Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 41 references

Improving Jet A-1 Thermal-Oxidative Stability through Selective Removal of Unwanted Trace Species via 3.7 \AA{} Chabazite Filtration

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bimetallic doping of chabazite, not just acidity, lets filters remove jet-fuel deposit promoters while keeping the antioxidant BHT.

desk verdict Solid DFT/AIMD composition scan for CHA fuel treatment; bimetallic selectivity is real in vacuum, but the design-framework claim overreaches without solvent or competition. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03375 v1 pith:CF52X6NX submitted 2026-07-03 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Morteza Roostaeinia , Ehsan Alborzi , Xue Yong , Kyungwha Park , Vsevolod Ivanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords JetA-1thermaloxidativestabilitychabaziteselectiveadsorptionbimetallicdopingBHTantioxidantabinitiomoleculardynamicsdensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Jet A-1 fuel forms harmful deposits when trace heteroatomic species oxidize at high temperature, yet the same filters that catch those promoters can also strip the antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) that protects the fuel. This paper uses density-functional theory and short ab initio molecular-dynamics runs to show how 3.7 Å chabazite can be compositionally tuned to break that trade-off. Simply lowering the Si/Al ratio strengthens binding of every molecule, including BHT, so acidity alone cannot be selective. Replacing one framework silicon with Co, Mg or Zn at fixed aluminum content produces molecule-specific shifts: some promoters bind more tightly while BHT binding can be strongly suppressed (Co) or enhanced (Zn). Mobility inside the pores at 400 K further shows that a strongly adsorbing linear molecule such as dibutyl disulfide can still slip through quickly, whereas bulky Fe-naphthenate stays put. Together the adsorption, transport and electronic-structure results supply a practical screening map for choosing chabazite compositions that clean Jet A-1 without depleting its antioxidant.

What carries the argument

A three-axis screening framework that couples framework acidity (Si/Al), bimetallic dopant identity, and adsorbate size/shape relative to the 3.7 Å eight-ring window; adsorption energies, 400 K self-diffusion coefficients, and projected density-of-states / HOMO–LUMO maps are computed together to rank compositions.

What would settle it

Synthesize Co- and Zn-doped CHA monoliths at the compositions predicted here, run them side-by-side with the mono-Al Si/Al ≈ 8 reference on a doped model Jet A-1 under identical flow-through conditions, and measure whether Co retains more residual BHT while still removing Fe-naphthenate or DBDS as the calculated adsorption and mobility trends claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Lowering the Si/Al ratio of potassium-exchanged chabazite strengthens adsorption of every Jet A-1-relevant species examined, including the antioxidant BHT, whereas bimetallic substitution (Co, Mg, Zn) at fixed aluminum content produces chemically selective adsorption: promoter uptake can be strengthened or weakened independently of BHT retention, and short AIMD trajectories show that intrapore mobility further controls effective capture under flow.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that single-molecule vacuum adsorption energies and roughly 90-picosecond molecular-dynamics trajectories inside pure potassium-chabazite are good enough predictors of real filter performance when bulk fuel solvent, competitive multi-adsorbate loading and continuous flow are present.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This computational study uses periodic DFT (PBE-D3) and short AIMD trajectories to map how 3.7 Å chabazite composition affects adsorption of five Jet A-1-relevant species (aniline, DBDS, Fe-naphthenate, ethanol, BHT). Two levers are examined: mono-Al acidity (Si/Al = 35–8, K-exchanged) and bimetallic substitution (Co, Mg, Zn) at fixed Al content with charge-equivalent K+ loading. Lowering Si/Al strengthens binding of all species, including the antioxidant BHT. Bimetallic doping instead yields molecule-specific shifts (e.g., Co strongly suppresses BHT; Mg selectively strengthens DBDS). AIMD at 400 K in Si/Al = 8 CHA gives relative self-diffusion coefficients that rationalize the prior experimental DBDS capture discrepancy via high mobility. PDOS and bare-framework HOMO–LUMO maps are used to link dopant identity to electronic structure. The authors propose a unified adsorption–transport–electronic screening framework for CHA fuel-treatment design.

