Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 109 references

Zero-field superconducting vortices and Majorana zero modes pinned by magnetic islands in correlated Rashba systems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A magnetic island can pin a superconducting vortex with no applied field, and odd vorticity traps Majorana zero modes in correlated Rashba superconductors.

desk verdict Careful GL theory for a genuinely new field-free vortex mechanism, but the headline thresholds assume Δ survives at η→1, which the paper neither verifies nor justifies. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12338 v2 pith:BVLWXBKG submitted 2026-03-12 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hall

Panagiotis Kotetes , Brian M. Andersen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hall
keywords zero-fieldvortexMajoranazeromodesRashbaspin-orbitcouplingmagneticislandcorrelationsGinzburg-Landautheoryspin-to-fluxconversiontopologicalsuperconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a magnetic island placed on a two-dimensional Rashba superconductor can create a stable superconducting vortex even with zero external magnetic field. The island's out-of-plane spin moment converts into effective magnetic flux through Zeeman and Rashba magnetoelectric effects, and the superconducting phase acquires a vorticity set by the integer closest to the induced flux. Magnetic correlations in the superconductor amplify the island's effective spin moment via an RPA-like enhancement, lowering the energy cost of vortex formation. The authors predict that an odd-vorticity vortex hosts Majorana zero modes: a core–rim pair in a Rashba metal and a single domain-wall mode on a superconducting topological-insulator surface. Concrete estimates place the required exchange energy at about 0.9 meV for FeTeSe-type surfaces and about 56 meV for a clean Rashba metal, with strong disorder reducing the latter to a few meV.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-to-vorticity conversion factor ζ (and its magnetic-correlation-dressed version ζ̃), which converts the island's total spin moment S_z into a number of flux quanta ν_ind entering the superconducting phase winding. The energy functional (D_φ/2)(ν_φ − ζν_I)² makes the stabilized vorticity simply the nearest integer to ν_ind. In the correlated case, the island's spin moment is renormalized by the random-phase-approximation factor 1/(1−Vχ_⊥), and the effective radius is max{ρ_I, ξ_M}, where ξ_M is the magnetic correlation length. The formalism yields closed-form vortex profiles built from modified Bessel functions K₀(ρ/ρ_s).

What would settle it

Measure the local density of states above a magnetic island (radius much larger than the coherence length) on a FeTeSe surface in zero field: if no zero-bias conductance peak appears at the vortex core while the vortex is present, or if no vortex appears for exchange splittings above 0.9 meV, the central claim is contradicted. Alternatively, a self-consistent BdG calculation that includes pairing-gap feedback near η→1 would settle whether the assumed uniform Δ survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that an exchange-coupled magnetic island, combined with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic correlations, produces a spin-to-flux conversion that stabilizes superconducting vortices at zero field. The vortex ground-state energy is written as a parabola in the vorticity, (D_φ/2)(ν_φ − ζ ν_I)², so the stabilized vorticity is the nearest integer to the induced flux ν_ind = ζν_I. Including magnetic correlations renormalizes the island's spin moment by an RPA factor 1/(1−Vχ_⊥) and introduces a modified conversion factor ζ̃, so that a single-unit vortex appears once the dressed exchange energy exceeds a threshold set by the London penetration depth, the effective island r

