Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 145 references

Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: a Review

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A decade of research has made pruning robots smart in parts, but the missing link is putting the parts together into a field-ready whole.

desk verdict A useful, competent review of a niche field whose high-level conclusions survive its sloppy tables; needs a careful table-checking revision but deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07318 v1 pith:CBZYISWH submitted 2025-05-12 cs.RO

Alessandro Navone , Mauro Martini , Marcello Chiaberge This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords autonomouspruningorchardroboticsvineyardprecisionagriculturemachinevisionskeletonizationpointestimationroboticmanipulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews a decade of research (2014–2024) on robots that prune apples, grapevines, cherries, and other fruit crops. It argues that progress has been real but lopsided: machine-vision methods for detecting branches, buds, and canes and for reconstructing plant skeletons have advanced rapidly with deep learning, and several full prototypes have been tested in the field. Yet most published works still target one module in isolation, and the few end-to-end systems remain an order of magnitude slower than manual pruning. The review's central claim is that the remaining barrier is not any single algorithm but the integration of perception, planning, actuation, and platform mobility into robust, affordable, field-ready systems.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is the modular pruning pipeline: perception (tree detection and segmentation, skeletonization and structure reconstruction, cutting-point estimation) feeding manipulation (manipulator design, end-effector design, planning and control). The review uses this decomposition to sort the literature and to measure coverage, and it is what lets the authors argue that most works address only one stage while few integrate the whole chain. Within the pipeline, the recurring technical workhorses are deep segmentation networks (Mask R-CNN, Faster R-CNN, SegNet, U-Net variants), thinning or graph-based skeletonization (Zhang–Suen, space colonization, shortest-path on graphs), and sampling-based planners (RRT-Connect) for motion.

What would settle it

A comprehensive, reproducible search that followed the review's own pipeline categories and covered additional databases, non-English venues, and commercial systems would settle the matter: if it surfaced several field-deployed pruners before 2024 that prune at near-manual speed across multiple sites, the claimed integration gap would be wrong. A cheaper test: timing the perception, planning, and actuation stages of an integrated prototype to show which stage dominates the one-to-two-minutes-per-vine figure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim, stated on its own terms, is that autonomous pruning research from 2014 to 2024 has produced strong component-level results but no mature integrated solution. The perception side—branch and bud detection, semantic segmentation, 2D/3D skeletonization, and pruning-point estimation—absorbs most of the literature (apple 31.6%, grapevine 24.6%, cherry 17.5% of the analyzed papers), reflecting the recent influence of deep learning. Manipulator and end-effector design and control receive less coverage, and the complete systems that do exist, such as grapevine pruners and a sweet-cherry pruner, achieve cutting success between roughly 58% and 97% in field or lab trials while taking one to two minutes per vine, about ten times slower than a human. The conclusion is that fully integrated, generalizable autonomous pruning systems require further development, with the path forward lying in speed, generalization, and simulation-based training.

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions depend on its literature search being comprehensive: the authors searched two major bibliographic databases in June 2024 and February 2025 but do not report the query strings, inclusion criteria, or a screening flow diagram, so unindexed or non-English work could be missing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Further progress should prioritize whole-system integration over isolated component accuracy, since perception already dominates the literature.
  • Operational speed, currently one to two minutes per vine against roughly eight cuts, is an order of magnitude below manual pruning and is a primary target for faster arms and lighter algorithms.
  • Simulation environments that model plant growth and pruning consequences can supply labeled training data and reduce the need for destructive real-world trials.
  • Modular designs let the same platform move between pruning, health monitoring, fruit counting, and harvesting, improving return on investment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review's pipeline taxonomy suggests a concrete community benchmark: a public dataset with paired annotations for branch instances, skeletons, and expert pruning points across apple, grapevine, and cherry would directly test which modules transfer across crops; the paper does not propose such a dataset.
  • If speed is the binding constraint, a component-level latency breakdown (perception vs planning vs actuation) would isolate whether the bottleneck is algorithm cost or arm dynamics; the review notes the symptoms but does not report such measurements.
  • The rise of simulation-trained perception in the reviewed works points toward end-to-end visuomotor policies, where pruning points are regressed directly from images rather than reconstructed geometrically; the paper lists imitation learning as a future direction but stops short of claiming it will close the integration gap.
  • Because the review counts only indexed academic publications, commercial pruning systems and non-English literature could already contain integrated solutions; a grey-literature scan would test whether the 'niche' characterization is an artifact of the search.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys the 2014-2024 literature on autonomous robotic pruning for orchards and vineyards. It decomposes the pruning task into perception, skeletonization, pruning-point estimation, manipulator/end-effector design, and planning/control; presents quantitative trends (crop distribution, ML adoption, task coverage); reviews simulation environments and integrated systems; and concludes that research remains modular and that fully integrated, generalizable systems are not yet mature. The central empirical claims are the growth of ML-based work and the integration gap.

