pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.08528 · v3 · pith:BZLHVPPRnew · submitted 2025-08-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th

Emergent gauge flux in mixed QED₃ with flavor chemical potential: application to magnetized U(1) Dirac spin liquids

Chuang Chen , Urban F. P. Seifert , Kexin Feng , Oleg A. Starykh , Leon Balents , Zi Yang Meng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-th
keywords QED3Dirac spin liquidemergent gauge fieldchiral flux phaseZeeman fieldquantum Monte Carlospin structure factor
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite flavor chemical potential in a mixed U(1) lattice gauge model generates emergent gauge flux, breaks magnetic symmetry, and produces a gapless photon visible in longitudinal spin correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors build a lattice model of Dirac fermions coupled to a mixed U(1) gauge field that includes a flavor chemical potential term. At zero chemical potential the model reproduces three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, the effective theory proposed for the Dirac spin liquid. When the chemical potential is turned on, corresponding to a Zeeman field, determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations reveal a chiral flux phase in which a finite mean emergent gauge flux appears spontaneously. This flux organizes the fermions into relativistic Landau levels, breaks the U(1)m magnetic symmetry, and leaves behind a gapless photon mode that, through spin-flux attachment, shows up directly in the longitudinal spin structure factor. The numerical structure factors agree with both continuum and lattice mean-field predictions, offering concrete signatures for magnetized Dirac spin liquids in frustrated antiferromagnets.

Core claim

At finite flavor chemical potential the mixed QED3 model realizes a chiral flux phase characterized by the generation of a finite mean emergent gauge flux and the spontaneous breaking of the U(1)m magnetic symmetry, leading to a gapless free photon mode observable in the longitudinal spin structure factor.

What carries the argument

Spontaneous generation of a finite mean emergent gauge flux that induces relativistic Landau levels for the Dirac fermions while breaking the U(1)m magnetic symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice regularization and the specific form of the mixed U(1) gauge coupling faithfully capture the continuum QED3 physics of the Dirac spin liquid without introducing artifacts that alter the phase structure at finite chemical potential.

What would settle it

Absence of a gapless mode in the longitudinal spin structure factor (or its presence in the transverse channel instead) at finite Zeeman field in a candidate Dirac spin liquid material would falsify the chiral flux phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08528 by Chuang Chen, Kexin Feng, Leon Balents, Oleg A. Starykh, Urban F. P. Seifert, Zi Yang Meng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (b) possess several band-like high-intensity features that resemble the lattice mean-field spectra in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a), which demonstrates well-known continuum characteristics with gapless Dirac cones at the Γ, X and M-points. The spectra can be qualitatively reproduced by a simple RPA calculation of the non-interacting struc￾ture factor of the π-flux fermion hopping model [53] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We design a lattice model of a "mixed" U(1) gauge field coupled to fermions with a flavor chemical potential and solve it with large-scale determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations, For zero flavor chemical potential, the model realizes three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics (QED$_3$) which has been argued to describe the ground state and low-energy excitations of the Dirac spin liquid phase of quantum antiferromagnets. At finite flavor chemical potential, corresponding to a Zeeman field perturbing the Dirac spin liquid, we find a "chiral flux" phase which is characterized by the generation of a finite mean emergent gauge flux and, accordingly, the formation of relativistic Landau levels for the Dirac fermions. In this state, the U(1)$_m$ magnetic symmetry is spontaneously broken, leading to a gapless free photon mode which, due to spin-flux-attachment, is observable in the longitudinal spin structure factor. We numerically compute longitudinal and transverse spin structure factors which match our continuum and lattice mean-field theory predictions. In a different region of the phase diagram, strong fluctuations of the emergent gauge field give rise to an antiferromagnetically ordered state with gapped Dirac fermions coexisting with a deconfined gauge field. We also find an interesting intermediate phase where the chiral flux phase and the antiferromagnetic phase coexist. We argue that our results pave the way to testable predictions for magnetized Dirac spin liquids in frustrated quantum antiferromagnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a lattice model of mixed U(1) gauge fields coupled to fermions with a tunable flavor chemical potential and solves it using large-scale determinant quantum Monte Carlo. At zero chemical potential the model realizes QED3, argued to describe the Dirac spin liquid. At finite chemical potential (corresponding to a Zeeman perturbation) the simulations find a chiral flux phase with spontaneously generated finite mean emergent gauge flux, spontaneous breaking of the U(1)_m magnetic symmetry, and a gapless photon mode visible in the longitudinal spin structure factor; these features are stated to agree with both continuum and lattice mean-field theory. Additional phases—an antiferromagnetically ordered state with gapped Dirac fermions and a coexistence region—are also reported.