Load-bearing premise

The Rashba superconductor remains a coherent, uniform-gap spin-singlet superconductor even when tuned arbitrarily close to a magnetic instability; if magnetic correlations instead suppress pairing or nucleate local magnetic order, the vortex-energy balance and Majorana criteria change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a superconducting topological-insulator surface with FeTeSe-type parameters, a single-unit zero-field vortex becomes stable when the dressed exchange energy reaches ~0.9 meV, which is within the range of magnetic-impurity splittings already reported.
  • In a clean Rashba metal with Pb/Si(111)-type parameters, the threshold rises to ~56 meV, but strong disorder (mean free path ~4 nm) lowers it to a few meV, making the mechanism viable in disordered elemental superconductors.
  • Odd vorticity traps Majorana zero modes: a core–rim pair in a Rashba metal when |I_z| > √(E_F²+Δ²), and a single domain-wall Majorana mode on a TI surface when the exchange and pairing gaps swap hierarchy.
  • Magnetic correlations enhance the effective island moment through an RPA factor, allowing vortex pinning even when the bare exchange is far below the threshold.
  • The pinned vortex is not tied to Yu-Shiba-Rusinov in-gap states, so the Majorana signatures may be cleaner than in sub-coherence-length impurity scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the RPA-enhancement picture holds, materials closer to a magnetic instability (without ordering) should show zero-field vortices at lower island magnetizations; this could be tested by doping a fixed Rashba superconductor toward the magnetic transition while keeping superconductivity intact.
  • The same spin-to-flux mechanism appears directly adaptable to other spin textures such as skyrmion lattices or helical magnetic orders, where the local spin profile would act as a distributed source for vorticity.
  • Because the topological criterion for the Rashba metal is an exchange field exceeding the Fermi energy, gate-tunable semiconductor–superconductor hybrids could realize the vortex-MZM pair at modest exchange fields; a next-step calculation of the quasiparticle spectrum and zero-bias conductance peak would test this.
  • The paper's assumption that the pairing gap Δ stays uniform outside the vortex core while η→1 remains unchecked; a self-consistent BdG calculation that includes pairing-gap feedback near the magnetic instability is the natural test of whether the predicted thresholds survive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Ginzburg-Landau theory for zero-field superconducting vortices pinned by extended magnetic islands exchange-coupled to two-dimensional Rashba superconductors. The island spin moment is converted into magnetic flux through Zeeman and Rashba magnetoelectric couplings, and the resulting vortex vorticity is selected by minimizing an effective energy of the form E ∝ D_φ (ν_φ − ζ ν_I)^2. Magnetic correlations dress the island moment through an RPA-like enhancement, lowering the threshold for vortex formation. Using a K0(r/ρ_I) island profile, the authors obtain exact analytical expressions for the magnetic field, magnetization, and vector potential, and derive a threshold exchange energy for single-vortex stability. They then apply the framework to superconducting TI surface states (FeTeSe-like parameters, threshold Ĩ_z ~ 0.9 meV) and Rashba metals (Pb/Si(111)-like parameters, threshold Ĩ_z ~ 56 meV clean, lower with disorder). Finally, they argue that odd vorticity traps Majorana zero modes: a core-rim pair for a Rashba metal and a single domain-wall Majorana mode for TI surface states.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a concrete new mechanism for zero-field vortex-Majorana physics in experimentally accessible systems, with falsifiable energy scales. The analytical GL solution is a genuine strength: the vortex profiles and energy minimization are carried out in closed form, and the GL coefficients are taken from published microscopic derivations rather than fitted to the target phenomena. The paper also makes honest and clear statements about its assumptions, including the non-self-consistent treatment of the pairing gap. The main risk is precisely that assumption: the quantitative predictions rely on tuning close to a magnetic instability, where the survival of a uniform conventional pairing gap is not guaranteed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV A, Sec. IV E, Sec. V A, Eq. (64), Eq. (69)]
  2. [Sec. VI A and Appendix G]
  3. [Sec. I, Sec. V A, Eq. (64)]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V C, text near Eq. (69)] The text says 'the first fraction on the l.h.s. of Eq. (69)' but the fraction ln(λ_L/ξ_S)/ln(max{ρ_I,ξ_M}/min{ρ_I,ξ_M}) appears on the right-hand side. Please correct.
  2. [Footnote 76] The reference to 'Sec. C 2' should be 'Appendix C 2'.
  3. [Fig. 3 and Appendix B] Several benchmark values are written as e.g. '0.019×20−2' and '0.08×10−2'. Presumably these should be powers of 10, i.e., 0.019×10^{-2}. Please check the formatting throughout Appendix B and the figure caption.
  4. [Sec. V A] The discussion of Fig. 4 states η∈[0,0.95), while the text earlier allows η∈[0,1) and later quotes η=0.999. The notation should be made consistent and the values used in the threshold estimates should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: vortex and MZM criteria are derived from a GL functional with independently published microscopic coefficients; no quantity is fitted to the target vorticity or MZM outcome.

full rationale

The central result is the GL energy E=(D_phi/2)(nu_phi - zeta_tilde nu_tilde_I)^2, whose minimization gives nu_phi as the nearest integer to zeta_tilde nu_tilde_I. This is a derivation, not a fit: zeta_tilde and D_phi are obtained from the EOMs (Eqs. 36-37) and the coefficients X, D, chi_spin_perp are taken from published microscopic calculations (Refs. 56, 59, 97, 98), which do not use the vortex or MZM outcome as input. The threshold Eq. (69) is the algebraic solution of the derived single-vortex condition zeta_tilde nu_tilde_I = 1/2; the stated values 0.9 meV and 56 meV are obtained by inserting material parameters, and the RPA factor 1/(1-V chi_spin_perp) is a standard mean-field renormalization, not an output relabeled as an input. The same dressed exchange field I_tilde_z then enters the MZM criterion |I_tilde_z| > sqrt(E_F^2 + Delta^2), but this is a consistency condition, not circularity. The paper explicitly states that Delta is not treated self-consistently; near eta -> 1 the same repulsion would generically tend to suppress the singlet gap, so the quantitative thresholds are conditional on the assumed uniform gap. This is a correctness/validity limitation, not a circularity. Self-citations (Refs. 56, 97, 98) are load-bearing for coefficients but are published, parameter-free derivations with explicit assumptions; under the review rule they count as external evidence. No step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The mechanism is a self-contained GL construction; no parameters are fitted to the target result. However, quantitative predictions require choosing S_z, ρ_I, V, ℓ, and Λ; the RPA enhancement depends sensitively on V near η=1.

