Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 4 cited by

Broadband phonon production from axion absorption

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that axion dark matter from 1 to 100 meV can excite phonons in crystals with randomly oriented nuclear spins, breaking translation symmetry so the rate tracks the phonon density of states without frequency scanning.

desk verdict New broadband axion-phonon mechanism is real for atomic crystals, but the molecular targets H2/D2/H2O/D2O need a fix for ortho-para spin-rotation coupling before their projected rates can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10542 v1 pith:BUKAE6YN submitted 2024-11-15 hep-ph

Itay M. Bloch , Simon Knapen , Amalia Madden , Giacomo Marocco This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords axiondarkmatterbroadbandphonondetectionincoherentabsorptionnuclearspindensityofstatesmeV-scaleaxionscrystaltargetsQCD
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that axion dark matter in the 1--100 meV mass range can be detected through incoherent phonon excitation in ordinary crystals, without magnetic fields or frequency scanning. The key mechanism is that randomly oriented nuclear spins break the translational symmetry of the crystal as seen by the axion, so momentum conservation no longer ties the phonon momentum to the tiny axion momentum; any phonon whose energy equals $m_a$ can be created. The absorption rate per unit mass then equals $R = 2\pi \rho_a m_a \, g_p^2 \sum_j \xi_j D_j(m_a) / \sum_j m_j$, proportional to the atom-projected phonon density of states $D_j(\omega)$ rather than to a narrow resonance. The paper evaluates this rate for eight solids, finds that light nuclei with unpaired spins (hydrogen, deuterium, lithium, beryllium) are the best targets, and estimates QCD-axion rates of a few events per 10 kg-year exposure. If correct, this turns the difficult meV-to-100 meV axion window into a broadband search that needs only two or three target materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the atom-projected phonon density of states, $D_j(\omega) = (1/3N)\sum_{\nu k} |\epsilon^j_{\nu k}|^2 \delta(\omega - \omega_{\nu k})$, together with the lattice-averaged spin coupling $\xi_j = (1/N)\sum_\ell \lambda_{\ell j}^2 J_{\ell j}(J_{\ell j}+1)/m_{\ell j}$. The argument splits the absorption rate into coherent and incoherent terms: the coherent terms carry the phase $e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot(\ell-\ell')}$ that enforces $\mathbf{k}\approx 0$ in a polarised crystal, while the incoherent term has no such phase after the random-spin ensemble average. Because the final-spin sum becomes a resolution of the identity, only $D_j(\omega)$ and $\xi_j$ control the rate, and since $D_j(\omega)$ has support across a wide range of phonon energies, the detection scheme is broadband.