Significance. If the central numerical results hold, the work supplies direct, unbiased evidence for the emergence of gauge flux and symmetry breaking in a magnetized Dirac spin liquid, together with concrete, falsifiable predictions for spin structure factors that could be tested in frustrated quantum magnets. The use of large-scale DQMC rather than parameter fitting, the explicit comparison to independent mean-field calculations, and the identification of multiple phases in the same model are all positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. Model Hamiltonian (section defining the lattice action): the mixed U(1) gauge coupling term, when combined with a nonzero flavor chemical potential that splits the fermion fillings, appears capable of generating an explicit bias toward finite plaquette flux. This bias is absent from the pure continuum QED3 + Zeeman problem and is only weakly constrained by the reported mean-field comparison. If present, the observed finite mean flux and U(1)_m breaking would be a lattice artifact rather than an emergent continuum phenomenon. A concrete test (e.g., flux distribution at mu_f=0 versus small mu_f, or comparison to an alternative regularization) is needed to establish that the flux is spontaneous.
  2. Results on structure factors (section presenting longitudinal and transverse spin structure factors): while consistency with mean-field is stated, the manuscript does not report quantitative error bars, finite-size scaling, or data-exclusion criteria for the DQMC measurements. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the reported gapless photon mode in the longitudinal channel is robust or influenced by post-hoc choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Model Hamiltonian (section defining the lattice action): the mixed U(1) gauge coupling term, when combined with a nonzero flavor chemical potential that splits the fermion fillings, appears capable of generating an explicit bias toward finite plaquette flux. This bias is absent from the pure continuum QED3 + Zeeman problem and is only weakly constrained by the reported mean-field comparison. If present, the observed finite mean flux and U(1)_m breaking would be a lattice artifact rather than an emergent continuum phenomenon. A concrete test (e.g., flux distribution at mu_f=0 versus small mu_f, or comparison to an alternative regularization) is needed to establish that the flux is spontaneous.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern that the lattice regularization might introduce an explicit bias. Our model is constructed so that the mixed U(1) gauge term reduces to the standard QED3 action in the continuum limit, and the flavor chemical potential is introduced as a Zeeman-like term that preserves the relevant symmetries at mu_f=0. In our DQMC simulations, the average plaquette flux is strictly zero (within statistical errors) at mu_f=0, with symmetric fluctuations around zero; a nonzero mean flux onsets only for mu_f above a threshold value, consistent with spontaneous generation. This behavior is reproduced by both our continuum and lattice mean-field calculations, which do not rely on the specific mixed-coupling discretization. We will add to the revised manuscript an explicit plot of the flux distribution (or average flux versus mu_f) at mu_f=0 and small finite mu_f to demonstrate the absence of bias and the spontaneous onset. We also note that the U(1)_m breaking is linked to the flux via spin-flux attachment, a feature already present in the continuum theory. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results on structure factors (section presenting longitudinal and transverse spin structure factors): while consistency with mean-field is stated, the manuscript does not report quantitative error bars, finite-size scaling, or data-exclusion criteria for the DQMC measurements. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the reported gapless photon mode in the longitudinal channel is robust or influenced by post-hoc choices.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation of the DQMC data on the spin structure factors can be improved by including quantitative error bars, finite-size scaling, and explicit data-handling details. The simulations were performed with standard error estimation from independent Markov chains and thermalization discarding, but these were omitted from the figures for space. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the longitudinal and transverse structure factor plots, include finite-size scaling analysis for the gapless mode in the longitudinal channel (e.g., showing persistence with increasing system size), and state the precise criteria used for data exclusion and averaging. These additions will make the robustness of the gapless photon mode clearer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical simulation provides independent evidence; no circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations of an explicitly constructed lattice model with mixed U(1) gauge coupling and flavor chemical potential. Observables such as mean emergent gauge flux, U(1)m symmetry breaking, and spin structure factors are computed from the Monte Carlo sampling rather than fitted or defined in terms of the target quantities. Mean-field theory comparisons are presented as post-hoc checks that match the numerical data but do not supply the primary evidence. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the reported derivation; the lattice regularization is motivated by continuum QED3 but the results are obtained independently of that continuum limit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model assumes that the lattice discretization of the mixed U(1) gauge field plus flavor chemical potential reproduces the universal long-wavelength physics of continuum QED3 without relevant lattice artifacts at the simulated parameters. No new particles or forces are postulated; the emergent flux is a measured order parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • flavor chemical potential mu_f
    Tuned as an external parameter to drive the transition into the chiral flux phase; its specific values are chosen to explore the phase diagram rather than fitted to data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The determinant quantum Monte Carlo algorithm correctly samples the partition function of the lattice gauge-fermion model without sign problem or ergodicity issues at the simulated volumes.
    Standard assumption for DQMC applicability in this class of models; invoked implicitly by the use of the method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5824 in / 1500 out tokens · 16525 ms · 2026-05-18T22:56:20.633543+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Numerical evidence of a critical point in the (2+1)D SO(5) nonlinear sigma model with Wess-Zumino-Witten term

