Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 125 references

Quantum and Semi-Classical Signatures of Dissipative Chaos in the Steady State

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The sign of the classical Lyapunov exponent controls the level statistics of the steady-state density matrix in an open many-boson system, with regular motion giving Poissonian statistics and chaotic motion giving Wigner-Dyson statistics.

desk verdict A valuable semiclassical framework and a new phase-space diagnostic, but the central Lyapunov-to-level-statistics claim rests on thin numerical evidence in the regular branch. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14961 v1 pith:C2W7XZZC submitted 2025-06-17 cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.CDquant-ph

Griffith Rufo , Sabrina Rufo , Pedro Ribeiro , Stefano Chesi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CDquant-ph
keywords dissipativequantumchaosBose-HubbardtrimersteadystatelevelstatisticsLyapunovexponentsemiclassicalLangevindynamicsphase-spaceinverseparticipationratioopensystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper targets a long-standing question: when a dissipative quantum system has a well-defined classical limit, do the classical dynamics—attractor, limit cycle, or chaos—show up in the quantum steady state? Using a three-well Bose-Hubbard model with particle-conserving dissipation, it argues yes. The sign of the leading Lyapunov exponent of the mean-field trajectories determines the level statistics of the effective Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$ defined by $\rho_0 \propto e^{-H_{\mathrm{eff}}}$: non-positive exponents give Poissonian statistics, positive exponents give Wigner-Dyson (GUE) statistics. The paper adds a phase-space inverse participation ratio whose scaling defines an effective dimension $D$ of the steady state's support, with the entropy obeying $S \propto \ln N^D$. If correct, this gives a semiclassical explanation for the integrability–chaos dichotomy in open-system steady states and a practical diagnostic for quantum ergodicity in dissipative systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$, defined by writing the steady-state density matrix as $\rho_0 \propto e^{-H_{\mathrm{eff}}}$; its level-spacing ratio distribution is the paper's quantum-chaos diagnostic. The argument is carried by two further pieces. First, a semiclassical density matrix $\rho_C$ is built by adding multiplicative $1/\sqrt{N}$ stochastic noise to the classical mean-field equations (the noise comes from truncating a path-integral expansion of the dissipative dynamics at quadratic order), evolving many samples, and averaging the resulting coherent states; this converts classical trajectory ensembles into a candidate steady state. Second, a phase-space inverse participation ratio $\mathrm{IPR}_\phi$ computed from the Husimi distribution defines an effective dimension $D$ through $\mathrm{IPR}_\phi\sim N^{-D/2}$, linking phase-space localization to the entropy scaling $S\propto \ln N^D$. The sign of the leading Lyapunov exponent of the deterministic flow is the classifier that separates regular ($\lambda\le 0$) from chaotic ($\lambda>0$) classical behavior.

What would settle it

Take a parameter set of the trimer with no strong symmetry and an unambiguously positive leading Lyapunov exponent, exactly diagonalize the Lindblad equation at $N=30$, and compute the level-spacing ratio distribution of $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$; if that distribution fails to converge toward the GUE prediction, the claimed Lyapunov-to-statistics correspondence is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a clean correspondence between classical mean-field dynamics and the structure of the quantum steady state in the $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ Bose-Hubbard trimer. When the classical equations of motion relax to a fixed-point attractor, the Liouvillian is gapped and the steady state is localized, with Poissonian level spacing in $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$ and entropy of order one. When dissipation instead drives cyclic motion, the Liouvillian gap closes as $N\to\infty$, and the steady state's spectral statistics follow the classical Lyapunov exponent: limit cycles and periodic orbits keep $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$ Poissonian, whereas chaotic dynamics produce GUE statistics, a delocalized Husimi distribution with $\mathrm{IPR}_\phi\propto N^{-2}$, and entropy scaling $S\propto \ln N^2$. The paper further establishes that a semiclassical density matrix built by averaging Langevin trajectories over noise samples reproduces all of these features, including the level statistics, to next-to-leading order in $1/N$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole correspondence rests on the assumption that quantum fluctuations around the classical trajectory are accurately represented by adding Gaussian noise to the classical equations, and that this quadratic-order approximation remains valid at arbitrarily long times.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any large-$N$ dissipative system with a classical limit, the steady-state level statistics of $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$ can be predicted from the classical Lyapunov spectrum alone: Poissonian for non-positive exponents, GUE for positive exponents.
  • The Liouvillian spectral gap distinguishes stationary from non-stationary classical regimes (gapped for fixed-point attractors, closing as $N^{-1}$ for limit cycles and chaos), but does not by itself identify chaos; the steady-state statistics of $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$ are needed for that.
  • The entropy of the steady state obeys the universal scaling $S\propto \ln N^D$, with $D$ read off from $\mathrm{IPR}_\phi$: $D=0$ at a fixed-point attractor, $D=4$ for full phase-space delocalization, and reduced $D$ under strong symmetries or dynamical confinement.
  • Strong symmetries constrain the dynamics to lower-dimensional manifolds and suppress chaos (in this $D=4$ system, any strong symmetry forces regular dynamics), while weak symmetries leave the phase-space structure and chaotic behavior intact.
  • The semiclassical density matrix $\rho_C$ reproduces not only expectation values but also entropy, localization, and level statistics, so for large $N$ the Lindblad steady state is effectively a classical mixture of coherent states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An untested extension of the correspondence is that $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$ level statistics could serve as an experimental probe of the underlying classical attractor in platforms like triple-well Bose-Einstein condensates, where direct measurement of chaotic trajectories is difficult but steady-state correlation functions are accessible.
  • The $\mathrm{IPR}_\phi$-based effective dimension $D$ suggests a general principle for open systems: in mixed phase spaces, the component with the smallest effective dimension dominates the IPR, so the asymptotic scaling of entropy and localization is set by the most localized sector rather than the most chaotic one.
  • Because $\rho_C$ captures GUE statistics without any quantum coherence, the paper implies that Wigner-Dyson statistics in dissipative steady states is compatible with a fully incoherent, classical-mixture interpretation; a similar mechanism may explain apparent random-matrix signatures in other driven-dissipative systems whose classical limit is chaotic.
  • The role of strong symmetries suggests a testable prediction beyond the trimer: in a four-well (or higher-dimensional) dissipative system, strong symmetries should reduce $D$ but still allow chaos when the remaining phase-space dimension exceeds two.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies an open SU(3) Bose-Hubbard trimer with number-conserving incoherent hopping, using four representative parameter sets to compare noiseless mean-field classical dynamics (Lyapunov exponents, Poincaré sections) with the exact Liouvillian spectrum and the steady-state density matrix, and with a semiclassical density matrix built from Langevin trajectories. The central claim is that the sign of the largest classical Lyapunov exponent determines the level statistics of the effective Hamiltonian H_eff defined by rho_0 = exp(-H_eff): non-positive exponents give Poissonian statistics and positive exponents give GUE statistics. The paper also introduces a phase-space inverse participation ratio IPR_phi whose scaling N^{-D/2} defines an effective dimension D, reports S proportional to ln N^D, and shows that the stochastic coherent-state mixture rho_C reproduces these spectral and structural features.