Significance. If the reported composition trends hold under more realistic conditions, the work supplies a useful molecular-level design map for CHA-based Jet A-1 treatment: acidity as a non-selective strength lever versus divalent dopants as a selectivity lever, with mobility as a necessary second axis for flow-through capture. Strengths include transparent, standard methods (multiple initial geometries, local contact descriptors, Einstein MSD fits with R² ≥ 0.94), explicit connection to the authors’ prior monolith experiments, and an independent first-principles explanation of the DBDS adsorption–capture mismatch. The bimetallic selectivity contrast with Si/Al-only tuning is the most actionable result for the fuel-treatment community.

major comments (3)
  1. §§2.2, 3.3 and Table 1: AIMD mobility is reported only for mono-Al Si/Al = 8, not for any CHA–Al2M composition. The central design claim (§§3.2, 3.4–3.5; Abstract) is that bimetallic substitution provides chemically selective promoter vs. BHT uptake and that adsorption energy alone is insufficient because mobility governs residence time. Without Ds (or even qualitative cage residence) for Co/Mg/Zn frameworks, the “adsorption–transport” half of the unified screening framework does not actually cover the compositions recommended for selectivity. Either extend AIMD to at least one bimetallic case (e.g., Co, where BHT suppression is largest) or restrict transport-based design statements to the mono-Al series and clearly separate them from the bimetallic energy ranking.
  2. Eq. (1), Methods §2.1 and design claims in §§3.4–3.5: All Ead values are single-molecule vacuum adsorption energies on pure K-CHA, with no hydrocarbon solvent, competitive co-adsorbates, or flow residence-time model. The paper itself flags multi-component adsorption as future work and labels Ds as order-of-magnitude relative indicators, yet §3.5 and the Abstract present a “predictive… screening framework for… Jet A-1 fuel treatment” and quote large percentage shifts (e.g., ~61% BHT suppression for Co, ~18% DBDS gain for Mg). Those percentages may compress or reverse under bulk Jet A-1 conditions. Temper the claim language to “idealized single-adsorbate ranking / composition screening under vacuum DFT+AIMD,” and state explicitly which design recommendations are expected to be robust vs. provisional pending competitive/solvent calculations or experiment.
  3. Fig. 3 and §§3.1–3.2: Main-text selectivity arguments rely on percentage changes and approximate eV shifts relative to Si/Al = 8, while absolute Ead values are deferred to SI Tables S1–S10. For a load-bearing claim that dopant identity “decouples promoter removal from antioxidant retention,” the main text should report absolute Ead (or a compact table of lowest-energy values) for the mono-Al Si/Al = 8 reference and the three bimetallics for all five species. Without those numbers, readers cannot judge whether a ~0.5 eV aniline weakening or ~61% BHT change is large relative to thermal energy, typical DFT error bars for PBE-D3 physisorption/chemisorption hybrids, or the spread among sampled initial configurations (3–13 per pair).
minor comments (7)
  1. §3.4: typo “whreas Co” → “whereas Co”.
  2. §3.5: “Mg selectively strengthened Fe-naphthenate DBDS adsorption” needs “and” (or a comma) between the two promoters.
  3. Methods §2.1: sentence fragment capitalization — “the inner and outer SCF convergence thresholds…” should start with a capital after the preceding period.
  4. Fig. 2: colored markers for five adsorbates across four panels are hard to parse in grayscale; consider distinct symbols plus a legend keyed to molecule names.
  5. Table 1: state the actual trajectory length used for Fe-naphthenate (not only that it is shorter) so the Einstein fit window can be assessed.
  6. §2.3 / Fig. 5: HOMO–LUMO and PDOS are for bare frameworks only; a one-sentence reminder in the figure caption that these do not include adsorbate–framework charge transfer would prevent over-reading the electronic “signatures” as direct binding mechanisms.
  7. Clarify once in §3.2 that CHA–Al2M is charge-equivalent (four K+) but not Si/Al-equivalent to mono-Al Si/Al = 8 (Al4 vs Al2M), so the comparison isolates dopant chemistry at fixed framework charge rather than fixed Al fraction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Ead and Ds are independent first-principles outputs, not forced by self-citation or by construction from experimental filtration data.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing quantities are standard DFT adsorption energies (Eq. 1: Ead = Etotal − Eframework − Eadsorbate) and AIMD self-diffusion coefficients from the Einstein relation on MSD trajectories (Eq. 2, Table 1). Neither is fitted to the Jet A-1 monolith filtration outcomes they interpret, nor defined in terms of those outcomes. Self-citations to the authors’ prior experiment [3] supply motivation, the observed Si/Al trade-off, and the DBDS capture discrepancy; they do not enter the energy or MSD formulas and do not force the reported % shifts or mobility ordering. PDOS/HOMO–LUMO analyses are post-hoc electronic characterizations of the same optimized frameworks, not uniqueness theorems or smuggled ansatzes. Concerns that vacuum single-molecule Ead and ~90 ps pure-K-CHA AIMD may not rank real multi-component flow filtration are validity/transferability issues, not circular reductions of prediction to input. Derivation chain is self-contained; steps empty.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central design claim rests on standard DFT/AIMD methodology plus several domain modeling choices that map single-molecule vacuum calculations onto multi-component flowing Jet A-1. No new physical entities are postulated. Free parameters are mostly numerical settings and composition choices, not fits to the target filtration data.