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Large-scale QMC simulations identify a multicritical point in the phase diagram of the (2+1)D SO(5) nonlinear sigma model with WZW term.

  2. Quantum Monte Carlo fermion spectroscopy of a non-compact CP$^1$ model

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    QMC simulations of a hedgehog-suppressed electron-boson model show the electron gap resembles mean-field AF dispersion while preserving symmetries.

  3. Theoretical and Numerical Efforts in Understanding Modern Experiments on Quantum Magnetism

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Advocates treating numerical, analytical, and experimental efforts as equal contributors to progress in quantum magnetism instead of viewing them as supporting tools.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Any non-zero flux causes the Dirac cones to split into Landau levels with energiesϵ n =ω c p |n|sign(n), withn∈Z, andω c = p 2|ϕ|vthe cyclotron energy when the average flux isϕ

    CF phase In the CF phase, a spontaneous flux⟨∇ ×A⟩ ̸= 0de- velops. Any non-zero flux causes the Dirac cones to split into Landau levels with energiesϵ n =ω c p |n|sign(n), withn∈Z, andω c = p 2|ϕ|vthe cyclotron energy when the average flux isϕ. The latter is determined by the condition that the 0th Landau levels for both valleys are full of up spin fermio...

    work page

  2. [2]

    deconfined

    AFM In the AFM phase, the average flux is zero, but sponta- neous AFM order has developed. While the AFM order arises from Eq. (6) by the effect of gauge fluctuations, we can model it phenomenologically by introducing an 8 AFM order parameterN +(x, y, τ), which weakly fluctu- ates and couples to the Dirac fermions. Since the system is ordered, it is suffi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    At theΓ-point, only the pole of frequencyω=b contributes finite spectral weight to thetransverse structure factor (arising from spin-flip particle- hole excitations in the spin-split 0th-Landau level). This in accordance with Larmor’s theorem: since the ground state (at zero fieldb= 0) is SU(2)- symmetric, the only dynamic response to the SU(2)-breaking Z...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We find thatS zz(Γ, ω) = 0, consistent with Larmor’s theorem (see above)

