Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 68 references

Investigating the possibility of extracting neutron-skin thickness in nuclei by their collisions at intermediate energies

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions cannot cleanly extract neutron-skin thickness from the free neutron-to-proton yield ratio, because the symmetry potential in the collision dynamics masks the signal.

desk verdict Useful negative result: the free n/p ratio at intermediate energies is dominated by the symmetry potential, not the neutron-skin thickness, but the paper needs a stability check on its initial skin configurations before the ~1% quote is trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08337 v1 pith:CD3TGEB4 submitted 2024-11-13 nucl-th nucl-ex

Tian-Ze Li , Lu-Meng Liu , Jun Xu , Zhong-Zhou Ren This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thnucl-ex PACS 25.70.-z21.10.Gv24.10.Cn24.10.Lx
keywords neutron-skinthicknessfreeneutron-to-protonyieldratioIBUUtransportmodelsymmetryenergyeffectivemasssplittingintermediate-energyheavy-ioncollisions124Sn+124Snisospin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the free neutron-to-proton yield ratio in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions can serve as a clean probe of the neutron-skin thickness of the colliding nuclei. Using the isospin-dependent Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck transport model for 124Sn+124Sn collisions at 600A MeV and 2A GeV, the authors vary the initial skin thickness independently of the symmetry potential and compare sensitivities. They find that in most kinematic windows the ratio is driven more strongly by the symmetry potential in the collision dynamics than by the initial skin. The clearest skin imprint appears at large transverse or longitudinal momenta in central collisions at a few GeV per nucleon, where a reasonable skin range still changes the ratio by only about 1%, smaller than the symmetry-potential uncertainty. The paper therefore concludes that the n/p yield ratio is not a clean skin probe at these energies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the isospin-dependent Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (IBUU) transport model, solved with the improved momentum-dependent interaction (ImMDI) for the mean field and the lattice-Hamiltonian method, plus Skyrme-Hartree-Fock (MSL0) initial density distributions that provide different Δrnp values. These pieces let the authors vary the initial skin and the symmetry potential separately and compare their influence on the same observable—the free n/p yield ratio from direct emission and from GEMINI deexcitation of residues.

