ν|≤12 for N=2, and |λ|≤12 for N=M=2) are a useful check, but they are not a proof. The paper also gives a concrete framework for studying NS limits and integrable-system connections, which is likely to be of interest to the hep-th community.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.2, §2.5, §3.4] The central claim that both the bulk and Shiraishi normalizations yield regular NS limits is conditional on the conjectured recursive identity (2.74) and its generalizations (2.100) and (3.35). As the authors state in §2.6.1, (2.74) is 'for now conjectured' and tested only for |μ|+|ν|≤12; §3.5 reports tests only for N=M=2 with |λ|≤12 and no test for generic M>1. Since eq. (2.85) and the corresponding arguments for M>1 are derived from this identity, a higher-order counterexample would leave uncancelled ε_2 poles and invalidate the claim that both normalizations are O(ε_2^0). The abstract and the summary of results currently present the NS-limit regularity as an established result; the paper should either supply a proof of the pole-cancellation identity or explicitly reclassify the NS-limit regularity as a conjecture throughout, including the abstract and §1.2.
  2. [§3.4 and §1.2, item 5] See previous comment.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.5, Eq. (3.35)] This is a typographical issue, but it affects the statement of the main conjectured identity for generic M,N.
  2. [§2.7.1, Eq. (2.104)] This typo should be corrected.
  3. [§3.1] Minor wording issue.
  4. [§2.6.1] Presentation issue.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the defect partition function is derived from an ADHM/LMNS construction and benchmarked against an independent vertex-operator result, while the NS-limit regularity claim is conditional on an explicitly labelled conjecture.

full rationale

The central new object, Z_def^{inst.,(N,M)}, is obtained in Section 3 from a Z_N x Z_M orbifold ADHM quiver, an LMNS integral, and Jeffrey-Kirwan residues; it is not fitted to the quantities later 'predicted'. For M=1, (2.46) is explicitly benchmarked against Shiraishi's independent vertex-operator construction [55], and Appendix B provides a separate algebraic re-derivation, so the main result has independent content. The non-perturbative symmetry statements import the parent-theory classification from the authors' prior works [26,35], but the defect-side invariance is checked directly on (2.46), for example through the theta-function quasi-periodicity computation leading to (2.56); the citation is therefore not load-bearing for the defect partition function itself. The NS-limit regularity of both normalizations is not circular, but it is conditional: Section 2.6.1 states that the recursive pole-cancellation identity (2.74) 'is for now conjectured but has been tested explicitly ... for all mu, nu such that |mu|+|nu| <= 12', and Section 3.5 states that its M>1 generalization (3.35) 'has been tested for N=M=2 and |lambda| <= 12'. If (2.74)/(3.35) fails at higher order, the O(epsilon_2^0) regularity conclusion would fail; this is an unproved assumption and a correctness risk, not a reduction of the conclusion to its own input. Score 2 reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations in the symmetry discussion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard string-theory engineering (brane/orbifold construction), the standard ADHM localization procedure, and a new but unproven recursive pole-cancellation identity. No free parameters are fitted; no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Z_N orbifold on C^2 x C^4 implements a full-type surface defect breaking U(N) to U(1)^N.
    Section 2.1, Table 2. This is the standard engineering of surface defects in the ADHM/orbifold literature, treated as background.
  • domain assumption The non-perturbative BPS partition function is obtained by taking the 6d index of the character of the tangent space to the instanton moduli space and computing residues at the fixed points of the Omega-background.
    Section 2.3, eqs (2.16)-(2.24). This is the standard LMNS/Jeffrey-Kirwan procedure; no proof is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption The fixed points of the instanton moduli space under the chosen integration ordering are classified by N-tuples of partitions with the colouring rule (2.29).
    Section 2.3, eqs (2.26)-(2.31). Standard in the chain-saw quiver literature [38], used without proof here.
  • domain assumption For M>1, the pole structure of the LMNS integral (3.12) does not mix the different Z_M sectors, so fixed points are classified by NM-tuples of partitions.
    Section 3.2, eqs (3.13)-(3.15). This is stated without detailed proof and underlies the M>1 combinatoric expression.
  • ad hoc to paper The recursive pole-cancellation relation (2.74), and its generalizations (2.100) and (3.35), hold for all partitions.
    This is the load-bearing unproven assumption. In Section 2.6.1 the authors state the relation is 'for now conjectured' and tested only for |mu|+|nu|<=12; the M>1 version is conjectured with tests for N=M=2, |lambda|<=12.
  • domain assumption The duality Z_def(q,q;a,rho;S) = Z_def(a,rho;q,q;S,epsilon_1,epsilon_2) of the full defect partition function (2.57) holds.
    Used in Section 2.5 to argue for the S->S-tau symmetry; attributed to conjectures in [55,61].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surface Defects in $A$-type Little String Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTDMFWGE

@misc{pith2026241215048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surface Defects in $A$-type Little String Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTDMFWGE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15048}
}
abstract

$A$-type Little String Theories (LSTs) are engineered from parallel M5-branes on a circle $\mathbb{S}_\perp^1$, probing a transverse $\mathbb{R}^4/\mathbb{Z}_M$ background. Below the scale of the radius of $\mathbb{S}_\perp^1$, these theories resemble a circular quiver gauge theory with $M$ nodes of gauge group $U(N)$ and matter in the bifundamental representation (or adjoint in the case of $M=1$). In this paper, we study these LSTs in the presence of a surface defect, which is introduced through the action of a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ orbifold that breaks the gauge groups into $[U(1)]^N$. We provide a combinatoric expression for the non-perturbative BPS partition function for this system. This form allows us to argue that a number of non-perturbative symmetries, that have previously been established for the LSTs, are preserved in the presence of the defect. Furthermore, we discuss the Nekrasov-Shatashvili (NS) limit of the defect partition function: focusing in detail on the case $(M,N)=(1,2)$, we analyse two distinct proposals made in the literature. We unravel an algebraic structure that is responsible for the cancellation of singular terms in the NS limit, which we generalise to generic $(M,N)$. In view of the dualities of higher dimensional gauge theories to quantum many-body systems, we provide indications that our combinatoric expression for the defect partition are useful in constructing and analysing quantum integrable systems in the future.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15048 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cyclic quiver following the Dynkin diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A portion of the cyclic chain-saw ADHM quiver characterising the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quiver describing the 4d gauge theory in the defect world-volume. point of view, the set of partitions contributing to the vortex PF S (N) vortex corresponds to: S (N) vortex := n λ = (λ (1), . . . , λ(N) ) ∈ PN | λ (i),T 1 ≤ N − i o , (2.106) in particular we remark that S (N) vortex ⊂ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A portion of the doubly cyclic chain-saw ADHM quiver associated with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Some comments on string dynamics,

    E. Witten, “Some comments on string dynamics,” inSTRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, pp. 501–523. 7, 1995.arXiv:hep-th/9507121

    arXiv 1995

  2. [2]

    Point - like instantons on K3 orbifolds,

    P. S. Aspinwall and D. R. Morrison, “Point - like instantons on K3 orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B503(1997) 533–564,arXiv:hep-th/9705104

    arXiv 1997

  3. [3]

    New string theories in six-dimensions via branes at orbifold singularities,

    K. A. Intriligator, “New string theories in six-dimensions via branes at orbifold singularities,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.1(1998) 271–282,arXiv:hep-th/9708117

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Branes and six-dimensional supersymmetric theories,

    A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, “Branes and six-dimensional supersymmetric theories,” Nucl. Phys. B529(1998) 180–206,arXiv:hep-th/9712145

    arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Branes at orbifolds versus Hanany Witten in six-dimensions,

    I. Brunner and A. Karch, “Branes at orbifolds versus Hanany Witten in six-dimensions,” JHEP03(1998) 003,arXiv:hep-th/9712143

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    F-theory and the Classification of Little Strings,

    L. Bhardwaj, M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, D. R. Morrison, T. Rudelius, and C. Vafa, “F-theory and the Classification of Little Strings,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 8, (2016) 086002, arXiv:1511.05565 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 100, 029901 (2019)]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Revisiting the classifications of 6d SCFTs and LSTs,

    L. Bhardwaj, “Revisiting the classifications of 6d SCFTs and LSTs,”JHEP03(2020) 171,arXiv:1903.10503 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Discovering T-dualities of little string theories,

    L. Bhardwaj, “Discovering T-dualities of little string theories,”JHEP02(2024) 046, arXiv:2209.10548 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    M-Strings,

