Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Generalized Misner-Sharp energy in $f(R,\mathcal{G})$ gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a generalized Misner-Sharp quasilocal energy for f(R,G) gravity by integrating the unified first law and by a Kodama conserved charge, with both routes yielding the same expression.

desk verdict A competent but conditional extension of Misner-Sharp energy to f(R,G) gravity; the main formula rests on two unverified assumptions, and the paper's own admission about one of them means the FLRW and thermodynamics sections need care. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04469 v1 pith:BXT3CG3N submitted 2025-06-04 gr-qc

Amin Rezaei Akbarieh , Navid Safarzadeh Ilkhchi , Yaghoub Heydarzade This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords Misner-Sharpenergyquasilocalf(RG)gravityGauss-BonnetKodamavectorapparenthorizonthermodynamicsFLRWcosmologymodified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to establish that the Misner-Sharp quasilocal energy, originally defined in Einstein gravity for spherically symmetric spacetimes, can be generalized to f(R,G) gravity, where the action depends on both the Ricci scalar R and the Gauss-Bonnet scalar G. It derives the same generalized energy by two independent routes: integrating the unified first law and computing a conserved charge from the Kodama vector. If correct, the result reduces to the known f(R) energy when the Gauss-Bonnet coupling vanishes and to the standard Misner-Sharp energy when f(R,G)=R, so it forms a consistent extension. A reader should care because a well-defined quasilocal energy is the prerequisite for discussing the energy content of black holes and cosmologies in modified gravity, and the paper uses it to claim that f(R,G) FLRW universes exhibit non-equilibrium thermodynamics at the apparent horizon.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the generalized unified first law $dE=A\Psi_a dx^a+W dV$ together with the Kodama vector $K^\mu=-\epsilon^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\nu r$ of spherically symmetric spacetimes. The first route rewrites the field equations as an exact form $A(u,v)du+B(u,v)dv$ and integrates it; the second builds a divergence-free current $J^\mu=-T^\mu{}_\nu K^\nu$ and integrates it over a surface. The load-bearing identity is the integrability condition $\partial A/\partial v=\partial B/\partial u$ (Eq. 10), which the paper assumes so that the energy is path-independent, and in the conserved-charge approach the condition in Eq. (16) makes the current divergence-free.

What would settle it

Evaluate Eq. (10) for the FLRW metric with a nontrivial f(R,G), for instance $f=R+f_0\mathcal{G}^n$: if $\partial A/\partial \rho$ and $\partial B/\partial t$ in the variables of Eq. (25) differ at any time or radius, then path-independence fails and the proposed energy and the subsequent apparent-horizon thermodynamics are not defined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in four-dimensional f(R,G) gravity the Misner-Sharp energy within a sphere of radius r takes the explicit form given in Eq. (11), obtained by integrating the unified first law, and that the same expression emerges in Eq. (18) from the conserved charge built with the Kodama vector. The energy contains terms proportional to $f_R$, $f_G$, and their derivatives, and it reduces to the f(R) result of the earlier literature when $f_G=0$ and to the Einstein result when $f(R,\mathcal{G})=R$. In the static spherically symmetric case the integral term drops out under conditions on the radial derivatives of $f_R$ and $f_G$, and in FLRW the energy is claimed to correspond to the total matter content within the sphere. The paper further claims that for the model $f(R,\mathcal{G})=R+f_0\mathcal{G}^n$, the apparent-horizon thermodynamics acquires a non-equilibrium character, with negative surface gravity when $\dot{R}_A/(2HR_A)<1$, and that the adiabatic index $q(t)$ can switch from a decelerating to an accelerating phase.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes the energy is path-independent: the integrability condition $\partial A/\partial v=\partial B/\partial u$ is imposed rather than verified for the spacetimes studied, and the paper itself notes it is not satisfied in general.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the derivation is correct, every spherically symmetric solution of f(R,G) gravity has a well-defined quasilocal energy that reproduces the f(R) and Einstein limits, so energy comparisons between modified theories become possible.
  • The equality of the integration and Kodama-charge results means the generalized energy can be interpreted as a conserved charge, tying it to a Noether-like construction in dynamic spacetimes.
  • In the static case, the integral term in the energy vanishes when $f_R$ and $f_G$ are constant or specific curvature conditions hold, so black-hole masses in f(R,G) gravity reduce to a simpler algebraic form.
  • For FLRW, the energy within the apparent horizon is claimed to equal the total matter energy inside, and the thermodynamics is non-equilibrium, which changes how the first law is written at cosmological horizons.
  • For $f=R+f_0\mathcal{G}^n$, the adiabatic index can cross from positive to negative, offering a curvature-only route from decelerated to accelerated expansion that does not invoke dark energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step the paper does not take is to verify Eq. (10) explicitly for the FLRW metric; if it fails for generic f(R,G), the energy should be replaced by a path-dependent or amended quantity.
  • The non-equilibrium term could be interpreted as an entropy-production term in a Clausius relation at the apparent horizon; deriving that relation would test the thermodynamics claim independently.
  • The q(t) transitions for n=2,3,4 could be confronted with cosmic expansion data, for instance the redshift of the deceleration-acceleration transition, to constrain the parameters $f_0$ and $n$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a generalization of the Misner-Sharp quasilocal energy to f(R,G) gravity. It uses two methods, an integration of a 1-form derived from the field equations and a conserved charge built from the Kodama vector, and claims they give the same expression (Eqs. (11) and (18)). The result is then specialized to static spherically symmetric and FLRW spacetimes, and an apparent-horizon thermodynamic analysis is presented for the model f(R,G)=R+f0 G^n. The central derivation is formal: the key identities that make the energy path-independent and the Kodama current conserved, Eqs. (10) and (16), are imposed rather than proved, and their validity is not checked for the dynamical metrics used in later sections.

