Quantum Metric Induced Critical Current Anomaly in Flat Band Josephson Junctions

Dmitri K. Efetov; K. T. Law; Yuxuan Deng; Zhong C.F. Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Quantum Metric Induced Critical Current Anomaly in Flat Band Josephson Junctions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that in flat-band Josephson junctions the critical current can increase while normal-state conductance decreases, because the supercurrent is carried by quantum-metric-enabled interface states rather than by propagating…

desk verdict The Lieb-lattice mechanism is clean and convincing; the 'strong evidence' claim about the TBG experiment outruns the calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08120 v1 pith:CINXGL7P submitted 2026-08-08 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hall

Zhong C.F. Li , Yuxuan Deng , Dmitri K. Efetov , K. T. Law This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hall

keywords quantummetricflatbandJosephsonjunctioncriticalcurrentanomalytwistedbilayergrapheneinterfacestatesnormal-stateconductanceLieblattice

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conventional Josephson-junction theory ties the supercurrent to the normal-state conductance: when conductance drops, critical current should drop too. This paper argues that in junctions whose weak link is a flat band with nontrivial quantum metric, that link breaks. The supercurrent can instead be carried by interface states whose spatial extent is set by the band's quantum-metric length, so in the right regime the critical current keeps growing while the normal conductance falls. The paper demonstrates the effect analytically and numerically in a modified Lieb-lattice model, then shows that a realistic six-band model of twisted bilayer graphene reproduces the experimental anomaly. The authors read the observed critical current anomaly as evidence for the previously ignored quantum-metric contribution to the Josephson current.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quantum-metric-enabled interface state: a bound state that appears where the superconducting lead meets the flat-band weak link, with a localization length $\xi_{\rm loc} = 8\xi_{\rm QM}$, where $\xi_{\rm QM} = \int g_0(k)\,dk/(2\pi)$ is the quantum-metric length obtained by integrating the quantum metric $g_0(k)$ of the flat band over the Brillouin zone. These interface states carry supercurrent only when $\xi_{\rm loc}$ is comparable to or longer than the junction length $L$, and this is the quantum-metric-enabled Josephson current (QMJC). The analytic argument uses an effective model in which the weak link is integrated out, leaving the two lead-interface sites coupled by an amplitude $|T_{LR}| \propto |T_A|^2 e^{-L/\xi_{\rm loc}}$; from this the paper derives the transmission formula for $G$ and the Matsubara-sum expression for $I_c$. The two-channel competition — dispersive states controlling $G$ and interface states controlling $I_c$ — is what produces the anomaly.

What would settle it

Measure the critical current of a twisted-bilayer-graphene junction as a function of junction length at fixed chemical potential and temperature. The QMJC mechanism predicts exponential decay with length scale $\xi_{\rm loc}=8\xi_{\rm QM}$, distinct from the conventional $e^{-L/\xi_{v_F}}$ dependence; if the extracted decay length does not track the independently computed quantum-metric length of the flat band, the proposed explanation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a flat-band Josephson junction supports two transport channels with different length scales. The conventional channel, carried by dispersive band states, makes the conductance nearly length-independent but makes the Josephson current decay as $e^{-L/\xi_{v_F}}$ with $\xi_{v_F}$ set by Fermi velocity and temperature. The quantum-metric channel, carried by interface states at the superconductor/weak-link boundaries, contributes to both conductance and critical current with a decay $e^{-L/\xi_{\rm loc}}$, where $\xi_{\rm loc} = 8\xi_{\rm QM}$ and $\xi_{\rm QM}$ is the quantum metric length of the flat band. When $\xi_{v_F} \ll \xi_{\rm loc} \lesssim L$, the conductance is dominated by the conventional channel while the critical current is dominated by the quantum-metric channel, so gating or temperature can suppress $G$ while $I_c$ rises. This is the proposed critical current anomaly, demonstrated in the exactly solvable Lieb-lattice limit and reproduced in a six-band TBG calculation that matches experiment without fine tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the boundary states at each superconducting contact leak into the flat band with a fixed decay length, eight times the band's quantum-metric length, and that these two boundary states can hybridize across the junction when that decay length is comparable to or longer than the junction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In flat-band junctions with $\xi_{v_F} \ll \xi_{\rm loc} \lesssim L$, the critical current and the normal-state conductance are controlled by different mechanisms, so the standard proportionality between them no longer holds.
Temperature can drive the anomaly: near the middle of a narrow band, $G$ decreases with increasing temperature while $I_c$ can increase as long as $\xi_{\rm loc} \gg \xi_{v_F}$.
The junction-length dependence is a clean signature: $G$ oscillates with $L$, while $I_c$ decays exponentially with a length scale set by the quantum metric, allowing the two channels to be separated experimentally.
The anomaly should appear in any narrow-band weak link with a nontrivial quantum metric and small dispersion, not just in the Lieb-lattice toy model or TBG.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If this mechanism is right, the TBG critical-current anomaly becomes an indirect measurement of band quantum geometry in a transport experiment, complementing superfluid-weight and optical probes.
The universal-looking prediction — that flat-band proximity junctions should show an $I_c$-versus-$G$ relation that is not monotonic — could be tested in other moiré platforms, such as twisted transition-metal dichalcogenides, where $\xi_{\rm QM}$ can be tuned by twist angle.
Because the factor 8 in $\xi_{\rm loc} = 8\xi_{\rm QM}$ is model-dependent, a quantitative match to experiment requires computing $\xi_{\rm loc}$ from the actual microscopics of each material; until then the theory predicts the crossover behavior but not its precise doping scale.
A natural extension would be to check whether the QMJC contribution also modifies the Josephson inductance or Shapiro steps in flat-band junctions, which would give independent signatures beyond the dc critical current.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the two-channel mechanism is real and the toy model is solid, but the headline claim about the experiment is not supported by what the calculation actually shows. The new idea — in a flat-band weak link, G is carried by the dispersive channel while I_c is carried by quantum-metric interface states with a much longer decay length — explains the anomaly cleanly and is, as far as I can tell, genuinely new in this form. The Lieb-lattice part is the real meat: analytic G and I_c matching the numerics, with the e^{-L/xi_loc} factor doing the work. That part is convincing on its own.

