pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16424 · v1 · pith:CGRQ67ISnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.quant-gas· hep-th

Thermodynamic and statistical properties of a multifractional modified dispersion relation via the grand-canonical ensemble

A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 20:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.quant-gashep-th
keywords multifractional dispersionmodified thermodynamicsdensity of statesStefan-Boltzmann lawequation of state parametergrand canonical ensembleBose-Einstein condensationdegenerate Fermi gas
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multifractional dispersion deforms Stefan-Boltzmann law to scale as E_*^{3/5} T^{17/5}

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the thermodynamic consequences of a multifractional correction in the dispersion relation for a gas of bosons or fermions. It uses the grand-canonical ensemble to find that the density of states in the ultraviolet regime scales differently, changing how energy and pressure depend on temperature. This matters for models where such corrections could appear at high energies, as it alters key relations like the radiation law and the equation of state. The analysis includes both high and low temperature limits as well as stability and fluctuation properties.

Core claim

In the ultraviolet regime the density of states scales as ρ(ω) ∝ ω^{7/5}, deforming the Stefan-Boltzmann law from u ∝ T^4 to u ∝ E_*^{3/5} T^{17/5} and driving the equation-of-state parameter to w = 5/12 instead of the standard radiation value 1/3. The modified dispersion relation is ω² = k² + 4 E_*^{-1/2} k^{5/2}. Standard behavior is recovered in the infrared with corrections in powers of (T/E_*)^{1/2}. The work derives the grand potential, partition function, and studies thermal stability, fluctuations, condensation for bosons, and degeneracy for fermions.

What carries the argument

The multifractional modified dispersion relation ω² = k² + 4 E_*^{-1/2} k^{5/2} that leads to a density of states ρ(ω) ∝ ω^{7/5} in the ultraviolet and controls all derived thermodynamic quantities.

If this is right

  • Energy density scales as u ∝ E_*^{3/5} T^{17/5} in the ultraviolet.
  • Equation of state parameter w equals 5/12 for the high-energy regime.
  • Critical temperature for Bose-Einstein condensation is increased.
  • Fermi energy and heat capacity are modified for degenerate fermions.
  • Particle number and energy fluctuations receive contributions from the new scaling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this dispersion arises from quantum gravity, it could affect predictions for the early universe expansion history.
  • The modified sound speed in the Fermi gas might be observable in condensed matter analogs.
  • One could test the result by simulating the dispersion in a laboratory system and measuring the energy scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The modified dispersion relation is accepted as given and the standard grand-canonical ensemble formulas apply without extra corrections.