Significance. If the survey's categorizations are reliable, it would be a useful and timely resource, updating earlier reviews (He and Schupp 2018; Tinoco et al. 2021; Zahid et al. 2021) and providing a structured pipeline taxonomy plus trend figures. The paper's strengths are its broad reference coverage, explicit treatment of simulation, and candid discussion of speed, cost, and data bottlenecks. It makes no new derivations and is not circular. However, the value of a review of this type hinges on the accuracy of its per-paper extraction; the inconsistencies detailed below prevent the figures and tables from being used as an audit trail in the current version.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.1] The literature search is described only as 'an extensive research using Google Scholar and Scopus' in two phases (June 2024 and February 2025). The manuscript does not report the query strings, databases' search fields, inclusion/exclusion criteria, deduplication rules, or number of records screened and retained. Since Figures 1, 2, and 4 and the claimed modularity gap are all statements about the resulting corpus, the missing protocol makes the review's comprehensiveness unverifiable. Please add a reproducible search protocol, or explicitly frame the figures as illustrative rather than exhaustive.
  2. [Section 7.2 and Table 4] The running text states that the Universal Robots UR5 'is a 6 DoF manipulator with 6 prismatic joints,' which is incorrect: the UR5 has six revolute joints. The same section's Table 4 lists [17], [125], and [129] as '6R' configurations, so the text and table contradict each other. Because the table is the reader's only audit trail for the manipulator classification, this must be corrected and the DoF/joint-type entries for all rows re-verified against the cited sources.
  3. [Table 5 and Section 7.3] Table 5 attributes a grapevine saw end-effector with '66% of cutting success' to reference [128] (2020, apple-tree end-effector paper), while Section 7.3 describes the saw as part of Botterill et al. [17], and Table 4 reports the same 66% cut-success rate under [17] (2017). This is a factual misattribution in a table that is supposed to summarize the surveyed hardware. Please reconcile the entries with the original papers.
  4. [Table 3] Table 3 contains two 2023 entries that both cite [33] and both report Faster R-CNN pruning-region detection with a highest detection rate of 0.97, differing only in phrasing. One row also cites [94] (2021) with different metrics. The duplication makes the table look like a copy/paste artifact and prevents readers from trusting the pruning-point-estimation summary. Please merge or re-extract these rows from the primary sources.
  5. [Table 1] Table 1, headed as an overview of deep-learning-based methods, lists [11] as 'HSV color + edge detection' for 'Generic tree' with segmentation accuracy 96.64%, but Section 3.1 describes Shalal et al. as combining RGB imagery with laser scanning to detect apple trunks. The method family, crop, and metric all appear inconsistent. Since Table 1 feeds the ML-trend narrative and Figure 2's 'Papers using ML' counts, this row needs verification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 8] The sentence about Corbett-Davies et al. ends mid-clause: 'their system outperformed a typical human pruner in 30'. It should be completed (presumably 'in 30% of cases') and reconciled with Section 6, which reports the system as 'similar to humans in 89% of the cases and better in 30% of the cases.'
  2. [Section 7.2 and 7.3] The DoF accounting for Zahid et al. [128] is ambiguous: Section 7.2 describes a 3-prismatic Cartesian manipulator, Section 7.3 describes a 3-revolute end effector, and Table 4 lists '6 DoF: 3P + 3R' under the manipulator heading. Please clarify whether DoF counts in Table 4 refer to the manipulator alone or to the combined arm-plus-end-effector system.
  3. [Figure 4] The figure's axis label 'Intersection size' is unclear for a bar chart of paper counts, and the caption does not define how the 'manipulator and end-effector' grouping was counted relative to the single-task bars. Adding a legend or a short definition would help readers interpret the modularity plot.
  4. [Throughout] Some non-standard or inconsistent spellings appear ('jujubees' vs 'jujube', 'interwined', 'Hilitch' for Hilditch, 'Stentifod' for Stentiford, 'Meideiros' for Medeiros). A careful proofread and reference-check pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning: the paper is a literature review with no derivations, fitted predictions, or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

This manuscript is a survey of external primary literature on autonomous robotic pruning. It constructs no mathematical model, fits no parameters, and makes no quantitative prediction that could reduce to its own inputs. The central claim—that most works address narrow subsystems while fully integrated, generalizable systems remain rare (Sections 9.1 and 10)—is a synthesis of the reviewed papers, not a derivation from those papers' conclusions. The authors do not cite their own prior work, so no self-citation chain is load-bearing. Internal inconsistencies in the tables and text (e.g., the UR5 joint type, the attribution of the 66% cut-success saw result, and the duplicated Faster R-CNN row in Table 3) are accuracy/verifiability issues, not circularity; they do not make the survey's conclusions equivalent to its inputs by construction. The absence of a detailed search protocol is a methodological transparency limitation, but a literature search is an input-gathering procedure, not a reasoning step that can be circular. No circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new parameters or entities. It relies on the assumption that the cited primary papers are correctly reported and that the search captured the relevant literature. Both assumptions are partially unsupported: the search protocol is not disclosed, and several table entries are inconsistent with the corresponding text.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The literature selected via Google Scholar and Scopus searches (June 2024 and February 2025) is representative of the field of autonomous robotic pruning in orchards and vineyards.
    The review's synthesis and trend analysis rely on this selection. The exact search queries and inclusion/exclusion criteria are not reported (Section 1.1).
  • domain assumption The performance metrics and attributions reported in the tables are accurate transcriptions of the primary papers.
    The high-level conclusions cite specific numbers (e.g., cut success rates, accuracies). Tables 1, 4, and 5 contain apparent misattributions, so this assumption is partially violated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: a Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CBZYISWH

@misc{pith2026250507318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: a Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CBZYISWH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07318}
}
read the original abstract

Manual pruning is labor intensive and represents up to 25% of annual labor costs in fruit production, notably in apple orchards and vineyards where operational challenges and cost constraints limit the adoption of large-scale machinery. In response, a growing body of research is investigating compact, flexible robotic platforms capable of precise pruning in varied terrains, particularly where traditional mechanization falls short. This paper reviews recent advances in autonomous robotic pruning for orchards and vineyards, addressing a critical need in precision agriculture. Our review examines literature published between 2014 and 2024, focusing on innovative contributions across key system components. Special attention is given to recent developments in machine vision, perception, plant skeletonization, and control strategies, areas that have experienced significant influence from advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning. The analysis situates these technological trends within broader agricultural challenges, including rising labor costs, a decline in the number of young farmers, and the diverse pruning requirements of different fruit species such as apple, grapevine, and cherry trees. By comparing various robotic architectures and methodologies, this survey not only highlights the progress made toward autonomous pruning but also identifies critical open challenges and future research directions. The findings underscore the potential of robotic systems to bridge the gap between manual and mechanized operations, paving the way for more efficient, sustainable, and precise agricultural practices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07318 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pie chart of the distribution of the addressed crops in the analyzed papers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of the analyzed papers in the period of time from 2014 to 2024. The orange bars represent the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scheme of the autonomous robotic pruning pipeline. The above part of the scheme depicts the perception [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This plot shows the number of papers addressing individual tasks in the autonomous pruning pipeline (bottom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of four different tasks of computer vision for autonomous pruning: (a): detection of branches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison with Zhang and Suen with other methods [38]. (a) RGB image. (b) The result image of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example of target grapevine plant structure. The types of branches are shown, such as branches and nodes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example of how the pruning point is evaluated depending on the position of the buds on a grapevine. [38] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a): cut-point detection: three-dimensional vector projection of a cane section in the YZ (red line – roll angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Two possible applications of simulation environments. (a): evolution of the growth of the plant after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of natural and artificial light [32]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) CAD rendering of the 7 DoF robot with its components. (b) Top view of the work volume of the 6 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Cordon and trellis wire are considered hard obstacles for motion planning [95]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Integrated robotic systems: (a): the system comprises a rover, a 7 DoF robot arm, cutting end-effector, dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Archie Jnr robotic platform, proposed by [20]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [128]

