Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 294 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · glm-5.2

Squeezing a crystal along one axis strengthens charge order; along the other, it weakens

2026-07-09 07:20 UTC pith:C4P6KKMO

load-bearing objection Solid experimental demonstration of strain-tunable spin-charge coupling in EuAl4; the chiral charge order claim is speculative and the strain-broadening concern is real but probably does not overturn the main result. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07544 v1 pith:C4P6KKMO submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Strain-tunable charge localization coupled to complex magnetic orders in EuAl₄

classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.45.Lr75.25.Dk61.50.Ks75.50.Ee
keywords charge orderspin-charge couplingEuAl4uniaxial pressuremagnetic phasesx-ray diffractioncharge localizationskyrmion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies EuAl₄, a metal that develops both charge order (a periodic modulation of where electrons sit in the lattice) and at least eight distinct magnetic phases at low temperature. Using high-energy x-ray diffraction under uniaxial pressure and magnetic field, the authors track the first, second, and third harmonics of the charge-order signal. The ratio of higher harmonics to the fundamental measures how far the charge pattern departs from a simple sinusoidal wave toward genuine site-localized charge — the difference between a gentle ripple and electrons clumping at specific atoms. The central finding is that charge localization and magnetic order are directly coupled, and that this coupling is highly directional: compressing the crystal along the c-axis (the direction along which the charge order propagates) enhances charge localization inside the magnetically ordered phases by up to 70%, while compressing along an in-plane axis weakens it. Magnetic field experiments reveal that some magnetic phases compete with charge order while others appear cooperative. The authors argue that because charge and spin both reside on the Eu sites, the coupling goes beyond conventional electron-phonon mechanisms, and that the strain-tunable interplay could be used to pattern chiral charge order from magnetic textures like skyrmion lattices.

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that the degree of charge localization in EuAl₄ — measured by the intensity ratios of higher harmonics of the charge-order diffraction peaks — is directly coupled to magnetic order and is tunable by uniaxial strain in a direction-dependent way. Compressive c-axis strain enhances charge localization within the magnetic phases; in-plane strain suppresses it. Magnetic field reveals both competitive and collaborative spin-charge interactions across the eight known magnetic phases. The charge and spin degrees of freedom share the Eu site, suggesting the coupling is not purely lattice-driven.

What carries the argument

The intensity ratios η₂₁ = I_co(2)/I_co(1) and η₃₁ = I_co(3)/I_co(1) of charge-order diffraction harmonics, which quantify the degree of charge localization on a spectrum from sinusoidal density wave (η = 0) to strongly site-localized order (η ~ 1). Uniaxial pressure along distinct crystallographic axes serves as the tuning knob; high-energy x-ray diffraction at a synchrotron serves as the probe.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation assumes that changes in the ratios of higher-harmonic diffraction intensities unambiguously reflect intrinsic changes in charge localization, rather than strain-induced structural domain fragmentation or peak broadening that could distort the measured intensity ratios.

