Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Numerical computation of the EOB potential q using self-force results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.03392 v2 pith:BTGXVALH submitted 2015-12-09 gr-qc

Numerical computation of the EOB potential q using self-force results

classification gr-qc
keywords resultscomputationnumericalself-forcetermsapproachbinarycompact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The effective-one-body theory (EOB) describes the conservative dynamics of compact binary systems in terms of an effective Hamiltonian approach. The Hamiltonian for moderately eccentric motion of two non-spinning compact objects in the extreme mass-ratio limit is given in terms of three potentials: $a(v), \bar{d}(v), q(v)$. By generalizing the first law of mechanics for (non-spinning) black hole binaries to eccentric orbits, [\prd{\bf92}, 084021 (2015)] recently obtained new expressions for $\bar{d}(v)$ and $q(v)$ in terms of quantities that can be readily computed using the gravitational self-force approach. Using these expressions we present a new computation of the EOB potential $q(v)$ by combining results from two independent numerical self-force codes. We determine $q(v)$ for inverse binary separations in the range $1/1200 \le v \lesssim 1/6$. Our computation thus provides the first-ever strong-field results for $q(v)$. We also obtain $\bar{d}(v)$ in our entire domain to a fractional accuracy of $\gtrsim 10^{-8}$. We find to our results are compatible with the known post-Newtonian expansions for $\bar{d}(v)$ and $q(v)$ in the weak field, and agree with previous (less accurate) numerical results for $\bar{d}(v)$ in the strong field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.