What would settle it

Take a nucleus whose neutron-skin thickness is already known from parity-violating electron scattering (e.g., 208Pb or 48Ca), collide it at 2A GeV with high statistics, and measure the central-collision n/p ratio at pT > 1 GeV/c; if the observed variation with the known skin thickness is comparable to or larger than the variation from the symmetry-potential bracket, the claim that the skin effect is masked would be wrong. A cheaper check is a transport-code intercomparison: if another credible BUU or QMD code with the same inputs gives a skin-induced change of several percent rather than about 1%, the conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the free neutron-to-proton yield ratio n/p in 124Sn+124Sn collisions at intermediate energies is, in most cases, more sensitive to the symmetry potential Usym in the transport dynamics than to the neutron-skin thickness Δrnp imprinted in the initial density distributions. The authors demonstrate this by comparing three sources of variation: initial skin thickness Δrnp=0.16, 0.19, and 0.23 fm from Skyrme-Hartree-Fock densities; symmetry-energy slope L=30, 60, and 90 MeV; and two opposite neutron-proton effective mass splittings in the mean-field potential. In peripheral collisions the skin effect is very small relative to the symmetry-energy effects on residue N/Z, excitation energy, and deexcitation; in central collisions the largest skin effect appears for nucleons at large transverse or longitudinal momenta at 2A GeV, but Table I shows it is about a 1% change in n/p, comparable to the L effect and much smaller than the effective-mass-splitting effect. The paper's conclusion is that extracting Δrnp from this observable alone is not viable without controlling the symmetry-potential uncertainty.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumed range of uncertainty for the symmetry potential in the collision dynamics (slope parameter L from 30 to 90 MeV and the two effective-mass-splitting choices); if the true symmetry-potential uncertainty is smaller than this bracketing range, the roughly 1% neutron-skin signal could become visible, while a larger uncertainty would strengthen the negative conclusion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The free n/p yield ratio at 600A MeV and 2A GeV cannot, by itself, determine Δrnp in 124Sn unless the symmetry potential is independently constrained.
  • At 2A GeV central collisions, the high-transverse-momentum (pT > 1 GeV/c) and high-longitudinal-momentum (|pz| > 1 GeV/c) n/p ratios carry the largest skin signal; even there the signal is about 1% for Δrnp = 0.16–0.23 fm.
  • Cascade calculations without mean-field or Coulomb effects set an upper bound on the skin sensitivity of n/p, and that bound remains smaller than the potential effects in full transport.
  • Forward-rapidity n/p in peripheral collisions is dominated by deexcitation of residues, so its skin sensitivity is diluted by symmetry-energy effects on fragment excitation.
  • The same comparison strategy can be applied to other observables or collision systems to search for a probe that isolates Δrnp from Usym.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If an independent constraint on the symmetry potential (e.g., from flow or pion ratios in the same collision system) were available, the residual high-momentum n/p signal could be inverted for Δrnp; the paper's Table I provides the sensitivity coefficients needed for such a two-step extraction.
  • The same comparison could be repeated for neutron-rich isotopes like 208Pb or for isobaric collision pairs, where the skin difference may be larger relative to the potential uncertainty; the paper's method would tell whether any variant escapes the masking.
  • The 1% level is a transport-model statement; a high-statistics experiment at 2A GeV with event-by-event neutron and proton identification at pT > 1 GeV/c could test whether the predicted ordering with Δrnp appears once the effective mass splitting is fixed.
  • A natural extension is to use double ratios or ratios between two collision systems with similar symmetry-potential dynamics but different known skin thicknesses, which could cancel the dominant mean-field uncertainty.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates whether the free neutron-to-proton yield ratio n/p in 124Sn+124Sn collisions at intermediate energies (600A MeV and 2A GeV) can be used to extract the neutron-skin thickness Δrnp. Using the IBUU transport model, the authors initialize 124Sn with Skyrme-Hartree-Fock densities corresponding to Δrnp = 0.16, 0.19, and 0.23 fm, and separately vary the symmetry energy slope L (30–90 MeV) and the neutron-proton effective mass splitting in the collision dynamics. They find that in peripheral collisions and in most central-collision kinematic regions, the n/p yield ratio is more sensitive to the symmetry potential in the dynamics than to the initial Δrnp. The largest skin effect, about 1% at high transverse or longitudinal momenta in central collisions at 2A GeV, is comparable to the effect of varying L but smaller than the effect of the effective mass splitting. The paper concludes that n/p at these energies is not a clean probe of neutron-skin thickness.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper provides a useful negative result for the heavy-ion community: the free n/p yield ratio at intermediate energies is dominated by collision dynamics (symmetry potential and effective mass splitting) rather than by the ground-state neutron-skin thickness, so proposed extractions of Δrnp from such data would be strongly model dependent. The study is a controlled model comparison, with the initial-structure and dynamics effects cleanly separated in the simulation setup. Strengths include the systematic variation of the symmetry energy parameters, the inclusion of a cascade limit that isolates the maximum possible skin effect, and the quantitative summary in Table I with statistical errors. The main limitations are the lack of a reported stability check for the initialized nuclei under the ImMDI mean field and the limited validation of the GEMINI deexcitation treatment, which is responsible for about 80% of free nucleons in peripheral collisions.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.A (and Figs. 3, 7)] The paper asserts (Sec. III.A) that the sampled density distributions with desired Δrnp are maintained before collision, but no quantitative stability check is reported. Since the initial densities are generated with the SHF/MSL0 functional while the dynamics uses ImMDI with different parameterizations, the neutron-skin thickness could partially relax under the ImMDI mean field in the initialization stage or early in the collision. This matters directly for the central claim of Table I, where the effect of varying Δrnp is isolated by keeping the dynamics fixed. Please provide a test, e.g., the time evolution of neutron and proton RMS radii and of Δrnp for an isolated 124Sn nucleus initialized with each L value under the ImMDI Hamiltonian for at least 50–100 fm/c, or an explicit demonstration that the time from initialization to first contact is negligible compared with the relaxation timescale. Without this check, the reported ~1% skin effect could be an artifact of a non-equilibrium initialization, and the conclusion that the symmetry potential dominates would be less robust.
  2. [II.B and Fig. 4] In peripheral collisions, about 80% of free nucleons come from deexcitation of residue fragments, and the deexcitation treatment relies on the GEMINI model with the excitation energy computed from Eq. (21) using a simplified SHF-like functional whose parameters are only stated to 'mimic' the ImMDI properties. The only experimental comparison is the total neutron number at forward angles (matching one GSI value). The sensitivity of the peripheral n/p ratios to the deexcitation model (e.g., the parameters a, b, σ, E_pot_sym, γ) is not explored. Since the peripheral-collision conclusions are largely driven by the deexcitation component, a sensitivity study or additional experimental comparisons (e.g., energy spectra or charge distributions of fragments) would materially strengthen the paper.
  3. [Table I and Conclusions] The quantitative conclusion that the initial Δrnp effect (about 1%) is 'smaller than the uncertainty due to the symmetry potential in the collision dynamics' depends on the chosen ranges of L (30–90 MeV) and of the effective mass splitting, as well as on other model choices (in-medium cross sections, coalescence thresholds, GEMINI parameters). The paper does not propagate systematic uncertainties from these choices. While the chosen ranges are motivated by earlier analyses, a brief discussion of how the ranking of sensitivities would change if, for instance, the symmetry-potential uncertainty were narrower (e.g., L tightly constrained by PREX-II/CREX) would make the claim more precise. As written, the conclusion is tied to the subjective brackets of Fig. 1.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo: 'isovector oberavables' should be 'isovector observables'.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption says 'direction production' in the fourth row label; this should read 'direct production'.
  3. [Sec. III.B] In the text below Fig. 8, 'freen/p yield ratio' should be 'free n/p yield ratio'.
  4. [Figs. 5 and 8–10] The subplot labels in Fig. 5 (especially the (j), (k), (l) row) appear misaligned with the description; please check that the labels match the panels as intended.
  5. [Eq. (15)] In Eq. (15), the notation C_{τ_i,τ_j} is not explicitly defined; please clarify that it equals C_l when τ_i=τ_j and C_u when τ_i≠τ_j, as used in Eq. (3).
  6. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (20)] The in-medium cross section uses the reduced effective mass (μ*_NN/μ_NN)^2, but the sensitivity of the final n/p ratio to this choice is not discussed; a sentence referencing previous tests would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central result comes from controlled transport simulations with independently varied inputs; only benign, non-load-bearing self-citations are present.

