Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Explainable Representations of Malware Behavior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.12328 v1 pith:BUDA5JCO submitted 2021-06-23 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords malwarenetworkbehavioralempheventscomprehensibledatapatterns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We address the problems of identifying malware in network telemetry logs and providing \emph{indicators of compromise} -- comprehensible explanations of behavioral patterns that identify the threat. In our system, an array of specialized detectors abstracts network-flow data into comprehensible \emph{network events} in a first step. We develop a neural network that processes this sequence of events and identifies specific threats, malware families and broad categories of malware. We then use the \emph{integrated-gradients} method to highlight events that jointly constitute the characteristic behavioral pattern of the threat. We compare network architectures based on CNNs, LSTMs, and transformers, and explore the efficacy of unsupervised pre-training experimentally on large-scale telemetry data. We demonstrate how this system detects njRAT and other malware based on behavioral patterns.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tiny Enough to Break In: Agentic Remote Access Trojans Powered by Small Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A locally hosted 8B language model closed an autonomous observe-decide-act attack loop against a vulnerable target but completed only 10.9% of tasks, showing architectural feasibility without operational reliability.

Pith tools