free parameters (5)
  • Island spin moment S_z
    Controls induced flux ν_I=ΓS_z/Φ0; treated as free in Eqs. (17)-(18) and stability analysis.
  • Island radius ρ_I
    One of three lengths setting conversion factor ζ; assumed ≫ ξ_S and chosen by hand in Secs. III-V.
  • Hubbard interaction V (or η) = η∈[0,1), e.g., 0.95, 0.999 in Fig. 4
    Sets magnetic correlation length ξ_M and RPA enhancement; explicitly listed by authors as a free parameter; must be tuned near η=1 for the enhancement.
  • Mean-free path ℓ (disorder) = 4 nm for Pb/Si(111)
    Renormalizes ξ_S and λ_L in dirty limit; taken from experiment [28,69].
  • UV cutoff Λ = 20 meV (TI case)
    Regulates high-energy contribution to χ_spin_⊥ and χ_Z; value chosen, affects threshold estimates.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Rashba SC remains a conventional spin-singlet superconductor with a uniform gap outside the vortex core even when magnetic correlations are strong (α_M>0, η<1).
    Invoked in Secs. IV and V; the entire GL treatment and the suppression of YSR/CdGM states depend on it.
  • domain assumption The magnetic island is exchange-coupled to the 2D electrons only and induces no Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states.
    Stated in Sec. I and conclusion; no microscopic proof; if wrong, in-gap states alter energy and MZMs.
  • domain assumption Ginzburg-Landau expansion to first/second order in island/magnetization fields with ξ_S neglected is valid.
    Secs. III and IV assume ξ_S ≪ ρ_I, λ_L, ξ_M; all results derived outside the core.
  • domain assumption Prior microscopic results for χ_R, χ_spin_⊥, and superfluid stiffness (Refs. 56, 59, 97, 98) are correct and applicable to inhomogeneous islands.
    Adopted in Appendix C; a localized-island generalization is not derived.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic approximation: spatial variations are slow compared to Fermi wavelength, so the local BdG Hamiltonian and topological indices apply.
    Sec. VI; subsequently coarse-grained to step functions for Δ and I_z.
  • standard math London limit and Maxwell equation ∇×B=J apply to the 2D SC; fluxoid quantization holds.
    Used in Eqs. (10)-(13) of Sec. III.
invented entities (1)
  • None
    purpose: No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced
    The magnetization M_z is an induced electronic field, not a new entity; the magnetic island and Rashba SOC are experimental inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Zero-field superconducting vortices and Majorana zero modes pinned by magnetic islands in correlated Rashba systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVLWXBKG

@misc{pith2026260312338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Zero-field superconducting vortices and Majorana zero modes pinned by magnetic islands in correlated Rashba systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVLWXBKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12338}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a route for pinning zero-field superconducting vortices in systems which are exchange-coupled to magnetic islands and feature Rashba spin-orbit coupling. We consider islands with sizes which greatly exceed those of the vortex cores and possess out-of-plane magnetic moments. A crucial ingredient of our approach is that it considers superconductors which are governed by magnetic correlations without, however, exhibiting long range magnetic order. The arising total magnetization is inhomogeneous and its gradients generate a nonzero vorticity in the superconducting phase. Vortices become energetically stable due to the energy reduction brought about from the generation of electronic magnetization. Using our developed framework, we make concrete predictions for the emergence of zero-field vortices and Majorana zero modes in superconducting topological insulator surfaces and planar Rashba superconductors. Our theory uncovers a nonstandard path for trapping composite vortex-Majorana excitations in systems which appear to be within experimental reach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of an extended magnetic impurity, i.e., a magnetic island, which is embedded in a quasi-2D SC of thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The heat map shows the induced vorticity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (d), in which case ˜ζ remains practically constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Results for the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top view of the system and vortex-MZMs for (a) a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    This further implies that at this level of approximation the variablesρ ± enter at zeroth order inG

    W eak Coupling Limit In the case that|G|is sufficiently weak, we consider the spin-to-vorticity conversion factor ˜ζat zeroth order with respect toG. This further implies that at this level of approximation the variablesρ ± enter at zeroth order inG. Hence, in the weak coupling limit, the lengthscales ρ± are approximately given byλ L andξ M . Due to the f...

  2. [2]

    Thus, here we have the condition|G|=|G| max, which leads toρ ± →¯ρwith the common lengthscale 1/¯ρ= q 1/ξ2 M + 1/λ2 L /2

    Strong Coupling Limit Having examined the weak coupling regime in detail, we now explore the other extreme limit, i.e., the one in which the coupling between magnetization and magnetic fields is the strongest possible. Thus, here we have the condition|G|=|G| max, which leads toρ ± →¯ρwith the common lengthscale 1/¯ρ= q 1/ξ2 M + 1/λ2 L /2. The arising coin...