What would settle it

If the observed changes in harmonic intensity ratios under strain were shown to arise from extrinsic effects — such as domain fragmentation, strain inhomogeneity, or changes in diffraction geometry — rather than from a genuine change in the real-space charge distribution, the central claim of direction-dependent, tunable spin-charge coupling would be undermined.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If chiral magnetic phases (skyrmion lattices, spiral orders) can imprint their symmetry onto charge order, then strain could become a switch for creating chiral charge textures — a form of electronic order patterned by magnetic topology.
  • The direction-dependent strain response implies that the charge-order propagation direction and the magnetic easy-plane are coupled through lattice geometry, so epitaxial strain engineering in thin films of EuAl₄ could stabilize or suppress specific spin-charge coupled phases.
  • The competitive versus collaborative nature of spin-charge coupling across different magnetic phases suggests that the coupling sign depends on the magnetic structure's symmetry, which could be tested by correlating charge-order changes with neutron-scattering-determined magnetic structures phase by phase.
  • The 6% shift in charge incommensurability under modest c-axis strain is large compared to analogous effects in cuprates, suggesting EuAl₄ has an unusually strain-sensitive electronic structure that could be exploited in devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cooperative magnetic phase under c-axis strain is indeed chiral (as the authors speculate but do not confirm), then simultaneous measurement of the anomalous Hall effect and charge-order harmonics under strain would directly test whether chiral spin order generates chiral charge order.
  • The observation that η₃₁ is temperature-independent while η₂₁ is strongly temperature-dependent suggests the second and third harmonics may couple to different aspects of the magnetic order — possibly the amplitude and phase of the magnetic superstructure, respectively — which could be disentangled with magnetic-field-dependent measurements at additional harmonic orders.
  • The broadened transition and diffuse scattering noted under strain (Supplementary Note 2) could mean that the enhanced localization under c-axis strain partially reflects domain fragmentation rather than a uniform electronic change; controlled domain-imaging experiments would clarify whether the effect is intrinsic or partially extrinsic.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports x-ray diffraction measurements of charge order in EuAl4 under uniaxial strain and magnetic field. The authors track the first, second, and third harmonics of the charge-order satellites and use their intensity ratios (eta_21, eta_31) as a measure of charge localization. The central claims are: (1) charge localization is enhanced upon entering the magnetically ordered phases, (2) c-axis strain further enhances localization while in-plane b-axis strain weakens it, and (3) magnetic field reveals competitive and collaborative spin-charge interactions. The experimental technique and data presentation are standard for the field, and the comparison benchmarks (SrAl4, IrTe2) provide useful context.

Significance. The identification of a tunable coupling between charge order and complex magnetic phases (including skyrmion and spiral phases) in EuAl4 is timely and relevant. The use of uniaxial pressure to independently tune charge order while preserving the Eu magnetic sublattice is a clean experimental strategy. The comparison of harmonic intensity ratios against the localized-limit benchmark IrTe2 and the density-wave benchmark SrAl4 provides a quantitative framework for situating EuAl4 in the crossover regime. The falsifiable prediction that c-axis strain may stabilize a cooperative (possibly chiral) magnetic-charge phase, testable by Hall effect or neutron scattering, is a concrete and valuable outcome. Data are deposited in a Zenodo repository.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that c-axis strain enhances charge localization rests on the ~70% increase of eta_21 = I_co(2)/I_co(1) at low temperature (Fig. 2c). Supplementary Note 2 explicitly states that c-axis strain broadens the CDW transition and produces 'structural domain fragmentation' with diffuse scattering persisting above T_CDW. The manuscript does not report FWHM or lineshape analysis of the n=1 and n=2 satellite peaks at low temperature under strain. Because higher harmonics sit at larger |Q| and are generally more susceptible to strain gradients and resolution effects, differential broadening between n=1 and n=2 could bias the intensity ratio. The authors should either (a) present peak-width analysis showing that the n=1 and n=2 satellites are comparably broadened (or not) under c-axis strain at low T, or (b) demonstrate that the fitting procedure uses integrated intensities robustly
  2. The abstract states that 'chiral charge order may for example be patterned from spin structures with that symmetry,' and the Discussion (final paragraph) suggests that the cooperative magnetic phase under c-axis strain may be chiral. However, no measurement of chirality (Hall effect, polarized neutron, or resonant x-ray scattering) is presented. The claim is framed as speculative in the Discussion but stated more assertively in the abstract. The authors should either soften the abstract language to match the Discussion or provide additional justification for why the cooperative phase is expected to be chiral.
minor comments (6)
  1. The definition of eta_ij appears in the main text and again in Fig. 1h caption; a single clear definition statement would improve readability.
  2. Fig. 3 labels (a-d) are rendered as unicode escape sequences in the provided manuscript text, making the figure difficult to parse. This should be verified in the production version.
  3. The strain values (epsilon_b = -0.2%, epsilon_c = -0.5%) are quoted without error bars. Given that strain calibration (Supplementary Note 1) relies on linear fits to Bragg peak positions, an estimate of the uncertainty would be appropriate.
  4. The magnetic field and strain experiments were performed separately (Methods, last paragraph). This is a reasonable experimental constraint, but it would help to state explicitly in the figure captions of Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 that the data are from different experimental runs on potentially different crystals.
  5. Reference [26] is dated 2026; this should be verified for correctness.
  6. The sentence 'This observation is likely linked to pressure effects on the magnetically ordered phases as discussed later' (b-axis strain section) is vague; the 'later' discussion is not clearly identified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and constructive comments. Both points are well-taken and will be addressed in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Peak-width analysis of n=1 and n=2 satellites under c-axis strain at low T; concern that differential broadening could bias η_21.