    Zahid, L

    A. Zahid, L. He, L. Zeng, D. Choi, J. Schupp, P. Heinemann, Development of a robotic end-effector for apple tree pruning, Transactions of the ASABE 63 (4) (2020) 847–856

    work page 2020

  2. [17]

    Botterill, S

    T. Botterill, S. Paulin, R. Green, S. Williams, J. Lin, V . Saxton, S. Mills, X. Chen, S. Corbett-Davies, A Robot System for Pruning Grape Vines, Journal of Field Robotics 34 (6) (2017) 1100–1122, _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/rob.21680. doi:10.1002/rob.21680. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/rob.21680

    work page doi:10.1002/rob.21680 2017

  3. [33]

    Guadagna, M

    P. Guadagna, M. Fernandes, F. Chen, A. Santamaria, T. Teng, T. Frioni, D. Caldwell, S. Poni, C. Semini, M. Gatti, Using deep learning for pruning region detection and plant organ segmentation in dormant spur- pruned grapevines, Precision Agriculture 24 (4) (2023) 1547–1569

    2023

  4. [106]

    Corbett-Davies, T

    S. Corbett-Davies, T. Botterill, R. Green, V . Saxton, An expert system for automatically pruning vines, in: Pro- ceedings of the 27th Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, ACM, Dunedin New Zealand, 2012, pp. 55–60. doi:10.1145/2425836.2425849. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2425836.2425849

    work page arXiv 2012

  5. [125]

    A. You, F. Sukkar, R. Fitch, M. Karkee, J. R. Davidson, An Efficient Planning and Control Framework for Pruning Fruit Trees, in: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 3930–3936, iSSN: 2577-087X. doi:10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197551

    arXiv 2020

  6. [129]

    Lu, Kinematics Analysis and Trajectory Planning of Dual-arm Pruning Robot, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 769 (4) (2021) 042067

    Y . Lu, Kinematics Analysis and Trajectory Planning of Dual-arm Pruning Robot, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 769 (4) (2021) 042067. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/769/4/042067. URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/769/4/042067

    work page doi:10.1088/1755-1315/769/4/042067 2021

  7. [94]

    Guadagna, T

    P. Guadagna, T. Frioni, F. Chen, A. I. Delmonte, T. Teng, M. Fernandes, A. Scaldaferri, C. Semini, S. Poni, M. Gatti, 16. fine-tuning and testing of a deep learning algorithm for pruning regions detection in spur-pruned grapevines, in: Precision agriculture’21, Wageningen Academic, 2021, pp. 147–153

    work page 2021

  8. [11]

    Shalal, T

    N. Shalal, T. Low, C. McCarthy, N. Hancock, Orchard mapping and mobile robot localisation using on-board camera and laser scanner data fusion–part a: Tree detection, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 119 (2015) 254–266

    2015

Show all 145 references
  1. [1]

    S. P. Galinato, A. Kendall, C. A. Miles, Costs and profitability for mechanized pruning and harvest in two cider apple orchard systems, HortTechnology 32 (3) (2022) 275–287

    2022

  2. [2]

    European Commission, The fruit and vegetable sector in the eu - a statistical overview, Eurostat (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    European Commission, Farmers and the agricultural labour force - statistics, Eurostat (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Calvin, P

    L. Calvin, P. Martin, S. Simnitt, Adjusting to higher labor costs in selected us fresh fruit and vegetable industries (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Allegro, R

    G. Allegro, R. Martelli, G. Valentini, C. Pastore, R. Mazzoleni, F. Pezzi, I. Filippetti, Effects of mechanical winter pruning on vine performances and management costs in a trebbiano romagnolo vineyard: A five-year study, Horticulturae 9 (1) (2022) 21

    2022

  6. [6]

    L. He, J. Schupp, Sensing and Automation in Pruning of Apple Trees: A Review, Agronomy 8 (10) (2018) 211. doi:10.3390/agronomy8100211. URL http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/8/10/211

    2018 doi

  7. [7]

    Tinoco, M

    V . Tinoco, M. F. Silva, F. N. Santos, L. F. Rocha, S. Magalhães, L. C. Santos, A review of pruning and harvest- ing manipulators, in: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), IEEE, 2021, pp. 155–160

    2021

  8. [8]

    Zahid, M

    A. Zahid, M. S. Mahmud, L. He, P. Heinemann, D. Choi, J. Schupp, Technological advancements towards developing a robotic pruner for apple trees: A review, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 189 (2021) 106383

    2021

  9. [9]

    Qiang, C

    L. Qiang, C. Jianrong, L. Bin, D. Lie, Z. Yajing, Identification of fruit and branch in natural scenes for citrus harvesting robot using machine vision and support vector machine, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 7 (2) (2014) 115–121

    2014

  10. [10]

    W. Ji, Z. Qian, B. Xu, Y . Tao, D. Zhao, S. Ding, Apple tree branch segmentation from images with small gray-level difference for agricultural harvesting robot, Optik 127 (23) (2016) 11173–11182