What would settle it

Observe or calculate the temperature scaling of the energy density u(T) in the ultraviolet regime for the given dispersion relation and verify if the exponent is 17/5 rather than 4.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16424 by A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Group velocity vg(k) plotted as a function of k for different values of E∗. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The density of states ϱ(ω) plotted as a function of k for different values of E∗. The density of states in energy space is defined by ϱ(ω) = dN /dω. Using Eq. (21), we have ϱ(ω) = gV 2π 2 k 2 dk dω = gV 2π 2 k 2 vg(k) , (22) where vg(k) = dω/dk is the group velocity. For the spectrum considered here, direct differentiation gives vg(k) = 1 + 5p k/E∗  1 + 4p k/E∗ 1/2 . (23) In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Bosonic pressure as a function of the temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bosonic particle number density as a function of the temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bosonic internal energy density as a function of the temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bosonic entropy density as a function of the temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bosonic heat capacity as a function of the temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the thermodynamic and statistical properties of a gas governed by a multifractional modified dispersion relation of the form $\omega^{2}=k^{2}+4E_{*}^{-1/2}k^{5/2}$, where $E_{*}$ sets the characteristic scale of the multifractional correction. Working within the grand-canonical ensemble, we derive the modified density of states, the grand potential, the partition function, and the main thermodynamic quantities for both bosonic and fermionic sectors. The deformation changes the available phase-space distribution and produces nonstandard thermal scalings controlled by the ratio $T/E_{*}$. In the infrared regime, the usual relativistic gas behavior is recovered with leading corrections proportional to powers of $(T/E_{*})^{1/2}$. In the ultraviolet regime, the density of states scales as $\varrho(\omega)\propto \omega^{7/5}$, corresponding to an effective density-of-states dimension $d_{\mathrm{eff}}=12/5$. As a consequence, the Stefan-Boltzmann law is deformed from $u\propto T^{4}$ to $u\propto E_{*}^{3/5}T^{17/5}$, while the equation-of-state parameter approaches $w=5/12$ instead of the standard radiation value $w=1/3$. We also analyze thermal stability, particle number and energy fluctuations, Bose-Einstein condensation, and the degenerate Fermi gas limit. The multifractional correction increases the critical temperature of a conserved bosonic gas and modifies the Fermi energy, pressure, sound speed, and low-temperature heat capacity of degenerate fermions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the thermodynamic and statistical properties of a gas obeying the multifractional modified dispersion relation ω² = k² + 4 E_*^{-1/2} k^{5/2} within the grand-canonical ensemble. It derives the modified density of states, grand potential, partition function, and thermodynamic quantities (energy density, pressure, fluctuations) for both bosonic and fermionic statistics. The work recovers standard relativistic behavior in the infrared with (T/E_*)^{1/2} corrections and reports nonstandard ultraviolet scalings: ρ(ω) ∝ ω^{7/5} (effective dimension d_eff = 12/5), energy density u ∝ E_*^{3/5} T^{17/5}, and equation-of-state parameter w = 5/12. Additional results cover thermal stability, Bose-Einstein condensation, and the degenerate Fermi gas limit.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the paper supplies explicit, internally consistent calculations of how a concrete modified dispersion alters thermodynamic scalings and phenomena such as BEC critical temperature and Fermi-gas thermodynamics. The reduction to standard results in the IR and the clean extraction of the UV exponents from the given dispersion are strengths. The comprehensive treatment of both statistics and multiple observables increases the utility of the results for models with high-energy dispersion modifications.

major comments (2)
  1. §3 (density of states): The UV claim ρ(ω) ∝ ω^{7/5} follows from the standard expression ρ(ω) = k²/(2π²) |dk/dω| once the dispersion is inverted in the k^{5/2}-dominated regime. The manuscript should explicitly display the inversion ω ≈ 2 E_*^{-1/4} k^{5/4} and the resulting dk/dω to confirm the exponent 7/5 and the E_*^{3/5} prefactor; without these intermediate steps the central scaling cannot be verified from the given dispersion alone.
  2. §4 (equation of state): The result w = 5/12 is obtained from the kinetic-theory identity P = (1/3) ∫ k (dω/dk) f(ω) d³k, which reduces to w = β/3 when ω ∝ k^β with β = 5/4. The paper should state the explicit value of dω/dk extracted from the dispersion in the UV limit to make this reduction transparent and to confirm that no additional multifractional corrections to the pressure-energy relation are assumed.
minor comments (3)
  1. Notation for the density of states is inconsistent (ρ in some sections, ϱ in the abstract); adopt a single symbol throughout.
  2. The range of validity of the UV approximation (where the k^{5/2} term dominates) should be quantified with an explicit inequality involving k and E_*.
  3. A brief comparison table of the IR and UV exponents for u, P, and w would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and constructive report. The suggestions for greater explicitness in the derivations are well taken and will be incorporated in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (density of states): The UV claim ρ(ω) ∝ ω^{7/5} follows from the standard expression ρ(ω) = k²/(2π²) |dk/dω| once the dispersion is inverted in the k^{5/2}-dominated regime. The manuscript should explicitly display the inversion ω ≈ 2 E_*^{-1/4} k^{5/4} and the resulting dk/dω to confirm the exponent 7/5 and the E_*^{3/5} prefactor; without these intermediate steps the central scaling cannot be verified from the given dispersion alone.