The soft spots are all at the level of the experimental claim. First, 'incredible consistency' is asserted, not shown: Fig. 5(b) plots the six-band calculation, not the experimental data from Ref. [48], and there is no overlay, no error analysis, and no statement of which model parameters correspond to which experimental conditions. Efetov is a co-author on both papers, so the data should be available; its absence weakens 'strong evidence' to 'consistent with.' Second, and more load-bearing, the realistic calculation imports xi_loc = 8 xi_QM (Eq. 6) from the authors' own Ref. [53] and never verifies it inside the six-band TBG model. The text admits the factor 8 is model dependent, and the regime xi_vF << xi_loc <~ L is assumed to hold rather than demonstrated. The six-band calculation never shows that these interface states exist there, that they hybridize across the 5x30 junction, or that they dominate I_c for the chosen parameters. If the true localization length in TBG is shorter than 8 xi_QM, the QMJC contribution is exponentially suppressed and the anomaly attribution fails. The stress-test note lands.

None of this sinks the paper. The Lieb-lattice mechanism is independently grounded, the analytic work is reproducible, and the central argument — that G and I_c can respond to different transport channels when a flat band has a nontrivial quantum metric — holds up on its own terms. What needs to change is the packaging: this is a model-based explanation of the anomaly, not a quantitative proof of QMJC in TBG. A referee should ask for a direct data comparison and some verification of the localization length in the realistic model.

Verdict: send it to review. The audience is people working on flat-band transport and quantum geometry in moiré systems, and for them this will be a useful mechanism paper worth citing. With the 'strong evidence' wording toned down and the experimental comparison made explicit, it would be a solid contribution.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that the recently observed critical current anomaly in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) Josephson junctions, where the critical current Ic increases while the normal-state conductance G decreases, arises from a quantum metric enabled Josephson current (QMJC). The authors argue that in a flat-band weak link the conventional supercurrent decays over the short length scale xi_vF, while a quantum metric contribution, carried by interface states with localization length xi_loc = 8 xi_QM, can dominate Ic without contributing significantly to G. The paper first demonstrates the effect analytically and numerically in a one-dimensional modified Lieb lattice with a nearly flat band, and then presents a six-band TBG calculation showing similar chemical-potential and junction-length dependences, which the authors interpret as strong evidence for QMJC.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, the paper provides a concrete route by which band geometry, rather than band dispersion, controls the supercurrent in flat-band Josephson junctions, and it offers falsifiable predictions for the junction-length and temperature dependences of Ic. The Lieb-lattice analysis is a genuine strength: the analytic results match the numerical Green's-function calculations, and the exponential decay e^{-L/xi_loc} of the quantum metric contribution is explicit. The main weakness is the quantitative bridge to experiment: the six-band calculation is not compared directly with the experimental data, no error analysis is provided, and the localization-length relation is imported from the authors' previous work without being verified in the realistic model. As it stands, the paper establishes a plausible mechanism and a qualitative fit, but not the 'strong evidence' claimed in the abstract.