Significance. If the missing checks are supplied, the result would be a useful extension of Misner-Sharp energy to f(R,G) gravity. The paper has genuine strengths: no fitted parameters enter the central derivation, and the reductions to the f(R) result of [17] when fG=0 and to Einstein gravity when f(R,G)=R are explicit anchors. The thermodynamic part, however, is only as secure as the unverified FLRW integrability condition, so the claimed unique non-equilibrium connection is currently conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.A, Eq. (10)] The integration method rests entirely on the closedness condition ∂A/∂v = ∂B/∂u, which the text itself states 'is not satisfied in general.' This condition is never checked for the general spherically symmetric metric (5) or for the FLRW metric of Section III.B before Eq. (25) is used. If Eq. (10) fails, the integral in Eq. (11) is path-dependent and Eq. (25), together with the thermodynamic results built on it in Section IV, is not a well-defined quasilocal energy. The static case is less exposed because A=0 makes Eq. (10) trivial, but the FLRW analysis is unprotected.
  2. [Section II.B, Eq. (16)] The Kodama charge derivation asserts that ∇_μ J^μ = 0 holds only when Eq. (16) is satisfied, but no proof or verification of Eq. (16) is given for the metrics considered in Sections III.A and III.B. Since Eq. (18) is claimed to equal Eq. (11), the agreement of the two methods is contingent on an unproven condition. Unless Eq. (16) is actually satisfied, Q_J is hypersurface-dependent and Eq. (18) does not define a conserved charge, so the central equivalence claim is not established.
  3. [Section IV, Eqs. (31)-(46)] The thermodynamic analysis of the FLRW universe depends on Eq. (32), which is obtained from Eq. (25), and therefore inherits the unverified integrability condition (10). The formulas for energy density, pressure, enthalpy, specific heats, and the adiabatic index are long and are presented without derivation; at minimum, the authors should show the algebra leading from Eqs. (27)-(33) to Eq. (32) and state explicitly where Eq. (10) has been verified for the model f(R,G)=R+f0 G^n. If Eq. (10) fails for FLRW, the thermodynamic results and the claimed non-equilibrium connection do not follow.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.A] The sentence 'This Eq is not satisfied in general' should be reworded as a complete sentence, e.g., 'This equation is not satisfied in general,' and the phrase 'we drive the Misner-Sharp energy' should be 'we derive.'
  2. [Eq. (25)] The displayed expression for E_eff in the FLRW case appears to be missing a minus sign before the integral term; compare the structure of Eq. (11), where the boundary term and the integral have opposite signs.
  3. [Section III.A] The sentence 'One observers that...' should read 'One observes that...', and 'In a particular, case' should be 'In a particular case.'
  4. [Section I, after Eq. (7)] The phrase 'and V = 4/3 π r^3 is it's volume' should be 'its volume'; also the text consistently writes 'FLR W' with an artificial space, which should be cleaned throughout.
  5. [Eqs. (20) and (24)] The notation T_t^r, T_t^t, T_{tρ}, and T_{ρρ} is used without defining whether these are mixed or coordinate components of T_μν; this should be stated explicitly to avoid ambiguity in reading the long formulas.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the generalized Misner-Sharp energy is constructed from the field equations, with unproven integrability/charge-conservation conditions representing validity gaps rather than input–output identifications.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense: the generalized Misner-Sharp energy in Eq. (11) is obtained by integrating the field-equation components in Eq. (8), i.e., it is defined as the quantity whose differential is the unified-first-law form dE_eff = A du + B dv. No parameter is fitted to a target output, and the claimed reductions to Einstein gravity (f_R = 1, f_G = 0) and to the f(R) result of [17] are consistency checks, not circular renamings. The conserved-charge expression in Eq. (18) is evaluated using the same field equations used to build A and B, so the agreement between Eqs. (11) and (18) is a consistency check between two routes through the same equations rather than an independent prediction; this is a limitation of the cross-check but not a circular derivation. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the integrability condition Eq. (10) is not generally satisfied, and it similarly imposes rather than proves the divergence-free condition Eq. (16); these are unverified assumptions that threaten the validity of the final expressions for FLRW and thermodynamics, but they do not reduce the claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The only self-citations involving a co-author (refs. [21] and [23]) are used motivationally in the introduction and are not load-bearing for the derivation of the Misner-Sharp energy or the thermodynamic results. Overall, no step in the derivation chain is equivalent by definition to its input, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formula (11) rests on the f(R,G) field equations and the integrability assumption; the thermodynamics sections additionally depend on unspecified model parameters f0,N,h,n.

