Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FinTextQA: A Dataset for Long-form Financial Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.09980 v1 pith:C3T4EZQO submitted 2024-05-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords questiondatasetansweringfinancialfintextqalfqasystembaichuan2-7b
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate evaluation of financial question answering (QA) systems necessitates a comprehensive dataset encompassing diverse question types and contexts. However, current financial QA datasets lack scope diversity and question complexity. This work introduces FinTextQA, a novel dataset for long-form question answering (LFQA) in finance. FinTextQA comprises 1,262 high-quality, source-attributed QA pairs extracted and selected from finance textbooks and government agency websites.Moreover, we developed a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based LFQA system, comprising an embedder, retriever, reranker, and generator. A multi-faceted evaluation approach, including human ranking, automatic metrics, and GPT-4 scoring, was employed to benchmark the performance of different LFQA system configurations under heightened noisy conditions. The results indicate that: (1) Among all compared generators, Baichuan2-7B competes closely with GPT-3.5-turbo in accuracy score; (2) The most effective system configuration on our dataset involved setting the embedder, retriever, reranker, and generator as Ada2, Automated Merged Retrieval, Bge-Reranker-Base, and Baichuan2-7B, respectively; (3) models are less susceptible to noise after the length of contexts reaching a specific threshold.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FinMME: Benchmark Dataset for Financial Multi-Modal Reasoning Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FinMME is a new 11,099-sample financial chart benchmark where top AI models average around 50% and FinScore adds penalties for guessing.

  2. Enhancing Document-Level Question Answering via Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation with LLaMA 3

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A standard RAG pipeline with an undefined multi-hop module is reported to outperform baselines on financial QA datasets, without code or data.

Pith tools