What would settle it

Measure the phonon density of states of solid H$_2$ and D$_2$ at meV energies and compare a cryogenic calorimeter's axion-absorption spectrum with the prediction $R \propto \sum_j \xi_j D_j(m_a)$: a rate that drops steeply below the ortho--para rotational splitting, rather than tracing $D(m_a)$, would falsify the degenerate-spin assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that axion absorption in an unpolarised crystal is broadband because the random spin configuration acts as disorder that fully breaks translation symmetry in the phonon effective theory. In a polarised crystal the coherent terms in the rate sum to a momentum-conservation condition $\delta_{\mathbf{k},0}$, so only zero-momentum optical phonons can absorb the axion and the response is a narrow Breit-Wigner peak. In an unpolarised crystal the ensemble average over spin configurations kills those interference terms, leaving the diagonal, incoherent term with no momentum-restricting phase; the sum over final spin states collapses to the identity because all spin configurations are degenerate in energy. The result is Eq. (31), $R = 2\pi \rho_a m_a \, g_p^2 \sum_j \xi_j D_j(m_a)/\sum_j m_j$, where $\xi_j$ is the lattice-averaged spin coupling of the $j$-th nucleus and $D_j(\omega)$ is its atom-projected phonon density of states. The same mechanism operates for the axion-induced time-dependent nuclear electric dipole moment, and the paper shows that this second channel is subdominant in standard QCD axion models.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that flipping a nuclear spin costs no energy beyond the phonon it creates, an assumption that molecular crystals with identical nuclei, where exchange symmetry couples spin to molecular rotation, may violate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single unpolarised crystal target can search the full energy range where its phonon density of states has support, with no frequency scanning or applied magnetic field.
  • Two or three light-nucleus targets (hydrogen- or deuterium-bearing solids) cover essentially the whole 1--100 meV axion mass window.
  • The previously studied coherent, narrow-band optical-phonon channel is not needed for sensitivity; the incoherent channel gives a comparable or larger rate in unpolarised crystals.
  • For standard QCD axion models, the spin coupling channel dominates over the induced nuclear electric dipole channel, so the rate is controlled by $\xi_j D_j(m_a)$.
  • Reaching the predicted QCD-axion rate of a few events per 10 kg-year requires a corresponding reduction of low-energy backgrounds in single-phonon calorimeters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the degenerate-spin assumption fails in molecular solids through ortho--para exchange couplings, the promised low-mass coverage for H$_2$, D$_2$, H$_2$O and D$_2$O would shift, and the rate formula would need a spin-flip energy threshold.
  • Beyond the paper: the same 'disorder makes absorption broadband' principle suggests that other forms of quenched disorder, such as isotope mixtures, impurities, or amorphous targets, could generate broadband phonon absorption for other dark matter candidates.
  • Beyond the paper: a testable extension is to measure the partial phonon density of states of solid H$_2$ and D$_2$ with inelastic neutron scattering and use it to predict the full spectral shape that a future single-phonon calorimeter should see.
  • Beyond the paper: for axion-like particles with suppressed photon coupling but large nucleon coupling, this channel may be the only terrestrial probe in the 1--100 meV window.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new phonon-based direct-detection channel for axion dark matter in the meV to 100 meV mass range. Starting from the non-relativistic axion-nucleon interaction, the authors derive the rate for incoherent single-phonon emission in crystals with randomly oriented nuclear spins. Their central result, Eq. (31), states that the rate per unit mass is proportional to the axion mass, the axion-proton coupling squared, and the atom-projected phonon density of states, with no momentum-conservation restriction. They compute this rate for H2, D2, Al2O3, GaAs, H2O, D2O, Be, and Li2O, compare it with the previously studied coherent absorption, estimate the subleading contribution from the axion-induced nuclear electric dipole moment, and discuss the experimental prospects for TESSERACT-style phonon sensors and the relevant backgrounds. The headline claim is that only two or three target materials suffice to cover the 1-100 meV axion mass range without frequency scanning.