    B. Haghighat, A. Iqbal, C. Kozçaz, G. Lockhart, and C. Vafa, “M-Strings,”Commun. Math. Phys.334no. 2, (2015) 779–842,arXiv:1305.6322 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    M-strings, elliptic genera andN= 4string amplitudes,

    S. Hohenegger and A. Iqbal, “M-strings, elliptic genera andN= 4string amplitudes,” Fortsch. Phys.62(2014) 155–206,arXiv:1310.1325 [hep-th]. 38

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Orbifolds of M-strings,

    B. Haghighat, C. Kozcaz, G. Lockhart, and C. Vafa, “Orbifolds of M-strings,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 4, (2014) 046003,arXiv:1310.1185 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Instanton-monopole correspondence from M-branes onS 1 and little string theory,

    S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Instanton-monopole correspondence from M-branes onS 1 and little string theory,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 6, (2016) 066016, arXiv:1511.02787 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    M-strings, monopole strings, and modular forms,

    S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “M-strings, monopole strings, and modular forms,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 6, (2015) 066005,arXiv:1503.06983 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dual Little Strings from F-Theory and Flop Transitions,

    S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Dual Little Strings from F-Theory and Flop Transitions,”JHEP07(2017) 112,arXiv:1610.07916 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Self-Duality and Self-Similarity of Little String Orbifolds,

    S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Self-Duality and Self-Similarity of Little String Orbifolds,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 4, (2016) 046006,arXiv:1605.02591 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bound states of little strings and symmetric orbifold conformal field theories,

    A. Ahmed, S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Bound states of little strings and symmetric orbifold conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 8, (2017) 081901, arXiv:1706.04425 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    ADE String Chains and Mirror Symmetry,

    B. Haghighat, W. Yan, and S.-T. Yau, “ADE String Chains and Mirror Symmetry,” JHEP01(2018) 043,arXiv:1705.05199 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Dual little strings and their partition functions,

    B. Bastian, S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Dual little strings and their partition functions,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 10, (2018) 106004,arXiv:1710.02455 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Triality in Little String Theories,

    B. Bastian, S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Triality in Little String Theories,” Phys. Rev. D97no. 4, (2018) 046004,arXiv:1711.07921 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Five-Brane Webs and Highest Weight Representations,

    B. Bastian and S. Hohenegger, “Five-Brane Webs and Highest Weight Representations,” JHEP12(2017) 020,arXiv:1706.08750 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fractional quiver W-algebras,

    T. Kimura and V. Pestun, “Fractional quiver W-algebras,”Lett. Math. Phys.108no. 11, (2018) 2425–2451,arXiv:1705.04410 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Five-Dimensional Gauge Theories from Shifted Web Diagrams,

    B. Bastian, S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Five-Dimensional Gauge Theories from Shifted Web Diagrams,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 4, (2019) 046012,arXiv:1810.05109 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    D-type fiber-base duality,

    B. Haghighat, J. Kim, W. Yan, and S.-T. Yau, “D-type fiber-base duality,”JHEP09 (2018) 060,arXiv:1806.10335 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    M5 branes and Theta Functions,

    B. Haghighat and R. Sun, “M5 branes and Theta Functions,”JHEP10(2019) 192, arXiv:1811.04938 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Beyond Triality: Dual Quiver Gauge Theories and Little String Theories,

    B. Bastian, S. Hohenegger, A. Iqbal, and S.-J. Rey, “Beyond Triality: Dual Quiver Gauge Theories and Little String Theories,”JHEP11(2018) 016,arXiv:1807.00186 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dihedral Symmetries of Gauge Theories from Dual Calabi-Yau Threefolds,

    B. Bastian and S. Hohenegger, “Dihedral Symmetries of Gauge Theories from Dual Calabi-Yau Threefolds,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 6, (2019) 066013,arXiv:1811.03387 [hep-th]. 39

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Symmetries in A-type little string theories. Part I. Reduced free energy and paramodular groups,

    B. Bastian and S. Hohenegger, “Symmetries in A-type little string theories. Part I. Reduced free energy and paramodular groups,”JHEP03(2020) 062,arXiv:1911.07276 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Symmetries in A-type little string theories. Part II. Eisenstein series and generating functions of multiple divisor sums,

