Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09469 v1 pith:BZWEHO5Q submitted 2023-11-16 cs.CL

Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs

classification cs.CL
keywords clarificationclarifyingresolvingwhenacrossambiguitybehaviorclarify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Resolving ambiguities through interaction is a hallmark of natural language, and modeling this behavior is a core challenge in crafting AI assistants. In this work, we study such behavior in LMs by proposing a task-agnostic framework for resolving ambiguity by asking users clarifying questions. Our framework breaks down this objective into three subtasks: (1) determining when clarification is needed, (2) determining what clarifying question to ask, and (3) responding accurately with the new information gathered through clarification. We evaluate systems across three NLP applications: question answering, machine translation and natural language inference. For the first subtask, we present a novel uncertainty estimation approach, intent-sim, that determines the utility of querying for clarification by estimating the entropy over user intents. Our method consistently outperforms existing uncertainty estimation approaches at identifying predictions that will benefit from clarification. When only allowed to ask for clarification on 10% of examples, our system is able to double the performance gains over randomly selecting examples to clarify. Furthermore, we find that intent-sim is robust, demonstrating improvements across a wide range of NLP tasks and LMs. Together, our work lays foundation for studying clarifying interactions with LMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HELP: Human-Efficient Large-Scale Robot Post-Training with Rollout Segmentation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A human-efficient robot post-training pipeline with two-operator, twelve-robot supervision and an automatic rollout-segmentation critic raises success rates to 80–95% on four real manipulation tasks.

  2. HELP: Human-Efficient Large-Scale Robot Post-Training with Rollout Segmentation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    VLAC-Cut-guided multi-robot HITL post-training reaches 80–95% success and 1.7–4.2× throughput over the base VLA, outperforming HITL-only under the same human budget.

  3. SG-CoT: An Ambiguity-Aware Robotic Planning Framework using Scene Graph Representations

    cs.RO 2026-03 reject novelty 5.0

    SG-CoT grounds an LLM planner's chain-of-thought in a scene graph via iterative API queries, improving ambiguity detection and clarification in simulated manipulation, though its success metric credits any clarifying ...