Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Phylogenetic trees of stellar chemistry recover distinct enrichment pathways that track how different regions of a disc galaxy assembled.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 21:39 UTC pith:C4CFWCY5

load-bearing objection Promising methods paper on chemical phylogenetics for disc assembly, but we only have the abstract and the load-bearing claim (tree topology = assembly pathway) is still unaudited. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2604.11974 v2 pith:C4CFWCY5 submitted 2026-04-13 astro-ph.GA

Reconstructing chemical enrichment pathways in disc galaxies: A phylogenetic approach

Brian Tapia-Contreras , Patricia B. Tissera , Emanuel Sillero , Paula Jofr\'e , Keaghan Yaxley , Xia Hua , Robert M. Yates , \'Alvaro M\'arquez S.
show 6 more authors
Theosamuele Signor Payel Das \'Alvaro Rojas-Arriagada Claudia Aguilera-G\'omez Francisco Jara-Ferreira Robert A. Foley
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galactic phylogeneticschemical enrichmentdisc galaxiesstellar populationsCorrected Colless indexbar-driven inflowsspiral armschemical abundances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that methods borrowed from evolutionary biology can read a galaxy’s chemical fossil record. Using a high-resolution simulation of an isolated disc, the authors build phylogenetic trees from the chemical abundances of stars in an inner ring (shaped by early bar-driven inflows) and an outer ring (shaped by spiral arms). The trees look different: the inner region shows a tight early clade dominated by rapid core-collapse supernova enrichment, then a hierarchical climb as Type Ia supernovae and AGB stars contribute; the outer region produces more balanced, caterpillar-like trees with smoother abundance gradients. A standard tree-balance metric, the Corrected Colless index, separates the two regions and remains stable even with only about a hundred stars. If the method works, chemical phylogenetics becomes a practical way to reconstruct assembly history from abundance patterns rather than from kinematics alone.

Core claim

In a simulated disc galaxy, phylogenetic trees constructed from stellar chemical abundances recover region-dependent enrichment pathways: the inner ring forms a compact old SNII-dominated clade followed by hierarchical SNIa/AGB enrichment, while the outer ring yields more symmetric trees consistent with prolonged star formation and local mixing, and these structural differences are captured by the Corrected Colless index even for modest samples.

What carries the argument

Galactic phylogenetic trees built from multi-element chemical abundance vectors of selected stellar populations, quantified by the Corrected Colless index of tree balance, which turns abundance relationships into a readable map of enrichment order and mixing.

Load-bearing premise

Tree shape built from chemical abundance vectors of selected stars truly records assembly history rather than simulation mixing, particle selection, or the particular enrichment model.

What would settle it

Apply the same tree construction and Corrected Colless comparison to stars drawn from inner and outer rings of an independent simulation (or real survey fields) with known but different bar versus spiral assembly histories; if the index no longer separates the regions or the SNII-then-SNIa hierarchy disappears, the claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Inner-disc versus outer-disc stellar samples should produce measurably different phylogenetic balance even when only ~100 stars are available.
  • Chemical phylogenetics can complement kinematic archaeology by ordering enrichment events without requiring full orbital histories.
  • Rapid early SNII clades followed by hierarchical SNIa/AGB branches become an expected chemical signature of bar-driven central assembly.
  • Smoother, more symmetric trees become an expected signature of spiral-arm-dominated outer discs with efficient local mixing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method is robust, multi-element abundance catalogues from large spectroscopic surveys could be turned into assembly chronologies for real Milky Way-like discs without new simulations for every field.
  • Tree-balance metrics may offer a compact scalar diagnostic for comparing chemical evolution across different galaxy simulations and enrichment codes.
  • The same residual-structure idea could be stress-tested on galaxies that experienced major mergers to see whether the balance signal survives violent mixing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript (as represented by its abstract and metadata for arXiv:2604.11974) proposes applying phylogenetic tree reconstruction to chemical abundance vectors of stellar populations in a high-resolution isolated disc-galaxy simulation, in order to recover assembly-linked chemical enrichment pathways. Two radial regions are contrasted: an inner ring associated with early bar-driven inflows and an outer ring shaped by spiral arms. Trees are quantified with the Corrected Colless balance index; the abstract reports a compact old SNII-dominated clade plus hierarchical SNIa/AGB enrichment in the inner ring, versus more symmetric caterpillar-like trees and smoother gradients in the outer ring, with enrichment-rate trends offered as corroboration and index differences said to converge for modest samples (NSSP = 100). The central claim is that galactic phylogenetics is a novel, complementary tool for decoding the chemical fossil record of disc assembly.