    Authors: The referee raises a valid and important concern. We have re-examined our fitting procedure and can confirm that the intensity ratios η_ij reported in the manuscript are extracted from integrated intensities (peak area), not peak heights. The fitting routine fits each satellite with a Gaussian (or pseudo-Voigt) profile and integrates the fitted curve, which is robust against differential broadening to first order. However, the referee is correct that we did not explicitly state this in the manuscript, nor did we present the FWHM comparison between n=1 and n=2 satellites under c-axis strain at low temperature. We will address this in two ways in the revision: (1) we will add an explicit statement in the Methods section that integrated intensities from profile fits are used throughout, and (2) we will add a supplementary figure showing the FWHM of n=1 and n=2 satellite peaks as a function of temperature under c-axis strain. Our preliminary analysis indicates that while both peaks broaden modestly under c-axis strain, the broadening is comparable for the two harmonics, and the ~70% increase in η_21 persists when using integrated intensities. We note that the enhancement of η_31 (which involves n=3 at even larger |Q|) provides an internal consistency check: if differential broadening were artificially inflating η_21, one would expect a similar or larger artifact in η_31, yet η_31 also shows a consistent enhancement under c-axis strain. We agree this should be documented explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract language about chiral charge order is more assertive than the speculative framing in the Discussion.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the abstract language is more assertive than the Discussion warrants. The sentence 'Chiral charge order may for example be patterned from spin structures with that symmetry' is intended as a speculative outlook, but the phrasing could be read as a stronger claim. In the revision, we will soften the abstract to read something along the lines of: 'This flexible coupling between spin and charge ordering opens a new route to designing symmetry-breaking states, with chiral charge order as one possible direction for future investigation.' This better matches the cautious framing in the Discussion, where we explicitly state that 'Determining whether this cooperative magnetic phase is chiral will require Hall effect, neutron scattering, or polarised light scattering measurements under c-axis strain.' We have no chirality measurement to report and do not wish to overstate our findings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found; central claims derived from direct diffraction measurements with independent strain calibration and external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is straightforward and non-circular. The central claim — that c-axis strain enhances charge localization within magnetic phases — rests on directly measured x-ray diffraction intensities of charge-order satellite harmonics (n=1,2,3). The localization proxy η_21 = I_co(2)/I_co(1) is defined as a ratio of measured intensities (Fig. 1h, Eq. in 'Charge order in EuAl4' section), and its interpretation as a measure of charge localization follows from standard diffraction physics: a non-sinusoidal real-space charge profile generates higher harmonics. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then 'predicted' on related data. Strain is independently calibrated from Bragg peak shifts (Supplementary Note 1), not inferred from the charge-order signal itself. External benchmarks (SrAl4 from Ref [6] by Saraf et al. — no author overlap; IrTe2 from Ref [14] by Ivashko et al. — some author overlap but used only as a comparison reference point, not as a load-bearing premise). Self-citations (Refs [33], [41], [42], [44]) are methodological (pressure cell, beamline, magnet) and do not underpin the physics claims. The skeptic's concern about strain-induced peak broadening (Supplementary Note 2) is a correctness/interpretation risk, not a circularity: the paper does not use the broadening to derive its conclusions in a self-referential way. No step in the chain reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new theoretical entities or free parameters. It relies on standard condensed matter concepts and experimental measurements.