  3. [3]

    Superconducting T opological Surface States From Ref. 56, one finds that the magnetoelectic coef- ficient is discontinuous across ∆ = 0 and that for ∆>0 it takes the form: χR = sgn(µ) 8Φ0 fδ +δ 2 ln δ 1 +f δ ,(C1) which is parametrized using the functionf δ = √ 1 +δ 2, that depends on the dimensionless variableδ= ∆/E soc. In the above we defined the Rashb...

  4. [4]

    ultraviolet

    Rashba Metal We now repeat the above procedure for a Rashba metal. In contrast to the TI case, here, the Fermi energy is the dominant energy scale, i.e., much larger than the Rashba splitting and the pairing gap. In fact, for certain calculations within this so-called quasiclassical limit,E F can be taken to be equal to positive infinity. In this sense, a...

  5. [5]

    For convenience, we assume for the rest of this paragraph that|ν ϕ|= 1, in which caseP νϕ becomes a projector operator

    F u-Kane Model We proceed by first briefly reminding the reader of the emergence of MZMs in the Fu-Kane model [3]. For convenience, we assume for the rest of this paragraph that|ν ϕ|= 1, in which caseP νϕ becomes a projector operator. Since in the Fu-Kane model ˜Iz(ρ) is zero and as a result [P νϕ , τyσy] = 0, the two different subspaces spanned by the pr...

  6. [6]

    The addition of ˜Iz(ρ) implies that the presence of the vortex cannot effectively close the energy gap at the points of space where ∆(ρ) = 0

    Our Model In stark contrast to the Fu-Kane framework, a different mechanism becomes relevant in our work. The addition of ˜Iz(ρ) implies that the presence of the vortex cannot effectively close the energy gap at the points of space where ∆(ρ) = 0. The MZM appears here as a conse- quence of a Majorana chiral edge mode which is trapped at the domain wall wh...

  7. [7]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green,Paired States of Fermions in Two dimensions with Breaking of Parity and Time- Reversal Symmetries, and the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  8. [8]

    G. E. Volovik,Fermion zero modes on vortices in chiral superconductors, JETP Lett.70, 609 (1999)

    1999

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane,Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic New Platform for Topological Quantum Com- putation Using Semiconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 040502 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Hosur, P

    P. Hosur, P. Ghaemi, R. S. K. Mong, and A. Vish- wanath,Majorana Modes at the Ends of Superconduc- tor Vortices in Doped Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 097001 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    C.-K. Chiu, M. J. Gilbert, and T. L. Hughes,Vor- tex lines in topological insulator-superconductor het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B84, 144507 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    R. R. Biswas,Majorana Fermions in Vortex Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 136401 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Z. F. Wang, H. Zhang, D. Liu, C. Liu, C. Tang, C. Song, Y. Zhong, J. Peng, F. Li, C. Nie, L. Wang, X. J. Zhou, X. Ma, Q. K. Xue, and F. Liu,Topological edge states in a high-temperature superconductor FeSe/SrTiO 3(001) film, Nat. Mat.15, 968 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Yaji, T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, J. Wen, G. D. Gu, H. Ding, and S. Shin,Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron-based superconductor, Science360, 182 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Zhang, Z

    P. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Wu, K. Yaji, Y. Ishida, Y. Kohama, G. Dai, Y. Sun, C. Bareille, K. Kuroda, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, K. Kindo, X. Wang, C. Jin, J. Hu, R. Thomale, K. Sumida, S. Wu, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, H. Ding, G. D. Gu, T. Tamegai, T. Kawakami, M. Sato, and S. Shin,Multip...

    2019

  9. [17]

    S. S. Zhang, J.-X. Yin, G. Dai, L. Zhao, T.-R. Chang, N. Shumiya, K. Jiang, H. Zheng, G. Bian, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, T. A. Cochran, X. Wu, D. Wu, J. Luo, G. Chen, H. Lin, F.-C. Chou, X. Wang, C. Jin, R. Sankar, Z. Wang, and M. Z. Hasan,Field-free p...

    2021

  10. [18]

    L. Kong, L. Cao, S. Zhu, M. Papaj, G. Dai, G. Li, P. Fan, W. Liu, F. Yang, X. Wang, S. Du, C. Jin, L. Fu, H.-J. Gao, and H. Ding,Tunable vortex Majorana zero modes in LiFeAs superconductor, Nat. Commun.12, 4146 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Z. Wang, P. Zhang, G. Xu, L. K. Zeng, H. Miao, X. Xu, T. Qian, H. Weng, P. Richard, A. V. Fedorov, H. Ding, X. Dai, and Z. Fang,Topological nature of the F eSe0.5T e0.5 superconductor, Phys. Rev. B92, 115119 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    G. Xu, B. Lian, P. Tang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological Superconductivity on the Surface of Fe- Based Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 047001 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    E. J. K¨ onig and P. Coleman,Crystalline symmetry pro- tected helical Majorana modes in the iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 207001 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    S. Qin, L. Hu, X. Wu, X. Dai, C. Fang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu,Topological Vortex Phase Transitions in Iron- Based Superconductors, Sci. Bull.64, 1207 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    C.-K. Chiu, T. Machida, Y. Huang, T. Hanaguri, and F.-C. Zhang,Scalable Majorana vortex modes in iron- based superconductors, Sci. Adv.6, eaay0443 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Pathak, S