    2016

  11. [12]

    Gao, T.-F

    M. Gao, T.-F. Lu, Image processing and analysis for autonomous grapevine pruning, in: 2006 international conference on mechatronics and automation, IEEE, 2006, pp. 922–927

    2006

  12. [13]

    McFarlane, B

    N. McFarlane, B. Tisseyre, C. Sinfort, R. Tillett, F. Sevila, Image analysis for pruning of long wood grape vines, Journal of agricultural engineering research 66 (2) (1997) 111–119

    1997

  13. [14]

    Zhang, L

    J. Zhang, L. He, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Gao, Branch detection for apple trees trained in fruiting wall architecture using depth features and regions-convolutional neural network (r-cnn), Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 155 (2018) 386–393

    2018

  14. [15]

    Amatya, M

    S. Amatya, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, M. D. Whiting, Automated Detection of Branch Shaking Loca- tions for Robotic Cherry Harvesting Using Machine Vision, Robotics 6 (4) (2017) 31. doi:10.3390/ robotics6040031. URL http://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/6/4/31 28 Autonomous Robotic Pruning i...

    2017

  15. [16]

    Amatya, M

    S. Amatya, M. Karkee, Integration of visible branch sections and cherry clusters for detecting cherry tree branches in dense foliage canopies, Biosystems Engineering 149 (2016) 72–81

    2016

  16. [18]

    A. You, C. Grimm, A. Silwal, J. R. Davidson, Semantics-guided skeletonization of upright fruiting offshoot trees for robotic pruning, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 192 (2022) 106622

    2022

  17. [19]

    Oliveira, D

    F. Oliveira, D. Q. da Silva, V . Filipe, T. M. Pinho, M. Cunha, J. B. Cunha, F. N. Dos Santos, Enhancing grapevine node detection to support pruning automation: Leveraging state-of-the-art yolo detection models for 2d image analysis, Sensors 24 (21) (2024) 6774

    2024

  18. [20]

    Williams, D

    H. Williams, D. Smith, J. Shahabi, T. Gee, M. Nejati, B. McGuinness, K. Black, J. Tobias, R. Jangali, H. Lim, et al., Modelling wine grapevines for autonomous robotic cane pruning, biosystems engineering 235 (2023) 31–49

    2023

  19. [21]

    Majeed, J

    Y . Majeed, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Fu, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, M. D. Whiting, Apple Tree Trunk and Branch Segmentation for Automatic Trellis Training Using Convolutional Neural Network Based Semantic Segmenta- tion, IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (17) (2018) 75–80. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.201...

    2018 doi

  20. [22]

    Majeed, M

    Y . Majeed, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, L. Fu, M. D. Whiting, A study on the detection of visible parts of cordons using deep learning networks for automated green shoot thinning in vineyards, IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (30) (2019) 82–86, 6th IFAC Conference on Sensing, Control and Automat...

    2019 doi

  21. [23]

    J. Wu, G. Yang, H. Yang, Y . Zhu, Z. Li, L. Lei, C. Zhao, Extracting apple tree crown information from remote imagery using deep learning, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 174 (2020) 105504. doi:10.1016/j. compag.2020.105504. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retriev...

    2020

  22. [24]

    Majeed, J

    Y . Majeed, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Fu, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, M. D. Whiting, Deep learning based segmentation for automated training of apple trees on trellis wires, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 170 (2020) 105277

    2020

  23. [25]

    Majeed, M

    Y . Majeed, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, L. Fu, M. D. Whiting, Determining grapevine cordon shape for automated green shoot thinning using semantic segmentation-based deep learning networks, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 171 (2020) 105308

    2020

  24. [26]

    Fernandes, A

    M. Fernandes, A. Scaldaferri, G. Fiameni, T. Teng, M. Gatti, S. Poni, C. Semini, D. Caldwell, F. Chen, Grapevine Winter Pruning Automation: On Potential Pruning Points Detection through 2D Plant Model- ing using Grapevine Segmentation, in: 2021 IEEE 11th Annual International C...

    2021

  25. [27]

    G. Lin, Y . Tang, X. Zou, C. Wang, Three-dimensional reconstruction of guava fruits and branches using instance segmentation and geometry analysis, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 184 (2021) 106107. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106107. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.co...

    2021

  26. [28]

    B. Ma, J. Du, L. Wang, H. Jiang, M. Zhou, Automatic branch detection of jujube trees based on 3D reconstruc- tion for dormant pruning using the deep learning-based method, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 190 (2021) 106484. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106484. URL https:/...

    2021

  27. [29]

    S. Tong, Y . Yue, W. Li, Y . Wang, F. Kang, C. Feng, Branch Identification and Junction Points Location for Apple Trees Based on Deep Learning, Remote Sensing 14 (18) (2022) 4495. doi:10.3390/rs14184495. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/18/4495

    2022 doi

  28. [30]

    A. You, C. Grimm, J. R. Davidson, Optical flow-based branch segmentation for complex orchard environments, in: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2022, pp. 9180– 9186

    2022

  29. [31]

    A. You, H. Kolano, N. Parayil, C. Grimm, J. R. Davidson, Precision fruit tree pruning using a learned hybrid vision/interaction controller, in: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2022, pp. 2280–2286. 29 Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards...

    2022

  30. [32]

    Borrenpohl, M

    D. Borrenpohl, M. Karkee, Automated pruning decisions in dormant sweet cherry canopies using instance segmentation, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 207 (2023) 107716

    2023

  31. [34]

    Z. Chen, K. Granland, R. Newbury, C. Chen, Hob-cnn: Hallucination of occluded branches with a convolutional neural network for 2d fruit trees, Smart Agricultural Technology 3 (2023) 100096

    2023

  32. [35]

    E. Kok, X. Wang, C. Chen, Obscured tree branches segmentation and 3d reconstruction using deep learning and geometrical constraints, Computers and electronics in agriculture 210 (2023) 107884

    2023

  33. [36]

    S. Tong, J. Zhang, W. Li, Y . Wang, F. Kang, An image-based system for locating pruning points in apple trees using instance segmentation and rgb-d images, Biosystems Engineering 236 (2023) 277–286

    2023

  34. [37]

    Gentilhomme, M

    T. Gentilhomme, M. Villamizar, J. Corre, J.-M. Odobez, Towards smart pruning: Vinet, a deep-learning approach for grapevine structure estimation, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 207 (2023) 107736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107736. URL https://www.scien...