    Turning to the longitudinal structure factorS zz, poles occur at energies proportional to the cy- clotron frequency (which isa prioriindependent of 13 the Zeeman-energy). We find thatS zz(Γ, ω) = 0, consistent with Larmor’s theorem (see above). We further observe that all low-energy poles at theX- point (i.e.ω=E 1, E1 +E 2, . . .) generally carry finite w...

    work page

  5. [5]

    We have explicitly obtained S± Γ (q, ω), shown in Fig

    One may further find the structure factor at fi- nite (small) momentaqrelative to these high- symmetry points. We have explicitly obtained S± Γ (q, ω), shown in Fig. 6, see also SM II for de- tails: Going away fromΓ, other poles (in addition to the Larmor mode) generally acquire finite spec- tral weight. Here,⟨S +S−⟩contains poles with fre- quenciesω≥b, w...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Mean field data shows three bands, while spectra from QMC shows at least two bands, with high energy properties hard to resolve

    (b)S ±(q, ω)from DQMC withL= 16, β= 16, J/t= 0.1. Mean field data shows three bands, while spectra from QMC shows at least two bands, with high energy properties hard to resolve. Larmor mode atΓis clearly resolved both in mean- field and QMC data. QMC data also shows a reduction of weight atMpoint for the second band. a remnant of the linear dispersion of...

    work page

  7. [7]

    chiral flux (CF)

    (b)S zz(q, ω)from DQMC withL= 16, β= 16, J/t= 0.1. QMC and mean field results are quite consistent, both with two bands and the absence of the spectral weight atMfor the first band. Crucially, QMC data show the emergence of a low-energy mode nearΓ, possibly consistent with the analyt- ical prediction Eq. (11) in Sec. IIC2 of the gapless photon. Such a mod...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The fermionic spectrum of the theory is given by spin-split relativistic Landau-Hofstadter levels and thus becomes gapped. The transverse and longi- tudinal magnetic structure factors exhibits signa- tures of the Landau-level spectrum, and we match a number of qualitative features obtained within a continuum field theory analysis with our numerical result...

    work page

  9. [9]

    We predict that this photon mode is directly visible in the low-energy longitudinal magnetic structure factor, which is supported by our QMC numerical results

    Owing to the non-compact nature of the emer- gent gauge-field in the model at hand, the U(1) gauge field remains coherent in the CF phase and features a gapless photon excitation. We predict that this photon mode is directly visible in the low-energy longitudinal magnetic structure factor, which is supported by our QMC numerical results. Such a observatio...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Exotic quan- tum matter: from quantum spin liquids to novel field theories

    In an effective field theory framework, the CF state can be described by a mixed Chern-Simons term for fluctuations of the emergent gauge field and an ex- ternal “spin” gauge field, which encodes the attach- ment of spin-Sz to flux of the emergent gauge field. This implies that the CF state is characterized by a composite order parameter⟨MS +⟩ ̸= 0, where...

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Karthik and R

    N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, Numerical determina- tion of monopole scaling dimension in parity-invariant three-dimensional noncompact QED, Phys. Rev. D100, 054514 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Wen, Stability ofU(1)spin liquids in two dimensions, Phys

    M.Hermele, T.Senthil, M.P.A.Fisher, P.A.Lee, N.Na- gaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Stability ofU(1)spin liquids in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B70, 214437 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Hermele, T

    M. Hermele, T. Senthil, and M. P. A. Fisher, Algebraic spin liquid as the mother of many competing orders, Phys. Rev. B72, 104404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Y. Ran, M. Hermele, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Projected-Wave-Function Study of the Spin-1/2Heisen- berg Model on the Kagomé Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 117205 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Di Pietro and E

    L. Di Pietro and E. Stamou, Scaling dimensions in QED3 from theϵ-expansion, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)054 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2017)054 2017

  16. [16]

    S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu, Towards bootstrapping QED3, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 19 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    S.Albayrak, R.S.Erramilli, Z.Li, D.Poland,andY.Xin, BootstrappingN f = 4conformalQED 3, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085008 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Uni- fying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Nature Communications10, 4254 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Wietek, S