    V. Pathak, S. Plugge, and M. Franz,Majorana bound states in vortex lattices on iron-based superconductors, Annals of Physics435, 168431 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Li, X.-J

    C. Li, X.-J. Luo, L. Chen, D. E. Liu, F.-C. Zhang, and X. Liu,Controllable Majorana vortex states in iron-based superconducting nanowires, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwac095 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Yaji, T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, J. Wen, G. D. Gu, H. Ding, and S. Shin,Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of iron-based superconductor, Science360, 182 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao,Observation of pristine Majorana bound state in iron-based superconductor, Sci- ence362, 333 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Q. Liu, C. Chen, T. Zhang, R. Peng, Y. J. Yan, C. H. P. Wen, X. Lou, Y. L. Huang, J. P. Tian, X. L. Dong, G. W. Wang, W. C. Bao, Q. H. Wang, Z. P. Yin, Z.-X. Zhao, and D. L. Feng,Robust and clean Majorana zero mode in the vortex core of high-temperature supercon- ductor (Li 0....

    2018

  21. [29]

    Machida, Y

    T. Machida, Y. Sun, S. Pyon, S. Takeda, Y. Kohsaka, T. Hanaguri, T. Sasagawa, and T. Tamegai,Zero-energy vortex bound state in the superconducting topological surface state of Fe(Se,Te), Nat. Mater.18, 811 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    L. Kong, S. Zhu, M. Papaj, L. Cao, H. Isobe, W. Liu, D. Wang, P. Fan, H. Chen, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H.-J. Gao, and H. Ding, Observation of half-integer level shift of vortex bound states in an iron-based superconductor, Nat. Phys.15, 1181 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    S. Zhu, L. Kong, L. Cao, H. Chen, M. Papaj, S. Du, Y. Xing, W. Liu, D. Wang, C. Shen, F. Yang, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, Y.-Y. Zhang, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao,Nearly quantized conductance plateau of vortex zero mode in an iron-based superconductor, Sci- ence367, 1...

    2020

  24. [32]

    J.-X. Yin, Z. Wu, J.-H. Wang, Z.-Y. Ye, J. Gong, X.-Y. Hou, L. Shan, A. Li, X.-J. Liang, X.-X. Wu, J. Li, C.-S. 25 Ting, Z. Wang, J.-P. Hu, P.-H. Hor, H. Ding, and S. H. Pan,Observation of a robust zero-energy bound state in iron-based superconductor Fe(Te,Se), Nat. Phys.11, 5...

    2015

  25. [33]

    Thampy, J

    V. Thampy, J. Kang, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, W. Bao, A. T. Savici, J. Hu, T. J. Liu, B. Qian, D. Fobes, Z. Q. Mao, C. B. Fu, W. C. Chen, Q. Ye, R. W. Erwin, T. R. Gentile, Z. Tesanovic, and C. Broholm,Friedel- Like Oscillations from Interstitial Iron in Superconduct- ing Fe 1+y...

    2012

  26. [34]

    G. C. M´ enard, A. Mesaros, C. Brun, F. Debontridder, D. Roditchev, P. Simon, and T. Cren,Isolated pairs of Majorana zero modes in a disordered superconducting lead monolayer, Nat. Commun.10, 2587 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    S. S. Pershoguba, S. Nakosai, and A. V. Balatsky, Skyrmion-induced bound states in a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B94, 064513 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    G. Yang, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss,Majorana bound states in magnetic skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B93, 224505 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    S. Rex, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin,Majorana bound states in magnetic skyrmions imposed onto a supercon- ductor, Phys. Rev. B100, 064504 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Garnier, A

    M. Garnier, A. Mesaros, and P. Simon,Topological su- perconductivity with orbital effects in magnetic skyrmion based heterostructures, arXiv:1909.12671

    1909 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Garnier, A

    M. Garnier, A. Mesaros, and P. Simon,Topological superconductivity with deformable magnetic skyrmions, Commun. Phys.2, 126 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Persky, A

    E. Persky, A. V. Bjørlig, I. Feldman, A. Almoalem, E. Altman, E. Berg, I. Kimchi, J. Ruhman, A. Kanigel, and B. Kalisky,Magnetic memory and spontaneous vortices in a van der Waals superconductor, Nature607, 692 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    B. A. Levitan, Y. Oreg, and E. Berg,Anomalous cur- rents and spontaneous vortices in spin-orbit coupled su- perconductors, npj Quantum Materials10, 58 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    H. S. Greenside, E. I. Blount, and C. M. Varma,Possible Coexisting Superconducting and Magnetic States, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 49 (1981)

