REVIEW 3 cited by
Simulating User Diversity in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems using Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this study, we explore the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating synthetic users and simulating user conversations with a task-oriented dialogue system and present detailed results and their analysis. We propose a comprehensive novel approach to user simulation technique that uses LLMs to create diverse user profiles, set goals, engage in multi-turn dialogues, and evaluate the conversation success. We employ two proprietary LLMs, namely GPT-4o and GPT-o1 (Achiam et al., 2023), to generate a heterogeneous base of user profiles, characterized by varied demographics, multiple user goals, different conversational styles, initial knowledge levels, interests, and conversational objectives. We perform a detailed analysis of the user profiles generated by LLMs to assess the diversity, consistency, and potential biases inherent in these LLM-generated user simulations. We find that GPT-o1 generates more heterogeneous user distribution across most user attributes, while GPT-4o generates more skewed user attributes. The generated set of user profiles are then utilized to simulate dialogue sessions by interacting with a task-oriented dialogue system.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Ideal Instruction: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Realistic Interactions
RUT-Bench evaluates 19 LLMs on realistic user tool-calling scenarios and finds success rates below 40% with further drops on non-ideal inputs.
-
WRIT: Write-Read Intensive Trajectory Synthesis for Multi-Turn User-Facing Agents
WRIT is a synthesis pipeline that generates write-read intensive trajectories along axes of write-decision count and per-decision evidence burden, enabling a 4B model to outperform GPT-5.1 on τ²-bench with reduced inf...
-
MirrorBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Conversational User-Proxy Agents for Human-Likeness
MirrorBench defines a reproducible benchmark combining lexical metrics (MATTR, Yule's K, HD-D) and LLM-judge metrics with calibration controls to measure human-likeness of user-proxy agents across four datasets.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.