Significance. If established, the claimed correspondence would extend the Prosen–Žnidarič steady-state integrability dichotomy to a collective bosonic model with a well-defined classical limit, connecting the sign of the classical Lyapunov exponent to random-matrix statistics of a steady-state density matrix. The paper has real strengths: the Lyapunov exponents are computed from the noiseless mean-field equations independently of the quantum steady state; the Liouvillian is diagonalized exactly up to N=15 and treated with sparse methods at N=20,30; Appendix E gives an analytic attractor spectrum showing a Poisson-like two-grid structure; and the Langevin dynamics is derived from the Keldysh action rather than fitted. The authors are also transparent about inconclusive scalings and about the non-convergence of Case III. These strengths make the paper a plausible and potentially useful contribution, but the advertised universal dichotomy is currently supported by a small number of visually classified histograms, and the regular-dynamics branch lacks quantitative convergence evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III.B, Fig. 6] For Case III, the authors state explicitly that 'we could not conclude that P(r) converges to a Poissonian distribution' even at N=30. Since Case III is the only non-attractor regular-dynamics example supporting the non-positive-Lyapunov branch of the central dichotomy, the claim that non-positive exponents yield Poissonian level statistics is not presently established for limit-cycle dynamics. The manuscript should provide a quantitative convergence test for Case III, such as the scaling of the mean and variance of r with N, a Kolmogorov–Smirnov or chi-square statistic against the Poisson and GUE ratio distributions, and bootstrap error bars; visual inspection and the absence of level repulsion are not sufficient to identify the distribution as Poissonian.
  2. [§II.C, §III.B, Fig. 6] The P(r) histograms in Fig. 6 are single-realization histograms: for N=15 the Hilbert-space dimension is d=(N+1)(N+2)/2=136, so each histogram is built from roughly 135 level-spacing ratios. No error bars, bootstrap resampling, or goodness-of-fit measures are provided, and the labels 'Poissonian' and 'GUE' are assigned by visual comparison with the limiting curves. With this sample size, distinguishing Poissonian statistics from weakly correlated distributions is not reliable, especially because the binning and the treatment of degenerate or nearly degenerate eigenvalues are not specified. Please add quantitative statistical measures and, where possible, averages over realizations or symmetry sectors.
  3. [§III.B, Table I, Fig. 7] For Case IV, the mixed distribution is fitted with alpha=0.57 without any reported uncertainty, and the finite-size scalings of IPR_phi and S are marked inconclusive in Table I. The statement in §IV.C that 'Across all regimes explored in Table I, we find that the entropy consistently scales as S∝ln N^D' is therefore stronger than the presented evidence: for Case IV the scaling is expressly not determined. The authors should either supply a scaling analysis with uncertainty for Case IV or restrict the entropy-scaling claim to the cases for which the scaling is actually established.
  4. [§II.B, Appendix C, Eq. (10), Eq. (C6)] The semiclassical density matrix rho_C is constructed from Langevin trajectories obtained by truncating the Keldysh action at quadratic order and using the smooth-path hypothesis of Eq. (C6). The paper validates rho_C against exact results mainly through observable averages and through the N=15 level-statistics insets of Fig. 6; it does not test whether rho_C approximates rho_0 in a norm that controls eigenvalue statistics at long times. Since the rho_C insets are presented as evidence that the semiclassical framework reproduces spectral correlations, please add a systematic check, for example the scaling of a trace distance or spectral distance between rho_C and rho_0 with N, and convergence in sampling time and in the number of noise realizations M_S, or explicitly label this as a heuristic assumption whose failure would not affect the exact-diagonalization results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§I] In the first paragraph of the introduction, 'The reminder of Section I' should read 'The remainder of Section I'.
  2. [§II.E] In Section II.E, 'stochasitc evolution' is a typo for 'stochastic evolution'; the Fig. 4 caption also contains 'parmaeters' instead of 'parameters'.
  3. [§III.B, Fig. 6] In the caption of Fig. 6, 'GUI' should be 'GUE', and in the main text 'si well described' should be 'is well described'.
  4. [§IV.B] The statement that a strong symmetry 'necessarily leads to regular Liouvillian dynamics' in the trimer would benefit from a one-sentence justification that autonomous flows on a two-dimensional manifold cannot produce chaos, since the paper currently leaves this as an implicit dimensional argument.
  5. [Table I] The table uses empty entries to denote zeroes, but the note 'Empty entries correspond to zeroes' is easy to miss; please consider printing explicit 0 values or a clearer legend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Lyapunov-to-level-statistics mapping is independently computed; minor self-citations and the IPR-entropy consistency check do not reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