free parameters (4)
  • Plane-wave cutoff / relative cutoff = 350 Ry / 50 Ry
    350 Ry / 50 Ry chosen by hand for charge density; not shown to be converged for adsorption energy differences.
  • AIMD trajectory length and thermostat time constant = 90 ps; 750 fs
    90 ps NVT with CSVR 750 fs; finite length acknowledged as non-equilibrium order-of-magnitude only, yet used for design conclusions.
  • Number of initial adsorption configurations sampled = 3–13
    3–13 starts per adsorbate–framework pair; lowest-energy retained. Sampling depth is ad hoc and may miss global minima for large species.
  • Bimetallic dopant set (Co, Mg, Zn) = Co, Mg, Zn
    Chosen because doped CHA structures were available in a database, not from a systematic chemical search; limits generality of ‘dopant identity’ conclusions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE with Grimme D3(BJ) dispersion and GTH/DZVP-MOLOPT basis adequately ranks adsorption energies and relative mobilities of polar organics and metal-organic complexes in CHA.
    Invoked throughout Methods §2.1–2.2; no higher-level (hybrid, RPA, experimental isotherm) benchmark for these specific adsorbates is provided.
  • domain assumption K-exchanged CHA (no Brønsted protons) with Si/Al as a proxy for K+ Lewis-site density is the relevant acidity descriptor for Jet A-1 polar-species capture.
    Stated explicitly in §3.1; maps experimental monolith acidity trends onto the computational models.
  • domain assumption Single-molecule vacuum adsorption energy plus relative intrapore Ds predict effective capture under multi-component flowing fuel treatment.
    Used to interpret the experimental DBDS discrepancy and to recommend compositions in §§3.3–3.5; competitive adsorption and solvent are deferred to future work.
  • ad hoc to paper Charge-equivalent comparison of CHA–Al2M (four K+) to mono-Al Si/Al = 8 is a fair reference for isolating dopant chemical effects.
    §3.2 notes the Si/Al ratios are not identical but total framework charge matches; this framing choice drives the selectivity narrative in Fig. 3(b).
  • standard math Einstein relation applied to finite AIMD MSD yields meaningful relative mobility ordering among the five adsorbates.
    Eq. (2) and Table 1; authors correctly caveat non-converged equilibrium Ds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improving Jet A-1 Thermal-Oxidative Stability through Selective Removal of Unwanted Trace Species via 3.7 \AA{} Chabazite Filtration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CF52X6NX

@misc{pith2026260703375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improving Jet A-1 Thermal-Oxidative Stability through Selective Removal of Unwanted Trace Species via 3.7 \AA Chabazite Filtration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CF52X6NX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03375}
}
abstract

The thermal stability of Jet A-1 fuel is strongly affected by trace heteroatomic species that promote thermal oxidative deposit formation, as well as antioxidant additives such as butylated hydroxytoluene, which preserve fuel stability. 3.7 {\AA} chabazite is a tunable microporous adsorbent, but optimizing its composition requires balancing promoter removal against antioxidant loss. Here, we use density functional theory and \textit{ab initio} molecular dynamics (AIMD) to evaluate this trade-off using two compositional descriptors: framework acidity (Si/Al $= 35$--$8$) and bimetallic substitution (Co, Mg, Zn) at fixed Al content. Lowering Si/Al strengthens adsorption of all species, including BHT, confirming an intrinsic selectivity penalty for acidity-only tuning. In contrast, bimetallic substitution introduces chemically selective behavior, strengthening uptake of specific promoters while either suppressing or enhancing antioxidant adsorption depending on dopant identity. AIMD simulations at 400 K further show that adsorption energy alone is insufficient to describe calculated trends, because molecular mobility inside chabazite can influence residence time and effective capture during fuel treatment. Analysis of the density of states and the participating wavefunctions reveals signatures that are consistent with dopant-dependent adsorption shifts. These results establish a unified adsorption--transport--electronic screening framework for selecting chabazite compositions that remove deposit promoters while preserving antioxidant functionality in Jet A-1 treatment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03375 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Framework topology of chabazite (CHA). (a) Top view of the cage–window motif. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative lowest-energy adsorption locations of BHT, DBDS, ethanol, Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Adsorption energies of representative species on mono-Al CHA as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Projected density of states (PDOS) for CHA–Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: HOMO and LUMO wavefunction isosurfaces of representative optimized bare CHA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024 , doi =