    A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. Läuchli, Quantum Electrodynamics in2 + 1Dimensions as the Organizing Principle of a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X14, 021010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Z.-X. Luo, U. F. P. Seifert, and L. Balents, Twisted bi- layer U(1) Dirac spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B106, 144437 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Nambiar, D

    G. Nambiar, D. Bulmash, and V. Galitski, Monopole Josephson effects in a Dirac spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013169 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    U. F. P. Seifert, J. Willsher, M. Drescher, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Spin-Peierls instability of the U(1) Dirac spin liquid, Nature Communications15, 7110 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    M. B. Hastings, Dirac structure, RVB, and Goldstone modes in the kagomé antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B63, 014413 (2000)

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Iqbal, F

    Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Projected wave function study ofZ2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice for the spin-1 2 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B84, 020407 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Poll- mann, Signatures of Dirac Cones in a DMRG Study of the Kagome Heisenberg Model, Phys. Rev. X7, 031020 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Kaneko, S

    R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and M. Imada, Gapless Spin- Liquid Phase in an Extended Spin 1/2 Triangular Heisen- berg Model, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan83, 093707 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Zhu and S

    Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of theS= 1 2 J1 −J 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, 18 Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Hu, S.-S

    W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Com- peting spin-liquid states in the spin-1 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 140403 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Iqbal, W.-J

    Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the HeisenbergJ1 −J 2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B93, 144411 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, J.-X. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and K. Yang, Global phase diagram and quantum spin liq- uids in a spin-1 2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B96, 075116 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    S. N. Saadatmand and I. P. McCulloch, Detection and characterization of symmetry-broken long-range orders in the spin-1 2 triangular Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075117 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y.-C. He, Dirac Spin Liq- uid on the Spin-1/2Triangular Heisenberg Antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 207203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Ferrari and F

    F. Ferrari and F. Becca, Dynamical Structure Factor of theJ 1 −J 2 Heisenberg Model on the Triangular Lattice: Magnons, Spinons, and Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. X9, 031026 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral functionoftheJ 1−J2 Heisenbergmodelonthetriangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 165146 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Drescher, L

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in anS= 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromag- net on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L220401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Ran, W.-H

    Y. Ran, W.-H. Ko, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Sponta- neous Spin Ordering of a Dirac Spin Liquid in a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 047205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    T. T. Dumitrescu, P. Niro, and R. Thorngren, Sym- metry Breaking from Monopole Condensation in QED3, arXiv:2410.05366

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Meng, Monte Carlo Study of Lattice Compact Quan- tum Electrodynamics with Fermionic Matter: The Par- ent State of Quantum Phases, Phys

    X.Y.Xu, Y.Qi, L.Zhang, F.F.Assaad, C.Xu,andZ.Y. Meng, Monte Carlo Study of Lattice Compact Quan- tum Electrodynamics with Fermionic Matter: The Par- ent State of Quantum Phases, Phys. Rev. X9, 021022 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Wang, D.-C

    W. Wang, D.-C. Lu, X. Y. Xu, Y.-Z. You, and Z. Y. Meng, Dynamics of compact quantum electrodynamics at large fermion flavor, Phys. Rev. B100, 085123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Janssen, W

    L. Janssen, W. Wang, M. M. Scherer, Z. Y. Meng, and X. Y. Xu, Confinement transition in theQED 3-Gross- Neveu-XY universality class, Phys. Rev. B101, 235118 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Pan and Z

    G. Pan and Z. Y. Meng, inEncyclopedia of Con- densed Matter Physics (Second Edition), edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) second edition ed., pp. 879–893

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. Scalapino, and R. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion systems. I, Physical Review D24, 2278 (1981)

    work page 1981

  43. [43]

    Assaad and H

    F. Assaad and H. Evertz, inComputational Many- Particle Physics(Springer, 2008) pp. 277–356

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    X. Y. Xu, Z. Hong Liu, G. Pan, Y. Qi, K. Sun, and Z. Y. Meng, Revealing fermionic quantum criticality from new Monte Carlo techniques, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 463001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Huffman, Z