The central claim that the sign of the classical Lyapunov exponent determines the level statistics of H_eff (rho0 = e^{-H_eff}) is not obtained by fitting: Lyapunov exponents are computed from the noiseless mean-field equations (Eq. 6), while P(r) histograms are computed by exact diagonalization of the steady-state density matrix (Fig. 6). No parameter is adjusted to connect them. The semiclassical density matrix rho_C is built from Langevin trajectories whose noise is derived from the Keldysh action (Appendix D), not tuned to reproduce H_eff statistics; its agreement with rho0 is a numerical prediction. The effective dimension D is inferred from the scaling IPR_phi ~ N^{-D/2} (Eq. 13), and the entropy scaling S ~ ln N^D is an independent measurement; the two are consistent (though Table I actually shows S ~ ln N^{D/2}, a factor-of-two inconsistency in the paper's own notation, not a circular derivation). Self-citations (e.g., refs. [29,33,34] by one of the present authors) are used only as diagnostic tools (CSR) and are not load-bearing for the central result. The admitted inconclusive convergence of Case III (Sec. III.B: 'we could not conclude that P(r) converges to a Poissonian distribution') is a limitation of the numerical evidence, not a circular step, because the claim is not forced by construction. Overall, the paper's derivation chain is self-contained and free of circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard coherent-state and Keldysh machinery plus the domain assumption that H_eff level statistics obey the closed-system integrability-chaos conjectures. No new physical entity is introduced. The only fitted quantity is the illustrative mixing fraction alpha in Case IV.

free parameters (1)
  • mixing fraction alpha for Case IV level statistics = 0.57
    The mixed P(r) in Fig. 6 is fitted as (1-alpha) P_Poisson + alpha P_GUE, with alpha=0.57. This matches the fraction of positive Lyapunov exponents and is used for illustration, not derived from first principles.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math SU(3) coherent states form an overcomplete basis with the given measure (Appendix B)
    Used to derive the path integral and the semiclassical equations of motion.
  • domain assumption Markovian Lindblad master equation with jump operators in Eq. (3) describes the dissipative Bose-Hubbard trimer
    The entire analysis is based on this open-system model.
  • domain assumption Smooth-path hypothesis in Eq. (C6) and truncation at quadratic order in quantum fluctuations (Appendix D)
    Needed to obtain the Langevin equation and the semiclassical density matrix rho_C.
  • domain assumption For large N, the mean-field limit yields the classical dynamics and noise is of order 1/sqrt(N)
    Establishes the semiclassical scaling on which the correspondence is based.
  • domain assumption Berry-Tabor and BGS conjectures transfer to the effective Hamiltonian H_eff of the steady state
    The paper assumes Poissonian versus Wigner-Dyson statistics of H_eff encode regular versus chaotic dynamics, extending closed-system conjectures to steady states.
  • domain assumption Unique steady state for generic parameters (except symmetry sectors)
    Needed for H_eff to be well defined from a single rho_0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum and Semi-Classical Signatures of Dissipative Chaos in the Steady State." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C2W7XZZC

@misc{pith2026250614961,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum and Semi-Classical Signatures of Dissipative Chaos in the Steady State},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C2W7XZZC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14961}
}
abstract

We investigate the quantum-classical correspondence in open quantum many-body systems using the SU(3) Bose-Hubbard trimer as a minimal model. Combining exact diagonalization with semiclassical Langevin dynamics, we establish a direct connection between classical trajectories characterized by fixed-point attractors, limit cycles, or chaos and the spectral and structural properties of the quantum steady state. We show that classical dynamical behavior, as quantified by the sign of the Lyapunov exponent, governs the level statistics of the steady-state density matrix: non-positive exponents associated with regular dynamics yield Poissonian statistics, while positive exponents arising from chaotic dynamics lead to Wigner-Dyson statistics. Strong symmetries constrain the system to lower-dimensional manifolds, suppressing chaos and enforcing localization, while weak symmetries preserve the global structure of the phase space and allow chaotic behavior to persist. To characterize phase-space localization, we introduce the phase-space inverse participation ratio IPR, which defines an effective dimension D of the Husimi distribution's support. We find that the entropy scales as $S \propto \ln N^D$, consistently capturing the classical nature of the underlying dynamics. This semiclassical framework, based on stochastic mixtures of coherent states, successfully reproduces not only observable averages but also finer features such as spectral correlations and localization properties. Our results demonstrate that dissipative quantum chaos is imprinted in the steady-state density matrix, much like in closed systems, and that the interplay between dynamical regimes and symmetry constraints can be systematically probed using spectral and phase-space diagnostics. These tools offer a robust foundation for studying ergodicity, localization, and non-equilibrium phases of open quantum systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14961 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of the Bose-Hubbard trimer model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of how noisy classical trajectories – [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Evolution of the real part of the expectation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Poincaré cross sections of the classical dynamics projected in the 3-dimensional space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution P(λ) of Lyapunov exponents for the same four cases of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Level-spacing ratio statistics P(r), obtained from the stationary density matrix of representative non-cyclic (I), cyclic (II and III), and mixed (IV) cases. In each panel we show the distribution obtained from the quantum (main) and semiclassical (inset) density matri…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scaling with N of (a) IPRϕ and (b) von Neumann entropy S(ρ0). In both panels, Cases I (black triangle), II (blue circle), III (green square), and IV (red diamond) are the same of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Husimi distribution and stochastic end point of trajectories. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: SU(2) two wells model - Von Neumann entropy S(ρ) (a) and IPR (b) as a function of system size N. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SU(2) - Von Neumann entropy S(ρ) (a) and IPR (b) as a function of system size J. The black and red points refer to the cases h = 0.25 and h = 0.75, respectively. Here, γx = γy = 0 and Γp = 1. The Hamiltonian and Liovillian superoperator can be written as H = −h · S + …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Gap as a function of system size N for four cases of interest: the non-cyclic case (black triangle), and several cyclic cases (blue circle, green square, and red diamond). Only the non-cyclic case is gapped, while the cyclic ones are gapless. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Lindblad complex spectrum and complex spacing ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Lindblad complex spectrum and complex spacing ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    9 (black tri- angle) a rigid gap as a function of size system

    Gapped system To check the first part of the conjecture, we first con- sidered values of two-particle interactionU= 1for which a rigid gap∆ =Re(Λ 1)emerges in the Liouvillian spec- trum (Λn) of the non-cyclic case, see Fig. 9 (black tri- angle) a rigid gap as a function of size system. The importance of a gap in the first part of our conjecture resides in...

