Accelerating Multi-Model Bayesian Inference, Model Selection and Systematic Studies for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:CH4VDKCKrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Gravitational wave models are used to infer the properties of black holes in merging binaries from the observed gravitational wave signals through Bayesian inference. Although we have access to a large collection of signal models that are sufficiently accurate to infer the properties of black holes, for some signals, small discrepancies in the models lead to systematic differences in the inferred properties. In order to provide a single estimate for the properties of the black holes, it is preferable to marginalize over the model uncertainty. Bayesian model averaging is a commonly used technique to marginalize over multiple models, however, it is computationally expensive. An elegant solution is to simultaneously infer the model and model properties in a joint Bayesian analysis. In this work we demonstrate that a joint Bayesian analysis can not only accelerate but also account for model-dependent systematic differences in the inferred black hole properties. We verify this technique by analysing 100 randomly chosen simulated signals and also the real gravitational wave signal GW200129_065458. We find that not only do we infer statistically identical properties as those obtained using Bayesian model averaging, but we can sample over a set of three models on average $2.5\times$ faster. In other words, a joint Bayesian analysis that marginalizes over three models takes on average only $20\%$ more time than a single model analysis. We then demonstrate that this technique can be used to accurately and efficiently quantify the support for one model over another, thereby assisting in Bayesian model selection.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Eccentric and unbound compact binaries in the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA catalog: parameter estimation and waveform systematics with SEOBNRv6EHM
SEOBNRv6EHM reduces parameter biases for eccentric binaries versus prior models and shows mild support for eccentricity in five catalog events plus comparable unbound fits for three high-mass events.
-
A Robust and Efficient F-statistic-based Framework for Consistent Bayesian Inference of Compact Binary Coalescences
F-statistic framework analytically maximizes over distance and polarization to enable faster Bayesian inference of compact binary coalescences with a new evidence formulation that matches full frequency-domain results...
-
Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data
Parametric models incorporating waveform phase and amplitude uncertainties mitigate systematic errors in gravitational wave parameter estimation, producing consistent results across models and raw/deglitched data for ...
-
Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data
Reanalysis of flagged LVK events with waveform uncertainty models produces consistent spin and precession inferences across raw/deglitched data and multiple waveform approximants.
-
The impact of waveform systematics and Gaussian noise on the interpretation of GW231123
The high mass and high spin magnitudes inferred for GW231123 using NRSur7dq4 are robust to waveform systematics and Gaussian noise.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.