major comments (3)

[Realistic 2D calculation, Fig. 5(b)] The central claim that the experiment provides 'strong evidence of QMJC' rests on the statement that the six-band calculation matches the experimental results well, yet no experimental data points are overlaid on Fig. 5(b), no error bars or systematic uncertainties are quoted, and no goodness-of-fit measure is given. The text also refers to resistance R while the figure axes show G and Ic/I0, and the normalization I0 is not defined. Please add a quantitative comparison with the data of Ref. [48], define the conversion between chemical potential and experimental gate voltage, and report the uncertainty in the decay length extracted from Fig. 5(c). Without these additions, the 'incredible consistency' is an unsupported assertion rather than a demonstrated result.
[Eq. (6) and surrounding text] The relation xi_loc = 8 xi_QM, imported from Ref. [53] and acknowledged by the authors to be model dependent, is the load-bearing premise for the claim that QMJC dominates Ic in the TBG junction. The six-band calculation never verifies that interface states with this localization length actually exist in the realistic weak-link model, never computes the quantum metric length of the TBG narrow bands within the same model, and never checks that the gap-opening term Delta H preserves these states. The regime xi_vF << xi_loc <= L is therefore assumed rather than demonstrated. Please compute the interface-state wavefunction and localization length in the six-band model, or explicitly state this as an assumption and soften the strong-evidence conclusion accordingly.
[Realistic 2D calculation, parameter choices] The claim that the six-band result matches experiment 'without fine tuning of parameters' is not supported by the manuscript: the induced gap (1.9 meV), lead hopping (10 meV), uniform lead-weak-link coupling (10 meV), junction size (5x30 unit cells), and temperature (0.15 meV) are all set by hand, and no sensitivity analysis is presented. A parameter scan, or at least a statement of which observables depend on each parameter, is needed to rule out that the anomaly is an artifact of the particular parameter set rather than a robust consequence of the quantum metric.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (8)] The Matsubara frequencies are written as omega_n = (2n+1) pi k_B T for n = 1, 2, ..., but the fermionic Matsubara sum should include n = 0, 1, 2, ...; either the index convention or the definition should be corrected, and the same convention should be used consistently in the Supplemental Material.
[Fig. 4(a)] The caption states L = 20a and delta = 0.05 but does not give xi_loc; quoting xi_loc in the caption would help the reader see that L/xi_loc is only about 2.8 and that the quantum metric contribution is exponentially suppressed but not negligible.
[Realistic 2D calculation, last paragraph] The sentence describing the junction-length dependence says that the interpretation is 'supported by the length dependence of the critical current,' but this length dependence is only a theoretical prediction and is not compared with any experimental data; the wording should distinguish a prediction from a postdiction.
[Discussion] The statement that xi_loc is 'lower-bounded by the quantum metric length' is more cautious than Eq. (6), which asserts the model-specific equality xi_loc = 8 xi_QM; the relationship between the general quantum metric length and the Lieb-lattice expression in Eq. (3) should be clarified.
[Realistic 2D calculation, text] The phrase 'TBG Josehson junction' contains a typo and should read 'Josephson junction'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The load-bearing localization length ξ_loc = 8ξ_QM is imported from the authors' own Ref. [53] and is not verified in the six-band TBG calculation, so the 'strong evidence' conclusion is partly self-referential; the Lieb-lattice analysis still provides independent content.

self citation load bearing [Eq. (6) in Section 'Quantum metric enabled Josephson current']
"Using the lattice model established above as an example, the localization length ξloc = a/(2√2δ) = 8ξQM, (6), characterizes the spatial extent of the interface states, where the factor 8 is model dependent [53]."