  2. [2]

    When the gap is zero, the imaginary part of Liouvillian eigenvalues contributes to the emer- gence of quantum dynamics that never ends (tr → ∞)

    Gapless system The second part of the conjecture states about the cyclic gapless case. When the gap is zero, the imaginary part of Liouvillian eigenvalues contributes to the emer- gence of quantum dynamics that never ends (tr → ∞). We show the gap as a function of systems sizeNfor a set of cyclic cases in Fig. 9 (blue circle, green square, and red diamond...

  3. [3]

    13, the Liouvillian spectrum is exhibited for each case: (a) non-cyclicU= 1(black color), cyclic U= 6(blue color) (b), cyclicU= 0.01(green color) (c) and cyclicU= 1(red color) (d)

    Liouvillian Spectrum In Fig. 13, the Liouvillian spectrum is exhibited for each case: (a) non-cyclicU= 1(black color), cyclic U= 6(blue color) (b), cyclicU= 0.01(green color) (c) and cyclicU= 1(red color) (d). The top figure is the Li- uvillian spectrum itself, and each middle panel represents a look more closely at the first spectrum points for some valu...

  4. [4]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller.Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Op- tics. Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, Berlin ; New York, 2nd enlarged ed edition, 2000

    2000

  5. [5]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014

    Gernot Schaller.Open Quantum Systems Far from Equilibrium, volume 881 ofLecture Notes in Physics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014

    2014

  6. [6]

    Felix Binder, Luis A. Correa, Christian Gogolin, Janet Anders, and Gerardo Adesso, editors.Thermodynam- ics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, volume 195 ofFundamental Theories of Physics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018

    2018

  7. [7]

    Wiseman and Gerard J

    Howard M. Wiseman and Gerard J. Milburn.Quantum Measurement and Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

    2014

  8. [8]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 10th anniver- sary ed edition, 2010

    2010

Show all 125 references
  1. [9]

    Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and F. Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York, 2002

    2002

  2. [10]

    Nonequilib- rium steady states and critical slowing down in the dis- sipative bose-hubbard model.Phys

    Robbe Ceulemans and Michiel Wouters. Nonequilib- rium steady states and critical slowing down in the dis- sipative bose-hubbard model.Phys. Rev. A, 108:013314, Jul 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Mixed-State Dynam- ics in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Systems: A Time-Dependent Superoperator Renormalization Algo- rithm.Phys

    Michael Zwolak and Guifré Vidal. Mixed-State Dynam- ics in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Systems: A Time-Dependent Superoperator Renormalization Algo- rithm.Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(20):207205, November 2004

    2004

  4. [12]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. García-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac. Ma- trix Product Density Operators: Simulation of Finite- Temperature and Dissipative Systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(20):207204, November 2004

    2004

  5. [13]

    A simple tensor network algorithm for two-dimensional steady states.Nat Commun, 8(1):1291, December 2017

    Augustine Kshetrimayum, Hendrik Weimer, and Román Orús. A simple tensor network algorithm for two-dimensional steady states.Nat Commun, 8(1):1291, December 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems.New J

    Tomaž Prosen. Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems.New J. Phys., 10(4):043026, April 2008

    2008

  7. [15]

    Quantization over boson operator spaces.J

    Tomaž Prosen and Thomas H Seligman. Quantization over boson operator spaces.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43(39):392004, October 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Solving quasi- free and quadratic Lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, April 2022

    Thomas Barthel and Yikang Zhang. Solving quasi- free and quadratic Lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, April 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of a Strongly Driven Open X X Z Chain.Phys

    Tomaž Prosen. Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of a Strongly Driven Open X X Z Chain.Phys. Rev. Lett., 107(13):137201, September 2011

    2011

  10. [18]

    Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of an Open Hubbard Chain.Phys

    Tomaz Prosen. Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of an Open Hubbard Chain.Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(3):030603, January 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Dissipation-driven integrable fermionic systems: From graded Yangians to exact nonequilib- rium steady states.SciPost Phys., 3(4):031, October 2017

    Enej Ilievski. Dissipation-driven integrable fermionic systems: From graded Yangians to exact nonequilib- rium steady states.SciPost Phys., 3(4):031, October 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Landi, Dario Poletti, and Gernot Schaller

    Gabriel T. Landi, Dario Poletti, and Gernot Schaller. Non-equilibrium boundary driven quantum systems: Models, methods and properties, March 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Ziolkowska and Fabian Essler

    Aleksandra A. Ziolkowska and Fabian Essler. Yang- Baxter integrable Lindblad equations.SciPost Phys., 8(3):044, March 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Rowlands and Austen Lamacraft

    Daniel A. Rowlands and Austen Lamacraft. Noisy Spins and the Richardson-Gaudin Model.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(9):090401, February 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Integrable Quantum Dynamics of Open Collective Spin Models.Phys

    Pedro Ribeiro and Tomaž Prosen. Integrable Quantum Dynamics of Open Collective Spin Models.Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(1):010401, January 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Dissipativedy- namics in open XXZ Richardson-Gaudin models.Phys

    PieterW.ClaeysandAustenLamacraft. Dissipativedy- namics in open XXZ Richardson-Gaudin models.Phys. Rev. Res., 4(1):013033, January 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Quan- tum chaos, randomness and universal scaling of entan- glement in various krylov spaces.arXiv, July 2024

    Hai-Long Shi, Augusto Smerzi, and Luca Pezzè. Quan- tum chaos, randomness and universal scaling of entan- glement in various krylov spaces.arXiv, July 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Simon Lieu, Max McGinley, and Nigel R. Cooper. Ten- fold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(4):040401, January 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Symmetry Classes of Open Fermionic Quantum Matter.Phys