    Fuel , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  2. [2]

    , publisher =

    Fletcher, R. , publisher =. General Linearly Constrained Optimization , booktitle =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118723203.ch11 , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118723203.ch11 , year =

    work page doi:10.1002/9781118723203.ch11

  3. [3]

    Quickstep: Fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach , journal =

    Joost VandeVondele and Matthias Krack and Fawzi Mohamed and Michele Parrinello and Thomas Chassaing and Jürg Hutter , keywords =. Quickstep: Fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach , journal =. 2005 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 , url =

    doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 2005

  4. [4]

    Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    1996

  5. [5]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1996 , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  6. [6]

    Kuprowicz and Jamie S

    Nicholas J. Kuprowicz and Jamie S. Ervin and Steven Zabarnick , keywords =. Modeling the liquid-phase oxidation of hydrocarbons over a range of temperatures and dissolved oxygen concentrations with pseudo-detailed chemical kinetics , journal =. 2004 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.03.013 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2004.03.013 2004

  7. [7]

    and Maxwell, David S

    Jorgensen, William L. and Maxwell, David S. and Tirado-Rives, Julian , title =. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    1996

  8. [8]

    Rappe, A. K. and Casewit, C. J. and Colwell, K. S. and Goddard, W. A. III and Skiff, W. M. , title =. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    1992

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Nosé, Shuichi , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1984 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.447334 , url =

    1984 doi

  2. [10]

    Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1985 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 , url =

    1985 doi

  3. [11]

    and Tildesley, Dominic J

    Allen, Michael P. and Tildesley, Dominic J. , title =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 , url =

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Understanding Molecular Simulation (Second Edition) , publisher =

    Chapter 1 - Introduction , editor =. Understanding Molecular Simulation (Second Edition) , publisher =. 2002 , isbn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012267351-1/50003-1 , url =

    2002 doi

  5. [13]

    , title =

    Hazlett, Robert N. , title =. 1991 , doi =

    1991

  6. [14]

    Taylor, W. F. , title =. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development , year =

  7. [15]

    Taylor, W. F. and Frankenfeld, J. W. , title =. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development , year =

  8. [16]

    Chemical Engineering Science , year =

    Jia, Tinghao and Zhang, Xiangwen and Liu, Yi and Gong, Si and Deng, Chuan and Pan, Lun and Zou, Ji-Jun , title =. Chemical Engineering Science , year =

  9. [17]

    Analysis and control of acid sites in zeolites , journal =

    Pal. Analysis and control of acid sites in zeolites , journal =. 2020 , volume =

    2020

  10. [18]

    Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects , journal =

    P. Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects , journal =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  11. [19]

    , title =

    Baerlocher, Christian and Brouwer, Dick and Marler, Bernd and McCusker, Lynne B. , title =. 2025 , url =

    2025

  12. [20]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Grimme, Stefan and Antony, Jens and Ehrlich, Stephan and Krieg, Helge , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  13. [21]

    Journal of Computational Chemistry , volume =

    Grimme, Stefan and Ehrlich, Stephan and Goerigk, Lars , title =. Journal of Computational Chemistry , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  14. [22]

    Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases , journal =

    VandeVondele, Joost and Hutter, J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases , journal =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  15. [23]

    and Shafer, Linda M

    Zabarnick, Steven and West, Zachary J. and Shafer, Linda M. and Mueller, Susan S. and Striebich, Richard C. and Wrzesinski, Paul J. , title =. Energy & Fuels , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  16. [24]

    Effect of organic sulfur-containing compounds on thermal oxidation stability of jet fuel , journal =