Eq. (6) is the load-bearing scale of the paper: it converts the quantum metric length of the weak link into the decay length of the interface states that supposedly carry QMJC, and the regime ξ_vF ≪ ξ_loc ≲ L, asserted for TBG junctions just above this equation, is what makes I_c dominated by QMJC while G is not. This relation is imported from the authors' own Ref. [53] ('the factor 8 is model dependent [53]') and is not recomputed in the six-band TBG model. The six-band calculation never evaluates ξ_loc or demonstrates the existence/hybridization of interface states, so the 'strong evidence' conclusion for the experiment reduces to accepting the same-author prior result rather than an independent derivation.

full rationale

The paper is not globally circular: the modified Lieb-lattice section contains a fully analytic calculation of G and I_c (Eqs. (7)-(8)) whose flat-band limit is checked against lattice Green's function numerics, and the six-band TBG simulation is an independent tight-binding computation with stated parameters rather than a fit to the experimental data. However, the chain that turns these calculations into evidence for the 'critical current anomaly' depends on the assertion that interface states at the lead/weak-link boundary have localization length ξ_loc = 8ξ_QM (Eq. 6). That assertion is imported from the authors' own Ref. [53], and the text itself notes the factor 8 is model dependent; the six-band model never computes ξ_loc or verifies that such interface states exist and dominate the supercurrent. The regime condition ξ_vF ≪ ξ_loc ≲ L is therefore adopted, not demonstrated, in the realistic model. This makes the 'strong evidence of QMJC' conclusion partly self-referential, though not reducible to a pure identity: the Lieb-lattice result provides independent toy-model content. Score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on hand-chosen model parameters (δ, t, T_A, λ, L, and the TBG induced gap) and on a quantum-metric interface-state length scale imported from the authors' own prior work. No new particles or fields are introduced; the main epistemic risk is the unverified self-cited length scale.

free parameters (6)

Lieb lattice quantum-metric parameter δ = 0.02 (flat-band limit), 0.05 (anomaly calculation)
Controls ξ_QM = a/(16√2 δ) and ξ_loc = 8ξ_QM; the regime ξ_loc ≫ ξ_vF is engineered by choosing δ small.
Lieb lattice dispersion t = t = 0.05 Δ_sc in anomaly calculations
Sets the conventional dispersive channel; the anomaly requires a small but nonzero t, so the balance between conventional and QMJC channels is chosen by hand.
Coupling strength T_A = T_A = 100 Δ_sc (Lieb); 10 meV (TBG)
Sets the absolute scale of the interface-state transmission and Josephson current; chosen large compared to Δ_sc to make the interface channel visible.
Lead hopping λ = λ = 100 Δ_sc (Lieb); 10 meV (TBG)
Lead bandwidth; chosen to satisfy λ ≫ Δ_sc and to set the lead density of states.
Junction length L = L = 20a (Lieb); 30 unit cells (TBG)
Must lie between ξ_vF and ξ_loc to see QMJC dominate; not derived from the experiment, only chosen in the model.
TBG induced gap ΔH = 1.9 meV
Gap-opening perturbation in the six-band model to isolate a narrow band; its magnitude is set by hand and affects the quantitative match.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Interface states at the lead/weak-link boundary have localization length ξ_loc = 8ξ_QM, with ξ_QM the quantum metric length, and these states hybridize across the junction to carry Josephson current when ξ_loc is comparable to or longer than the junction length.
Imported from Ref. [53], with the length scale repeated in Eq. (6). The entire QMJC contribution and the anomaly mechanism depend on this relation; it is not derived in this paper.
domain assumption The conventional Josephson current through a dispersive channel decays as exp(-L/ξ_vF) with ξ_vF = ℏvF/(2πkBT), as in Bardeen and Johnson.
Used to argue that the conventional supercurrent is negligible for long junctions, leaving the quantum-metric contribution dominant; cited from Refs. [52,57].
domain assumption The six-band tight-binding Hamiltonian of Po et al. faithfully represents the narrow bands and quantum metric of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene.
The realistic 2D calculation inherits its band structure and quantum metric from this model; no independent verification of the metric is provided here.
domain assumption The leads are described by BCS pairing with a single gap Δ_sc for supercurrent, by noninteracting metallic leads for conductance, and the weak link has no self-consistent pairing.
Standard modeling assumption; it excludes inverse proximity effect and interaction renormalizations in the narrow band, which could affect the quantitative comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Metric Induced Critical Current Anomaly in Flat Band Josephson Junctions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CINXGL7P