    AlexanderAltland, MichaelFleischhauer, andSebastian Diehl. Symmetry Classes of Open Fermionic Quantum Matter.Phys. Rev. X, 11(2):021037, May 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Universal Spectra of Random Lindblad Operators.Phys

    Sergey Denisov, Tetyana Laptyeva, Wojciech Tarnowski, Dariusz Chruściński, and Karol Ży- czkowski. Universal Spectra of Random Lindblad Operators.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(14):140403, October 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Random Lindblad dynamics.J

    Tankut Can. Random Lindblad dynamics.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 52(48):485302, November 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Spectral Gaps and Midgap States in Random Quantum Master Equations.Phys

    Tankut Can, Vadim Oganesyan, Dror Orgad, and Sarang Gopalakrishnan. Spectral Gaps and Midgap States in Random Quantum Master Equations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(23):234103, December 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Spectral transitions and universal steady states in random Kraus maps and circuits.Phys

    Lucas Sá, Pedro Ribeiro, Tankut Can, and Tomaž Prosen. Spectral transitions and universal steady states in random Kraus maps and circuits.Phys. Rev. B, 102(13):134310, October 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Complex Spacing Ratios: A Signature of Dissipative Quantum Chaos.Phys

    Lucas Sá, Pedro Ribeiro, and Tomaz Prosen. Complex Spacing Ratios: A Signature of Dissipative Quantum Chaos.Phys. Rev. X, 10(2):021019, April 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    Levelclusteringinthereg- ular spectrum.Proc

    MichaelBerryandM.Tabor. Levelclusteringinthereg- ular spectrum.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 356(1686):375– 394, September 1977

    1977

  26. [34]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit. Character- ization of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws.Phys. Rev. Lett., 52(1):1–4, January 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Casati, F

    G. Casati, F. Valz-Gris, and I. Guarnieri. On the con- nection between quantization of nonintegrable systems and statistical theory of spectra.Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 28(8):279–282, June 1980

    1980

  28. [36]

    Spectral and steady-state properties of random Liouvillians.J

    Lucas Sá, Pedro Ribeiro, and Tomaž Prosen. Spectral and steady-state properties of random Liouvillians.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 53(30):305303, July 2020

    2020

  29. [37]

    Inte- grable nonunitary open quantum circuits.Phys

    Lucas Sá, Pedro Ribeiro, and Tomaz Prosen. Inte- grable nonunitary open quantum circuits.Phys. Rev. B, 103(11):115132, March 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    From integrability to chaos in quantum Liouvil- lians.SciPost Phys

    Alvaro Rubio-García, Rafael Molina, and Jorge Dukel- sky. From integrability to chaos in quantum Liouvil- lians.SciPost Phys. Core, 5(2):026, May 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Thermofielddynamics: Quantumchaosver- sus decoherence.Phys

    Zhenyu Xu, Aurelia Chenu, Tomaž Prosen, and Adolfo 22 delCampo. Thermofielddynamics: Quantumchaosver- sus decoherence.Phys. Rev. B, 103(6):064309, February 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Spectral Statistics of Non-Hermitian Matrices and Dissipative Quantum Chaos.Phys

    Jiachen Li, Tomaž Prosen, and Amos Chan. Spectral Statistics of Non-Hermitian Matrices and Dissipative Quantum Chaos.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(17):170602, Oc- tober 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Springer Series in Synergetics

    Fritz Haake, Sven Gnutzmann, and Marek Kuś.Quan- tum Signatures of Chaos. Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, Cham, 4th ed. 2018 edition, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Universality, robustness, and limits of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in open quantum systems

    Gabriel Almeida, Pedro Ribeiro, Masudul Haque, and Lucas Sá. Universality, robustness, and limits of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in open quantum systems. 2025

    2025

  35. [43]

    Chaos and thermalization in open quantum sys- tems

    Filippo Ferrari, Vincenzo Savona, and Fabrizio Min- ganti. Chaos and thermalization in open quantum sys- tems. 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Eigenvalue Statis- tics as an Indicator of Integrability of Nonequilibrium Density Operators.Phys

    Tomaž Prosen and Marko Žnidarič. Eigenvalue Statis- tics as an Indicator of Integrability of Nonequilibrium Density Operators.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(12):124101, September 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    Santos, and Pablo Barberis- Blostein

    David Villaseñor, Lea F. Santos, and Pablo Barberis- Blostein. Breakdown of the Quantum Distinction of Regular and Chaotic Classical Dynamics in Dissipative Systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:240404, Dec 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schirò, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio. Boundary Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(3):035301, July 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Chaos in time: A dissipative continuous quasi time crystals

    Parvinder Solanki and Fabrizio Minganti. Chaos in time: A dissipative continuous quasi time crystals. arXiv, November 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 2011

    Alex Kamenev.Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Sys- tems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 2011

    2011

  41. [49]

    Alireza Seif, Yu-Xin Wang, and Aashish A. Clerk. Dis- tinguishing between quantum and classical markovian dephasing dissipation.Phys. Rev. Lett., 128:070402, Feb 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Semiclassical quantum trajectories in the monitored lipkin-meshkov-glick model.arXiv, July 2024

    Alessandro Santini, Luca Lumia, Mario Collura, and Guido Giachetti2. Semiclassical quantum trajectories in the monitored lipkin-meshkov-glick model.arXiv, July 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Quantum Effects in the Steady State of the Dissipative Standard Map.Euro- phys

    T Dittrich and R Graham. Quantum Effects in the Steady State of the Dissipative Standard Map.Euro- phys. Lett., 4(3):263–268, August 1987

    1987

  44. [52]

    Effects of Weak Dissipation on the Long-Time Behaviour of the Quantized Standard Map.Europhys

    T Dittrich and R Graham. Effects of Weak Dissipation on the Long-Time Behaviour of the Quantized Standard Map.Europhys. Lett., 7(4):287–291, October 1988

    1988

  45. [53]

