Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ClickAgent: Enhancing UI Location Capabilities of Autonomous Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.11872 v2 pith:C6SLFMM6 submitted 2024-10-09 cs.HC cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.LG
keywords clickagentagentsautonomousandroidelementslocationmllmssmartphone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the growing reliance on digital devices equipped with graphical user interfaces (GUIs), such as computers and smartphones, the need for effective automation tools has become increasingly important. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) like GPT-4V excel in many areas, they struggle with GUI interactions, limiting their effectiveness in automating everyday tasks. In this paper, we introduce ClickAgent, a novel framework for building autonomous agents. In ClickAgent, the MLLM handles reasoning and action planning, while a separate UI location model (e.g., SeeClick) identifies the relevant UI elements on the screen. This approach addresses a key limitation of current-generation MLLMs: their difficulty in accurately locating UI elements. ClickAgent outperforms other prompt-based autonomous agents (CogAgent, AppAgent) on the AITW benchmark. Our evaluation was conducted on both an Android smartphone emulator and an actual Android smartphone, using the task success rate as the key metric for measuring agent performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Software Engineering for and with GUI Agent

    cs.SE 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey of 336 GUI-agent papers finds rapid growth alongside weak engineering support for recovery, human oversight, maintainability, and privacy, and calls for lifecycle-centered testing and governance.

Pith tools