Significance. If the method robustly recovers assembly-driven enrichment structure beyond what is already visible in abundance gradients and enrichment-rate histories, it would be a genuine methodological contribution to galactic archaeology, importing a mature biological toolkit (tree balance metrics, clade structure) into chemical evolution. The abstract’s emphasis on multi-channel enrichment (SNII, SNIa, AGB), particle inheritance of parent-gas composition, and sample-size convergence (NSSP = 100) is in principle falsifiable and of practical interest for both simulations and future multi-element surveys. That significance, however, is entirely conditional on controls that cannot be audited from the materials provided for this review.

major comments (3)
  1. The full manuscript text supplied under paper_id 2604.11974 is not this paper: it is an unrelated DeepONet / coherent nonlinear wave dynamics manuscript (arXiv:2604.11972). No methods, distance metric, tree-building algorithm, figures, tables, or statistical tests for the galactic phylogenetics work are available. A load-bearing technical review of the central claim is therefore impossible; the report below is constrained to the abstract and cannot verify any result.
  2. Abstract (central claim): Differences in phylogenetic topology and Corrected Colless index between the inner (bar-influenced) and outer (spiral-influenced) rings are interpreted as recovering assembly-linked enrichment pathways. That inference requires that abundance-vector trees primarily encode assembly history rather than continuous mixing, radial enrichment-rate gradients, particle selection, chemical-distance definition, or the isolated-disc enrichment model. The abstract supplies no distance metric, linkage/algorithm, null models (e.g. shuffled abundances, mixed-region controls, or trees built from enrichment rates alone), or comparison showing that phylogeny adds information beyond the enrichment-rate corroboration already cited. Until those controls are present and auditable, the assembly-history reading of tree structure remains an assumption.
  3. Abstract (experimental design): Results rest on a single isolated disc simulation and two hand-chosen rings. Without a suite of simulations (varying bar strength, spiral structure, feedback, or cosmological accretion) or explicit tests against known assembly histories, it is unclear whether tree-balance differences generalise or are simulation- and selection-specific. The free parameter NSSP and the claim of robust convergence at NSSP = 100 also cannot be assessed without the sampling protocol and uncertainty quantification.
minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: ‘Target particles are selected to store the chemical history of each chemical element’ is ambiguous (which elements, how many, abundance ratios vs absolute abundances, normalisation). Clarify in any resubmission.
  2. Abstract: ‘caterpillar-like trees’ and ‘compact clade’ are qualitative; define operationally (e.g. Colless, Sackin, or clade-size statistics) when the correct full text is provided.
  3. Title/abstract framing as ‘unveil assembly histories’ is stronger than what an isolated disc (no mergers/accretion) can demonstrate; consider ‘enrichment pathways linked to internal secular structure’ unless cosmological assembly is actually modelled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical phylogenetic comparison of simulated chemical abundances, not a closed-loop derivation.