full rationale

The paper is a controlled transport-model sensitivity study, not an extraction from data. Initial 124Sn configurations are generated with the MSL0 Skyrme-Hartree-Fock functional using L = 30, 60, 90 MeV, giving Δrnp = 0.16, 0.19, and 0.23 fm (Sec. II.B), while the collision dynamics is evolved with the ImMDI interaction using independently chosen L values and nucleon effective-mass splittings (Sec. II.A). The n/p observables are obtained from IBUU simulations with clusterization and GEMINI deexcitation; no observable is fitted to the input Δrnp or to the symmetry-potential parameters. The comparison between the initial-skin effect and the symmetry-potential effect is therefore not equivalent by construction: the same L values label the two variations, but the final n/p ratios are nontrivial outputs of the transport equation and could in principle have shown a different ranking. The self-citations (Refs. [24-27] for the relativistic spectator-neutron analogue, Ref. [49] for ImMDI, Ref. [56] for MSL0) provide context or the adopted interaction model; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for the calculation reported here. Possible concerns about initialization stability or the chosen uncertainty brackets are physical/correctness caveats, not circularity. The score of 2 reflects only the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of symmetry-potential uncertainty ranges, the realism of the deexcitation treatment, and the transport model itself. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • ImMDI (x, y) parameter pairs = (0.585,-115), (-0.016,-115), (-0.618,-115) for L=30/60/90 MeV; (0.999,115) for m*n>m*p
    Chosen by hand to generate the symmetry energy and symmetry potential uncertainty ranges used in the sensitivity comparison (Sec. II.A, Fig. 1).
  • SHF slope parameter L in initial densities = 30, 60, 90 MeV
    Selected in the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock calculation to yield Delta r_np = 0.16, 0.19, 0.23 fm in 124Sn (Sec. II.B).
  • Cluster coalescence thresholds = Delta r < 3 fm, Delta p < 300 MeV/c
    Adopted from Ref. [41] to group nucleons into fragments; the direct versus deexcited nucleon decomposition depends on these choices (Sec. II.B).
  • GEMINI energy-density functional parameters (a, b, sigma, E_pot_sym, gamma) = numerical values not quoted
    Adjusted to mimic the same nuclear matter properties as ImMDI when computing fragment excitation energies for deexcitation (Eq. 21, Sec. II.B).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck transport equation with mean-field, collision, and Pauli-blocking terms adequately describes intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions.
    The IBUU equation (Eq. 8) is the basis of the entire study; if the transport approximation fails, all extracted sensitivities are unreliable.
  • domain assumption The symmetry energy (L=30-90 MeV) and effective-mass-splitting ranges chosen in ImMDI bracket the realistic uncertainty of the symmetry potential in the collision dynamics.
    The central comparison 'Usym effect larger than Delta r_np effect' depends on these brackets being realistic or extreme (Sec. II.A, Fig. 1).
  • domain assumption GEMINI deexcitation correctly converts excited fragments into free nucleons with correct isospin balance.
    In peripheral collisions about 80% of free nucleons come from deexcitation (Sec. III.A, Fig. 4), so errors in GEMINI directly propagate to n/p.
  • domain assumption Skyrme-Hartree-Fock densities with the MSL0 force provide realistic initial nucleon positions with the prescribed Delta r_np.
    Initial nucleon coordinates are sampled from these densities (Sec. II.B); if the skin is not faithfully represented in the sampled phase space, the study would not probe the intended quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating the possibility of extracting neutron-skin thickness in nuclei by their collisions at intermediate energies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CD3TGEB4