    Authors: We agree that the intermediate algebraic steps should be shown explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will insert, in §3, the UV inversion ω² ≈ 4 E_*^{-1/2} k^{5/2} yielding ω ≈ 2 E_*^{-1/4} k^{5/4}, followed by dω/dk = (5/2) E_*^{-1/4} k^{1/4} and therefore dk/dω = (2/5) E_*^{1/4} k^{-1/4}. Substituting into the standard density-of-states formula and re-expressing k in terms of ω recovers ρ(ω) ∝ E_*^{3/5} ω^{7/5} with d_eff = 12/5. This addition makes the scaling fully verifiable from the given dispersion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (equation of state): The result w = 5/12 is obtained from the kinetic-theory identity P = (1/3) ∫ k (dω/dk) f(ω) d³k, which reduces to w = β/3 when ω ∝ k^β with β = 5/4. The paper should state the explicit value of dω/dk extracted from the dispersion in the UV limit to make this reduction transparent and to confirm that no additional multifractional corrections to the pressure-energy relation are assumed.

    Authors: We accept the suggestion. In the revised §4 we will state that, in the UV regime, dω/dk ≈ 5 E_*^{-1/4} k^{1/4}. Because this is equivalent to dω/dk ∝ k^{1/4} and ω ∝ k^{5/4}, one has β = 5/4. The kinetic-theory identity then directly yields w = β/3 = 5/12 with no additional multifractional corrections to the pressure-energy relation. The explicit derivative will be displayed to render the reduction transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard phase-space integrals applied to externally given dispersion yield the reported scalings as direct algebraic consequences

full rationale

The modified dispersion ω² = k² + 4 E_*^{-1/2} k^{5/2} is introduced as an input with E_* an external scale. The UV density of states ρ(ω) ∝ ω^{7/5} follows immediately from the conventional formula ρ(ω) ∝ k² (dk/dω) after inverting the dominant term to obtain k ∝ ω^{4/5} E_*^{1/5} and substituting; likewise w = 5/12 follows from the standard kinetic-theory identity P = (1/3) ∫ k (dω/dk) f(ω) d³k evaluated on the UV branch ω ∝ k^{5/4}. Both results are expressed in terms of the dimensionless ratio T/E_* and do not reduce to tautologies or fitted parameters within the paper's own equations. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansätze are invoked to close the derivation; the grand-canonical formulas and flat d³k measure are assumed valid by standard statistical mechanics rather than derived from the dispersion itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on one free parameter E_* that sets the scale of the correction and on the domain assumption that ordinary statistical mechanics applies unchanged to the modified single-particle spectrum.

free parameters (1)
  • E_*
    Characteristic energy scale that controls the strength of the multifractional correction term in the dispersion relation.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The grand-canonical ensemble remains valid for the modified dispersion relation without further corrections from interactions or field-theoretic renormalization.
    Invoked when deriving the grand potential, partition function, and all thermodynamic quantities from the altered density of states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5838 in / 1564 out tokens · 83127 ms · 2026-05-20T20:35:12.408438+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The same result follows directly from the ultraviolet thermodynamic functions

    This limiting value is independent of the quantum statistics; the statistics only affects how the system approaches this limit through the distribution function. The same result follows directly from the ultraviolet thermodynamic functions. Indeed,P UV σ ≃ AE3/5 ∗ T 17/5L(σ) 17/5(z), whereasu UV σ ≃ 12 5 AE3/5 ∗ T 17/5L(σ) 17/5(z). In this manner, P UV σ ...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Quantum-corrected finite entropy of noncommutative acoustic black holes,

    M. A. Anacleto, F. A. Brito, G. C. Luna, E. Passos, and J. Spinelly, “Quantum-corrected finite entropy of noncommutative acoustic black holes,”Annals Phys., vol. 362, pp. 436–448, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Quantum-corrected self-dual black hole entropy in tunneling formalism with GUP,

    M. A. Anacleto, F. A. Brito, and E. Passos, “Quantum-corrected self-dual black hole entropy in tunneling formalism with GUP,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 749, pp. 181–186, 2015. 27

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries,

    C. M. Will, “Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 57, pp. 2061–2068, 1998

    work page 2061

  5. [5]

    Tests of quantum gravity from observations of gamma-ray bursts,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, D. V. Nanopoulos, and S. Sarkar, “Tests of quantum gravity from observations of gamma-ray bursts,”Nature, vol. 393, no. 6687, pp. 763–765,

    work page

  6. [6]

    Erratum: Nature 395, 525 (1998)

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    High-energy tests of lorentz invariance,

    S. R. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, “High-energy tests of lorentz invariance,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 59, p. 116008, 1999

