REVIEW 1 cited by
Data Augmentation Techniques for Process Extraction from Scientific Publications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Data Augmentation Techniques for Process Extraction from Scientific Publications
read the original abstract
We present data augmentation techniques for process extraction tasks in scientific publications. We cast the process extraction task as a sequence labeling task where we identify all the entities in a sentence and label them according to their process-specific roles. The proposed method attempts to create meaningful augmented sentences by utilizing (1) process-specific information from the original sentence, (2) role label similarity, and (3) sentence similarity. We demonstrate that the proposed methods substantially improve the performance of the process extraction model trained on chemistry domain datasets, up to 12.3 points improvement in performance accuracy (F-score). The proposed methods could potentially reduce overfitting as well, especially when training on small datasets or in a low-resource setting such as in chemistry and other scientific domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimizing Small Transformer-Based Language Models for Multi-Label Sentiment Analysis in Short Texts
On SemEval 2025 Task 11 short texts, generated data helped some BERT models, continued pretraining was mixed, and classification head changes barely mattered.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.