@misc{pith2026241108337,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating the possibility of extracting neutron-skin thickness in nuclei by their collisions at intermediate energies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CD3TGEB4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08337}
}
abstract

Inspired by various studies on extracting the density distributions of nuclei from their collisions at ultrarelativistic energies, in the present work we investigate the possibility of extracting the neutron-skin thickness $\Delta r_{np}$ in nuclei by their collisions at intermediate energies. We have analyzed the free neutron-to-proton yield ratio $n/p$ as a candidate probe at both midrapidities and forward rapidities in peripheral and central $^{124}$Sn+$^{124}$Sn collisions based on an isospin-dependent Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (IBUU) transport model, and found that the resulting $n/p$ yield ratio is more sensitive to the symmetry potential in the collision dynamics than to the initial $\Delta r_{np}$ in colliding nuclei in most cases. The largest effect on the $n/p$ yield ratio from the initial $\Delta r_{np}$ is observed for nucleons at large transverse or longitudinal momenta in central collisions at the collision energy of a few GeV/nucleon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08337 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Pseudorapidity dependence of neutrons and pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Time evolution of the central density (upper) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Density contours in the reaction plane (x-o-z plane) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Transverse momentum dependence of the free [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Pseudorapidity dependence of the free neutron-to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Topical issue on nuclear symmetry energy,

    Bao-An Li, Angels Ramos, Giuseppe Verde, and Isaac Vidana, “Topical issue on nuclear symmetry energy,” Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 9 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Isospin asymmetry in nuclei and neutron stars,

    Andrew W. Steiner, Madappa Prakash, James M. Lat- timer, and Paul J. Ellis, “Isospin asymmetry in nuclei and neutron stars,” Phys. Rept. 411, 325–375 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0410066

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Re- action dynamics with exotic beams,

    V. Baran, M. Colonna, V. Greco, and M. Di Toro, “Re- action dynamics with exotic beams,” Phys. Rept. 410, 335–466 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0412060

    arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    Recent Progress and New Challenges in Isospin Physics with Heavy-Ion Reactions,

    Bao-An Li, Lie-Wen Chen, and Che Ming Ko, “Recent Progress and New Challenges in Isospin Physics with Heavy-Ion Reactions,” Phys. Rept. 464, 113–281 (2008), arXiv:0804.3580 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    The nuclear symmetry energy,

    M. Baldo and G. F. Burgio, “The nuclear symmetry energy,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 203–258 (2016), arXiv:1606.08838 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Neutron star struc- ture and the neutron radius of Pb-208,

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, “Neutron star struc- ture and the neutron radius of Pb-208,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5647 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010227

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Neutron radii in mean field mod- els,

    R. J. Furnstahl, “Neutron radii in mean field mod- els,” Nucl. Phys. A 706, 85–110 (2002), arXiv:nucl- th/0112085

    work page arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Neutron-Rich Nu- clei and Neutron Stars: A New Accurately Calibrated In- teraction for the Study of Neutron-Rich Matter,

    B. G. Todd-Rutel and J. Piekarewicz, “Neutron-Rich Nu- clei and Neutron Stars: A New Accurately Calibrated In- teraction for the Study of Neutron-Rich Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 122501 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0504034

    arXiv 2005

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Nuclear symmetry energy probed by neutron skin thick- ness of nuclei,