    Long time behavior in the quantized standard map with dissipation.Annals of Physics, 200(2):363–421, June 1990

    T Dittrich and R Graham. Long time behavior in the quantized standard map with dissipation.Annals of Physics, 200(2):363–421, June 1990

    1990

  46. [54]

    Carlo, Giuliano Benenti, and Dima L

    Gabriel G. Carlo, Giuliano Benenti, and Dima L. Shep- elyansky. Dissipative Quantum Chaos: Transition from Wave Packet Collapse to Explosion.Phys. Rev. Lett., 95(16):164101, October 2005

    2005

  47. [55]

    Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M

    Gabriel G. Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M. F. Rivas, María E. Spina, and Dario Poletti. Classical counterparts of quantum attractors in generic dissipa- tive systems.Phys. Rev. E, 95(6):062202, June 2017

    2017

  48. [56]

    Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M

    Gabriel G. Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M. F. Rivas, and María E. Spina. Classical properties of the leading eigenstates of quantum dissipative systems. Phys. Rev. E, 96(3):032202, September 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M

    Gabriel G. Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M. F. Rivas, and María E. Spina. Signatures of classical struc- tures in the leading eigenstates of quantum dissipative systems.Phys. Rev. E, 96(3):032202, sep 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, and Alejan- dro M.F

    Gabriel G. Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, and Alejan- dro M.F. Rivas. Effects of chaotic dynamics on quantum friction.Phys. Rev. E, 99(4):042214, April 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M

    Gabriel G. Carlo, Leonardo Ermann, Alejandro M. F. Rivas, and María E. Spina. Three-dimensional classical and quantum stable structures of dissipative systems. Phys. Rev. E, 99(1):012214, January 2019

    2019

  52. [60]

    Morrison and A

    S. Morrison and A. S. Parkins. Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Dissipative Lipkin-Meshkov- Glick Model with Proposed Realization in Optical Cav- ityQED.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100(4):040403, January2008

  53. [61]

    E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, A. Imamoglu, S. F. Yelin, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac. Dissipative phase transition in a central spin system.Phys. Rev. A, 86(1):012116, July 2012

    2012

  54. [62]

    Dissipation- driven quantum phase transitions and symmetry break- ing.Phys

    Julia Hannukainen and Jonas Larson. Dissipation- driven quantum phase transitions and symmetry break- ing.Phys. Rev. A, 98(4):042113, October 2018

    2018

  55. [63]

    Ferreira and Pedro Ribeiro

    João S. Ferreira and Pedro Ribeiro. Lipkin-Meshkov- Glick model with Markovian dissipation: A description of a collective spin on a metallic surface.Phys. Rev. B, 100(18):184422, November 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    S. Ya. Kilin. Effect of high-power coherent radiation on spontaneous emission of systems of many particles.J Appl Spectrosc, 28(2):180–185, February 1978

    1978

  57. [65]

    Drummond and H.J

    P.D. Drummond and H.J. Carmichael. Volterra cycles and the cooperative fluorescence critical point.Opt. Commun., 27(1):160–164, October 1978

    1978

  58. [66]

    Ivanchenko, Eugene A

    Mikhail V. Ivanchenko, Eugene A. Kozinov, Valentin D. Volokitin, Alexey V. Liniov, Iosif B. Meyerov, and Sergey V. Denisov. Classical Bifurcation Diagrams by Quantum Means.Ann. Phys., 529(8):1600402, August 2017

    2017

  59. [67]

    Nonlinear semiclassical dynamics of the unbalanced, open Dicke model.Phys

    KevinC.Stitely, AndrusGiraldo, BerndKrauskopf, and Scott Parkins. Nonlinear semiclassical dynamics of the unbalanced, open Dicke model.Phys. Rev. Research, 2(3):033131, July 2020

    2020

  60. [68]

    A. R. Kolovsky. Steady-state regime for the rotational dynamics of a molecule at the condition of quantum chaos.Phys. Rev. A, 48(4):3072–3081, October 1993

    1993

  61. [69]

    Volokitin, A

    V. Volokitin, A. Liniov, I. Meyerov, M. Hartmann, M. Ivanchenko, P. Hänggi, and S. Denisov. Com- putation of the asymptotic states of modulated open quantum systems with a numerically exact realization of the quantum trajectory method.Phys. Rev. E, 96(5):053313, November 2017

    2017

  62. [70]

    Asymptotic Floquet states of open quan- tum systems: The role of interaction.New J

    M Hartmann, D Poletti, M Ivanchenko, S Denisov, and P Hänggi. Asymptotic Floquet states of open quan- tum systems: The role of interaction.New J. Phys., 19(8):083011, August 2017

    2017

  63. [71]

    Debabrata Mondal, Andrey Kolovsky, and S. Sinha. Dissipative chaos and steady state of an open tavis- cummings dimer.Phys. Rev. E, 111:L052204, 2025

    2025

  64. [72]

    Steady-state quantum chaos in open quan- tum systems

    Debbie Eeltink Filippo Ferrari, Luca Gravina and Pasquale. Steady-state quantum chaos in open quan- tum systems

  65. [73]

    Integrabil- ity versus chaos in the steady state of many-body open quantum systems.Phys

    JosefRichter, LucasSá, andMasudulHaque. Integrabil- ity versus chaos in the steady state of many-body open quantum systems.Phys. Rev. E, 111:064103, 2025

    2025

  66. [74]

    Lidar and K

    Daniel A. Lidar and K. Birgitta Whaley. Decoherence- 23 Free Subspaces and Subsystems. In R. Beig, B. G. En- glert, U. Frisch, P. Hänggi, K. Hepp, W. Hillebrandt, D. Imboden, R. L. Jaffe, R. Lipowsky, H. v. Löh- neysen, I. Ojima, D. Sornette, S. Theisen, W. Weise, J. Wess, J. ...