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Doubly-special relativity: First results and key open problems,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, “Doubly-special relativity: First results and key open problems,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1643–1669, 2002

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,

    J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 88, p. 190403, 2002

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Modern tests of lorentz invariance,

    D. Mattingly, “Modern tests of lorentz invariance,”Living Rev. Relativ., vol. 8, p. 5, 2005

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena, and astrophysical constraints,

    T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, “Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena, and astrophysical constraints,”Annals Phys., vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 150–196, 2006

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,

    P. Hoˇ rava, “Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 79, p. 084008, 2009

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,

    S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,”Living Rev. Relativ., vol. 16, p. 2, 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Testing local lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and M. Mewes, “Testing local lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 757, pp. 510–514, 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers gw150914 and gw151226,

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, “Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers gw150914 and gw151226,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, p. 084002, 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Einstein-Hilbert graviton modes modified by the Lorentz-violating bumblebee Field,

    R. V. Maluf, C. A. S. Almeida, R. Casana, and M. M. Ferreira, Jr., “Einstein-Hilbert graviton modes modified by the Lorentz-violating bumblebee Field,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 025007, 2014

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Radiative corrections in metric-affine bumblebee model,

    A. Delhom, J. R. Nascimento, G. J. Olmo, A. Y. Petrov, and P. J. Porf´ ırio, “Radiative corrections in metric-affine bumblebee model,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 826, p. 136932, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Lorentz-violating dimension-five operator contribution to the black body radiation,

    M. A. Anacleto, F. A. Brito, E. Maciel, A. Mohammadi, E. Passos, W. O. Santos, and J. R. L. Santos, “Lorentz-violating dimension-five operator contribution to the black body radiation,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 785, pp. 191–196, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Lorentz-violating extension of scalar QED at finite temperature,

    M. C. Ara´ ujo, J. Furtado, and R. V. Maluf, “Lorentz-violating extension of scalar QED at finite temperature,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 844, p. 138064, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    The Lorentz-violating real scalar field at thermal equilibrium,

    A. R. Aguirre, G. Flores-Hidalgo, R. G. Rana, and E. S. Souza, “The Lorentz-violating real scalar field at thermal equilibrium,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 81, no. 5, p. 459, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Fermionic quantum gas at finite temperature within a Lorentz- violating background,

    R. L. J. Costa and R. F. Sobreiro, “Fermionic quantum gas at finite temperature within a Lorentz- violating background,”EPL, vol. 145, no. 4, p. 44001, 2024. 28

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    CP-violating non-linear electrodynamics and cor- rections to blackbody radiation thermal laws,

    L. P. R. Ospedal, R. Turcati, and S. B. Duarte, “CP-violating non-linear electrodynamics and cor- rections to blackbody radiation thermal laws,” 11 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Non-commutative correction of ideal gas thermodynamics,

    D. Parai and S. K. Panja, “Non-commutative correction of ideal gas thermodynamics,”Annals Phys., vol. 470, p. 169815, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Higher-derivative Lorentz-breaking dispersion relations: a thermal description,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho and A. Y. Petrov, “Higher-derivative Lorentz-breaking dispersion relations: a thermal description,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 81, no. 9, p. 843, 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Modified particle dynamics and thermodynamics in a traversable wormhole in bumblebee gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. A. A. S. Reis, and A.¨Ovg¨ un, “Modified particle dynamics and thermodynamics in a traversable wormhole in bumblebee gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 1, p. 83, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Particle motion and thermal effects around a Kalb–Ramond black hole,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Particle motion and thermal effects around a Kalb–Ramond black hole,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 9, p. 1002, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Exploring the thermodynamics of non-commutative scalar fields,

    F. A. Brito and E. E. M. Lima, “Exploring the thermodynamics of non-commutative scalar fields,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, vol. 31, no. 11, p. 1650057, 2016

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Classical radiation fields for scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational waves with spacetime-symmetry breaking,

    Q. G. Bailey, A. S. Gard, N. A. Nilsson, R. Xu, and L. Shao, “Classical radiation fields for scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational waves with spacetime-symmetry breaking,”Annals Phys., vol. 461, p. 169582, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Power spectra and circular polarization of primordial gravitational waves with parity and lorentz violations,