    M. Centelles, X. Roca-Maza, X. Vinas, and M. Warda, “Nuclear symmetry energy probed by neutron skin thick- ness of nuclei,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 122502 (2009), arXiv:0806.2886 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Constraining the sym- metry energy at subsaturation densities using isotope binding energy difference and neutron skin thickness,

    Zhen Zhang and Lie-Wen Chen, “Constraining the sym- metry energy at subsaturation densities using isotope binding energy difference and neutron skin thickness,” Phys. Lett. B 726, 234–238 (2013), arXiv:1302.5327 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bayesian inference of nuclear symmetry energy from mea- sured and imagined neutron skin thickness in 116,118,120,122,124,130,132Sn, 208Pb , and 48Ca,

    Jun Xu, Wen-Jie Xie, and Bao-An Li, “Bayesian inference of nuclear symmetry energy from mea- sured and imagined neutron skin thickness in 116,118,120,122,124,130,132Sn, 208Pb , and 48Ca,” Phys. Rev. C 102, 044316 (2020), arXiv:2007.07669 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Neutron density distributions of Pb- 204, Pb-206, Pb-208 deduced via proton elastic scattering at Ep=295 MeV,

    J. Zenihiro et al., “Neutron density distributions of Pb- 204, Pb-206, Pb-208 deduced via proton elastic scattering at Ep=295 MeV,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 044611 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Proton elastic scattering from tin isotopes at 295-MeV and systematic change of neutron density distributions,

    S. Terashima et al., “Proton elastic scattering from tin isotopes at 295-MeV and systematic change of neutron density distributions,” Phys. Rev. C 77, 024317 (2008), arXiv:0801.3082 [nucl-ex]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Neutron skins of 208Pb and 48Ca from pionic probes,

    E. Friedman, “Neutron skins of 208Pb and 48Ca from pionic probes,” Nucl. Phys. A 896, 46–52 (2012), arXiv:1209.6168 [nucl-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Excitation of Isovector Spin- Dipole Resonances and Neutron Skin of Nuclei,

    A. Krasznahorkay et al., “Excitation of Isovector Spin- Dipole Resonances and Neutron Skin of Nuclei,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3216–3219 (1999)

    1999

  8. [16]

    Neutron skin of 208Pb from Co- herent Pion Photoproduction,

    C. M. Tarbert et al., “Neutron skin of 208Pb from Co- herent Pion Photoproduction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 242502 (2014), arXiv:1311.0168 [nucl-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Neutron density distributions from an- tiprotonic Pb-208 and Bi-209 atoms,

    B. Klos et al., “Neutron density distributions from an- tiprotonic Pb-208 and Bi-209 atoms,” Phys. Rev. C 76, 014311 (2007), arXiv:nucl-ex/0702016

    2007 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Neutron skin deduced from antiprotonic atom data,

    B. Alex Brown, G. Shen, G. C. Hillhouse, Jie Meng, and A. Trzcinska, “Neutron skin deduced from antiprotonic atom data,” Phys. Rev. C 76, 034305 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Neutron density distributions deduced from anti-protonic atoms,

    A. Trzcinska, J. Jastrzebski, P. Lubinski, F. J. Hartmann, R. Schmidt, T. von Egidy, and B. Klos, “Neutron density distributions deduced from anti-protonic atoms,” Phys. 10 Rev. Lett. 87, 082501 (2001)

    2001

  12. [20]

    Accurate Determination of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208Pb through Parity- Violation in Electron Scattering,

    D. Adhikari et al. (PREX), “Accurate Determination of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208Pb through Parity- Violation in Electron Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172502 (2021), arXiv:2102.10767 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of Ca48,

    D. Adhikari et al. (CREX), “Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of Ca48,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 042501 (2022), arXiv:2205.11593 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Probing the neutron skin with ultrarelativistic isobaric collisions,

    Hanlin Li, Hao-jie Xu, Ying Zhou, Xiaobao Wang, Jie Zhao, Lie-Wen Chen, and Fuqiang Wang, “Probing the neutron skin with ultrarelativistic isobaric collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 222301 (2020), arXiv:1910.06170 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Determination of the Neutron Skin of Pb208 from Ultrarelativistic Nuclear Collisions,

