Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLM-Guided Search for Deletion-Correcting Codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00613 v2 pith:BVHHXOFL submitted 2025-04-01 cs.AI cs.ITcs.NEmath.IT

classification cs.AIcs.ITcs.NEmath.IT
keywords searchcodescodefunctionsdeletion-correctingevolutionaryfunctionllm-guided
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Finding deletion-correcting codes of maximum size has been an open problem for over 70 years, even for a single deletion. We adapt FunSearch, a large language model (LLM)-guided evolutionary search, to discover functions that construct deletion-correcting codes at short code lengths. For a single deletion, our search finds a function that we prove constructs the conjectured-optimal Varshamov-Tenengolts code. For multiple deletions and quaternary edit codes, the discovered functions improve on prior explicit, search-based, and neural constructions but remain empirical heuristics without new theoretical insights. We study design choices for LLM-guided evolutionary search and find that, for our problem, compute is better allocated to sampling more functions than to longer reasoning traces per function, and that co-evolving natural language descriptions with code hurts search quality. We propose deduplicating logically identical functions during evolution, which we find critical for search diversity. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLM-guided evolutionary search for information theory and code design and represent the first application of such methods for constructing error-correcting codes. However, in our current formulation, evaluating a function scales exponentially with code length, limiting the approach to short codes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Using Reasoning Models to Generate Search Heuristics that Solve Open Instances of Combinatorial Design Problems

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-generated search heuristics run through the CPro1 protocol with the reasoning model o3-mini-high produced verified constructions resolving open instances in 7 Handbook design families and newer problems.

Pith tools