free parameters (4)
  • f0 = not specified (arbitrary constant)
    Appears in the model f(R,G)=R+f0 G^n used for the thermodynamic analysis; the value is never specified but affects Fig. 1.
  • N (normalization constant in scale factor) = not specified
    In a(t)=N(t+h)^n, used for Fig. 1; value not given.
  • h (temporal shift) = not specified
    Same scale factor; value not given.
  • n (exponent in f and scale factor) = 2,3,4 in Fig. 1
    Used both in f(R,G)=R+f0 G^n and a(t)=N(t+h)^n; the plot varies n but no values of f0,N,h are provided.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The integrability condition ∂A/∂v = ∂B/∂u (Eq. 10) holds for the spacetimes considered.
    Stated as an assumption before Eq. (11) and after Eq. (24); the paper notes it is not generally valid.
  • ad hoc to paper The Kodama current conservation condition (16) is satisfied for the metrics used.
    Condition (16) is asserted without proof and never verified for the static or FLRW metrics.
  • domain assumption The field equations (4) are the correct f(R,G) equations.
    The derivation starts from these equations; they are stated without derivation and may contain typos.
  • domain assumption The matter energy-momentum tensor is divergence-free, ∇_μ T^{μν}=0.
    Minimal coupling implies conservation, and the Kodama current construction relies on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized Misner-Sharp energy in $f(R,\mathcal{G})$ gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BXT3CG3N

@misc{pith2026250604469,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized Misner-Sharp energy in $f(R,\mathcalG)$ gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BXT3CG3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04469}
}
abstract