    2023

  35. [38]

    Z. Chen, Y . Wang, S. Tong, C. Chen, F. Kang, Grapevine Branch Recognition and Pruning Point Localization Technology Based on Image Processing, Applied Sciences 14 (8) (2024) 3327, number: 8 Publisher: Multidis- ciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. doi:10.3390/app14083327. ...

    2024 doi

  36. [39]

    Girshick, J

    R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, J. Malik, Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38 (1) (2015) 142–158

    2015

  37. [40]

    Girshick, Fast r-cnn, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2015, pp

    R. Girshick, Fast r-cnn, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2015, pp. 1440–1448

    2015

  38. [41]

    S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, J. Sun, Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks, Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015)

    2015

  39. [42]

    K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, Mask r-cnn, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017, pp. 2980–2988. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2017.322

    2017 doi

  40. [43]

    Z. Cai, N. Vasconcelos, Cascade r-cnn: High quality object detection and instance segmentation, IEEE transac- tions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 43 (5) (2019) 1483–1498

    2019

  41. [44]

    Z. Liu, Y . Lin, Y . Cao, H. Hu, Y . Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, B. Guo, Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10012–10022

    2021

  42. [45]

    Cheng, Y

    X. Cheng, Y . Zhong, M. Harandi, Y . Dai, X. Chang, H. Li, T. Drummond, Z. Ge, Hierarchical neural architecture search for deep stereo matching, Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020) 22158–22169

    2020

  43. [46]

    Ronneberger, P

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: N. Navab, J. Hornegger, W. M. Wells, A. F. Frangi (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, Springer International Publishing, Cham...

    2015

  44. [47]

    R. L. Graham, An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set, Info. Proc. Lett. 1 (1972) 132–133

    1972

  45. [48]

    Krizhevsky, I

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G. E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (2012)

    2012

  46. [49]

    Z. Zhou, M. M. R. Siddiquee, N. Tajbakhsh, J. Liang, Unet++: Redesigning skip connections to exploit multi- scale features in image segmentation, IEEE transactions on medical imaging 39 (6) (2019) 1856–1867

    2019

  47. [50]

    Badrinarayanan, A

    V . Badrinarayanan, A. Kendall, R. Cipolla, Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 39 (12) (2017) 2481–2495

    2017

  48. [51]

    Simonyan, A

    K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  49. [52]

    J. Long, E. Shelhamer, T. Darrell, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015, pp. 3431–3440

    2015

  50. [53]

    X. Wang, R. Zhang, T. Kong, L. Li, C. Shen, Solov2: Dynamic and fast instance segmentation, Advances in Neural information processing systems 33 (2020) 17721–17732. 30 Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: a Review

    2020

  51. [54]

    H. Zhao, J. Shi, X. Qi, X. Wang, J. Jia, Pyramid scene parsing network, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 2881–2890

    2017

  52. [55]

    Newell, K

    A. Newell, K. Yang, J. Deng, Stacked hourglass networks for human pose estimation, in: Computer Vision– ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part VIII 14, Springer, 2016, pp. 483–499

    2016

  53. [56]

    Williams, D

    H. Williams, D. Smith, J. Shahabi, T. Gee, A. Qureshi, B. McGuinness, S. Harvey, C. Downes, R. Jangali, K. Black, et al., Archie jnr: A robotic platform for autonomous cane pruning of grapevines, in: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IRO...

    2024

  54. [57]

    Y . Wu, A. Kirillov, F. Massa, W.-Y . Lo, R. Girshick, Detectron2, https://github.com/ facebookresearch/detectron2 (2019)

    2019

  55. [58]

    Kirillov, K

    A. Kirillov, K. He, R. Girshick, C. Rother, P. Dollár, Panoptic segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 9404–9413

    2019

  56. [59]

    E. Ilg, N. Mayer, T. Saikia, M. Keuper, A. Dosovitskiy, T. Brox, Flownet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estima- tion with deep networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 2462–2470

    2017

  57. [60]

    Isola, J.-Y

    P. Isola, J.-Y . Zhu, T. Zhou, A. A. Efros, Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 1125–1134

    2017

  58. [61]

    Landrieu, M

    L. Landrieu, M. Simonovsky, Large-scale point cloud semantic segmentation with superpoint graphs, in: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 4558–4567

    2018

  59. [62]

    N. M. Elfiky, S. A. Akbar, J. Sun, J. Park, A. Kak, Automation of dormant pruning in specialty crop production: An adaptive framework for automatic reconstruction and modeling of apple trees, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition wor...

    2015

  60. [63]

    Chattopadhyay, S

    S. Chattopadhyay, S. A. Akbar, N. M. Elfiky, H. Medeiros, A. Kak, Measuring and modeling apple trees us- ing time-of-flight data for automation of dormant pruning applications, in: 2016 IEEE Winter conference on applications of computer vision (W ACV), IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–9

    2016

  61. [64]

    Medeiros, D

    H. Medeiros, D. Kim, J. Sun, H. Seshadri, S. A. Akbar, N. M. Elfiky, J. Park, Modeling Dormant Fruit Trees for Agricultural Automation, Journal of Field Robotics 34 (7) (2017) 1203–1224. doi:10.1002/rob.21679. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rob.21679

    2017 doi

  62. [65]

    S. Liu, J. Yao, H. Li, C. Qiu, R. Liu, Research on 3D skeletal model extraction algorithm of branch based on SR4000, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1237 (2) (2019) 022059. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1237/ 2/022059. URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/123...