    T.-C. Li, T. Zhu, W. Zhao, and A. Wang, “Power spectra and circular polarization of primordial gravitational waves with parity and lorentz violations,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2024, no. 07, p. 005, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Gravitational waves in metric-affine bumblebee gravity,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Gravitational waves in metric-affine bumblebee gravity,” 3 2026

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Modified gravitational wave propagations in linearized gravity with lorentz and diffeomorphism violations and their gravitational wave constraints,

    Q. Wang, J.-M. Yan, T. Zhu, and W. Zhao, “Modified gravitational wave propagations in linearized gravity with lorentz and diffeomorphism violations and their gravitational wave constraints,”Physical Review D, vol. 111, no. 8, p. 084064, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Propagation effects of Lorentz violation in gravita- tional waves,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, and I. P. Lobo, “Propagation effects of Lorentz violation in gravita- tional waves,” 2 2026

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    Gravitational waves in a minimal gravitational SME,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, and I. P. Lobo, “Gravitational waves in a minimal gravitational SME,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 875, p. 140350, 2026

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Signals for lorentz violation in gravitational waves,

    M. Mewes, “Signals for lorentz violation in gravitational waves,”Physical Review D, vol. 99, no. 10, p. 104062, 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Gravitational waves effects in a Lorentz–violating scenario,

    K. M. Amarilo, M. B. F. Filho, A. A. A. Filho, and J. A. A. S. Reis, “Gravitational waves effects in a Lorentz–violating scenario,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 855, p. 138785, 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al., “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 061102, 2016

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Tests of general relativity with gw150914,

    B. P. Abbottet al., “Tests of general relativity with gw150914,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 221101,

    work page

  38. [38]

    Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 129902 (2018). 29

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,

    M. Arzano and G. Calcagni, “What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, p. 124065, 2016

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the ligo-virgo catalog gwtc-1,

    B. P. Abbottet al., “Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the ligo-virgo catalog gwtc-1,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, p. 104036, 2019

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Tests of general relativity with gwtc-3,

    R. Abbottet al., “Tests of general relativity with gwtc-3,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 084080, 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [43]

    Fractal universe and quantum gravity,

    G. Calcagni, “Fractal universe and quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, p. 251301, 2010

    work page 2010

  43. [44]

    Geometry of fractional spaces,

    G. Calcagni, “Geometry of fractional spaces,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 549–644, 2012

    work page 2012

  44. [45]

    Multi-scale gravity and cosmology,

    G. Calcagni, “Multi-scale gravity and cosmology,”JCAP, vol. 12, p. 041, 2013

    work page 2013

  45. [46]

    Multiscale spacetimes from first principles,

    G. Calcagni, “Multiscale spacetimes from first principles,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 95, p. 064057, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [47]

    The spectral dimension of the universe is scale dependent,

    J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “The spectral dimension of the universe is scale dependent,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, p. 171301, 2005

    work page 2005

  47. [48]

    Fractal spacetime structure in asymptotically safe gravity,

    O. Lauscher and M. Reuter, “Fractal spacetime structure in asymptotically safe gravity,”JHEP, vol. 10, p. 050, 2005

    work page 2005

  48. [49]

    Fractal structure of loop quantum gravity,

    L. Modesto, “Fractal structure of loop quantum gravity,”Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 26, p. 242002, 2009

    work page 2009

  49. [50]

    Dimension and dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    S. Carlip, “Dimension and dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 34, p. 193001, 2017

    work page 2017

  50. [51]

    Multifractional theories: an unconventional review,

    G. Calcagni, “Multifractional theories: an unconventional review,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, no. 3, p. 138, 2017

    work page 2017

  51. [52]

    Thermodynamics of a photon gas and deformed dispersion relations,

    A. Camacho and A. Mac´ ıas, “Thermodynamics of a photon gas and deformed dispersion relations,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit., vol. 39, pp. 1175–1183, 2007

    work page 2007

  52. [53]

    Black-hole thermodynamics with modified dispersion relations and generalized uncertainty principles,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, Y. Ling, and G. Mandanici, “Black-hole thermodynamics with modified dispersion relations and generalized uncertainty principles,”Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 23, pp. 2585–2606, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [54]