Significance. If Eq. (31) is valid for a given material, the paper makes an important methodological contribution: it shows that spin disorder in an unpolarised crystal removes the momentum-matching condition, so the axion absorption spectrum becomes proportional to the phonon density of states. This turns a narrowband search into a broadband one and gives falsifiable predictions for Be, Li2O, Al2O3, and GaAs, which do not involve any fitting parameters and depend only on the axion couplings and independently measured or computed phonon spectra. The coherent limit is checked against the existing literature, and the paper is careful about nuclear form factors and isotope averaging. However, the most promising projected rates and the '2-3 materials cover the full range' claim rely on molecular crystals (H2, D2, H2O, D2O), where a load-bearing spin-degeneracy assumption fails because identical-nucleus exchange symmetry couples nuclear spin to molecular rotation. The mechanism as rigorously proven is therefore restricted to atomic crystals, and the headline coverage claim is not yet established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II D, Eqs. (25)-(31), footnote 4] The derivation of Eq. (31) replaces the final-spin sum in Eq. (25) by the identity using the assertion in footnote 4 that all spin configurations have degenerate energies. This is the load-bearing assumption of the incoherent rate. It is valid for atomic crystals in the absence of magnetic fields, but it fails for the molecular crystals H2, D2, H2O, and D2O, where exchange symmetry of identical nuclei entangles nuclear spin with molecular rotation. For H2, para-H2 has total nuclear spin I=0 and even rotational J, while ortho-H2 has I=1 and odd J, with E(J=1)-E(J=0) about 15 meV; D2 has a comparable gap of several meV. A one-proton spin flip in a para molecule changes the total molecular spin and forces a rotational transition, so the energy-conserving delta function should involve delta(ma - omega_k - Delta_rot), not delta(ma - omega_k). The footnote's observation that the axion flips only a single spin limits which final states can contribute, but it does not imply that those states are degenerate with the initial state. Equations (25)-(31) and the low-mass rates for these molecular targets are therefore not established as written.
  2. [Table I, Eq. (28), and Fig. 2] The material-specific input for solid H2 is internally inconsistent even apart from the general degeneracy issue. The phonon density of states is taken from Ref. [52], which is a measurement on solid parahydrogen. Parahydrogen molecules have total nuclear spin I=0 and do not supply the independent spin-1/2 degree of freedom per proton that Eq. (28) and Table I assume when assigning xi_H = 0.75 GeV^-1 to every H site. A single-proton spin flip in such a molecule is an off-diagonal transition to an ortho-like state, not a reorientation within the degenerate manifold used in Eq. (27). The same objection applies to D2 and to the hydrogen/deuterium nuclei in H2O and D2O. Consequently, the low-mass parts of the H2, D2, H2O, and D2O contours in Fig. 2 are not supported by the calculation as written, and the claim that 2-3 materials cover the 1-100 meV range is not established. The rates for Be, Li2O, Al2O3, and GaAs do not have this defect because their nuclei are not subject to identical-nucleus exchange within the crystal unit.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. II D] The statement that random spin orientations 'break translation symmetry' is imprecise: the ensemble-averaged crystal is translation invariant, and what removes the momentum-conservation delta function is the suppression of the off-diagonal interference term in Eq. (19) by uncorrelated spin orientations. Consider rewording to avoid the impression that the ensemble itself is a disordered static configuration.
  2. [Sec. IV and Fig. 2] Section IV states that the aluminium pair-breaking threshold of 7.2 meV sets a theoretical lower limit on the detectable axion mass, yet Fig. 2 shows contours extending down to 1 meV. Please clarify which readout or sensor is assumed for masses below 7.2 meV, or restrict the plotted range accordingly.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'Brioullin zone' in the Introduction, 'gann' in Appendix B, and the notation in Eq. (34) for the spin operators appears garbled. A careful proofread would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the incoherent absorption rate in Eq. (31) is derived from first principles and external phonon densities of states; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and first-principles. Starting from the axion-nucleon Lagrangian (Eq. (1)-(2)), the non-relativistic Hamiltonian (Eq. (4)), and the crystal matrix element (Eq. (15)), the authors use Fermi's Golden Rule to obtain the coherent and incoherent rates. The incoherent rate in Eq. (31) follows from (i) replacing the final-spin sum by the identity under the explicitly stated degenerate-spin assumption (footnote 4), (ii) the ensemble average in Eq. (27), and (iii) the definition of the atom-projected phonon density of states D_j(omega) in Eq. (29). The phonon densities of states are external inputs obtained from published DFT calculations and neutron-scattering measurements (Refs. [51]-[56]), not quantities fitted in this paper. The nuclear spin form factors lambda_j are taken from external nuclear-structure calculations (Refs. [88], [90]). The coherent result is rederived and checked against the earlier literature (Ref. [44]), which is an independent cross-check, not a load-bearing self-citation. The one self-citation (Ref. [55], a public package used for the sapphire phonon DOS) provides an external computational input rather than a result asserted by this paper. The spin-degeneracy assumption may be physically invalid for molecular crystals such as H2, D2, H2O, and D2O, and this is an openly stated limitation that could affect the projected rates; however, that is a correctness risk, not a circularity, because Eq. (31) is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. No fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The derivation is therefore not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central rate formula uses no fitted parameters. All numerical inputs, such as nuclear form factors, spins, masses, and phonon densities of states, are taken from prior measurements or computations. The main unstated assumption is the spin-phonon factorisation and spin degeneracy, which is safe for atomic crystals but questionable for molecular targets.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Fermi's Golden rule applies to the axion-to-single-phonon transition.
    Used in Eq. (16) to convert matrix elements into absorption rates.
  • domain assumption Spin and phonon degrees of freedom factorise as product states (Eq. (9)).
    Needed to separate spin and spatial matrix elements; likely valid for atomic crystals but questionable for molecular crystals with identical nuclei.
  • domain assumption All nuclear spin configurations are degenerate in energy.
    Invoked in Sec. II D to replace the final-spin sum with the identity; requires zero magnetic field and no spin-rotation coupling.
  • domain assumption No sizable internal or external magnetic fields, so the potential commutes with position and D can be replaced by the gradient.
    Used in Eqs. (6)-(8) and before Eq. (4) to simplify the Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The phonon density of states from external DFT or neutron scattering accurately represents the targets.
    DoS inputs for all eight materials are taken from cited references and not recomputed or assigned error bars.
  • domain assumption The Born-Oppenheimer approximation holds and electronic excitations are negligible.
    Appendix B; valid when the axion frequency is far below electronic gaps and the material has no unpaired electrons.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Broadband phonon production from axion absorption." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BUKAE6YN

@misc{pith2026241110542,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Broadband phonon production from axion absorption},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BUKAE6YN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10542}
}
abstract

