REVIEW 2 cited by
Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Training
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as an effective approach for activating latent capabilities in LLMs. Interestingly, we observe that both CoT reasoning and self-training share the core objective: iteratively leveraging model-generated information to progressively reduce prediction uncertainty. Building on this insight, we propose a novel CoT framework to improve reasoning performance. Our framework integrates two key components: (i) a task-specific prompt module that optimizes the initial reasoning process, and (ii) an adaptive reasoning iteration module that dynamically refines the reasoning process and addresses the limitations of previous CoT approaches, \ie over-reasoning and high similarity between consecutive reasoning iterations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method achieves significant advantages in both performance and computational efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
What Does Chain-of-Thought Contribute at Probe Time? Evidence for Local Co-Occurrence Activation
CoT probe-time gains arise primarily from lexical activation and short-range token co-occurrence rather than sentence-level logical derivation.
-
Reflect, Retry, Reward: Self-Improving LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
A GRPO-based method that rewards only self-reflection tokens, not answer tokens, improves LLM accuracy on function calling and Countdown math tasks using only binary success/failure feedback.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.