    Giuliano Giacalone, Govert Nijs, and Wilke van der Schee, “Determination of the Neutron Skin of Pb208 from Ultrarelativistic Nuclear Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 202302 (2023), arXiv:2305.00015 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Probing neutron-skin thickness with free spectator neutrons in ultracentral high-energy isobaric collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Chun-Jian Zhang, Jia Zhou, Jun Xu, Jiangyong Jia, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Probing neutron-skin thickness with free spectator neutrons in ultracentral high-energy isobaric collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 834, 137441 (2022), arXiv:2203.09924 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Free spectator nucleons in ultracentral relativistic heavy-ion collisions as a probe of neutron skin,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Chun-Jian Zhang, Jun Xu, Jiangyong Jia, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Free spectator nucleons in ultracentral relativistic heavy-ion collisions as a probe of neutron skin,” Phys. Rev. C 106, 034913 (2022), arXiv:2209.03106 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Measur- ing deformed neutron skin with free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Jun Xu, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Measur- ing deformed neutron skin with free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 838, 137701 (2023), arXiv:2301.07893 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Col- lision geometry effect on free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Lu-Meng Liu, Jun Xu, and Guang-Xiong Peng, “Col- lision geometry effect on free spectator nucleons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Nucl. Phys. Rev. 40, 2022095 (2023), arXiv:2301.08251 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Neutron/proton ratio of nucleon emissions as a probe of neutron skin,

    X. Y. Sun, D. Q. Fang, Y. G. Ma, X. Z. Cai, J. G. Chen, W. Guo, W. D. Tian, and H. W. Wang, “Neutron/proton ratio of nucleon emissions as a probe of neutron skin,” Phys. Lett. B 682, 396–400 (2010), arXiv:0906.5281 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Triton/3He ratio as an observable for neu- tron skin thickness,

    Z. T. Dai, D. Q. Fang, Y. G. Ma, X. G. Cao, and G. Q. Zhang, “Triton/3He ratio as an observable for neu- tron skin thickness,” Phys. Rev. C 89, 014613 (2014), arXiv:1402.3038 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Effect of neutron skin thickness on projectile fragmentation,

    Z. T. Dai, D. Q. Fang, Y. G. Ma, X. G. Cao, G. Q. Zhang, and W. Q. Shen, “Effect of neutron skin thickness on projectile fragmentation,” Phys. Rev. C 91, 034618 (2015), arXiv:1504.00226 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ef- fects of neutron-skin thickness on light-particle produc- tion,

    Meng-Qi Ding, De-Qing Fang, and Yu-Gang Ma, “Ef- fects of neutron-skin thickness on light-particle produc- tion,” Phys. Rev. C 109, 024616 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Probing the Neutron Skin of Unsta- ble Nuclei with Heavy-Ion Collisions,

    Junping Yang, Xiang Chen, Ying Cui, Zhuxia Li, and Yingxun Zhang, “Probing the Neutron Skin of Unsta- ble Nuclei with Heavy-Ion Collisions,” Universe 9, 206 (2023), arXiv:2304.12059 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Study of quasi-projectile properties at Fermi energies in 48Ca projectile systems,

    S. Upadhyaya et al. (F AZIA), “Study of quasi-projectile properties at Fermi energies in 48Ca projectile systems,” (2024), arXiv:2402.09289 [nucl-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Violent collisions and multifragment final states in the Ca-40 + Ca-40 reaction at 35 MeV/nucleon,

    K. Hagel et al., “Violent collisions and multifragment final states in the Ca-40 + Ca-40 reaction at 35 MeV/nucleon,” Phys. Rev. C 50, 2017–2034 (1994)

    1994

  27. [35]

    Projectile fragmentation of Ca40, Ca48, Ni58, and Ni64 at 140 MeV/nucleon,

    M. Mocko et al., “Projectile fragmentation of Ca40, Ca48, Ni58, and Ni64 at 140 MeV/nucleon,” Phys. Rev. C 74, 054612 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Neutrons from projectile fragmen- tation at 600 MeV/nucleon,

    P. Pawlowski et al., “Neutrons from projectile fragmen- tation at 600 MeV/nucleon,” Phys. Rev. C 108, 044610 (2023), arXiv:2310.00409 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Nu- clear fragments in projectile fragmentation reactions,

    Chun-Wang Ma, Hui-Ling Wei, Xing-Quan Liu, Jun Su, Hua Zheng, Wei-Ping Lin, and Ying-Xun Zhang, “Nu- clear fragments in projectile fragmentation reactions,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 121, 103911 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Peeling off neutron skins from neutron-rich nuclei: Con- straints on the symmetry energy from neutron-removal cross sections,

