REVIEW 1 cited by
Modelling and Analysis of Quantum Key Distribution Protocols, BB84 and B92, in Communicating Quantum Processes(CQP) language and Analysing in PRISM
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Proof of security of cryptographic protocols theoretically establishes the strength of a protocol and the constraints under which it can perform, it does not take into account the overall design of the protocol. In the past model checking has been successfully applied to classical cryptographic protocols to weed out design flaws which would have otherwise gone unnoticed. Quantum cryptographic protocols differ from their classical counterparts, in their ability to detect the presence of an eavesdropper. Although unconditional security has been proven for both BB84 and B92 protocols, in this paper we show that identifying an eavesdropper's presence is constrained on the number of qubits exchanged. We first model the protocols in CQP and then explain the mechanism by which we have translated this into a PRISM model. We mainly focus on the protocols' ability to detect an active eavesdropper and the extent to which an eavesdropper can retrieve the shared key without being detected by either party. We then conclude by comparing the performance of the protocols.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond the Quantum Promise: A Security Analysis of Classical Control in Quantum Key Distribution
Symbolic Tamarin models of standards-grounded QKD protocols reveal three control-plane vulnerabilities and confirm two countermeasures.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.