    2019 doi

  63. [66]

    Y . Xu, C. Hu, Y . Xie, An improved space colonization algorithm with dbscan clustering for a single tree skeleton extraction, International Journal of Remote Sensing 43 (10) (2022) 3692–3713

    2022

  64. [67]

    L. You, Y . Sun, Y . Liu, X. Chang, J. Jiang, Y . Feng, X. Song, Tree skeletonization with dbscan clustering using terrestrial laser scanning data, Forests 14 (8) (2023) 1525

    2023

  65. [68]

    Y . Fu, Y . Xia, H. Zhang, M. Fu, Y . Wang, W. Fu, C. Shen, Skeleton extraction and pruning point identification of jujube tree for dormant pruning using space colonization algorithm, Frontiers in Plant Science 13 (2023) 1103794

    2023

  66. [69]

    X. Li, B. Liu, Y . Shi, M. Xiong, D. Ren, L. Wu, X. Zou, Efficient three-dimensional reconstruction and skeleton extraction for intelligent pruning of fruit trees, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 227 (2024) 109554

    2024

  67. [70]

    Duki ´c, P

    J. Duki ´c, P. Peji ´c, A. Bošnjak, E. K. Nyarko, Branch-a labeled dataset of rgb-d images and 3d models for autonomous tree pruning, in: 2024 International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies (SST), IEEE, 2024, pp. 57–64

    2024

  68. [71]

    P. J. Besl, N. D. McKay, Method for registration of 3-d shapes, in: Sensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures, V ol. 1611, Spie, 1992, pp. 586–606

    1992

  69. [72]

    T. Su, W. Wang, H. Liu, Z. Liu, X. Li, Z. Jia, L. Zhou, Z. Song, M. Ding, A. Cui, An adaptive and rapid 3d delaunay triangulation for randomly distributed point cloud data, The Visual Computer (2022) 1–25

    2022

  70. [73]

    Straub, D

    J. Straub, D. Reiser, N. Lüling, A. Stana, H. W. Griepentrog, Approach for graph-based individual branch modelling of meadow orchard trees with 3d point clouds, Precision Agriculture 23 (6) (2022) 1967–1982

    2022

  71. [74]

    G. Hu, Z. Zhou, J. Cao, H. Huang, Non-linear calibration optimisation based on the levenberg–marquardt algorithm, IET Image Processing 14 (7) (2020) 1402–1414. 31 Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: a Review

    2020

  72. [75]

    A. Tabb, H. Medeiros, A robotic vision system to measure tree traits, in: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Confer- ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2017, pp. 6005–6012

    2017

  73. [76]

    Dong, W.-Y

    X. Dong, W.-Y . Kim, Z. Yu, J.-Y . Oh, R. Ehsani, K.-H. Lee, Improved voxel-based volume estimation and pruning severity mapping of apple trees during the pruning period, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 219 (2024) 108834

    2024

  74. [77]

    S.-C. Zhu, D. Mumford, et al., A stochastic grammar of images, Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graph- ics and Vision 2 (4) (2007) 259–362

    2007

  75. [78]

    Botterill, R

    T. Botterill, R. Green, S. Mills, Finding a vine’s structure by bottom-up parsing of cane edges, in: 2013 28th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ 2013), IEEE, 2013, pp. 112– 117

    2013

  76. [79]

    Ramer, An iterative procedure for the polygonal approximation of plane curves, Computer graphics and image processing 1 (3) (1972) 244–256

    U. Ramer, An iterative procedure for the polygonal approximation of plane curves, Computer graphics and image processing 1 (3) (1972) 244–256

    1972

  77. [80]

    T. Y . Zhang, C. Y . Suen, A fast parallel algorithm for thinning digital patterns, Commun. ACM 27 (3) (1984) 236–239. doi:10.1145/357994.358023. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/357994.358023

    1984

  78. [81]

    Cuevas-Velasquez, A.-J

    H. Cuevas-Velasquez, A.-J. Gallego, R. B. Fisher, Segmentation and 3d reconstruction of rose plants from stereoscopic images, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 171 (2020) 105296. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105296. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...

    2020

  79. [82]

    C. J. Hilitch, Linear skeletons from square cupboards (1969)

    1969

  80. [83]

    Martin, S

    A. Martin, S. Tosunoglu, Image processing techniques for machine vision, Miami, Florida (2000) 1–9

    2000

  81. [84]

    J. Cao, A. Tagliasacchi, M. Olson, H. Zhang, Z. Su, Point cloud skeletons via laplacian based contraction, in: 2010 Shape Modeling International Conference, 2010, pp. 187–197. doi:10.1109/SMI.2010.25

    2010 doi

  82. [85]

    Harris, M

    C. Harris, M. Stephens, et al., A combined corner and edge detector, in: Alvey vision conference, V ol. 15, Citeseer, 1988, pp. 10–5244

    1988

  83. [86]

    Y . Fu, C. Li, J. Zhu, B. Wang, B. Zhang, W. Fu, Three-dimensional model construction method and experiment of jujube tree point cloud using alpha-shape algorithm, Trans. Chin. Soc Agric. Eng 36 (22) (2020) 214–221

    2020

  84. [87]

    Runions, M

    A. Runions, M. Fuhrer, B. Lane, P. Federl, A.-G. Rolland-Lagan, P. Prusinkiewicz, Modeling and visualization of leaf venation patterns, in: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers, 2005, pp. 702–711

    2005

  85. [88]

    S. A. Akbar, S. Chattopadhyay, N. M. Elfiky, A. Kak, A novel benchmark rgbd dataset for dormant apple trees and its application to automatic pruning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2016, pp. 81–88

    2016

  86. [89]

    D. W. Marquardt, An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 11 (2) (1963) 431–441

    1963

  87. [90]