    T. Aumann, C. A. Bertulani, F. Schindler, and S. Typel, “Peeling off neutron skins from neutron-rich nuclei: Con- straints on the symmetry energy from neutron-removal cross sections,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 262501 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Influence of neutron-skin thickness on π−/π+ ratio in Pb+Pb collisions,

    Gao-Feng Wei, Bao-An Li, Jun Xu, and Lie-Wen Chen, “Influence of neutron-skin thickness on π−/π+ ratio in Pb+Pb collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 90, 014610 (2014), arXiv:1309.7717 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The influence of the neutron skin and the asymmetry energy on the π−/π+ ratio,

    C. Hartnack, A. Le F` evre, Y. Leifels, and J. Aichelin, “The influence of the neutron skin and the asymmetry energy on the π−/π+ ratio,” (2018), arXiv:1808.09868 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Equation of state of asymmetric nuclear matter and collisions of neutron rich nuclei,

    Bao-An Li, C. M. Ko, and Zhong-zhou Ren, “Equation of state of asymmetric nuclear matter and collisions of neutron rich nuclei,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1644 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9701048

    1997 arXiv

  34. [42]

    The influence of cluster emission and the symmetry energy on neutron- proton spectral double ratios,

    Y. X. Zhang, P. Danielewicz, M. Famiano, Z. Li, W. G. Lynch, M. B. Tsang, and Zhuxia Li, “The influence of cluster emission and the symmetry energy on neutron- proton spectral double ratios,” Phys. Lett. B 664, 145– 148 (2008), arXiv:0708.3684 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Double neutron/proton ratio of nucleon emissions in isotopic reaction systems as a robust probe of nuclear symmetry energy,

    Bao-An Li, Lie-Wen Chen, Gao-Chan Yong, and Wei Zuo, “Double neutron/proton ratio of nucleon emissions in isotopic reaction systems as a robust probe of nuclear symmetry energy,” Phys. Lett. B 634, 378–382 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0510016

    2006 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Neutron and Pro- ton Transverse Emission Ratio Measurements and the Density Dependence of the Asymmetry Term of the Nu- clear Equation of State,

    M. A. Famiano, T. Liu, W. G. Lynch, A. M. Rogers, M. B. Tsang, M. S. Wallace, R. J. Charity, S. Komarov, D. G. Sarantites, and L. G. Sobotka, “Neutron and Pro- ton Transverse Emission Ratio Measurements and the Density Dependence of the Asymmetry Term of the Nu- clear Equation...

    2006 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Fast nucleon emission as a probe of the isospin momentum depen- dence,

    J. Rizzo, M. Colonna, and M. Di Toro, “Fast nucleon emission as a probe of the isospin momentum depen- dence,” Phys. Rev. C 72, 064609 (2005), arXiv:nucl- th/0508008

    2005

  38. [46]

    Reexamination of the neutron-to-proton-ratio puzzle in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions,

    Hai-Yun Kong, Yin Xia, Jun Xu, Lie-Wen Chen, Bao- An Li, and Yu-Gang Ma, “Reexamination of the neutron-to-proton-ratio puzzle in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 91, 047601 (2015), arXiv:1502.00778 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Probing effective nucleon masses with heavy-ion collisions,

    D. D. S. Coupland et al., “Probing effective nucleon masses with heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 94, 011601 (2016), arXiv:1406.4546 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Constraining the symmetry energy with heavy-ion collisions and Bayesian analyses,

    P. Morfouace et al., “Constraining the symmetry energy with heavy-ion collisions and Bayesian analyses,” Phys. Lett. B 799, 135045 (2019), arXiv:1904.12471 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Thermal prop- erties of asymmetric nuclear matter with an improved isospin- and momentum-dependent interaction,

    Jun Xu, Lie-Wen Chen, and Bao-An Li, “Thermal prop- erties of asymmetric nuclear matter with an improved isospin- and momentum-dependent interaction,” Phys. Rev. C 91, 014611 (2015), arXiv:1410.1604 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Momentum dependence of symmetry potential in asym- metric nuclear matter for transport model calculations,

    C. B. Das, S. Das Gupta, Charles Gale, and Bao-An Li, “Momentum dependence of symmetry potential in asym- metric nuclear matter for transport model calculations,” Phys. Rev. C 67, 034611 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0212090. 11

    2003 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Density matrix expansion for the MDI interaction,

    Jun Xu and Che Ming Ko, “Density matrix expansion for the MDI interaction,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 044311 (2010), arXiv:1007.1469 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Nucleon Effective Masses in Neutron-Rich Mat- ter,