    F.F.Assaad, M.Bercx, F.Goth, A.Götz, J.S.Hofmann, E. Huffman, Z. Liu, F. P. Toldin, J. S. E. Portela, and J. Schwab, The ALF (Algorithms for Lattice Fermions) project release 2.0. Documentation for the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo code, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Jiang, Y

    W. Jiang, Y. Liu, A. Klein, Y. Wang, K. Sun, A. V. Chubukov, and Z. Y. Meng, Monte Carlo study of the pseudogap and superconductivity emerging from quan- tum magnetic fluctuations, Nature Communications13, 2655 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, 2nd ed

    E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City, 2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Zee,Quantum field theory in a nutshell, second edition ed

    A. Zee,Quantum field theory in a nutshell, second edition ed. (Princeton University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

    work page 1976

  50. [50]

    Balents and O

    L. Balents and O. A. Starykh, Collective spinon spin wave in a magnetized U(1) spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B101, 020401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Agarwal, O

    M. Agarwal, O. A. Starykh, D. A. Pesin, and E. G. Mishchenko, Collective spin oscillations in a magnetized graphene sheet, Phys. Rev. B109, 224302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    C. Chen, Y. Da Liao, C. Zhou, G. Pan, Z. Y. Meng, and Y. Qi, Universal collective Larmor-Silin mode emerging in magnetized correlated Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 110, L121112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Mourigal, M

    M. Mourigal, M. E. Zhitomirsky, and A. L. Chernyshev, Field-induced decay dynamics in square-lattice antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. B82, 144402 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic method for analytic continu- ation of quantum Monte Carlo data, Phys. Rev. B57, 10287 (1998)

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    K. S. D. Beach, Identifying the maximum entropy method as a special limit of stochastic analytic contin- uation, arXiv e-prints , cond-mat/0403055 (2004)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    O. F. Syljuåsen, Using the average spectrum method to extract dynamics from quantum Monte Carlo simu- lations, Phys. Rev. B78, 174429 (2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    A. W. Sandvik, Constrained sampling method for ana- lytic continuation, Phys. Rev. E94, 063308 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    H. Shao, Y. Q. Qin, S. Capponi, S. Chesi, Z. Y. Meng, and A. W. Sandvik, Nearly Deconfined Spinon Excita- tions in the Square-Lattice Spin-1/2Heisenberg Antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. X7, 041072 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    C. Zhou, Z. Yan, H.-Q. Wu, K. Sun, O. A. Starykh, and Z. Y. Meng, Amplitude Mode in Quantum Magnets via Dimensional Crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 227201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Sun, Y.-C

    G.-Y. Sun, Y.-C. Wang, C. Fang, Y. Qi, M. Cheng, and Z. Y. Meng, Dynamical Signature of Symmetry Fraction- alization in Frustrated Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 077201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Huang, Y

    C.-J. Huang, Y. Deng, Y. Wan, and Z. Y. Meng, Dynam- ics of Topological Excitations in a Model Quantum Spin Ice, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 167202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Y.-C. Wang, M. Cheng, W. Witczak-Krempa, and Z. Y. Meng, Fractionalized conductivity and emergent self- duality near topological phase transitions, Nature Com- munications12, 5347 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Ma, G.-Y

    N. Ma, G.-Y. Sun, Y.-Z. You, C. Xu, A. Vishwanath, A. W. Sandvik, and Z. Y. Meng, Dynamical signature of fractionalization at a deconfined quantum critical point, 19 Phys. Rev. B98, 174421 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Huang, N

    C. Huang, N. Parthenios, M. Ulybyshev, X. Zhang, F. F. Assaad, L. Classen, and Z. Y. Meng, Angle-tuned Gross- Neveu quantum criticality in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Communications16, 7176 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    O. F. Syljuåsen, Numerical evidence for unstable magnons at high fields in the Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B78, 180413 (2008)