    Schnabel, R

    R. Schnabel, R. Wahl, R. Klein, Efficient ransac for point-cloud shape detection, in: Computer graphics forum, V ol. 26, Wiley Online Library, 2007, pp. 214–226

    2007

  88. [91]

    C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, L. J. Guibas, Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space, Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  89. [92]

    C. Lin, C. Li, Y . Liu, N. Chen, Y .-K. Choi, W. Wang, Point2skeleton: Learning skeletal representations from point clouds, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 4277–4286

    2021

  90. [93]

    Yandun, A

    F. Yandun, A. Silwal, G. Kantor, Visual 3d reconstruction and dynamic simulation of fruit trees for robotic manipulation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2020, pp. 54–55

    2020

  91. [95]

    Silwal, F

    A. Silwal, F. Yandun, A. K. Nellithimaru, T. Bates, G. Kantor, Bumblebee: A path towards fully autonomous robotic vine pruning., Field Robotics 2 (1) (2022) 1661–1696

    2022

  92. [96]

    A. You, N. Parayil, J. G. Krishna, U. Bhattarai, R. Sapkota, D. Ahmed, M. Whiting, M. Karkee, C. M. Grimm, J. R. Davidson, An autonomous robot for pruning modern, planar fruit trees, arXiv:2206.07201 [cs] (Jun. 2022). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07201 32 Autonomous Robotic P...

    2022 arXiv

  93. [97]

    Strnad, Š

    D. Strnad, Š. Kohek, Novel discrete differential evolution methods for virtual tree pruning optimization, Soft Computing 21 (4) (2017) 981–993

    2017

  94. [98]

    Kolmani ˇc, D

    S. Kolmani ˇc, D. Strnad, Š. Kohek, B. Benes, P. Hirst, B. Žalik, An algorithm for automatic dormant tree pruning, Applied Soft Computing 99 (2021) 106931

    2021

  95. [99]

    W. V . Marset, D. S. Pérez, C. A. Díaz, F. Bromberg, Towards practical 2d grapevine bud detection with fully convolutional networks, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 182 (2021) 105947

    2021

  96. [100]

    C. A. Díaz, D. S. Pérez, H. Miatello, F. Bromberg, Grapevine buds detection and localization in 3d space based on structure from motion and 2d image classification, Computers in Industry 99 (2018) 303–312

    2018

  97. [101]

    G. Zhao, D. Wang, A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method Generated by the Space Colonization Al- gorithm for Automated Pruning Strategies of Trees, AgriEngineering 6 (1) (2024) 539–554. doi:10.3390/ agriengineering6010033. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2624-7402/6/1/33

    2024

  98. [102]

    L. Tang, C. Chen, H. Huang, D. Lin, An integrated system for 3d tree modeling and growth simulation, Envi- ronmental Earth Sciences 74 (2015) 7015–7028

    2015

  99. [103]

    Bérut, H

    A. Bérut, H. Chauvet, V . Legué, B. Moulia, O. Pouliquen, Y . Forterre, Gravisensors in plant cells behave like an active granular liquid, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (20) (2018) 5123–5128

    2018

  100. [104]

    M ˇech, P

    R. M ˇech, P. Prusinkiewicz, Visual models of plants interacting with their environment, in: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 1996, pp. 397–410

    1996

  101. [105]

    Palubicki, K

    W. Palubicki, K. Horel, S. Longay, A. Runions, B. Lane, R. Mˇech, P. Prusinkiewicz, Self-organizing tree models for image synthesis, ACM Transactions On Graphics (TOG) 28 (3) (2009) 1–10

    2009

  102. [107]

    Runions, B

    A. Runions, B. Lane, P. Prusinkiewicz, Modeling trees with a space colonization algorithm., Nph 7 (63-70) (2007) 6

    2007

  103. [108]

    Bryson, F

    M. Bryson, F. Wang, J. Allworth, Using synthetic tree data in deep learning-based tree segmentation using lidar point clouds, Remote Sensing 15 (9) (2023) 2380

    2023

  104. [109]

    Kohek, N

    Š. Kohek, N. Guid, S. Tojnko, T. Unuk, S. Kolmani ˇc, Eduapple: Interactive teaching tool for apple tree crown formation, HortTechnology 25 (2) (2015) 238–246

    2015

  105. [110]

    H. Kang, M. Fiser, B. Shi, F. Sheibani, P. Hirst, B. Benes, Imapple—functional structural model of apple trees, in: 2016 IEEE international conference on functional-structural plant growth modeling, simulation, visualiza- tion and applications (FSPMA), IEEE, 2016, pp. 90–97

    2016

  106. [111]

    De Reffye, C

    P. De Reffye, C. Edelin, J. Françon, M. Jaeger, C. Puech, Plant models faithful to botanical structure and development, ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics 22 (4) (1988) 151–158

    1988

  107. [112]

    Storn, K

    R. Storn, K. Price, Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Journal of global optimization 11 (1997) 341–359

    1997

  108. [113]

    Westling, J

    F. Westling, J. Underwood, M. Bryson, A procedure for automated tree pruning suggestion using LiDAR scans of fruit trees, arXiv:2102.03700 [cs, eess] (Feb. 2021). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03700

    2021 arXiv

  109. [114]

    P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, B. Raphael, A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths, IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4 (2) (1968) 100–107

    1968

  110. [115]

    T. Qiu, A. Zoubi, L. Cheng, Y . Jiang, 3d branch point cloud completion for robotic pruning in apple orchards, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05953 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  111. [116]

    T. Qiu, L. Cheng, Y . Jiang, 3d characterization of tree architecture for apple crop load estimation, in: 2022 ASABE Annual International Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2022, p. 1

    2022

  112. [117]

    X. Yu, Y . Rao, Z. Wang, J. Lu, J. Zhou, Adapointr: Diverse point cloud completion with adaptive geometry- aware transformers, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023)

    2023

  113. [118]

    H. Yang, L. Li, Z. Gao, Obstacle avoidance path planning of hybrid harvesting manipulator based on joint configuration space, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 33 (4) (2017) 55–62