full rationale

Based on the available abstract (the cached full manuscript is the unrelated DeepONet paper 2604.11972, so methods/equations cannot be audited), the work is an empirical simulation experiment: stellar particles inherit parent-gas chemical compositions; phylogenetic trees are built for inner-ring vs outer-ring populations; tree balance is quantified with the Corrected Colless index; and chemical enrichment rates are used as independent corroboration. Nothing in the abstract defines the claimed pathway difference (compact SNII clade vs caterpillar-like outer trees; significant Colless contrast) as equal to a fitted parameter or as a tautology of the inputs. There is no self-definitional loop, no fitted quantity re-labeled as a prediction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, and no ansatz smuggled via self-citation. Residual methodological risks (region selection, chemical distance, enrichment model) are assumptions about interpretation, not circular reductions of the derivation chain. Score 0 is therefore the honest finding from the text that can be quoted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

With only the abstract, the load-bearing premises are domain assumptions of chemical tagging and phylogenetic reconstruction plus simulation-specific modeling choices. No free numerical parameters beyond the reported sample size threshold are given; invented entities are methodological constructs (galactic phylogenetic trees of stellar populations), not new physical particles.

free parameters (1)
  • NSSP (number of stellar sample particles) = 100
    Abstract reports robust convergence at NSSP = 100; this is a chosen sample size that affects claimed stability of tree indices.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Stellar chemical abundance vectors inherit parent-gas composition and preserve enough evolutionary signal to reconstruct enrichment pathways via phylogenetic trees.
    Core premise of galactic chemical tagging and of the phylogenetic application stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The Corrected Colless index of tree balance is a meaningful discriminator of chemical assembly modes between galactic regions.
    Abstract uses this biological metric as the quantitative structural comparison between inner and outer rings.
  • ad hoc to paper An isolated high-resolution disc simulation with multi-channel enrichment (SNII, SNIa, AGB) is a sufficient laboratory for testing whether phylogenetics can unveil assembly histories.
    Study design rests on one simulated isolated disc and two selected rings; no multi-simulation or observational validation is stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Inner-ring chemistry is dominated by early bar-driven inflows and outer-ring chemistry by spiral-arm-driven prolonged star formation and local mixing.
    Abstract interprets tree differences through these dynamical narratives of the two regions.
invented entities (1)
  • Galactic phylogenetic trees of stellar populations (chemical clades) no independent evidence
    purpose: Represent hierarchical chemical enrichment relationships among stars as evolutionary trees analogous to biological phylogenies.
    The paper's central construct; independent evidence would require recovery of known assembly events in controlled simulations or real multi-element surveys beyond this abstract.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 8614 in / 2876 out tokens · 30889 ms · 2026-07-12T21:39:21.931252+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reconstructing chemical enrichment pathways in disc galaxies: A phylogenetic approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C4CFWCY5

@misc{pith2026260411974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reconstructing chemical enrichment pathways in disc galaxies: A phylogenetic approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C4CFWCY5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.11974}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Phylogenetic methods, traditionally used in biology to trace the evolutionary relationships among species, are emerging as a powerful framework to reconstruct evolutionary processes in galaxies from chemical information. We apply galactic phylogenetics to study the chemical evolution of stellar populations in distinct regions of a simulated disc galaxy, assessing its capability to unveil assembly histories. We used a high-resolution simulation that follows the chemical enrichment of an isolated disc galaxy, by different stellar progenitors. We track gas particles as they turn into stars and inherit their parent gas chemical composition. Target particles are selected to store the chemical history of each chemical element considered in the simulation. Two regions were analysed: an inner ring, influenced by early bar-driven inflows, and an outer ring, shaped by spiral arms. We built phylogenetic trees for stellar populations in each region and quantified their structure using the Corrected Colless index, a standard metric of tree balance used in biology. The inner ring tree reveals a compact clade of old stars enriched by rapid SNII feedback, followed by a hierarchical sequence with increasing SNIa and AGB contributions. In contrast, the outer ring exhibits more symmetric, caterpillar-like trees with smoother abundance gradients, consistent with more prolonged star formation and efficient local mixing. Chemical enrichment rates corroborate these trends, showing fast early enrichment in the inner ring and gradual, spatially extended enrichment in the outer disc. The structural indices differ significantly between the two regions and converge robustly even for modest stellar samples (NSSP = 100). Galactic phylogenetics provides a novel and complementary tool to decode the fossil record of galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11974 by \'Alvaro M\'arquez S., \'Alvaro Rojas-Arriagada, Brian Tapia-Contreras, Claudia Aguilera-G\'omez, Emanuel Sillero, Francisco Jara-Ferreira, Keaghan Yaxley, Patricia B. Tissera, Paula Jofr\'e, Payel Das, Robert A. Foley, Robert M. Yates, Theosamuele Signor, Xia Hua.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Face-on and edge-on projected gas (left) and stellar (right) density distribution of the simulated galaxy. The inner, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time evolution of the star formation rate for the whole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Enrichment histories of target gas particles in the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The age-metallicity relation (AMR) of the stellar populations in the inner ring (purple squares) and outer ring (orange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper panel: Histogram of the radii of the donor parti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phylogenetic tree constructed with 400 target stellar particles randomly selected from the inner ring. Color indicates the age [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phylogenetic Tree of the inner ring (same as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Phylogenetic Tree of the outer ring (same as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distribution of tree balance metric, the CC index, com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Convergence of CC tree shape index, as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disentangling chemical evolution histories with phylogenetic trees

