Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Greater Transferability and Accuracy of Norm-conserving Pseudopotentials using Nonlinear Core Corrections

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.09717 v1 pith:BV6V2BV6 submitted 2023-07-19 physics.chem-ph

Greater Transferability and Accuracy of Norm-conserving Pseudopotentials using Nonlinear Core Corrections

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords nlccfunctionaltransferabilityall-electronatomizationcalculationscomparedcore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an investigation into the transferability of pseudopotentials (PPs) with a nonlinear core correction (NLCC) using the Goedecker, Teter, and Hutter (GTH) protocol across a range of pure GGA, meta-GGA and hybrid functionals, and their impact on thermochemical and non-thermochemical properties. The GTH-NLCC PP for the PBE density functional demonstrates remarkable transferability to the PBE0 and $\omega$B97X-V exchange-correlation functionals, and relative to no NLCC, improves agreement significantly for thermochemical benchmarks compared to all-electron calculations. On the other hand, the B97M-rV meta-GGA functional performs poorly with the PBE-derived GTH-NLCC PP, which is mitigated by reoptimizing the NLCC parameters for this specific functional. The findings reveal that atomization energies exhibit the greatest improvements from use of the NLCC, which thus provides an important correction needed for covalent interactions relevant to applications involving chemical reactivity. Finally we test the NLCC-GTH PPs when combined with medium-size TZV2P molecularly optimized (MOLOPT) basis sets which are typically utilized in condensed phase simulations, and show that they lead to consistently good results when compared to all-electron calculations for atomization energies, ionization potentials, barrier heights, and non-covalent interactions, but lead to somewhat larger errors for electron affinities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.