We show that axion dark matter in the range meV $\lesssim m_a\lesssim$ 100 meV can incoherently excite phonons in crystal targets with unpolarised nuclear spins. This can occur through its coupling to nuclear spins and/or through its induced time-dependent electric dipole moment in nuclei. Due to the random orientation of the nuclear spins, translation symmetry is broken in the phonon effective theory, allowing axion absorption to create phonons with unrestricted momentum. The absorption rate is therefore proportional to the phonon density of states, which generically has support across a wide range of energies, allowing for a broadband detection scheme. We calculate the absorption rate for solid $\text{H}_2$, $\text{D}_2$, $\text{Al}_2\text{O}_3$, $\text{GaAs}$, $\text{H}_2\text{O}$, $\text{D}_2\text{O}$, $\text{Be}$ and $\text{Li}_2 \text{O}$, and find that materials containing light, non-zero spin nuclei are the most promising. The predicted rates for the QCD axion are of the order of a few events / 10 kg-year exposure, setting an ambitious target for the required exposure and background suppression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10542 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison of rate for coherent and incoherent ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Rate contours for the axion-proton (left) and axion-neutron coupling (right), corresponding to a signal rate of 3 events [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin-Dependent Scattering of Sub-GeV Dark Matter: Models and Constraints

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A new calculation of spin-dependent sub-GeV dark matter phonon scattering shows only the light scalar mediator model retains testable parameter space, conditional on the supernova trapping window.

  2. Suppressed Quantum Effects of Weakly Coupled Waves

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nonclassical (quantum) signatures of weakly coupled waves are suppressed by an extra power of the tiny conversion efficiency η (~10^-21 for axions, ~10^-33 for gravitons), so experiments cannot establish the quantizat...

  3. Piezoelectric Bulk Acoustic Resonators For Dark Photon Detection

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A piezoelectric quartz resonator could detect dark photon dark matter through resonant phonon excitation, with projected sensitivity orders of magnitude beyond current experiments.

  4. Spin-dependent dark matter scattering in quasi-two-dimensional magnets

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spin-dependent dark matter scattering off magnons in quasi-2D (anti)ferromagnets can produce an order-10 percent daily modulation, offering directional sensitivity for keV to MeV mass dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [52]

    Colognesi, M

    D. Colognesi, M. Celli, and M. Zoppi, Density of phonon states in solid parahydrogen from inelastic neutron scattering, The Journal of Chemical Physics 120 (03, 2004) 5657–5663, [https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1649312]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1649312 2004

  2. [1]

    C. B. Adams et al., Axion Dark Matter , in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.14923

    arXiv 2021

  3. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  4. [3]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  5. [4]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

    1978

  6. [5]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226

    1978

  7. [6]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127–132

    1983

  8. [7]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136

    1983

Show all 99 references
  1. [8]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141

    1983

  2. [9]

    K. J. Bae, J.-H. Huh, and J. E. Kim, Update of axion CDM energy, JCAP 09 (2008) 005, [ arXiv:0806.0497]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Wantz and E

    O. Wantz and E. P. S. Shellard, Axion Cosmology Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 123508, [arXiv:0910.1066]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, and C. Tamarit, Standard Model—axion—seesaw—Higgs portal inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke , JCAP 08 (2017) 001, [arXiv:1610.01639]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics , Nature 539 (2016), no

    S. Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics , Nature 539 (2016), no. 7627 69–71, [arXiv:1606.07494]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [13]

    V. B. . Klaer and G. D. Moore, The dark-matter axion mass, JCAP 11 (2017) 049, [ arXiv:1708.07521]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, More axions from strings, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021), no. 2 050, [arXiv:2007.04990]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Buschmann, J

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement , Nature Commun. 13 (2022), no. 1 1049, [arXiv:2108.05368]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 6 065014, [ arXiv:1412.0789]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Ringwald and K

    A. Ringwald and K. Saikawa, Axion dark matter in the post-inflationary Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking scenario, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 8 085031, [arXiv:1512.06436]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 049908 (2016)]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    K. A. Beyer and S. Sarkar, Ruling out light axions: The writing is on the wall , SciPost Phys. 15 (2023), no. 1 003, [arXiv:2211.14635]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Horns, J

    D. Horns, J. Jaeckel, A. Lindner, A. Lobanov, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, Searching for WISPy Cold Dark Matter with a Dish Antenna , JCAP 04 (2013) 016, [ arXiv:1212.2970]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Baryakhtar, J

    M. Baryakhtar, J. Huang, and R. Lasenby, Axion and hidden photon dark matter detection with multilayer optical haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 3 035006, [arXiv:1803.11455]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Liu et al., Broadband Solenoidal Haloscope for Terahertz Axion Detection , Phys

