pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.11290 · v3 · pith:BW4PYTEKnew · submitted 2024-05-18 · 💻 cs.CL

MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords mbiasbiascontentcontextualdatasetdesigneddiversefine-tuned
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in diverse applications necessitates an assurance of safety without compromising the contextual integrity of the generated content. Traditional approaches, including safety-specific fine-tuning or adversarial testing, often yield safe outputs at the expense of contextual meaning. This can result in a diminished capacity to handle nuanced aspects of bias and toxicity, such as underrepresentation or negative portrayals across various demographics. To address these challenges, we introduce MBIAS, an LLM framework carefully instruction fine-tuned on a custom dataset designed specifically for safety interventions. MBIAS is designed to significantly reduce biases and toxic elements in LLM outputs while preserving the main information. This work also details our further use of LLMs: as annotator under human supervision and as evaluator of generated content. Empirical analysis reveals that MBIAS achieves a reduction in bias and toxicity by over 30\% in standard evaluations, and by more than 90\% in diverse demographic tests, highlighting the robustness of our approach. We make the dataset and the fine-tuned model available to the research community for further investigation and ensure reproducibility. The code for this project can be accessed here https://github.com/shainarazavi/MBIAS/tree/main. Warning: This paper contains examples that may be offensive or upsetting.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Auditing Proprietary Alignment in Large Language Models: A Comparative Framework Without a Ground-Truth Standard

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A comparative statistical framework is proposed to audit proprietary alignment in black-box LLMs by quantifying behavioral divergences from reference models rather than absolute correctness.