    Jiayi An and Kang Xue and Mengchao Zhao and Yumei Shu and Ji-Jun Zou and Xiangwen Zhang and Lun Pan , keywords =. Effect of organic sulfur-containing compounds on thermal oxidation stability of jet fuel , journal =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137105 , url =

    2026 doi

  17. [25]

    and Iannuzzi, Marcella and Del Ben, Mauro and Rybkin, Vladimir V

    Kühne, Thomas D. and Iannuzzi, Marcella and Del Ben, Mauro and Rybkin, Vladimir V. and Seewald, Patrick and Stein, Frederick and Laino, Teodoro and Khaliullin, Rustam Z. and Schütt, Ole and Schiffmann, Florian and Golze, Dorothea and Wilhelm, Jan and Chulkov, Sergey and Bani-H...

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    and Alborzi, Ehsan and Blakey, Simon G

    Parks, Christopher M. and Alborzi, Ehsan and Blakey, Simon G. and Meijer, Anthony J. H. M. and Pourkashanian, Mohamed , title =. Energy & Fuels , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  19. [27]

    and Meijer, Anthony J

    Parks, Christopher M. and Meijer, Anthony J. H. M. and Blakey, Simon G. and Alborzi, Ehsan and Pourkashanian, Mohamed , title =. Fuel , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  20. [28]

    and Sheikhansari, Abdolkarim and Dwyer, Matthew R

    Alborzi, Ehsan and Gadsby, Phil and Ismail, Mohammed S. and Sheikhansari, Abdolkarim and Dwyer, Matthew R. and Meijer, Anthony J. H. M. and Blakey, Simon G. and Pourkashanian, Mohamed , title =. Energy & Fuels , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  21. [29]

    and Gadsby, Phil and Sheikhansari, Abdolkarim and Blakey, Simon G

    Alborzi, Ehsan and Parks, Christopher M. and Gadsby, Phil and Sheikhansari, Abdolkarim and Blakey, Simon G. and Pourkashanian, Mohamed , title =. Energy & Fuels , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  22. [30]

    and Parks, Christopher M

    Alborzi, Ehsan and Dwyer, Matthew R. and Parks, Christopher M. and Sheikhansari, Abdolkarim and Mielczarek, Detlev C. and Zanganeh, Mohammad and Meijer, Anthony J. H. M. and Blakey, Simon G. and Pourkashanian, Mohamed , title =. Fuel , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  23. [31]

    and Mielczarek, Detlev C

    Alborzi, Ehsan and Flyagina, Irina S. and Mielczarek, Detlev C. and Blakey, Simon G. and Pourkashanian, Mohamed , title =. Fuel , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  24. [32]

    Assessing the Acidity of High Silica Chabazite

    Bordiga, Silvia and Regli, Laura and Cocina, Donato and Lamberti, Carlo and Bj. Assessing the Acidity of High Silica Chabazite. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  25. [33]

    , title =

    Piccini, GiovanniMaria and Alessio, Maristella and Sauer, Joachim and Zhi, Yuchun and Liu, Yuanshuai and Kolvenbach, Robin and Jentys, Andreas and Lercher, Johannes A. , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  26. [34]

    and Lin, Li-Chiang , title =

    Yang, Chi-Ta and Janda, Amber and Bell, Alexis T. and Lin, Li-Chiang , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  27. [35]

    Ab Initio Screening of Divalent Cations for

    Daouli, Ayoub and Rey, J. Ab Initio Screening of Divalent Cations for. Langmuir , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  28. [36]

    Smit, Berend and Maesen, Theo L. M. , title =. Chemical Reviews , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  29. [37]

    , title =

    Krishna, Rajamani and van Baten, Jasper M. , title =. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  30. [38]

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , volume =

    Velu, Subramani and Ma, Xiaoliang and Song, Chunshan , title =. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , volume =. 2003 , doi =

    2003

  31. [39]

    Nanomaterials , volume =

    Hessou, Etienne Paul and Ponce-Vargas, Miguel and Mensah, Jean-Baptiste and Tielens, Frederik and Santos, Juan Carlos and Badawi, Michael , title =. Nanomaterials , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  32. [40]

    and Hutter, J

    Lippert, G. and Hutter, J. and Parrinello, M. , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  33. [41]

    IZA Structure Commission , title =

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.