    B. Bastian and S. Hohenegger, “Symmetries in A-type little string theories. Part II. Eisenstein series and generating functions of multiple divisor sums,”JHEP03(2020) 016,arXiv:1911.07280 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    From Little String Free Energies Towards Modular Graph Functions,

    S. Hohenegger, “From Little String Free Energies Towards Modular Graph Functions,” JHEP03(2020) 077,arXiv:1911.08172 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Symmetric orbifold theories from little string residues,

    S. Hohenegger and A. Iqbal, “Symmetric orbifold theories from little string residues,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 6, (2021) 066004,arXiv:2009.00797 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    6d/5d exceptional gauge theories from web diagrams,

    H. Hayashi, H.-C. Kim, and K. Ohmori, “6d/5d exceptional gauge theories from web diagrams,”JHEP07(2021) 128,arXiv:2103.02799 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Diagrammatic Expansion of Non-Perturbative Little String Free Energies,

    S. Hohenegger, “Diagrammatic Expansion of Non-Perturbative Little String Free Energies,”JHEP04(2021) 275,arXiv:2011.06323 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Double Quiver Gauge Theory and BPS/CFT Correspondence,

    T. Kimura, “Double Quiver Gauge Theory and BPS/CFT Correspondence,”SIGMA19 (2023) 039,arXiv:2212.03870 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    DE-type little strings from glued brane webs,

    X.-Y. Wei, Y. Sugimoto, F. Yagi, and S.-S. Kim, “DE-type little strings from glued brane webs,”JHEP05(2023) 214,arXiv:2212.07344 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Non-perturbative Symmetries of Little Strings and Affine Quiver Algebras,

    B. Filoche, S. Hohenegger, and T. Kimura, “Non-perturbative Symmetries of Little Strings and Affine Quiver Algebras,”JHEP02(2024) 233,arXiv:2311.03858 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Seiberg-Witten curves ofbD-type Little Strings,

    B. Filoche, S. Hohenegger, and T. Kimura, “Seiberg-Witten curves ofbD-type Little Strings,”arXiv:2407.11164 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Local Calabi-Yau manifolds of type˜Avia SYZ mirror symmetry,

    A. Kanazawa and S.-C. Lau, “Local Calabi-Yau manifolds of type˜Avia SYZ mirror symmetry,”J. Geom. Phys.139(2019) 103–138,arXiv:1605.00342 [math.AG]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Instanton counting with a surface operator and the chain-saw quiver,

    H. Kanno and Y. Tachikawa, “Instanton counting with a surface operator and the chain-saw quiver,”JHEP06(2011) 119,arXiv:1105.0357 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Quantum spin systems and supersymmetric gauge theories. Part I,

    N. Lee and N. Nekrasov, “Quantum spin systems and supersymmetric gauge theories. Part I,”JHEP03(2021) 093,arXiv:2009.11199 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Quantum Elliptic Calogero-Moser Systems from Gauge Origami,

    H.-Y. Chen, T. Kimura, and N. Lee, “Quantum Elliptic Calogero-Moser Systems from Gauge Origami,”JHEP02(2020) 108,arXiv:1908.04928 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Defect in gauge theory and quantum Hall states,

    T. Kimura and N. Lee, “Defect in gauge theory and quantum Hall states,”Nucl. Phys. B 991(2023) 116218,arXiv:2210.05949 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Blowup equations for little strings,

    H.-C. Kim, M. Kim, and Y. Sugimoto, “Blowup equations for little strings,”JHEP05 (2023) 029,arXiv:2301.04151 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Riemann-Hilbert correspondence and blown up surface defects,

    S. Jeong and N. Nekrasov, “Riemann-Hilbert correspondence and blown up surface defects,”JHEP12(2020) 006,arXiv:2007.03660 [hep-th]. 40

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    2D CFT blocks for the 4D classSk theories,

    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni, “2D CFT blocks for the 4D classSk theories,”JHEP08(2017) 009,arXiv:1703.00736 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Instanton counting in classSk,

    T. Bourton and E. Pomoni, “Instanton counting in classSk,”J. Phys. A53no. 16, (2020) 165401,arXiv:1712.01288 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    The Coulomb and Higgs branches ofN= 1 theories of ClassSk,