    2017

  114. [119]

    C. W. Bac, J. Hemming, B. Van Tuijl, R. Barth, E. Wais, E. J. van Henten, Performance evaluation of a harvest- ing robot for sweet pepper, Journal of Field Robotics 34 (6) (2017) 1123–1139. 33 Autonomous Robotic Pruning in Orchards and Vineyards: a Review

    2017

  115. [120]

    Harrell, P

    R. Harrell, P. D. Adsit, R. Munilla, D. Slaughter, Robotic picking of citrus, Robotica 8 (4) (1990) 269–278

    1990

  116. [121]

    Silwal, J

    A. Silwal, J. R. Davidson, M. Karkee, C. Mo, Q. Zhang, K. Lewis, Design, integration, and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester, Journal of Field Robotics 34 (6) (2017) 1140–1159

    2017

  117. [122]

    Tanigaki, T

    K. Tanigaki, T. Fujiura, A. Akase, J. Imagawa, Cherry-harvesting robot, Computers and electronics in agricul- ture 63 (1) (2008) 65–72

    2008

  118. [123]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. K. Schueller, Kinematics and dynamics of a fruit picking robotic manipulator, in: 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2015, p. 1

    2015

  119. [124]

    Y . Li, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Fu, J. Li, Automatic reconstruction and modeling of dormant jujube trees using three-view image constraints for intelligent pruning applications, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 212 (2023) 108149

    2023

  120. [126]

    T. Teng, M. Fernandes, M. Gatti, S. Poni, C. Semini, D. Caldwell, F. Chen, Whole-Body Control on Non- holonomic Mobile Manipulation for Grapevine Winter Pruning Automation, in: 2021 6th IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), 2021, pp. 37...

    2021

  121. [127]

    Zhang, X

    B. Zhang, X. Chen, H. Zhang, C. Shen, W. Fu, Design and performance test of a jujube pruning manipulator, Agriculture 12 (4) (2022) 552

    2022

  122. [130]

    Kondo, K

    N. Kondo, K. Ting*, Robotics for plant production, Artificial intelligence review 12 (1998) 227–243

    1998

  123. [131]

    A. You, N. Parayil, J. G. Krishna, U. Bhattarai, R. Sapkota, D. Ahmed, M. Whiting, M. Karkee, C. M. Grimm, J. R. Davidson, Semiautonomous precision pruning of upright fruiting offshoot orchard systems: An integrated approach, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (2023)

    2023

  124. [132]

    S. B. Slotine, B. Siciliano, A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic sys- tems, in: proceeding of 5th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, V ol. 2, 1991, pp. 1211–1216

    1991

  125. [133]

    Y . Guan, K. Yokoi, O. Stasse, A. Kheddar, On robotic trajectory planning using polynomial interpolations, in: 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics-ROBIO, IEEE, 2005, pp. 111–116

    2005

  126. [134]

    J. J. Kuffner, S. M. LaValle, Rrt-connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning, in: Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065), V ol. 2, IEEE, 2000, pp. 995–1001

    2000

  127. [135]

    Y . Chen, Y . Fu, B. Zhang, W. Fu, C. Shen, Path planning of the fruit tree pruning manipulator based on improved rrt-connect algorithm, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 15 (2) (2022) 177–188

    2022

  128. [136]

    Paulin, T

    S. Paulin, T. Botterill, J. Lin, X. Chen, R. Green, A comparison of sampling-based path planners for a grape vine pruning robot arm, in: 2015 6th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA), IEEE, 2015, pp. 98–103

    2015

  129. [137]

    Zucker, N

    M. Zucker, N. Ratliff, A. D. Dragan, M. Pivtoraiko, M. Klingensmith, C. M. Dellin, J. A. Bagnell, S. S. Srini- vasa, Chomp: Covariant hamiltonian optimization for motion planning, The International journal of robotics research 32 (9-10) (2013) 1164–1193

    2013

  130. [138]

    Schulman, J

    J. Schulman, J. Ho, A. X. Lee, I. Awwal, H. Bradlow, P. Abbeel, Finding locally optimal, collision-free trajec- tories with sequential convex optimization., in: Robotics: science and systems, V ol. 9, Berlin, Germany, 2013, pp. 1–10

    2013

  131. [139]

    J. D. Gammell, S. S. Srinivasa, T. D. Barfoot, Batch informed trees (bit*): Sampling-based optimal planning via the heuristically guided search of implicit random geometric graphs, in: 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2015, pp. 3067–3074

    2015

  132. [140]

    Silwal, T

    A. Silwal, T. Parhar, F. Yandun, H. Baweja, G. Kantor, A robust illumination-invariant camera system for agri- cultural applications, in: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2021, pp. 3292–3298. 34 Autonomous Robotic Pruning i...

    2021

  133. [141]

    Goodfellow, J

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y . Bengio, Gener- ative adversarial nets, Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014)

    2014

  134. [142]

    James, P

    S. James, P. Wohlhart, M. Kalakrishnan, D. Kalashnikov, A. Irpan, J. Ibarz, S. Levine, R. Hadsell, K. Bousmalis, Sim-to-real via sim-to-sim: Data-efficient robotic grasping via randomized-to-canonical adaptation networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer ...

    2019

  135. [143]

    Lauretti, C

    C. Lauretti, C. Tamantini, H. Tomè, L. Zollo, Robot learning by demonstration with dynamic parameterization of the orientation: an application to agricultural activities, Robotics 12 (6) (2023) 166

    2023

  136. [144]

    Häring, S

    S. Häring, S. Folawiyo, M. Podguzova, D. Stricker, et al., Vid2cuts: A framework for enabling ai-guided grapevine pruning, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 5814–5836

    2024

  137. [145]

    C. H. Kim, A. Silwal, G. Kantor, Autonomous robotic pepper harvesting: Imitation learning in unstructured agricultural environments, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2025). 35

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.