    BREAD Collaboration, J. Liu et al., Broadband Solenoidal Haloscope for Terahertz Axion Detection , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 13 131801, [arXiv:2111.12103]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Mitridate, T

    A. Mitridate, T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Detectability of Axion Dark Matter with Phonon Polaritons and Magnons , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 9 095005, [ arXiv:2005.10256]. 12

    2020 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Berlin and T

    A. Berlin and T. Trickle, Absorption of Axion Dark Matter in a Magnetized Medium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 18 181801, [ arXiv:2305.05681]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    D. J. E. Marsh, J. I. McDonald, A. J. Millar, and J. Sch¨ utte-Engel,Axion detection with phonon-polaritons revisited, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 3 035036, [ arXiv:2209.12909]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Sch¨ utte-Engel, D

    J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, D. J. E. Marsh, A. J. Millar, A. Sekine, F. Chadha-Day, S. Hoof, M. N. Ali, K.-C. Fong, E. Hardy, and L. ˇSmejkal, Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection , JCAP 08 (2021) 066, [arXiv:2102.05366]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    ARIADNE Collaboration, A. A. Geraci et al., Progress on the ARIADNE axion experiment , Springer Proc. Phys. 211 (2018) 151–161, [ arXiv:1710.05413]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Craig, A

    N. Craig, A. Hook, and S. Kasko, The Photophobic ALP, JHEP 09 (2018) 028, [ arXiv:1805.06538]

    2018 arXiv

  21. [28]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199–202

    1981

  22. [29]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian) , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  23. [30]

    Wu et al., Search for Axionlike Dark Matter with a Liquid-State Nuclear Spin Comagnetometer , Phys

    T. Wu et al., Search for Axionlike Dark Matter with a Liquid-State Nuclear Spin Comagnetometer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), no. 19 191302, [ arXiv:1901.10843]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Garcon et al., Constraints on bosonic dark matter from ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance , Sci

    A. Garcon et al., Constraints on bosonic dark matter from ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance , Sci. Adv. 5 (2019), no. 10 eaax4539, [ arXiv:1902.04644]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [32]

    NASDUCK Collaboration, I. M. Bloch, G. Ronen, R. Shaham, O. Katz, T. Volansky, and O. Katz, New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a Floquet quantum detector, Sci. Adv. 8 (2022), no. 5 abl8919, [arXiv:2105.04603]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [33]

    NASDUCK Collaboration, I. M. Bloch, R. Shaham, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky, and O. Katz, Constraints on axion-like dark matter from a SERF comagnetometer, Nature Commun. 14 (2023), no. 1 5784, [arXiv:2209.13588]

    2023

  27. [34]

    Wei et al., Dark matter search with a strongly-coupled hybrid spin system , arXiv:2306.08039

    K. Wei et al., Dark matter search with a strongly-coupled hybrid spin system , arXiv:2306.08039

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    Xu et al., Constraining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search, Commun

    Z. Xu et al., Constraining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search, Commun. Phys. 7 (2024), no. 1 226, [ arXiv:2309.16600]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    D. F. Jackson Kimball et al., Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr) , Springer Proc. Phys. 245 (2020) 105–121, [ arXiv:1711.08999]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [37]

    P. W. Graham, S. Hacı¨ omero˘ glu, D. E. Kaplan, Z. Omarov, S. Rajendran, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Storage ring probes of dark matter and dark energy , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 5 055010, [arXiv:2005.11867]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Chigusa, T

    S. Chigusa, T. Moroi, K. Nakayama, and T. Sichanugrist, Dark matter detection using nuclear magnetization in magnet with hyperfine interaction , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 9 095007, [arXiv:2307.08577]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    I. M. Bloch and O. Katz, A Rotating-Wave Comagnetometer Detector for Particle Physics , arXiv:2410.16360

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, and K. Van Tilburg, Resonant absorption of bosonic dark matter in molecules, Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018), no. 4 041001, [arXiv:1709.05354]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [41]

    S. A. Hertel, A. Biekert, J. Lin, V. Velan, and D. N. McKinsey, Direct detection of sub-gev dark matter using a superfluid 4He target, Phys. Rev. D 100 (Nov, 2019) 092007

    2019

  35. [42]

    Biekert, C

    SPICE/HeRALD Collaboration Collaboration, A. Biekert, C. Chang, C. W. Fink, M. Garcia-Sciveres, E. C. Glazer, W. Guo, S. A. Hertel, S. Kravitz, J. Lin, M. Lisovenko, R. Mahapatra, D. N. McKinsey, J. S. Nguyen, V. Novosad, W. Page, P. K. Patel, B. Penning, H. D. Pinckney, M. Py...