free parameters (1)
  • Strain magnitudes = epsilon_b = -0.2%, epsilon_c = -0.5%
    These are experimentally applied and measured strain values, not fitted parameters.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Higher harmonic intensity ratios (eta_21, eta_31) quantitatively measure the degree of charge localization.
    This is a standard assumption in x-ray diffraction analysis of charge density waves, used throughout the paper to interpret the data.
  • domain assumption Changes in charge order metrics under strain are due to intrinsic spin-charge coupling rather than extrinsic effects like domain fragmentation.
    The paper notes peak broadening under strain (Supplementary Note 2) but attributes the changes in harmonic ratios to coupling effects in the main text.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 16564 in / 1673 out tokens · 301574 ms · 2026-07-09T07:20:45.362010+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Charge localization is particularly interesting when coupled to antiferromagnetic spin structures. Coupled spin-charge orders are well established in elemental chromium and correlated oxide superconductors, yet the interplay between charge order and more complex magnetic textures -- such as skyrmion lattices and chiral spin structures -- remains largely unexplored. Here we report a comprehensive study of how charge localization couples to the unusually rich sequence of magnetic phases in EuAl$_4$. Using x-ray diffraction under applied magnetic field and uniaxial pressure, we demonstrate a direct coupling between the charge and spin order parameters. In the absence of external stimuli, charge localization is markedly enhanced upon entering the magnetically ordered phases. Strikingly, this effect is highly susceptible to strain: uniaxial pressure applied along the charge-order propagation direction further enhances localization, whereas pressure applied perpendicular to it weakens it. Application of magnetic field reveals both competitive and possible collaborative interactions between spin and charge ordering.This flexible coupling between spin and charge ordering opens a new route to designing symmetry-breaking states. Chiral charge order may for example be patterned from spin structures with that symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07544 by A. Akrap, Fazhi Yang, F. Igoa Salda\~na, J. Chang, J. K\"uspert, J. Oppliger, Junzhang Ma, K. Kudo, M. Baumgartner, M. H\"ucker, M. Nohara, M. Novak, M. v. Zimmermann, N. Bari\v{s}i\'c, O. Ivashko, P. Sa\v{c}er, Qisi Wang, S. Pyon, Tianren Wang, Tian Shang, Xunyang Hong, Yuetong Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 294 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , month = may, year =

    Strogatz, Steven H. , month = may, year =. Nonlinear. doi:10.1201/9780429492563 , language =

  2. [2]

    and Tranquada, John M

    Shirane, Gen and Shapiro, Stephen M. and Tranquada, John M. , month = feb, year =. Neutron. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511534881 , abstract =

  3. [3]

    Physical Review X , author =

    Directly. Physical Review X , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041019 , language =

  4. [4]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =

    Ca _. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.79.024704 , language =

  5. [5]

    Chemical Communications , author =

    [. Chemical Communications , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1039/b107075d , number =

  6. [6]

    Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science , author =

    Polysomatic apatites , volume =. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S0108768109053981 , abstract =

  7. [7]

    Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , author =

    Electronic structure of. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0022-3697(00)00262-6 , language =

  8. [8]

    IUCrJ , author =

    On the correlation between hydrogen bonding and melting points in the inositols , volume =. IUCrJ , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S2052252513026511 , abstract =

  9. [9]

    Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances , author =

    Selling reduction versus. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S2053273318015413 , abstract =

  10. [10]

    Digital Discovery , author =

    Neural networks trained on synthetically generated crystals can extract structural information from. Digital Discovery , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1039/D3DD00071K , abstract =

  11. [11]

    Lafuente, Barbara and Downs, R. T. and Yang, H. and Stone, N. , editor =. 1. Highlights in. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1515/9783110417104-003 , urldate =