    2003

  67. [75]

    D. C. Meredith, S. E. Koonin, and M. R. Zirnbauer. Quantum chaos in a schematic shell model.Phys. Rev. A, 37:3499–3513, May 1988

    1988

  68. [76]

    Quan- tum chaos of su3 observables

    Sven Gnutzmann, Fritz Haake, and Marek Kus. Quan- tum chaos of su3 observables. 33(1):143–161, dec 1999

    1999

  69. [77]

    Quantum signatures of an oscillatory instability in the bose-hubbardtrimer.Phys

    Peter Jason, Magnus Johansson, and Katarina Kirr. Quantum signatures of an oscillatory instability in the bose-hubbardtrimer.Phys. Rev. E,86:016214, Jul2012

  70. [78]

    Nemoto, C

    K. Nemoto, C. A. Holmes, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro. Quantum dynamics of three coupled atomic bose-einsteincondensates.Phys. Rev. A,63:013604, Dec 2000

    2000

  71. [79]

    Mossmann and C

    S. Mossmann and C. Jung. Semiclassical approach to bose-einstein condensates in a triple well potential. Phys. Rev. A, 74:033601, Sep 2006

    2006

  72. [80]

    Self-trapping mechanisms in the dynamics of three coupled bose- einstein condensates.Phys

    Roberto Franzosi and Vittorio Penna. Self-trapping mechanisms in the dynamics of three coupled bose- einstein condensates.Phys. Rev. A, 65:013601, Dec 2001

    2001

  73. [81]

    Dynamics of a bose–einstein condensate in a symmetric triple-well trap.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical, 44(17):175301, mar 2011

    Thiago F Viscondi and K Furuya. Dynamics of a bose–einstein condensate in a symmetric triple-well trap.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical, 44(17):175301, mar 2011

    2011

  74. [82]

    C. V. Chianca and M. K. Olsen. Quantum phase-space analysis of population equilibration in multiwell ultra- coldatomicsystems.Phys. Rev. A,84:043636, Oct2011

  75. [83]

    Open quantum symmetric simple exclusion process.Phys

    Denis Bernard and Tony Jin. Open quantum symmetric simple exclusion process.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:080601, Aug 2019

    2019

  76. [84]

    Equilib- rium fluctuations in maximally noisy extended quantum systems.SciPost Phys., 6:045, 2019

    Michel Bauer, Denis Bernard, and Tony Jin. Equilib- rium fluctuations in maximally noisy extended quantum systems.SciPost Phys., 6:045, 2019

    2019

  77. [85]

    Generalized coherent states and their ap- plications.Springer-Verlag New York Inc., 1 1986

    A Perelomov. Generalized coherent states and their ap- plications.Springer-Verlag New York Inc., 1 1986

    1986

  78. [86]

    Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(9):096001, aug 2016

    L M Sieberer, M Buchhold, and S Diehl. Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(9):096001, aug 2016

    2016

  79. [87]

    Tabor, and John Michael Zi- man

    Michael Victor Berry, M. Tabor, and John Michael Zi- man. Level clustering in the regular spectrum.Proceed- ings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 356(1686):375–394, 1977

    1977

  80. [88]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit. Charac- terization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws.Phys. Rev. Lett., 52:1–4, Jan 1984

    1984

  81. [89]

    Connection between quantization of nonintegrable systems and sta- tistical theory of spectra.Lett

    G Casati, F Valz-Gris, and I Guarnieri. Connection between quantization of nonintegrable systems and sta- tistical theory of spectra.Lett. Nuovo Cimento;(Italy), 28(8), 1980

    1980

  82. [90]

    W. M. Visscher. Localization of electron wave func- tions in disordered systems.Journal of Non Crystalline Solids, 8-10:477–484, June 1972

    1972

  83. [91]

    Dynamicalsystems.jl: A julia software library for chaos and nonlinear dynamics.Journal of Open Source Software, 3(23):598, mar 2018

    George Datseris. Dynamicalsystems.jl: A julia software library for chaos and nonlinear dynamics.Journal of Open Source Software, 3(23):598, mar 2018

    2018

  84. [92]

    Springer Nature, 2022

    George Datseris and Ulrich Parlitz.Nonlinear dynam- ics: a concise introduction interlaced with code. Springer Nature, 2022

    2022

  85. [93]

    Cvitanović, R

    P. Cvitanović, R. Artuso, R. Mainieri, G. Tanner, and G. Vattay.Chaos: Classical and Quantum. Niels Bohr Inst., Copenhagen, 2016

    2016

  86. [94]

    Com- plex spacing ratios: A signature of dissipative quantum chaos.Phys

    Lucas Sá, Pedro Ribeiro, and Toma ž Prosen. Com- plex spacing ratios: A signature of dissipative quantum chaos.Phys. Rev. X, 10:021019, Apr 2020

    2020

  87. [95]

    A note on symme- try reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains.New Journal of Physics, 14(7):073007, jul 2012

    Berislav Buča and Tomaž Prosen. A note on symme- try reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains.New Journal of Physics, 14(7):073007, jul 2012

    2012

  88. [96]

    An introduction to phase transitions in stochastic dynamical systems.Journal of Physics: Con- ference Series, 40(1):1, may 2006

    R A Blythe. An introduction to phase transitions in stochastic dynamical systems.Journal of Physics: Con- ference Series, 40(1):1, may 2006

    2006

  89. [97]

    Santos, and S

    Debabrata Mondal, Lea F. Santos, and S. Sinha. Tran- sient and steady-state chaos in dissipative quantum sys- tems, 2025. [95]https://doi.org/10.54499/QuantERA/0003/2021

    2025 doi

  90. [98]

    Ignacio Cirac

    Tommaso Guaita, Lucas Hackl, Tao Shi, Eugene Dem- ler, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Generalization of group- theoretic coherent states for variational calculations. Phys. Rev. Research, 3:023090, May 2021

    2021

  91. [99]

    Properties of coherent states.Rev

    R Gilmore. Properties of coherent states.Rev. Mex. Fis., v. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 143-187, 23(1), 1 1974

    1974

  92. [100]