    Bao-An Li, Bao-Jun Cai, Lie-Wen Chen, and Jun Xu, “Nucleon Effective Masses in Neutron-Rich Mat- ter,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 99, 29–119 (2018), arXiv:1801.01213 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Equa- tions of state for supernovae and compact stars,

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, “Equa- tions of state for supernovae and compact stars,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015007 (2017), arXiv:1610.03361 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Constraining the neutron- proton effective mass splitting using empirical constraints on the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy around normal density,

    Bao-An Li and Xiao Han, “Constraining the neutron- proton effective mass splitting using empirical constraints on the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy around normal density,” Phys. Lett. B 727, 276–281 (2013), arXiv:1304.3368 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Nuclear mean field dynamics in the lattice Hamiltonian Vlasov method,

    R. J. Lenk and V. R. Pandharipande, “Nuclear mean field dynamics in the lattice Hamiltonian Vlasov method,” Phys. Rev. C 39, 2242–2249 (1989)

    1989

  48. [56]

    Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei,

    Lie-Wen Chen, Che Ming Ko, Bao-An Li, and Jun Xu, “Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C82, 024321 (2010), arXiv:1004.4672 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Nucleon-nucleon cross sections in neutron-rich matter and isospin transport in heavy-ion reactions at intermediate energies,

    Bao-An Li and Lie-Wen Chen, “Nucleon-nucleon cross sections in neutron-rich matter and isospin transport in heavy-ion reactions at intermediate energies,” Phys. Rev. C 72, 064611 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0508024

    2005 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Nuclear transparency to intermediate-energy nucleons from (e, e’p) reactions,

    V. R. Pandharipande and Steven C. Pieper, “Nuclear transparency to intermediate-energy nucleons from (e, e’p) reactions,” Phys. Rev. C 45, 791–798 (1992)

    1992

  51. [59]

    Nucleon-nucleon scattering analyses. ii. neutron-proton scattering from 0 to 425 mev and proton-proton scatter- ing from 1 to 500 mev,

    R. A. Arndt, R. H. Hackman, and L. D. Roper, “Nucleon-nucleon scattering analyses. ii. neutron-proton scattering from 0 to 425 mev and proton-proton scatter- ing from 1 to 500 mev,” Phys. Rev. C 15, 1002–1020 (1977)

    1977

  52. [60]

    Sim- ulating spin dynamics with spin-dependent cross sections in heavy-ion collisions,

    Yin Xia, Jun Xu, Bao-An Li, and Wen-Qing Shen, “Sim- ulating spin dynamics with spin-dependent cross sections in heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 96, 044618 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Transport properties of asymmetric nuclear matter in the spinodal region,

    Lei-Ming Hua and Jun Xu, “Transport properties of asymmetric nuclear matter in the spinodal region,” Phys. Rev. C 109, 034614 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Comparing pion production in transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at 270AMeV under controlled conditions,

    Jun Xu et al. (TMEP), “Comparing pion production in transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at 270AMeV under controlled conditions,” Phys. Rev. C 109, 044609 (2024), arXiv:2308.05347 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Formation of super- dense hadronic matter in high-energy heavy ion colli- sions,

    Bao-An Li and Che Ming Ko, “Formation of super- dense hadronic matter in high-energy heavy ion colli- sions,” Phys. Rev. C 52, 2037–2063 (1995), arXiv:nucl- th/9505016

    1995

  56. [64]

    Light clus- ter production in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions induced by neutron rich nuclei,

    Lie-Wen Chen, C. M. Ko, and Bao-An Li, “Light clus- ter production in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions induced by neutron rich nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A729, 809– 834 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0306032

    2003 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Analytical coales- cence formula for particle production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Kai-Jia Sun and Lie-Wen Chen, “Analytical coales- cence formula for particle production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 95, 044905 (2017), arXiv:1701.01935 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Systematics of complex fragment emission in niobium-induced reactions,

    R. J. Charity et al., “Systematics of complex fragment emission in niobium-induced reactions,” Nucl. Phys. A 483, 371–405 (1988)

    1988

  59. [67]

    A Systematic description of evaporation spectra for light and heavy compound nuclei,

    R. J. Charity, “A Systematic description of evaporation spectra for light and heavy compound nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 014610 (2010), arXiv:1006.5018 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references,

    Meng Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, “The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references,” Chin. Phys. C45, 030003 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.