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Phylogenetic trees built from flexCE model abundances separate primarily by the outflow mass-loading parameter η, with branches connecting at the most metal-rich tips.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    C., Somerville , R

    Arrigoni , M., Trager , S. C., Somerville , R. S., & Gibson , B. K. 2010, , 402, 173

    2010

  4. [4]

    A., Wetzel , A., Loebman , S

    Bellardini , M. A., Wetzel , A., Loebman , S. R., et al. 2021, , 505, 4586

    2021

  5. [5]

    & Freeman , K

    Bland-Hawthorn , J. & Freeman , K. C. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 297, Star Formation Through Time, ed. E. Perez, R. M. Gonzalez Delgado, & G. Tenorio-Tagle , 457--+

    2003

  6. [6]

    & Menci , N

    Calura , F. & Menci , N. 2009, , 400, 1347

    2009

  7. [7]

    B., Padilla , N., et al

    Casanueva-Villarreal , C., Tissera , P. B., Padilla , N., et al. 2024, , 688, A183

    2024

  8. [8]

    E., Tissera , P

    Cataldi , P., Pedrosa , S. E., Tissera , P. B., et al. 2023, , 523, 1919

    2023

  9. [9]

    1997, ApJ, 477, 765

    Chiappini , C., Matteucci , F., & Gratton , R. 1997, ApJ, 477, 765

    1997

  10. [10]

    1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (London: John Murray)

    Darwin, C. 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (London: John Murray)

  11. [11]

    B., et al

    de Brito Silva , D., Jofr \'e , P., Tissera , P. B., et al. 2024, , 962, 154

    2024

  12. [12]

    E., Bower , R

    De Rossi , M. E., Bower , R. G., Font , A. S., Schaye , J., & Theuns , T. 2017, , 472, 3354

    2017

  13. [13]

    Deason , A. J. & Belokurov , V. 2024, , 99, 101706

    2024

  14. [14]

    L., & Wicke, K

    Fischer, M., Herbst, L., Kersting, S., K \"u hn, A. L., & Wicke, K. 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Fragkoudi , F., Grand , R. J. J., Pakmor , R., et al. 2020, , 494, 5936

    2020

  16. [16]

    M., Torrey , P., Hemler , Z

    Garcia , A. M., Torrey , P., Hemler , Z. S., et al. 2023, , 519, 4716

    2023

  17. [17]

    2006, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 1997

    Gascuel , O. 2006, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 1997

    2006

  18. [18]

    B., Monachesi , A., et al

    Gonzalez-Jara , J., Tissera , P. B., Monachesi , A., et al. 2025, , 693, A282

    2025

  19. [19]