In this work, we explore the formulation of the Misner-Sharp energy within the framework of $f(R, \mathcal{G})$ gravity, a modified theory incorporating the Ricci scalar $R$ and the Gauss-Bonnet scalar $\mathcal{G}$. By extending the quasilocal energy definition to both static spherically symmetric spacetime and the dynamic Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) spacetime, we derive explicit expressions for the generalized Misner-Sharp energy using two complementary approaches: the integration method and the conserved charge method based on the Kodama vector. Our analysis shows that the Misner-Sharp energy expression in $f(R, \mathcal{G})$ gravity reduces to standard $f(R)$ gravity results when the Gauss-Bonnet term is absent, revealing how curvature modifications influence the geometric structure and dynamics of cosmic evolution. Furthermore, we investigate the thermodynamic properties at the apparent horizon associated with the FLRW background, and we find a connection to non-equilibrium thermodynamics unique to $f(R, \mathcal{G})$ gravity. These findings underscore the subtle and fundamental role of curvature corrections in determining the energy distribution and thermodynamic behavior of gravitational systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04469 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Adiabatic index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermodynamics of FLRW universe in Quadratic Gravity

    gr-qc 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quadratic-gravity terms are claimed to shift the thermodynamic phase structure of the FLRW apparent horizon, but the printed critical-radius formula does not follow from the paper's own equation of state.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    Cai, L.-M

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, Y.-P. Hu, and N. Ohta, General- 11 ized Misner-Sharp Energy in f(R) Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 80, 104016 (2009), arXiv:0910.2387 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  2. [1]

    Mie, Foundations of a theory of matter

    G. Mie, Foundations of a theory of matter. Third com- munication, End, Annalen Phys. 40, 1 (1913)

    work page 1913

  3. [2]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  4. [3]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05, 008, arXiv:hep-th/0011156

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Locally Localized Gravity and Geometric Transitions

    D. Bazeia, F. A. Brito, and A. R. Gomes, Locally local- ized gravity and geometric transitions, JHEP 11, 070, arXiv:hep-th/0411088

    work page Pith review arXiv

  6. [5]

    Oda, Locally localized gravity models in higher di- mensions, Phys

    I. Oda, Locally localized gravity models in higher di- mensions, Phys. Rev. D 64, 026002 (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0102147

    work page arXiv 2001

  7. [6]

    ’t Hooft, A Locally finite model for gravity, Found

    G. ’t Hooft, A Locally finite model for gravity, Found. Phys. 38, 733 (2008), arXiv:0804.0328 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [7]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f(R) theories, Living Rev. Rel. 13, 3 (2010), arXiv:1002.4928 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. 136, B571 (1964)

    1964

  2. [9]

    J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Jr., Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1407 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9209012

    1993 arXiv

  3. [10]

    A. B. Nielsen and D.-h. Yeom, Spherically symmetric trapping horizons, the Misner-Sharp mass and black hole evaporation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5261 (2009), arXiv:0804.4435 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  4. [11]

    J. W. Moffat, Gravitational theory, galaxy rotation curves and cosmology without dark matter, JCAP 05, 003, arXiv:astro-ph/0412195

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    S. A. Hayward, Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 3147 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710089

    1998 arXiv

  6. [13]

    S. A. Hayward, S. Mukohyama, and M. C. Ashworth, Dy- namic black hole entropy, Phys. Lett. A 256, 347 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810006

    1999 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Cai and S

    R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynam- ics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann-Robertson- Walker universe, JHEP 02, 050, arXiv:hep-th/0501055

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    S. A. Hayward, General laws of black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6467 (1994)

    1994

  9. [16]

    Maeda and M

    H. Maeda and M. Nozawa, Generalized Misner-Sharp quasi-local mass in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 77, 064031 (2008), arXiv:0709.1199 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [18]

    S.-Y. Zhou, E. J. Copeland, and P. M. Saffin, Cosmologi- cal Constraints on f (G) Dark Energy Models, JCAP 07, 009, arXiv:0903.4610 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Greene and G

    B. Greene and G. Shiu, Dark Energy in String Theory, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 22, 385 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Emparan and H

    R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, Black Holes in Higher Di- mensions, Living Rev. Rel. 11, 6 (2008), arXiv:0801.3471 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    G¨ urses, Y

    M. G¨ urses, Y. Heydarzade, and C. S ¸ent¨ urk, Geometric perfect fluids and the dark side of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024073 (2024), arXiv:2401.09784 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Capozziello, C

    S. Capozziello, C. A. Mantica, and L. G. Molinari, Cosmological perfect fluids in Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 16, 1950133 (2019), arXiv:1906.05693 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    G¨ urses and Y

