Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Unmasking DeepFakes with simple Features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.00686 v3 pith:C4VH4G3W submitted 2019-11-02 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords imagesfakeaccuracyfacemethodsamplesachievedachieves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep generative models have recently achieved impressive results for many real-world applications, successfully generating high-resolution and diverse samples from complex datasets. Due to this improvement, fake digital contents have proliferated growing concern and spreading distrust in image content, leading to an urgent need for automated ways to detect these AI-generated fake images. Despite the fact that many face editing algorithms seem to produce realistic human faces, upon closer examination, they do exhibit artifacts in certain domains which are often hidden to the naked eye. In this work, we present a simple way to detect such fake face images - so-called DeepFakes. Our method is based on a classical frequency domain analysis followed by basic classifier. Compared to previous systems, which need to be fed with large amounts of labeled data, our approach showed very good results using only a few annotated training samples and even achieved good accuracies in fully unsupervised scenarios. For the evaluation on high resolution face images, we combined several public datasets of real and fake faces into a new benchmark: Faces-HQ. Given such high-resolution images, our approach reaches a perfect classification accuracy of 100% when it is trained on as little as 20 annotated samples. In a second experiment, in the evaluation of the medium-resolution images of the CelebA dataset, our method achieves 100% accuracy supervised and 96% in an unsupervised setting. Finally, evaluating a low-resolution video sequences of the FaceForensics++ dataset, our method achieves 91% accuracy detecting manipulated videos. Source Code: https://github.com/cc-hpc-itwm/DeepFakeDetection

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Generalizable Deepfake Detection with Spatial-Frequency Collaborative Learning and Hierarchical Cross-Modal Fusion

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A spatial-frequency deepfake detector with hierarchical cross-modal fusion reports state-of-the-art accuracy on FaceForensics++ and improved cross-dataset AUC on Celeb-DF and DFDC.

  2. Towards a Universal Synthetic Video Detector: From Face or Background Manipulations to Fully AI-Generated Content

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single detector trained on face-forgery and game-rendered video beats face-only detectors on background-edited and text-to-video synthetic content.

  3. Unmasking Deep Fakes: Leveraging Deep Learning for Video Authenticity Detection

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A MTCNN-EfficientNet-B5 pipeline achieves 0.4278 log loss, 0.938 AUC, and 0.8682 F1 on the Kaggle DFDC deepfake video dataset.

  4. Face Deepfakes -- A Comprehensive Review

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of face deepfake generation and detection finds that off-the-shelf deepfake tools such as Wav2Lip and SimSwap achieve high attack success rates against lightweight face recognition models.

Pith tools