    2022

  36. [43]

    Anthony-Petersen et al., Demonstration of the HeRALD superfluid helium detector concept , Phys

    HeRALD, SPICE Collaboration, R. Anthony-Petersen et al., Demonstration of the HeRALD superfluid helium detector concept , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 7 072006, [ arXiv:2307.11877]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Mitridate, K

    A. Mitridate, K. Pardo, T. Trickle, and K. M. Zurek, Effective field theory for dark matter absorption on single phonons , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 1 015010, [arXiv:2308.06314]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    O. A. Ashour and S. M. Griffin, Pressure-Tunable Targets for Light Dark Matter Direct Detection: The Case of Solid Helium , arXiv:2409.02439

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    A. R. Bhatt, K. W. Kim, and M. A. Stroscio, Theoretical calculation of longitudinal-optical-phonon lifetime in GaAs , Journal of Applied Physics 76 (09,

  40. [47]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, and G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely , JHEP 01 (2016) 034, [ arXiv:1511.02867]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Mitridate, T

    A. Mitridate, T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Dark matter absorption via electronic excitations , JHEP 09 (2021) 123, [ arXiv:2106.12586]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Berlin, A

    A. Berlin, A. J. Millar, T. Trickle, and K. Zhou, Physical signatures of fermion-coupled axion dark matter, JHEP 05 (2024) 314, [ arXiv:2312.11601]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Campbell-Deem, P

    B. Campbell-Deem, P. Cox, S. Knapen, T. Lin, and T. Melia, Multiphonon excitations from dark matter scattering in crystals , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 3 036006, [arXiv:1911.03482]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 102, 019904 (2020)]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [51]

    del Rosso, M

    L. del Rosso, M. Celli, D. Colognesi, S. Rudi´ c, N. J. English, and L. Ulivi, Density of phonon states in cubic 13 ice ic, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125 (10,

  45. [53]

    A. Frei, E. Gutsmiedl, C. Morkel, A. R. M¨ uller, S. Paul, M. Urban, H. Schober, S. Rols, T. Unruh, and M. H¨ olzel,Density of states in solid deuterium: Inelastic neutron scattering study , Phys. Rev. B 80 (Aug, 2009) 064301

    2009

  46. [54]

    P. Goel, N. Choudhury, and S. L. Chaplot, Lattice dynamics of lithium oxide , Pramana 63 (Aug., 2004) 409–412

    2004

  47. [55]

    Knapen, J

    S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 1 015014, [ arXiv:2104.12786]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Hawari, I

    A. Hawari, I. Al-Qasir, V. Gillette, B. Wehring, and T. Zhou, Ab initio generation of thermal neutron scattering cross sections, Proceedings of the PHYSOR 2004: The Physics of Fuel Cycles and Advanced Nuclear Systems - Global Developments (01, 2004)

    2004

  49. [57]

    Yamanaka, B

    N. Yamanaka, B. K. Sahoo, N. Yoshinaga, T. Sato, K. Asahi, and B. P. Das, Probing exotic phenomena at the interface of nuclear and particle physics with the electric dipole moments of diamagnetic atoms: A unique window to hadronic and semi-leptonic CP violation , Eur. Phys. J....

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics , Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119–169, [hep-ph/0504231]

    2005 arXiv

  51. [59]

    I. B. Khriplovich and S. K. Lamoreaux, CP violation without strangeness: Electric dipole moments of particles, atoms, and molecules . 1997

    1997

  52. [60]

    V. V. Flambaum, I. B. Khriplovich, and O. P. Sushkov, On the Possibility to Study P Odd and T Odd Nuclear Forces in Atomic and Molecular Experiments , Sov. Phys. JETP 60 (1984) 873

    1984

  53. [61]

    de Vries, E

    J. de Vries, E. Epelbaum, L. Girlanda, A. Gnech, E. Mereghetti, and M. Viviani, Parity- and Time-Reversal-Violating Nuclear Forces, Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 218, [ arXiv:2001.09050]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Engel, M

    J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and U. van Kolck, Electric Dipole Moments of Nucleons, Nuclei, and Atoms: The Standard Model and Beyond , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71 (2013) 21–74, [ arXiv:1303.2371]