    M. G¨ urses and Y. Heydarzade, FLR W-Cosmology in Generic Gravity Theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1061 (2020), arXiv:2009.12825 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin, Gravitational energy in quadratic curvature gravities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 101101 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205318

    2002 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Mukohyama and S

    S. Mukohyama and S. A. Hayward, Quasilocal first law of black hole dynamics, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 2153 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9905085

    2000 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Abreu and M

    G. Abreu and M. Visser, Kodama time: Geometrically preferred foliations of spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 82, 044027 (2010), arXiv:1004.1456 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dorau and R

    P. Dorau and R. Verch, Kodama-like vector fields in ax- isymmetric spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 145008 (2024), arXiv:2402.18993 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kodama, Conserved Energy Flux for the Spherically Symmetric System and the Back Reaction Problem in the Black Hole Evaporation, Prog

    H. Kodama, Conserved Energy Flux for the Spherically Symmetric System and the Back Reaction Problem in the Black Hole Evaporation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 1217 (1980)

    1980

  22. [30]

    Minamitsuji and M

    M. Minamitsuji and M. Sasaki, Local conservation law and dark radiation in cosmological brane world, Phys. Rev. D 70, 044021 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0312109

    2004 arXiv

  23. [31]

    M. D. Seifert, Stability of spherically symmetric solutions in modified theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064002 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703060

    2007 arXiv

  24. [32]

    K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084003 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904193

    2000 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Abdusattar, S.-B

    H. Abdusattar, S.-B. Kong, M. Omar, and Z.-W. Feng, Thermodynamics of the arbitrary dimensional FR W universe: Joule-Thomson expansion, (2024), arXiv:2403.01495 [gr-qc]

    2024

  26. [34]

    S. A. Hayward, Gravitational energy in spherical symme- try, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1938 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9408002

    1996 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Akbar and R.-G

    M. Akbar and R.-G. Cai, Thermodynamic Behavior of Friedmann Equations at Apparent Horizon of FR W Universe, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084003 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0609128

    2007

  28. [36]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Modified Gauss-Bonnet the- ory as gravitational alternative for dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 631, 1 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0508049

    2005 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and S. Banerjee, Dy- namics of inflation and dark energy fromF (R, G) gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 938, 935 (2019), arXiv:1807.00335 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Abbas, D

    G. Abbas, D. Momeni, M. Aamir Ali, R. Myrzakulov, and S. Qaisar, Anisotropic Compact Stars in f (G) Gravity, Astrophys. Space Sci. 357, 158 (2015), arXiv:1501.00427 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    B. Wu, C. Wang, Z.-M. Xu, and W.-L. Yang, Ruppeiner geometry and thermodynamic phase transition of the black hole in massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 626 (2021), arXiv:2006.09021 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    B. P. Dolan, D. Kastor, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, and J. Traschen, Thermodynamic Volumes and Isoperimetric Inequalities for de Sitter Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 87, 104017 (2013), arXiv:1301.5926 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Abdusattar, S.-B

    H. Abdusattar, S.-B. Kong, Y. Yin, and Y.-P. Hu, The Hawking-Page-like phase transition from FR W space- time to McVittie black hole, JCAP 08 (08), 060, arXiv:2203.10868 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    I. Bena, M. Berkooz, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, and D. Van den Bleeken, Scaling BPS Solutions and pure- Higgs States, JHEP 11, 171, arXiv:1205.5023 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hu, H.-A

    Y.-P. Hu, H.-A. Zeng, Z.-M. Jiang, and H. Zhang, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of black holes in Einstein-Horndeski gravity, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084004 (2019), arXiv:1812.09938 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Arcadi, A

    G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Kado, The Higgs- portal for dark matter: effective field theories versus concrete realizations, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 653 (2021), arXiv:2101.02507 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Abdusattar, S.-B

    H. Abdusattar, S.-B. Kong, H. Zhang, and Y.-P. Hu, Phase transitions and critical phenomena for the FR W universe in an effective scalar-tensor theory, Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101330 (2023), arXiv:2301.01938 [gr-qc]

    2023

  38. [46]

    S. Saha, S. Saha, and N. Mahata, For a flat Universe, CP /CV = −q : another coincidence in Cosmology?, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 055018 (2025), arXiv:2409.16328 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.