    1981

  35. [43]

    Tachiki, A

    M. Tachiki, A. Kotani, H. Matsumoto, and H. Umezawa,Spin-spiral ordering in magnetic supercon- ductors, Solid State Commun.31, 927 (1979)

    1979

  36. [44]

    Tachiki, H

    M. Tachiki, H. Matsumoto, T. Koyama, and H. Umezawa,Self-induced vortices in magnetic supercon- ductors, Solid State Commun.34, 19 (1980)

    1980

  37. [45]

    C. G. Kuper, M. Revzen, and A. Ron,Ferromagnetic Superconductors: A Vortex Phase in Ternary Rare- Earth Compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 1545 (1980)

    1980

  38. [46]

    Tewari, D

    S. Tewari, D. Belitz, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and J. Toner,Spontaneous Flux Lattices in Ferromagnetic Spin-Triplet Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 177002 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    T. K. Ng and C. M. Varma,Spontaneous Vortex Phase Discovered?, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 330 (1997)

    1997

  40. [48]

    Deguchi, E

    K. Deguchi, E. Osaki, S. Ban, N. Tamura, Y. Simura, T. Sakakibara, I. Satoh, and N. K. Sato,Absence of Meiss- ner State and Robust Ferromagnetism in the Supercon- ducting State of UCoGe: Possible Evidence of Sponta- neous Vortex State, J. Phys. Soc. Japan.79, 083708 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    W.-H. Jiao, Q. Tao, Z. Ren, Y. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Evidence of spontaneous vortex ground state in an iron-based ferromagnetic superconductor, npj Quantum Mater.2, 50 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    A. V. Samokhvalov, A. S. Mel’nikov, and A. I. Buzdin, Vortex states induced by proximity effect in hybrid ferromagnet-superconductor systems, Phys. Rev. B76, 184519 (2007)

    2007

  43. [51]

    L. A. B. Olde Olthof, X. Montiel, J. W. A. Robinson, and A. I. Buzdin,Superconducting vortices generated via spin-orbit coupling at superconductor/ferromagnet interfaces, Phys. Rev. B100, 220505(R) (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    K. M. D. Hals, M. Schecter, and M. S. Rud- ner,Composite Topological Excitations in Ferromagnet- Superconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 017001 (2016). [47]Generation of a superconducting vortex via N´ eel skyrmions, J. Baumard, J. Cayssol, F. S. Bergeret, and A....

    2016

  45. [53]

    Jiang, X

    K. Jiang, X. Dai, and Z. Wang,Quantum anomalous vortex and Majorana zero mode in iron-based supercon- ductor Fe(Te,Se), Phys. Rev. X9, 011033 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Caroli, P

    C. Caroli, P. G. De Gennes, and J. Matricon,Bound Fermion states on a vortex line in a type II supercon- ductor, Phys. Lett.9, 307 (1964)

    1964

  47. [55]

    P. Fan, F. Yang, G. Qian, H. Chen, Y.-Y. Zhang, G. Li, Z. Huang, Y. Xing, L. Kong, W. Liu, K. Jiang, C. Shen, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, Z. Wang, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao,Observation of magnetic adatom-induced Majorana vortex and its hybridization with field-induced ...

    2021

  48. [56]

    Y. S. Lin, S. Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. P. Pan, H. Ru, J. J. Zhu, B. K. Xiang, K. Liu, C. L. Zheng, L. Y. Wei, M. X. Wang, Z. K. Liu, L. Chen, K. Jiang, Y. F. Guo, Z. Wang, and Y. H. Wang,Direct Observation of Quantum Anomalous Vortex in Fe(Se,Te), Phys. Rev. X13, 011046 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Yu,Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Phys

    L. Yu,Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Phys. Sin.21, 75 (1965); H. Shiba,Classical spins in superconductors, Prog. Theor. Phys.40, 435 (1968); A. I. Rusinov,Theory of gap- less superconductivity in alloys containing paramagnetic impurities, Z...

    1965

  50. [58]

    J. M. Tranquada, G. Xu and I. A. Zaliznyak,Magnetism and superconductivity in Fe1+yTe1−xSex, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter32, 374003 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Kreisel, P

    A. Kreisel, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen,On the Remarkable Superconductivity of FeSe and Its Close Cousins, Symmetry12, 1402 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Therefore, di- rect replacement of ˆπyields the Zeeman term in Eq

    This is understood by recalling that the original expres- sion of the Zeeman term within the BdG framework takes the formE Z =gi ˆπ× ˆπ ·τzσ/(4m). Therefore, di- rect replacement of ˆπyields the Zeeman term in Eq. (2). When we instead consider a gauge in which ˆπdoes not inclu...

