REVIEW 2 cited by
MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling and Imputation of Incomplete Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider the problem of handling missing data with deep latent variable models (DLVMs). First, we present a simple technique to train DLVMs when the training set contains missing-at-random data. Our approach, called MIWAE, is based on the importance-weighted autoencoder (IWAE), and maximises a potentially tight lower bound of the log-likelihood of the observed data. Compared to the original IWAE, our algorithm does not induce any additional computational overhead due to the missing data. We also develop Monte Carlo techniques for single and multiple imputation using a DLVM trained on an incomplete data set. We illustrate our approach by training a convolutional DLVM on a static binarisation of MNIST that contains 50% of missing pixels. Leveraging multiple imputation, a convolutional network trained on these incomplete digits has a test performance similar to one trained on complete data. On various continuous and binary data sets, we also show that MIWAE provides accurate single imputations, and is highly competitive with state-of-the-art methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CACTI: Leveraging Copy Masking and Contextual Information to Improve Tabular Data Imputation
CACTI combines median-truncated copy masking with language-model column embeddings to improve tabular imputation accuracy across MCAR, MAR, and MNAR missingness.
-
Latent Diffusion for Missing Data
A VAE-based latent diffusion model trained on incomplete data maintains sample quality and imputation performance up to 50% missingness while pixel-space diffusion degrades.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.