REVIEW 2 cited by
Surveying Generative AI's Economic Expectations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
I introduce a survey of economic expectations formed by querying a large language model (LLM)'s expectations of various financial and macroeconomic variables based on a sample of news articles from the Wall Street Journal between 1984 and 2021. I find the resulting expectations closely match existing surveys including the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF), the American Association of Individual Investors, and the Duke CFO Survey. Importantly, I document that LLM based expectations match many of the deviations from full-information rational expectations exhibited in these existing survey series. The LLM's macroeconomic expectations exhibit under-reaction commonly found in consensus SPF forecasts. Additionally, its return expectations are extrapolative, disconnected from objective measures of expected returns, and negatively correlated with future realized returns. Finally, using a sample of articles outside of the LLM's training period I find that the correlation with existing survey measures persists -- indicating these results do not reflect memorization but generalization on the part of the LLM. My results provide evidence for the potential of LLMs to help us better understand human beliefs and navigate possible models of nonrational expectations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Nowcasting the euro area with social media data
Reddit-derived LLM sentiment, augmented with comment voting signals, improves out-of-sample nowcasts of euro area inflation and unemployment, with gains up to 13 percentage points.
-
DatedGPT: Preventing Lookahead Bias in Large Language Models with Time-Aware Pretraining
Twelve yearly-cutoff language models are trained to prevent lookahead bias, but the headline finance result in the abstract does not appear in the paper.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.