    2013 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Yamanaka, T

    N. Yamanaka, T. Yamada, and Y. Funaki, Nuclear electric dipole moment in the cluster model with a triton: 7Li and 11B, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019), no. 5 055501, [arXiv:1907.08091]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    V. V. Flambaum, D. Budker, and A. Wickenbrock, Oscillating nuclear electric dipole moments inside atoms, arXiv:1909.04970

    1909 arXiv

  57. [65]

    C. W. Fink et al., Characterizing TES Power Noise for Future Single Optical-Phonon and Infrared-Photon Detectors, AIP Adv. 10 (2020), no. 8 085221, [arXiv:2004.10257]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Golwala, J

    S. Golwala, J. Gao, D. Moore, B. Mazin, M. Eckart, B. Bumble, P. Day, H. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, A wimp dark matter detector using mkids , Journal of Low Temperature Physics 151 (2008) 550–556

    2008

  59. [67]

    D. C. Moore, S. R. Golwala, B. Bumble, B. Cornell, P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, Position and energy-resolved particle detection using phonon-mediated microwave kinetic inductance detectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 (2012) 232601, [arXiv:1203.4549]

    2012 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Cardani, N

    L. Cardani, N. Casali, I. Colantoni, A. Cruciani, S. Di Domizio, M. Martinez, V. Pettinacci, G. Pettinari, and M. Vignati, Final results of CALDER: kinetic inductance light detectors to search for rare events , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 7 636, [ arXiv:2104.06850]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Cruciani et al., BULLKID: Monolithic array of particle absorbers sensed by kinetic inductance detectors , Appl

    A. Cruciani et al., BULLKID: Monolithic array of particle absorbers sensed by kinetic inductance detectors , Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 (2022), no. 21 213504, [arXiv:2209.14806]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Temples et al., Performance of a Kinetic Inductance Phonon-Mediated Detector at the NEXUS Cryogenic Facility, arXiv:2402.04473

    D. Temples et al., Performance of a Kinetic Inductance Phonon-Mediated Detector at the NEXUS Cryogenic Facility, arXiv:2402.04473

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Essig et al., Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade , in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022

    R. Essig et al., Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade , in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.08297

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, M. Pyle, and K. M. Zurek, Detection of Light Dark Matter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials , Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 386–390, [arXiv:1712.06598]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Hochberg, M

    Y. Hochberg, M. Pyle, Y. Zhao, and K. M. Zurek, Detecting Superlight Dark Matter with Fermi-Degenerate Materials, JHEP 08 (2016) 057, [ arXiv:1512.04533]

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Zatschler, Background simulations for the SuperCDMS experiment – Efficient GEANT4 simulations using Importance Biasing , PoS T AUP2023(2024) 024

    SuperCDMS Collaboration, B. Zatschler, Background simulations for the SuperCDMS experiment – Efficient GEANT4 simulations using Importance Biasing , PoS T AUP2023(2024) 024

    2024

  67. [75]

    Lattaud et al., Sub-MeV Dark Matter Searches with EDEL WEISS: results and prospects, PoS EPS-HEP2021 (2022) 153

    Edelweiss Collaboration, H. Lattaud et al., Sub-MeV Dark Matter Searches with EDEL WEISS: results and prospects, PoS EPS-HEP2021 (2022) 153

    2022

  68. [76]

    K. V. Berghaus, R. Essig, Y. Hochberg, Y. Shoji, and M. Sholapurkar, Phonon background from gamma rays in sub-GeV dark matter detectors , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 2 023026, [ arXiv:2112.09702]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    P. Du, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and M. Sholapurkar, Sources of Low-Energy Events in Low-Threshold Dark-Matter and Neutrino Detectors , Phys. Rev. X 12 (2022), no. 1 011009, [arXiv:2011.13939]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    R. K. Romani, Y.-Y. Chang, R. Mahapatra, M. Platt, M. Reed, I. Rydstrom, B. Sadoulet, B. Serfass, and 14 M. Pyle, A Transition Edge Sensor Operated in Coincidence with a High Sensitivity Phonon Veto for Photon Coupled Rare Event Searches , arXiv:2408.11158

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Adari et al., EXCESS workshop: Descriptions of rising low-energy spectra, SciPost Phys

    P. Adari et al., EXCESS workshop: Descriptions of rising low-energy spectra, SciPost Phys. Proc. 9 (2022) 001, [arXiv:2202.05097]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Anthony-Petersen et al., A stress-induced source of phonon bursts and quasiparticle poisoning , Nature Commun

