REVIEW 1 cited by
Isothermal Fragmentation: Is there a low-mass cut-off?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Isothermal Fragmentation: Is there a low-mass cut-off?
read the original abstract
The evolution of self-gravitating clouds of isothermal gas forms the basis of many star formation theories. Therefore it is important to know under what conditions such a cloud will undergo homologous collapse into a single, massive object, or will fragment into a spectrum of smaller ones. And if it fragments, do initial conditions (e.g. Jeans mass, sonic mass) influence the mass function of the fragments, as predicted by many theories of star formation? In this paper we show that the relevant parameter separating homologous collapse from fragmentation is not the Mach number of the initial turbulence (as suspected by many), but the infall Mach number $\mathcal{M}_{\rm infall}\sim\sqrt{G M/(R c_s^2)}$, equivalent to the number of Jeans masses in the initial cloud $N_J$. We also show that fragmenting clouds produce a power-law mass function with slopes close to the expected -2 (i.e. equal mass in all logarithmic mass intervals). However, the low-mass cut-off of this mass function is entirely numerical; the initial properties of the cloud have no effect on it. In other words, if $\mathcal{M}_{\rm infall}\gg 1$, fragmentation proceeds without limit to masses much smaller than the initial Jeans mass.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn: A Cloud-Scale Star Formation Model Unifying Variable SFE, IMFs, and Stochasticity
A cloud-based semi-analytic model shows that a top-heavy stellar initial mass function and a cloud-property-dependent star-formation efficiency, rather than cloud mass or density, most strongly shape the UV luminosity...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.