    & Madau , P

    Haardt , F. & Madau , P. 2001, in Clusters of Galaxies and the High Redshift Universe Observed in X-rays, ed. D. M. Neumann & J. T. V. Tran

    2001

  20. [20]

    Heard, S. B. 1992, Evolution, 46, 1818

    1992

  21. [21]

    2020, , 58, 205

    Helmi , A. 2020, , 58, 205

    2020

  22. [22]

    S., Torrey , P., Qi , J., et al

    Hemler , Z. S., Torrey , P., Qi , J., et al. 2021, , 506, 3024

    2021

  23. [23]

    1990, , 356, 359

    Hernquist , L. 1990, , 356, 359

    1990

  24. [24]

    1999, ApJS, 125, 439

    Iwamoto , K., Brachwitz , F., Nomoto , K., et al. 1999, ApJS, 125, 439

    1999

  25. [25]

    2021, , 502, 32

    Jackson , H., Jofr \'e , P., Yaxley , K., et al. 2021, , 502, 32

    2021

  26. [26]

    B., Sillero , E., et al

    Jara-Ferreira , F., Tissera , P. B., Sillero , E., et al. 2024, , 530, 1369

    2024

  27. [27]

    B., & Matteucci , F

    Jim \'e nez , N., Tissera , P. B., & Matteucci , F. 2015, , 810, 137

    2015

  28. [28]

    2025, , 699, A291

    Jofr \'e , P., Aguilera-G \'o mez , C., Villarreal , P., et al. 2025, , 699, A291

    2025

  29. [29]

    2017, , 467, 1140

    Jofr \'e , P., Das , P., Bertranpetit , J., & Foley , R. 2017, , 467, 1140

    2017

  30. [30]

    W., Weinberg , D

    Johnson , J. W., Weinberg , D. H., Vincenzo , F., et al. 2021, , 508, 4484

    2021

  31. [31]

    Karakas , A. I. 2010, , 403, 1413

    2010

  32. [32]

    J., Rupke , D., Zahid , H

    Kewley , L. J., Rupke , D., Zahid , H. J., Geller , M. J., & Barton , E. J. 2010, ApJL, 721, L48

    2010

  33. [33]

    & Slatkin, M

    Kirxpatrick, M. & Slatkin, M. 1993, Evolution, 47, 1171

    1993

  34. [34]

    A., & Mendel , J

    Leaman , R., VandenBerg , D. A., & Mendel , J. T. 2013, , 436, 122

    2013

  35. [35]

    2002, MNRAS, 330, 821

    Lia , C., Portinari , L., & Carraro , G. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 821

    2002

  36. [36]

    F., Wetzel , A

    Ma , X., Hopkins , P. F., Wetzel , A. R., et al. 2017, , 467, 2430

    2017

  37. [37]

    2021, , 29, 5

    Matteucci , F. 2021, , 29, 5

    2021

  38. [38]

    & Greggio , L

    Matteucci , F. & Greggio , L. 1986, A & A, 154, 279

    1986

  39. [39]

    & Ferrini , F

    Moll\'a , M. & Ferrini , F. 1995, ApJ, 454, 726

    1995

  40. [40]

    B., Tissera , P

    Mosconi , M. B., Tissera , P. B., Lambas , D. G., & Cora , S. A. 2001, , 325, 34

    2001

  41. [41]

    G., Okamoto , T., et al

    Nagashima , M., Lacey , C. G., Okamoto , T., et al. 2005, , 363, L31

    2005

  42. [42]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1996, , 462, 563

    1996

  43. [43]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1997, , 490, 493

    1997

  44. [44]

    E., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., Mosumgaard , J

    Nissen , P. E., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., Mosumgaard , J. R., et al. 2020, , 640, A81

    2020

  45. [45]

    2013, , 51, 457

    Nomoto , K., Kobayashi , C., & Tominaga , N. 2013, , 51, 457

    2013

  46. [46]

    A., Spitoni , E., Recio-Blanco , A., et al

    Palicio , P. A., Spitoni , E., Recio-Blanco , A., et al. 2023, , 678, A61

    2023

  47. [47]