    R. Anthony-Petersen et al., A stress-induced source of phonon bursts and quasiparticle poisoning , Nature Commun. 15 (2024), no. 1 6444, [ arXiv:2208.02790]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Romani, Observations of the LEE in a Two Channel SPICE Athermal Phonon Detector , in EXCESS 2023, 2023

    R. Romani, Observations of the LEE in a Two Channel SPICE Athermal Phonon Detector , in EXCESS 2023, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    Anthony-Petersen et al., Low Energy Backgrounds and Excess Noise in a Two-Channel Low-Threshold Calorimeter, arXiv:2410.16510

    R. Anthony-Petersen et al., Low Energy Backgrounds and Excess Noise in a Two-Channel Low-Threshold Calorimeter, arXiv:2410.16510

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    C. Chang et al., The tesseract dark matter project , in Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest , 2021, https://www.snowmass21.org/docs/files/summaries/ CF/SNOWMASS21-CF1_CF2-IF1_IF8-120.pdf

    2021

  76. [84]

    Buschmann, C

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long, and B. R. Safdi, Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 9 091102, [ arXiv:2111.09892]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Carenza, T

    P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, G. Guo, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, and A. Mirizzi,Improved axion emissivity from a supernova via nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung, JCAP 10 (2019), no. 10 016, [arXiv:1906.11844]. [Erratum: JCAP 05, E01 (2020)]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Co’, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi, and T. Rauscher, Getting the most on supernova axions, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 2 023001, [arXiv:2306.01048]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Taufertsh¨ ofer, M

    N. Taufertsh¨ ofer, M. Garcia-Sciveres, and S. M. Griffin, Broad-Range Directional Detection of Light Dark Matter in Cryogenic Ice , arXiv:2301.04778

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Engel and P

    J. Engel and P. Vogel, Spin dependent cross-sections of weakly interacting massive particles on nuclei , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 3132–3135

    1989

  81. [89]

    Engel, S

    J. Engel, S. Pittel, and P. Vogel, Nuclear physics of dark matter detection, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 1 (1992) 1–37

    1992

  82. [90]

    B. S. Hu, J. Padua-Arg¨ uelles, S. Leutheusser, T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, and J. D. Holt, Ab Initio Structure Factors for Spin-Dependent Dark Matter Direct Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 7 072502, [arXiv:2109.00193]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    K. S. Krane, Introductory Nuclear Physics. 1987

    1987

  84. [92]

    Broglia, G

    R. Broglia, G. Col` o, G. Onida, and H. Roman, Solid State Physics of Finite Systems . 01, 2004

    2004

  85. [93]

    L. I. Schiff, Measurability of nuclear electric dipole moments, Phys. Rev. 132 (Dec, 1963) 2194–2200

    1963

  86. [94]

    Cafiero, S

    M. Cafiero, S. Bubin, and L. Adamowicz, Non-born–oppenheimer calculations of atoms and molecules, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5 (2003) 1491–1501

    2003

  87. [95]

    Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics

    C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics . Wiley, 8 ed., 2004. Appendix A: Nuclear form factors In this appendix, we review how the proportionality constants λℓj are being computed. For completeness, we also briefly discuss the effect of P & T violating nuclear potential...

    2004

  88. [96]

    Nuclear spin form factors To go from the axion-nucleon coupling in (4) to the axion-nucleus effective interaction in (5), we must ac- count for the nuclear form factors. Since the axion wave- length is much larger than the size of the nucleus, we can add the contributions of t...

  89. [97]

    axioelectric

    P & T violating forces for large nuclei In the heavy-pion limit and nonrelativistic approxima- tion, the potential experienced by the outer nucleon inter- acting with the nucleons in the core can be approximated by: VP T= 1 2mim2π ηiσN · ∇ρ(r) (A8) where ρ(r) is the number den...

  90. [98]

    Diatomic rate To evaluate the rate, we need the polarisation vectors of the optical phonons. For diatomic crystals, these are known at long wavelengths to be [95] ϵ1,LO,k ≈ s A1P j′ Aj′ ˆk, ϵ2,LO,k ≈ − s A2P j′ Aj′ e−ik·x0 2 ˆk, (C1) for the longitudinal optical (LO) modes 7, ...

  91. [99]

    If there are multiple isotopes present in a material, then we must take this into account in the mass and nuclear form factor of a lattice site

    Isotopic averaging In writing (19), we are implicitly assuming that we have isotopically pure materials. If there are multiple isotopes present in a material, then we must take this into account in the mass and nuclear form factor of a lattice site. In principle, also the peri...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.