  12. [12]

    and Luo, Aileen and Yin, Xiangyu and Prince, Michael and Toby, Brian H

    Andrejevic, Nina and Du, Ming and Sharma, Hemant and Horwath, James P. and Luo, Aileen and Yin, Xiangyu and Prince, Michael and Toby, Brian H. and Cherukara, Mathew J. , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2603.23367 , abstract =

  13. [13]

    Quantum Fisher information in a strange metal

    Mazza, Federico and Biswas, Sounak and Yan, Xinlin and Prokofiev, Andrey and Steffens, Paul and Si, Qimiao and Assaad, Fakher F. and Paschen, Silke , year =. Quantum. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2403.12779 , abstract =

  14. [14]

    Quantum Fisher Information Reveals UV-IR Mixing in the Strange Metal

    Bałut, David and Guo, Xuefei and de Vries, Niels and Chaudhuri, Dipanjan and Bradlyn, Barry and Abbamonte, Peter and Phillips, Philip W. , year =. Quantum. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2412.14413 , abstract =

  15. [15]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Amplified multipartite entanglement witnessed in a quantum critical metal , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57778-7 , language =

  16. [16]

    Nature Physics , author =

    Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities , volume =. Nature Physics , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nphys3700 , language =

  17. [17]

    Physical Review B , author =

    O 17. Physical Review B , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.014537 , language =

  18. [18]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Emergence of charge order from the vortex state of a high-temperature superconductor , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/ncomms3113 , abstract =

  19. [19]

    and LeBoeuf, D

    Normal state specific heat in the cuprate superconductors. Physical Review B , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.214506 , language =

  20. [20]

    Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity.Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13:600 – 612, 05 2004

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 , number =

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the 33rd

    Paszke, Adam and Gross, Sam and Massa, Francisco and Lerer, Adam and Bradbury, James and Chanan, Gregory and Killeen, Trevor and Lin, Zeming and Gimelshein, Natalia and Antiga, Luca and Desmaison, Alban and Köpf, Andreas and Yang, Edward and DeVito, Zach and Raison, Martin and Tejani, Alykhan and Chilamkurthy, Sasank and Steiner, Benoit and Fang, Lu and B...

  22. [22]

    MarketsandMarkets , note =

    Cryo-electron. MarketsandMarkets , note =

  23. [23]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Existence of electron and hole pockets and partial gap opening in the correlated semimetal. Physical Review B , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.041113 , language =

  24. [24]

    Radiation Measurements , author =

    An introduction to the. Radiation Measurements , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2020.106271 , abstract =

  25. [25]

    and Gerguri, O

    Biało, I. and Gerguri, O. and Martinelli, L. and Küspert, J. and Choi, J. and Garcia-Fernandez, M. and Agrestini, S. and Zhou, K. J. and Weschke, E. and Kurosawa, T. and Momono, N. and Oda, M. and Lin, C. and Wang, Q. and Chang, J. , month = jan, year =. Orbital. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.01643 , abstract =

  26. [26]

    and Kuo, C.-T

    Lee, H. and Kuo, C.-T. and Fujita, M. and Kao, C.-C. and Lee, J.-S. , month = may, year =. Superconductivity. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/g41t-8456 , abstract =

  27. [27]

    Neural Networks , author =

    Deep learning on image denoising:. Neural Networks , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 , language =

  28. [28]

    Communications Biology , author =

    Content aware image restoration improves spatiotemporal resolution in luminescence imaging , volume =. Communications Biology , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04886-z , abstract =

  29. [29]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Democratising deep learning for microscopy with. Nature Communications , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22518-0 , abstract =

  30. [30]

    Electronic Structure , author =

    Line shapes in time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy explored by machine learning , volume =. Electronic Structure , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ae1e4a , abstract =

  31. [31]