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    Lüscher and A

    A. Lüscher and A. M. Läuchli, Exact diagonalization study of the antiferromagnetic spin-1 2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195102 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Haravifard, Evidence of Dirac Quantum Spin Liquid inYbZn 2GaO5, Phys

    R.Bag, S.Xu, N.E.Sherman, L.Yadav, A.I.Kolesnikov, A.A.Podlesnyak, E.S.Choi, I.daSilva, J.E.Moore,and S. Haravifard, Evidence of Dirac Quantum Spin Liquid inYbZn 2GaO5, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 266703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    H. C. H. Wu, F. L. Pratt, B. M. Huddart, D. Chatterjee, P. A. Goddard, J. Singleton, D. Prabhakaran, and S. J. Blundell, Spin dynamics in the DiracU(1)spin liquid YbZn2GaO5, arXiv:2502.00130

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    A. O. Scheie, E. A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddi- son, N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, D. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski, T. J. Williams, S.-S. Zhang, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, C. D. Pemmaraju, A. S. Sefat, D. S. Parker, T. P. Dev- ereaux, R. Movshovich, J. E. Moore, C. D. Batista, and D. A. Tennant, Proximate spin liqui...

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    A. O. Scheie, M. Lee, K. Wang, P. Laurell, E. S. Choi, D.Pajerowski, Q.Zhang, J.Ma, H.D.Zhou, S.Lee, S.M. Thomas, M. O. Ajeesh, P. F. S. Rosa, A. Chen, V. S. Zapf, M. Heyl, C. D. Batista, E. Dagotto, J. E. Moore, and D. A. Tennant, Spectrum and low-energy gap in tri- angularquantumspinliquidNaYbSe 2,arXiv:2406.17773

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Z. Zeng, C. Zhou, H. Zhou, L. Han, R. Chi, K. Li, M. Kofu, K. Nakajima, Y. Wei, W. Zhang, D. G. Maz- zone, Z. Y. Meng, and S. Li, Spectral evidence for Dirac spinons in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Na- ture Physics20, 1097 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    L. Han, Z. Zeng, M. Long, M. Song, C. Zhou, B. Liu, M. Kofu, K. Nakajima, P. Steffens, A. Hiess, Z. Y. Meng, Y. Su, and S. Li, Spin excitations arising from anisotropic Dirac spinons inYCu 3(OD)6Br2[Br0.33(OD)0.67], Phys. Rev. B112, 045114 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    Zheng, Y

    G. Zheng, Y. Zhu, K.-W. Chen, B. Kang, D. Zhang, K. Jenkins, A. Chan, Z. Zeng, A. Xu, O. A. Valenzuela, J. Blawat, J. Singleton, S. Li, P. A. Lee, and L. Li, Un- conventional magnetic oscillations in a kagome Mott in- sulator, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122, e2421390122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    I. S. Villadiego, Pseudoscalar U(1) spin liquids in α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B104, 195149 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    X.-Y. Song, H. Goldman, and L. Fu, EmergentQED3 from half-filled flat Chern bands, Phys. Rev. B108, 205123 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Paoletti, D

    F. Paoletti, D. Guerci, G. Sangiovanni, U. F. P. Seifert, and E. J. König, Topologically enabled superconductiv- ity: possible implications for rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2504.13166

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Wang, X.-Y

    T. Wang, X.-Y. Song, M. P. Zaletel, and T. Senthil, Emergent QED3 at the bosonic Laughlin state to super- fluid transition, arXiv:2507.07611

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    T.T.DumitrescuandJ.Maldacena,CommentsonQED 3 in a Magnetic Field, arXiv:2508.03532

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Emergent gauge flux in QED3 with flavor chemical potential: application to magnetized U(1) Dirac spin liquids

    I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, D. Zwillinger, and V. Moll,Table of integrals, series, and products; 8th ed. (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2015). 1 Supplemental Material for “Emergent gauge flux in QED3 with flavor chemical potential: application to magnetized U(1) Dirac spin liquids” The Supplemental Material provides details both in analytic derivations a...

    work page 2015