    T. Bourton, A. Pini, and E. Pomoni, “The Coulomb and Higgs branches ofN= 1 theories of ClassSk,”JHEP02(2021) 137,arXiv:2011.01587 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Elliptic quantum curves of class Sk,

    J. Chen, B. Haghighat, H.-C. Kim, and M. Sperling, “Elliptic quantum curves of class Sk,”JHEP03(2021) 028,arXiv:2008.05155 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and integrable systems,

    R. Donagi and E. Witten, “Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and integrable systems,” Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 299–334,arXiv:hep-th/9510101

    1996 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Double elliptic dynamical systems from generalized Mukai-Sklyanin algebras,

    H. W. Braden, A. Gorsky, A. Odessky, and V. Rubtsov, “Double elliptic dynamical systems from generalized Mukai-Sklyanin algebras,”Nucl. Phys. B633(2002) 414–442, arXiv:hep-th/0111066

    2002 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A-type Quiver Varieties and ADHM Moduli Spaces,

    P. Koroteev, “A-type Quiver Varieties and ADHM Moduli Spaces,”Commun. Math. Phys.381no. 1, (2021) 175–207,arXiv:1805.00986 [math.AG]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Defects and Quantum Seiberg-Witten Geometry,

    M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim, and P. Koroteev, “Defects and Quantum Seiberg-Witten Geometry,”JHEP05(2015) 095,arXiv:1412.6081 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Intersecting defects in gauge theory, quantum spin chains, and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations,

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, and N. Nekrasov, “Intersecting defects in gauge theory, quantum spin chains, and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations,”JHEP10(2021) 120, arXiv:2103.17186 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Elliptic Calogero-Moser system, crossed and folded instantons, and bilinear identities,

    A. Grekov and N. Nekrasov, “Elliptic Calogero-Moser system, crossed and folded instantons, and bilinear identities,” 10, 2023.arXiv:2310.04571 [math-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Generalized Calogero-Moser system and supergroup gauge origami,

    T. Kimura and N. Lee, “Generalized Calogero-Moser system and supergroup gauge origami,”Nucl. Phys. B1005(2024) 116604,arXiv:2404.01844 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Affine Screening Operators, Affine Laumon Spaces, and Conjectures Concerning Non-Stationary Ruijsenaars Functions,

    J. Shiraishi, “Affine Screening Operators, Affine Laumon Spaces, and Conjectures Concerning Non-Stationary Ruijsenaars Functions,”J. Syst. Integr.no. 1, (2019) , arXiv:1903.07495 [math.QA].https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07495

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    On Ruijsenaars-Schneider spectrum from superconformal indices and ramified instantons,

    H.-C. Kim, A. Nedelin, and S. S. Razamat, “On Ruijsenaars-Schneider spectrum from superconformal indices and ramified instantons,”arXiv:2407.08776 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Seiberg-Witten curves and double-elliptic integrable systems,

    G. Aminov, H. W. Braden, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and A. Zotov, “Seiberg-Witten curves and double-elliptic integrable systems,”JHEP01(2015) 033,arXiv:1410.0698 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    The quantum DELL system,

    P. Koroteev and S. Shakirov, “The quantum DELL system,”Lett. Math. Phys.110no. 5, (2020) 969–999,arXiv:1906.10354 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    On a complete solution of the quantum Dell system,

    H. Awata, H. Kanno, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, “On a complete solution of the quantum Dell system,”JHEP04(2020) 212,arXiv:1912.12897 [hep-th]. 41

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Double Inozemtsev limits of the quantum DELL system,

    A. Gorsky, P. Koroteev, O. Koroteeva, and S. Shakirov, “Double Inozemtsev limits of the quantum DELL system,”Phys. Lett. B826(2022) 136919,arXiv:2110.02157 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Elliptic lift of the Shiraishi function as a non-stationary double-elliptic function,

    H. Awata, H. Kanno, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, “Elliptic lift of the Shiraishi function as a non-stationary double-elliptic function,”JHEP08(2020) 150,arXiv:2005.10563 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    On the status of DELL systems,

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “On the status of DELL systems,”Nucl. Phys. B999 (2024) 116448,arXiv:2309.06403 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions,

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, “Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions,”Prog. Math.244(2006) 525–596,arXiv:hep-th/0306238