    Pedrosa , S. E. & Tissera , P. B. 2015, , 584, A43

    2015

  48. [48]

    Perez , J., Michel-Dansac , L., & Tissera , P. B. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 580

    2011

  49. [49]

    & Matteucci , F

    Pipino , A. & Matteucci , F. 2011, , 530, A98

    2011

  50. [50]

    Queiroz , A. B. A., Anders , F., Chiappini , C., et al. 2023, , 673, A155

    2023

  51. [51]

    M., Villata , M., & Navarro , J

    Raiteri , C. M., Villata , M., & Navarro , J. F. 1996, A & A, 315, 105

    1996

  52. [52]

    A., et al

    Recio-Blanco , A., de Laverny , P., Palicio , P. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A29

    2023

  53. [53]

    D., et al

    Rodr \' guez , S., Garcia Lambas , D., Padilla , N. D., et al. 2022, , 514, 6157

    2022

  54. [54]

    Rupke , D. S. N., Kewley , L. J., & Chien , L.-H. 2010, , 723, 1255

    2010

  55. [55]

    Salpeter , E. E. 1955, , 121, 161

    1955

  56. [56]

    B., White , S

    Scannapieco , C., Tissera , P. B., White , S. D. M., & Springel , V. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 552

    2005

  57. [57]

    B., White , S

    Scannapieco , C., Tissera , P. B., White , S. D. M., & Springel , V. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1125

    2006

  58. [58]

    B., Lambas , D

    Sillero , E., Tissera , P. B., Lambas , D. G., & Michel-Dansac , L. 2017, , 472, 4404

    2017

  59. [59]

    2021, , 647, A73

    Spitoni , E., Verma , K., Silva Aguirre , V., et al. 2021, , 647, A73

    2021

  60. [60]

    B., Sillero , E., et al

    Tapia-Contreras , B., Tissera , P. B., Sillero , E., et al. 2025, , 700, A69

    2025

  61. [61]

    A., Monachesi , A., Gomez , F

    Tau , E. A., Monachesi , A., Gomez , F. A., et al. 2025, , 699, A93

    2025

  62. [62]

    1998, , 296, 119

    Thomas , D., Greggio , L., & Bender , R. 1998, , 296, 119

    1998

  63. [63]

    Tinsley , B. M. 1980, , 5, 287

    1980

  64. [64]

    B., Bignone , L., Gonzalez-Jara , J., et al

    Tissera , P. B., Bignone , L., Gonzalez-Jara , J., et al. 2025, , 697, A134

    2025

  65. [65]

    B., Pedrosa , S

    Tissera , P. B., Pedrosa , S. E., Sillero , E., & Vilchez , J. M. 2016, , 456, 2982

    2016

  66. [66]

    B., Scannapieco , C., Beers , T

    Tissera , P. B., Scannapieco , C., Beers , T. C., & Carollo , D. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3391

    2013

  67. [67]

    B., White , S

    Tissera , P. B., White , S. D. M., & Scannapieco , C. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 255

    2012

  68. [68]

    2024, , 529, 2946

    Walsen , K., Jofr \'e , P., Buder , S., et al. 2024, , 529, 2946

    2024

  69. [69]

    White , S. D. M. & Frenk , C. S. 1991, , 379, 52

    1991

  70. [70]

    Wiersma , R. P. C., Schaye , J., & Smith , B. D. 2009, , 393, 99

    2009

  71. [71]

    M., Henriques , B., Thomas , P

    Yates , R. M., Henriques , B., Thomas , P. A., et al. 2013, , 435, 3500

    2013

  72. [72]

    M., Henriques , B

    Yates , R. M., Henriques , B. M. B., Fu , J., et al. 2021, , 503, 4474

    2021

  73. [73]

    Zhang , C., Li , Z., Hu , Z., & Krumholz , M. R. 2025, , 540, 3906

    2025