    The effect of modified dispersion relations on the thermodynamics of black-body radiation,

    K. Nozari and A. S. Sefidgar, “The effect of modified dispersion relations on the thermodynamics of black-body radiation,”Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 339–347, 2008

    work page 2008

  54. [55]

    Modified dispersion relation, photon’s velocity, and unruh effect,

    B. R. Majhi and E. C. Vagenas, “Modified dispersion relation, photon’s velocity, and unruh effect,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 725, no. 4–5, pp. 477–480, 2013

    work page 2013

  55. [56]

    Dsr-gup, maximally localized state, and black hole thermody- namics,

    W. S. Chung and H. Hassanabadi, “Dsr-gup, maximally localized state, and black hole thermody- namics,”Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., vol. 2019, no. 12, p. 123E01, 2019. 30

    work page 2019

  56. [57]

    Black hole corrections due to minimal length and modified dispersion relation,

    A. N. Tawfik and A. M. Diab, “Black hole corrections due to minimal length and modified dispersion relation,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, vol. 30, no. 12, p. 1550059, 2015

    work page 2015

  57. [58]

    Thermal analysis of photon-like particles in rainbow gravity,

    J. Furtado, H. Hassanabadi, J. Reis,et al., “Thermal analysis of photon-like particles in rainbow gravity,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08587, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [59]

    R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale,Statistical Mechanics. Oxford: Academic Press, 3 ed., 2011

    work page 2011

  59. [60]

    Huang,Statistical Mechanics

    K. Huang,Statistical Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2 ed., 1987

    work page 1987

  60. [61]

    Kardar,Statistical Physics of Particles

    M. Kardar,Statistical Physics of Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  61. [62]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Part 1. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3 ed., 1980

    work page 1980

  62. [63]

    Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries,

    C. M. Will, “Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries,”Physical Review D, vol. 57, pp. 2061–2068, 1998

    work page 2061

  63. [64]

    Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers gw150914 and gw151226,

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, “Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers gw150914 and gw151226,”Physical Review D, vol. 94, no. 8, p. 084002, 2016

    work page 2016

  64. [65]

    What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,

    M. Arzano and G. Calcagni, “What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,”Physical Review D, vol. 93, no. 12, p. 124065, 2016

    work page 2016

  65. [66]

    Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,

    P. Hoˇ rava, “Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,”Physical Review D, vol. 79, p. 084008, 2009

    work page 2009

  66. [67]

    Testing local lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and M. Mewes, “Testing local lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,”Physics Letters B, vol. 757, pp. 510–514, 2016

    work page 2016

  67. [68]

    Fractal universe and quantum gravity,

    G. Calcagni, “Fractal universe and quantum gravity,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 25, p. 251301, 2010

    work page 2010

  68. [69]

    Geometry of fractional spaces,

    G. Calcagni, “Geometry of fractional spaces,”Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 549–644, 2012

    work page 2012

  69. [70]

    Lorentz violations in multifractal spacetimes,

    G. Calcagni, “Lorentz violations in multifractal spacetimes,”European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, p. 291, 2017

    work page 2017

  70. [71]

    Relativistic particle in multiscale spacetimes,

    G. Calcagni, “Relativistic particle in multiscale spacetimes,”Physical Review D, vol. 88, p. 065005, 2013

    work page 2013

  71. [72]

    Symmetries and propagator in multifractional scalar field theory,

    G. Calcagni and G. Nardelli, “Symmetries and propagator in multifractional scalar field theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, p. 085008, 2013

    work page 2013

  72. [73]

    Abc of multi-fractal spacetimes and fractional sea turtles,

    G. Calcagni, “Abc of multi-fractal spacetimes and fractional sea turtles,”European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, p. 181, 2016

    work page 2016

  73. [74]

    Geometry and field theory in multi-fractional spacetime,

    G. Calcagni, “Geometry and field theory in multi-fractional spacetime,”JHEP, vol. 01, p. 065, 2012

    work page 2012

  74. [75]

    R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale,Statistical Mechanics. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 3 ed., 2011

    work page 2011

  75. [76]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Part 1, vol. 5 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3 ed., 1980. 31

    work page 1980