Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.02701 v2 pith:C6KGBFDQ submitted 2025-04-03 cs.AI cs.MA

Responsible Development of Offensive AI

classification cs.AI cs.MA
keywords offensivedevelopmentprioritiesadvancesagentsai-poweredbalancebenefits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI advances, broader consensus is needed to determine research priorities. This endeavor discusses offensive AI and provides guidance by leveraging Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and interpretability techniques. The objective is to more effectively establish priorities that balance societal benefits against risks. The two forms of offensive AI evaluated in this study are vulnerability detection agents, which solve Capture- The-Flag challenges, and AI-powered malware.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.