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories,

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories,” in16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics, pp. 265–289. 2010.arXiv:0908.4052 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,”JHEP04(2010) 040,arXiv:0910.5670 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    On Quiver W-algebras and Defects from Gauge Origami,

    P. Koroteev, “On Quiver W-algebras and Defects from Gauge Origami,”Phys. Lett. B 800(2020) 135101,arXiv:1908.04394 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Spiked Instantons from Intersecting D-branes,

    N. Nekrasov and N. S. Prabhakar, “Spiked Instantons from Intersecting D-branes,”Nucl. Phys. B914(2017) 257–300,arXiv:1611.03478 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Elliptic Genera of 2dN= 2 Gauge Theories,

    F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori, and Y. Tachikawa, “Elliptic Genera of 2dN= 2 Gauge Theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.333no. 3, (2015) 1241–1286,arXiv:1308.4896 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Yangians and cohomology rings of laumon spaces,

    B. Feigin, M. Finkelberg, A. Negut,, and L. Rybnikov, “Yangians and cohomology rings of laumon spaces,”Sel. Math.17no. 3, (2011) 573–607,arXiv:0812.4656 [math.AG]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Higgsingqq-character and irreducibility,

    T. Kimura, “Higgsingqq-character and irreducibility,”arXiv:2205.08312 [math.QA]

  63. [71]

    Kimura,Instanton Counting, Quantum Geometry and Algebra

    T. Kimura,Instanton Counting, Quantum Geometry and Algebra. Springer, 7, 2021. arXiv:2012.11711 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Instanton counting and Chern-Simons theory,

    A. Iqbal and A.-K. Kashani-Poor, “Instanton counting and Chern-Simons theory,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7no. 3, (2003) 457–497,arXiv:hep-th/0212279

    2003 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Little string instanton partition functions and scalar propagators,

    B. Filoche and S. Hohenegger, “Little string instanton partition functions and scalar propagators,”JHEP08(2023) 114,arXiv:2212.09602 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,

    N. A. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7no. 5, (2003) 831–864,arXiv:hep-th/0206161

    2003 arXiv

  67. [75]

    The modular properties and the integral representations of the multiple elliptic gamma functions,

    A. Narukawa, “The modular properties and the integral representations of the multiple elliptic gamma functions,”arXiv:math/0306164. 42

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Restricted partition pairs,

    W. H. Burge, “Restricted partition pairs,”J. Comb. Theory Ser. A63no. 2, (1993) 210–222

    1993

  69. [77]

    AGT, Burge pairs and minimal models,

    M. Bershtein and O. Foda, “AGT, Burge pairs and minimal models,”JHEP06(2014) 177,arXiv:1404.7075 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Conformal blocks ofWN minimal models and AGT correspondence,

    K. B. Alkalaev and V. A. Belavin, “Conformal blocks ofWN minimal models and AGT correspondence,”JHEP07(2014) 024,arXiv:1404.7094 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras,

    T. Kimura and G. Noshita, “Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras,”JHEP05(2024) 208,arXiv:2310.08545 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Surface Operators from M-strings,

    H. Mori and Y. Sugimoto, “Surface Operators from M-strings,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 2, (2017) 026001,arXiv:1608.02849 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations andqq-characters,

    N. Nekrasov, “BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations andqq-characters,”JHEP03(2016) 181,arXiv:1512.05388 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, “Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,”Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 167–197, arXiv:0906.3219 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Loop and surface operators inN= 2gauge theory and Liouville modular geometry,

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, S. Gukov, Y. Tachikawa, and H. Verlinde, “Loop and surface operators inN= 2gauge theory and Liouville modular geometry,”JHEP01(2010) 113, arXiv:0909.0945 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Affine SL(2) conformal blocks from 4d gauge theories,

    L. F. Alday and Y. Tachikawa, “Affine SL(2) conformal blocks from 4d gauge theories,” Lett. Math. Phys.94(2010) 87–114,arXiv:1005.4469 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Quiver W-algebras,

    T. Kimura and V. Pestun, “Quiver W-algebras,”Lett. Math. Phys.108no. 6, (2018) 1351–1381,arXiv:1512.08533 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Quiver elliptic W-algebras,

    T. Kimura and V. Pestun, “Quiver elliptic W-algebras,”Lett. Math. Phys.108no. 6, (2018) 1383–1405,arXiv:1608.04651 [hep-th]. 43

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.