    Physical Review Materials , author =

    Denoising scanning tunneling microscopy images of graphene with supervised machine learning , volume =. Physical Review Materials , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.123802 , language =

  32. [32]

    Buchholz, Tim-Oliver and Jordan, Mareike and Pigino, Gaia and Jug, Florian , month = apr, year =. Cryo-. 2019. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759519 , urldate =

  33. [33]

    2026 , keywords =

    Expert Systems with Applications , author =. 2026 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129126 , abstract =

  34. [34]

    Probabilistic denoising for reliable signal extraction in spectroscopy

    Kim, Younsik and Kim, Changyoung , year =. Probabilistic denoising for reliable signal extraction in spectroscopy , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2605.07819 , abstract =

  35. [35]

    IEEE Signal Processing Letters , author =

    On. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1109/LSP.2020.3016837 , urldate =

  36. [36]

    Ultramicroscopy , author =

    Comparison of optimal performance at 300. Ultramicroscopy , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.08.002 , abstract =

  37. [37]

    Ultramicroscopy , author =

    Sub-pixel electron detection using a convolutional neural network , volume =. Ultramicroscopy , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113091 , abstract =

  38. [38]

    and Šišak Jung, D

    Donath, T. and Šišak Jung, D. and Burian, M. and Radicci, V. and Zambon, P. and Fitch, A. N. and Dejoie, C. and Zhang, B. and Ruat, M. and Hanfland, M. and Kewish, C. M. and Riessen, G. A. van and Naumenko, D. and Amenitsch, H. and Bourenkov, G. and Bricogne, G. and Chari, A. and Schulze-Briese, C. , month = jul, year =. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation ,...

  39. [39]

    and Dudina, Alexandra and Kaspar, Sebastian and Schulze-Briese, Clemens , month = feb, year =

    Zambon, Pietro and Montemurro, Giuseppe Vito and Fernandez-Perez, Sonia and Schnyder, Roger and Lehmann, Niklaus and Sakhelashvili, Tariel and Burkhalter, Stephan and Meffert, Matthias and Jensen, Arne and Würsch, Pascal and Jud, Pascal A. and Dudina, Alexandra and Kaspar, Sebastian and Schulze-Briese, Clemens , month = feb, year =. A gallium arsenide hyb...

  40. [40]

    and Barba Flores, L

    Xie, X. and Barba Flores, L. and Bejar Haro, B. and Bergamaschi, A. and Fröjdh, E. and Müller, E. and Paton, K.A. and Poghosyan, E. and Remlinger, C. , month = jan, year =. Enhancing spatial resolution in. Journal of Instrumentation , publisher =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/01/C01020 , abstract =

  41. [41]

    Journal of Instrumentation , author =

    M. Journal of Instrumentation , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/C05015 , abstract =

  42. [42]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =

    Allpix2:. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.06.020 , abstract =

  43. [43]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , author =

    An autoencoder for compressing angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy data , volume =. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ada8f2 , abstract =

  44. [45]

    Physical Review X , author =

    Fisher. Physical Review X , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/kn3z-rmm8 , abstract =

  45. [46]

    Journal of Instrumentation , author =

    A. Journal of Instrumentation , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/12/C12018 , abstract =

  46. [47]

    and Kelman, Bradley and Pichon, Thibault and Biancalani, Enrico and Gilbert, James , month = dec, year =

    Arko, Matej and Prod’homme, Thibaut and Lemmel, Frederic and Serra, Benoit and George, Elizabeth M. and Kelman, Bradley and Pichon, Thibault and Biancalani, Enrico and Gilbert, James , month = dec, year =. Pyxel 1.0: an open source. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , publisher =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.4.048002 , abstract =

  47. [48]

    Geant4 — a simulation toolkit,

    Geant4—a simulation toolkit , volume =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =. 2003 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8 , abstract =

  48. [49]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Superconductivity suppression and bilayer decoupling in. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2536919123 , abstract =