  53. [61]

    Kotetes, H

    P. Kotetes, H. O. M. Sura, and B. M. Andersen, Anatomy of spin and current generation from magne- tization gradients in topological insulators and Rashba metals, Phys. Rev. B108, 155310 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    P. G. de Gennes,Superconductivity Of Metals And Al- loys (Advanced Books Classics), (Westview Press 1966). 26

    1966

  55. [63]

    Note that either term leads to a legitimate form for the coupling

    This symmetrization allows us to avoid any ambiguity in the choice of the form of the coupling, since any linear combinationc 1Iz(r) ˆz· ∇×a(r) +c2a(r)· ∇× ˆzIz(r) , withc 1 +c 2 =Xdoes not alter the bulk physics. Note that either term leads to a legitimate form for the coupli...

  56. [64]

    S. S. Pershoguba, K. Bj¨ ornson, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and A. V. Balatsky,Currents Induced by Magnetic Im- purities in Superconductors with Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 116602 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    56, the coefficientχ R was denotedχ

    Note that in Ref. 56, the coefficientχ R was denotedχ

  58. [66]

    M. Roig, P. Kotetes, and B. M. Andersen,Superconduc- ting diodes from magnetization gradients, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144503 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Kotetes, M

    P. Kotetes, M. Roig, and B. M. Andersen,Nonrecipro- cal Equilibrium4π-Periodic Josephson Effect from Poor Man ’s Majorana Zero Modes, arXiv:2409.13027 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Klein, D

    T. Klein, D. Braithwaite, A. Demuer, W. Knafo, G. Lapertot, C. Marcenat, P. Rodi¨ ere, I. Sheikin, P. Stro- bel, A. Sulpice, and P. Toulemonde,Thermodynamic phase diagram of Fe(Se0.5Te0.5) single crystals in fields up to28tesla, Phys. Rev. B82, 184506 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    W. A. Little and R. D. Parks,Observation of Quan- tum Periodicity in the Transition Temperature of a Su- perconducting Cylinder, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 9 (1962); R. D. Parks and W. A. Little,Fluxoid Quantization in a Multiply-Connected Superconductor, Phys. Rev.133, A97 (1964)

    1962

  62. [70]

    Prada, P

    E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. W. A. de Moor, A. Geresdi, E. J. H. Lee, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, J. Nyg ˚ ard, R. Aguado, and L. P. Kouwenhoven,From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowires, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 575 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-Body Quantum Theo- ry in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction, (Ox- ford, 2004; online edn, Oxford Academic, 2023)

    2004

  64. [72]

    Kong and D

    L.-Y. Kong and D. Hong,Emergent vortex Majorana zero mode in iron-based superconductors, Acta. Phys. Sin.69, 110301 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    H. Lei, R. Hu, E. S. Choi, J. B. Warren, and C. Petrovic, Pauli-Limited Upper Critical Field of Fe 1+yTe1−xSex, Phys. Rev. B81, 094518 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    G. C. M´ enard, S. Guissart, C. Brun, R. T. Leriche, M. Trif, F. Debontridder, D. Demaille, D. Roditchev, P. Si- mon, and T. Cren,Two-dimensional topological super- conductivity in Pb/Co/Si(111), Nat. Commun.8, 2040 (2017)

  67. [75]

    Hansmann, T

    P. Hansmann, T. Ayral, L. Vaugier, P. Werner, and S. Biermann,Long-Range Coulomb Interactions in Surface Systems: A First-Principles Description within Self- Consistently Combined GW and Dynamical Mean-Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 166401 (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer,Nonstandard Symme- try Classes in Mesoscopic Normal-Superconducting Hy- brid Structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  69. [77]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki and A. W. W. Lud- wig,Topological Insulators and Superconductors: Ten- Fold Way and Dimensional Hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  70. [78]

    G. E. Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet, (Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  71. [79]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane,Topological Defects and Gapless Modes in Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  72. [80]

    Alicea,New Directions in the Pursuit of Majorana Fermions in Solid State Systems, Rep

    J. Alicea,New Directions in the Pursuit of Majorana Fermions in Solid State Systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  73. [81]

    C 2 is no longer valid

    Note that in the case of a small Fermi energy which is comparable to ∆, the analysis that was carried out in Sec. C 2 is no longer valid. In this limit, the various parameters which govern the stabilization of supercon- ducting vortices can be obtained by extending the re- sul...

