REVIEW 4 cited by
Unmasking DeepFakes with simple Features
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep generative models have recently achieved impressive results for many real-world applications, successfully generating high-resolution and diverse samples from complex datasets. Due to this improvement, fake digital contents have proliferated growing concern and spreading distrust in image content, leading to an urgent need for automated ways to detect these AI-generated fake images. Despite the fact that many face editing algorithms seem to produce realistic human faces, upon closer examination, they do exhibit artifacts in certain domains which are often hidden to the naked eye. In this work, we present a simple way to detect such fake face images - so-called DeepFakes. Our method is based on a classical frequency domain analysis followed by basic classifier. Compared to previous systems, which need to be fed with large amounts of labeled data, our approach showed very good results using only a few annotated training samples and even achieved good accuracies in fully unsupervised scenarios. For the evaluation on high resolution face images, we combined several public datasets of real and fake faces into a new benchmark: Faces-HQ. Given such high-resolution images, our approach reaches a perfect classification accuracy of 100% when it is trained on as little as 20 annotated samples. In a second experiment, in the evaluation of the medium-resolution images of the CelebA dataset, our method achieves 100% accuracy supervised and 96% in an unsupervised setting. Finally, evaluating a low-resolution video sequences of the FaceForensics++ dataset, our method achieves 91% accuracy detecting manipulated videos. Source Code: https://github.com/cc-hpc-itwm/DeepFakeDetection
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Towards Generalizable Deepfake Detection with Spatial-Frequency Collaborative Learning and Hierarchical Cross-Modal Fusion
A spatial-frequency deepfake detector with hierarchical cross-modal fusion reports state-of-the-art accuracy on FaceForensics++ and improved cross-dataset AUC on Celeb-DF and DFDC.
-
Towards a Universal Synthetic Video Detector: From Face or Background Manipulations to Fully AI-Generated Content
A single detector trained on face-forgery and game-rendered video beats face-only detectors on background-edited and text-to-video synthetic content.
-
Unmasking Deep Fakes: Leveraging Deep Learning for Video Authenticity Detection
A MTCNN-EfficientNet-B5 pipeline achieves 0.4278 log loss, 0.938 AUC, and 0.8682 F1 on the Kaggle DFDC deepfake video dataset.
-
Face Deepfakes -- A Comprehensive Review
A review of face deepfake generation and detection finds that off-the-shelf deepfake tools such as Wav2Lip and SimSwap achieve high attack success rates against lightweight face recognition models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.