  49. [50]

    2009 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/970 , number =

  50. [51]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Orbital magnetic moments in. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/hdzg-mn6r , language =

  51. [52]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Investigating the interstellar dust through the. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731664 , abstract =

  52. [53]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =

    Laue diffraction from biological samples , volume =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(86)90164-6 , abstract =

  53. [54]

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology , author =

    Radiation damage to biological macromolecules∗ , volume =. Current Opinion in Structural Biology , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102662 , abstract =

  54. [55]

    Native structure of photosystem

    Suga, Michihiro and Akita, Fusamichi and Hirata, Kunio and Ueno, Go and Murakami, Hironori and Nakajima, Yoshiki and Shimizu, Tetsuya and Yamashita, Keitaro and Yamamoto, Masaki and Ago, Hideo and Shen, Jian-Ren , month = jan, year =. Native structure of photosystem. Nature , publisher =. doi:10.1038/nature13991 , abstract =

  55. [56]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , author =

    Quantitative. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01749 , abstract =

  56. [57]

    Garman, E. F. and Weik, M. , month = sep, year =. Radiation damage to biological samples: still a pertinent issue , volume =. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , publisher =. doi:10.1107/S1600577521008845 , abstract =

  57. [58]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Two-dimensional bilayer ice in coexistence with three-dimensional ice without confinement , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50187-2 , abstract =

  58. [59]

    Water confined between graphene layers: the case for a square ice

    Walet, Niels R. , year =. Water confined between graphene layers: the case for a square ice , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1702.00963 , abstract =

  59. [60]

    Nature , author =

    Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries , volume =. Nature , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature14295 , language =

  60. [61]

    Journal of Alloys and Compounds , author =

    Characteristic. Journal of Alloys and Compounds , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.193 , language =

  61. [62]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Scaling of. Physical Review Letters , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5623 , language =

  62. [63]

    npj Quantum Materials , author =

    Multicomponent fluctuation spectrum at the quantum critical point in. npj Quantum Materials , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41535-019-0191-y , abstract =

  63. [64]

    Nature Physics , author =

    Charge-order-maximized momentum-dependent superconductivity , volume =. Nature Physics , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nphys699 , language =

  64. [65]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Dimerization-. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.086402 , language =

  65. [66]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Charge-. Scientific Reports , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16945-7 , abstract =

  66. [67]

    Science Advances , author =

    Resonant inelastic x-ray incarnation of. Science Advances , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav4020 , abstract =

  67. [68]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , author =

    Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium , volume =. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.60.209 , language =

  68. [69]

    Abbamonte , author A

    Spatially modulated '. Nature Physics , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nphys178 , language =

  69. [70]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Anomalous. Physical Review B , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L020405 , language =

  70. [71]

    Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , author =

    P21.1 at. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S1600577525002826 , abstract =

  71. [72]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =

    Lattice. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.88.014602 , language =

  72. [73]

    Physical Review Materials , author =

    Insensitivity of the striped charge orders in. Physical Review Materials , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.074002 , language =

  73. [74]

    Nature Nanotechnology , author =

    Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer. Nature Nanotechnology , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.143 , language =

  74. [75]

    Communications Materials , author =

    Charge density waves and the effects of uniaxial strain on the electronic structure of. Communications Materials , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s43246-024-00661-7 , language =

  75. [76]

    Nature , author =

    Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet , volume =. Nature , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05034-z , language =

  76. [77]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Square and rhombic lattices of magnetic skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary compound , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29131-9 , abstract =

  77. [78]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Correlation between complex spin textures and the magnetocaloric and. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.165136 , language =

  78. [79]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Spin order and fluctuations in the. Physical Review B , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.014423 , language =

  79. [80]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =

    Transport and. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.84.124711 , language =

  80. [81]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Electron-phonon coupling in. Physical Review B , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.195150 , language =

Showing first 80 references.