  74. [82]

    Brand, S

    C. Brand, S. Muff, M. Fanciulli, H. Pfn¨ ur, M. C. Tringides, J. H. Dil, and C. Tegenkamp,Spin-resolved band structure of a densely packed Pb monolayer on Si(111), Phys. Rev. B96, 035432 (2017)

    2017

  75. [83]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer,The Index of Elliptic Operators: I, Ann. Math.87, 484 (1968)

    1968

  76. [84]

    Jackiw and and C

    R. Jackiw and and C. Rebbi,Solitons with fermion num- ber 1/2, Phys. Rev. D13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  77. [85]

    A. Y. Kitaev,Unpaired Majorana Fermions in Quantum Wires, Phys. Usp.44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  78. [86]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma,Majo- rana Fermions and a Topological Phase Transition in Semiconductor-Superconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  79. [87]

    Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen,Helical Liquids and Majorana Bound States in Quantum Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    2010

  80. [88]

    Chatzopoulos, D

    D. Chatzopoulos, D. Cho, K. M. Bastiaans, G. O. Stef- fensen, D. Bouwmeester, A. Akbari, G. Gu, J. Paaske, B. M. Andersen, and M. P. Allan,Spatially dispersing Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in the unconventional super- conductor FeTe0.55Se0.45, Nat. Comm.12, 298 (2021)

    2021

  81. [89]

    Uldemolins, A

    M. Uldemolins, A. Mesaros, G. D. Gu, A. Palacio- Morales, M. Aprili, P. Simon, and F. Massee,Hund’s coupling mediated multi-channel quantum phase transi- tion of a single magnetic impurity in Fe(Se,Te), Nat. Comm.15, 8526 (2024)

    2024

  82. [90]

    Fischer, M

    Ø. Fischer, M. Kugler, I. Maggio-Aprile, C. Berthod, and C. Renner,Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of high- temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 353 (2007)

    2007

  83. [91]

    Arovas, A

    P. Arovas, A. J. Berlinsky, C. Kallin, and S.-C. Zhang, Superconducting Vortex with Antiferromagnetic Core, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2871 (1997)

    1997

  84. [92]

    B. M. Andersen, H. Bruus, and P. Hedeg ˚ ard,SO(5) theory of insulating vortex cores in high-Tc materials, Phys. Rev. B61, 6298 (2000)

    2000

  85. [93]

    Chen and C

    Y. Chen and C. S. Ting,Magnetic-field-induced spin-density wave in high-temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B65, 180513 (2002)

    2002

  86. [94]

    Ghosal, C

    A. Ghosal, C. Kallin, and A. J. Berlinsky,Competi- tion of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in a d-wave vortex lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 214502 (2002)

    2002

  87. [95]

    J.-X. Zhu, I. Martin, and A. R. Bishop,Spin and Charge Order around Vortices and Impurities in High-Tc Su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 067003 (2002). 27

    2002

  88. [96]

    Takigawa, M

    M. Takigawa, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida,NMR Rela- xation Time around a Vortex in Stripe Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 047001 (2003)

    2003

  89. [97]

    L. Udby, B. M. Andersen, and P. Hedeg ˚ ard,Recursion method for the quasiparticle structure of a single vortex with induced magnetic order, Phys. Rev. B73, 224510 (2006)

    2006

  90. [98]

    Schmid, B

    M. Schmid, B. M. Andersen, A. P. Kampf, and P. J. Hirschfeld,d-Wave superconductivity as a catalyst for antiferromagnetism in underdoped cuprates, New Jour- nal of Physics12, 053043 (2010)

    2010

  91. [99]

    N. B. Kopnin and E. B. Sonin,BCS Superconductivity of Dirac electrons in graphene layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246808 (2008)

    2008

  92. [100]

    N. B. Kopnin and E. B. Sonin,Supercurrent in super- conducting graphene, Phys. Rev. B82, 014516 (2010)

    2010

  93. [101]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a,Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    J.-A. Wang, M. Assili, and P. Kotetes,Topological su- perfluid responses of superconducting Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022053 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    J.-A. Wang, M. Assili, and P. Kotetes,Superfluid stiff- ness and Josephson quantum capacitance: Adiabatic ap- proach and topological effects, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023256 (2024)

    2024

  96. [104]

    Wang and P

    J.-A. Wang and P. Kotetes,Neural-Network- Assisted Detection of Superconducting Topological Semimetals,preprint onResearch Square (2024), https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5368971/v1

    2024 doi

  97. [105]

    Nishida, L

    Y. Nishida, L. Santos, and C. Chamon,Topological su- perconductors as nonrelativistic limits of Jackiw-Rossi and Jackiw-Rebbi models, Phys. Rev. B82, 144513 (2010)

    2010

  98. [106]

    Jackiw and P

    R. Jackiw and P. Rossi,Zero modes of the vortex- fermion system, Nucl. Phys. B190, 681 (1981)

    1981

  99. [107]

    Steffensen, B

    D. Steffensen, B. M. Andersen, and P. Kotetes,Trapping Majorana zero modes in vortices of magnetic texture crystals coupled to nodal superconductors, Phys. Rev. B104, 174502 (2021)

    2021

  100. [108]

    Kotetes, A

    P. Kotetes, A. Shnirman, and G. Sch¨ on,Enginee- ring and manipulating topological qubits in 1D quantum wires, J. Korean Phys. Soc.62, 1558 (2013)

    2013

  101. [109]

    Jiang, D

    L. Jiang, D. Pekker, J. Alicea, G. Refael, Y. Oreg, A. Brataas, and F. von Oppen,Magneto-Josephson effects in junctions with Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075438 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.