    Semi- classical propagator for su(n) coherent states.J

    ThiagoF.ViscondiaandMarcusA.M.deAguiar. Semi- classical propagator for su(n) coherent states.J. Math. Phys., 52:052104, 2011

    2011

  93. [101]

    Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff relation for specialunitarygroupsSU(N).J

    Stefan Weigert. Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff relation for specialunitarygroupsSU(N).J. Phys. A,30:8739–8749, 1997

    1997

  94. [102]

    Cambridge University Press, 2010

    Alexander Altland and Ben D Simons.Condensed mat- ter field theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  95. [103]

    Vadim Oganesyan and David A. Huse. Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature.Phys. Rev. B, 75:155111, Apr 2007

    2007

  96. [104]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux. Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:084101, Feb 2013

    2013

  97. [106]

    Entropy of quantum states.Entropy, 23(6), 2021

    Paolo Facchi, Giovanni Gramegna, and Arturo Kon- derak. Entropy of quantum states.Entropy, 23(6), 2021

    2021

  98. [107]

    Ferreira and Pedro Ribeiro

    João S. Ferreira and Pedro Ribeiro. Lipkin-meshkov- glick model with markovian dissipation: A description of a collective spin on a metallic surface.Phys. Rev. B, 100:184422, Nov 2019

    2019

  99. [108]

    Kalthoff, Dante M

    Mona H. Kalthoff, Dante M. Kennes, Andrew J. Millis, and Michael A. Sentef. Nonequilibrium phase transition in a driven-dissipative quantum antiferromagnet.Phys. Rev. Res., 4:023115, May 2022

    2022

  100. [109]

    Santos, and Pablo Barberis- Blostein

    David Villaseñor, Lea F. Santos, and Pablo Barberis- Blostein. Breakdown of the Quantum Distinction of Regular and Chaotic Classical Dynamics in Dissipative Systems.arXiv, June 2024

    2024

  101. [110]

    Self-trapping mechanisms in the dynamics of three coupled Bose- Einstein condensates.Phys

    Roberto Franzosi and Vittorio Penna. Self-trapping mechanisms in the dynamics of three coupled Bose- Einstein condensates.Phys. Rev. A, 65(1):013601, De- cember 2001

    2001

  102. [111]

    Medvedyeva, Fabian H

    Mariya V. Medvedyeva, Fabian H. L. Essler, and Tomaž Prosen. Exact Bethe Ansatz Spectrum of a Tight- 24 Binding Chain with Dephasing Noise.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(13):137202, September 2016

    2016

  103. [112]

    Properties of coherent states.Rev

    R Gilmore. Properties of coherent states.Rev. Mex. Fis., v. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 143-187, January 1974

    1974

  104. [113]

    I. I. Yusipov, O. S. Vershinina, S. Denisov, S. P. Kuznetsov, and M. V. Ivanchenko. Quantum Lyapunov exponents beyond continuous measurements.Chaos, 29(6):063130, June 2019

    2019

  105. [114]

    Constructing Integrable Lindblad Superoperators

    Marius de Leeuw, Chiara Paletta, and Balázs Pozs- gay. Constructing Integrable Lindblad Superoperators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(24):240403, June 2021

    2021

  106. [115]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux. Distribution of the Ratio of Consecutive Level Spac- ings in Random Matrix Ensembles.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(8):084101, February 2013

    2013

  107. [116]

    Semi- classical propagator for SU(n) coherent states.J

    ThiagoF.ViscondiaandMarcusA.M.deAguiar. Semi- classical propagator for SU(n) coherent states.J. Math. Phys., 52:052104, 2011

    2011

  108. [117]

    I. I. Yusipov, S. V. Denisov, and M. V. Ivanchenko. Chaotic spin-photonic quantum states in an open pe- riodically modulated cavity.Chaos, 31(1):013112, Jan- uary 2021

    2021

  109. [118]

    Complex WKB evolution of Markovian open systems.J

    O Brodier and A M Ozorio de Almeida. Complex WKB evolution of Markovian open systems.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43(50):505308, December 2010

    2010

  110. [119]

    Quan- tum chaos ofSU 3 observables.J

    Sven Gnutzmann, Fritz Haake, and Marek Kus. Quan- tum chaos ofSU 3 observables.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 33(1):143–161, January 2000

    2000

  111. [120]

    I. I. Yusipov, O. S. Vershinina, S. V. Denisov, S. P. Kuznetsov, and M. V. Ivanchenko. Lyapunov expo- nents of quantum trajectories beyond continuous mea- surements.Chaos, 29(6):063130, June 2019

    2019

  112. [121]

    Liniov, I

    A. Liniov, I. Meyerov, E. Kozinov, V. Volokitin, I. Yusipov, M. Ivanchenko, and S. Denisov. Unfold- ing quantum master equation into a system of real- valued equations: Computationally effective expansion over the basis of $SU(N)$ generators.Phys. Rev. E, 100(5):053305, November 2019

    2019

  113. [122]

    Nemoto, C

    K. Nemoto, C. A. Holmes, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro. Quantum dynamics of three coupled atomic Bose-Einstein condensates.Phys. Rev. A, 63(1):013604, December 2000

    2000

  114. [123]

    Ignacio Cirac

    Tommaso Guaita, Lucas Hackl, Tao Shi, Eugene Dem- ler, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Generalization of group- theoretic coherent states for variational calculations. Phys. Rev. Research, 3(2):023090, May 2021

    2021

  115. [124]

    Reuben R. W. Wang, Bo Xing, Gabriel G. Carlo, and Dario Poletti. Period doubling in period-one steady states.Phys. Rev. E, 97(2):020202, February 2018

    2018

  116. [125]

    Lindblad dynamics of Gaussian states and their super- positions in the semiclassical limit.J

    E M Graefe, B Longstaff, T Plastow, and R Schubert. Lindblad dynamics of Gaussian states and their super- positions in the semiclassical limit.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 51(36):365203, September 2018

    2018

  117. [126]

    Vadim Oganesyan and David A. Huse. Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature.Phys. Rev. B, 75(15):155111, April 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.