@misc{pith2026260808120,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Metric Induced Critical Current Anomaly in Flat Band Josephson Junctions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CINXGL7P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08120}
}

abstract

In well-established theories of Josephson junctions, the superconducting critical current $ I_\mathrm{c} $ increases as the normal state conductance $ \mathcal{G} $ increases. However, in a recent experiment in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) based Josephson junctions, unexpectedly, it was observed that the increase of the critical current is accompanied by a decrease of the normal state conductance. We call this phenomenon the critical current anomaly. In this work, we point out that in the TBG-based Josephson junction, due to the suppression of the conventional Josephson current by the flatness of the band and the quantum metric enabled Josephson current (QMJC), the critical current anomaly can occur. The QMJC appears if the quantum metric length is comparable or longer than the junction length. We show that both $ \mathcal{G} $ and $ I_\mathrm{c} $ have the conventional and the quantum metric contributions, and there are parameter regimes in which $ I_\mathrm{c} $ increases even when $ \mathcal{G} $ decreases. We first demonstrate the critical current anomaly by a simple modified Lieb-lattice model both analytically and numerically. The incredible consistency with the experimental results is demonstrated using a realistic six-band model of twisted bilayer graphene. Therefore, we suggest that the critical current anomaly observed in the experiment provide strong evidence of QMJC which were ignored in well-established theories of Josephson junctions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08120 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (a) The lattice structure of the Josephson junction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. (a) The critical current anomaly probed by tuning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Band structure of 6-band model of magic angle twisted bilayer graphene. (b) The critical current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[48]

Jiang, P

G. Jiang, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and Y. Barlas, Superfluid weight cross-over and critical temperature enhancement in sin- gular flat bands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2416726122 (2025)

work page 2025
[53]

Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Mi- croelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995)

S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Mi- croelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995)

work page 1995
[1]

Department of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China and
[2]

Fakult¨ at f¨ ur Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨ at, Schellingstrasse 4, M¨ unchen 80799, Germany In well-established theories of Josephson junctions, the superconducting critical currentI c in- creases as the normal state conductanceGincreases. However, in a recent experiment in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) based Josephson junctions, unexpectedly...

work page Pith review arXiv 2026
[3]

Bistritzer and A

R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Science108, 12233 (2011)

work page 2011
[4]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture (London)556, 43 (2018)

2018
[5]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature (London)574, 653 (2019)

work page 2019

Show all 62 references

[7]

Yankowitz, S

M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

2019
[8]

H. C. Po, L. Zou, T. Senthil, and A. Vishwanath, Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic-angle bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 195455 (2019)

2019
[9]

Codecido, Q

E. Codecido, Q. Wang, R. Koester, S. Che, H. Tian, R. Lv, S. Tran, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Zhang, M. Bockrath, and C. N. Lau, Correlated insulating and superconducting states in twisted bilayer graphene below the magic angle, Science Advances5, eaaw9770 (2019)

2019
[10]

Hazra, N

T. Hazra, N. Verma, and M. Randeria, Bounds on the Superconducting Transition Temperature: Applications to Twisted Bilayer Graphene and Cold Atoms, Physical Review X9, 031049 (2019)

2019
[11]

Balents, C

L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands, Nature Physics16, 725 (2020). 7

2020
[12]

Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies- Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near planckian dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076801 (2020)

2020
[13]

Stepanov, I

P. Stepanov, I. Das, X. Lu, A. Fahimniya, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. H. L. Koppens, J. Lischner, L. Levi- tov, and D. K. Efetov, Untying the insulating and su- perconducting orders in magic-angle graphene, Nature (London)583, 375 (2020)

2020
[14]

E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nature Materials19, 1265 (2020)

2020
[15]

Zondiner, A

U. Zondiner, A. Rozen, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y. Cao, R. Queiroz, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Oreg, F. von Oppen, A. Stern, et al., Cascade of phase transitions and dirac revivals in magic-angle graphene, Nature582, 203 (2020)

2020
[16]

Saito, J

Y. Saito, J. Ge, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. F. Young, Independent superconductors and correlated in- sulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics16, 926 (2020)

2020
[17]

E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 201 (2021)

2021
[18]

Peri, Z.-D

V. Peri, Z.-D. Song, B. A. Bernevig, and S. D. Huber, Fragile Topology and Flat-Band Superconductivity in the Strong-Coupling Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 027002 (2021)

2021
[19]

J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled supercon- ductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Na- ture (London)590, 249 (2021)

2021
[20]

Verma, T

N. Verma, T. Hazra, and M. Randeria, Optical spectral weight, phase stiffness, and T c bounds for trivial and topological flat band superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science118, e2106744118 (2021)

2021
[21]

Rossi, Quantum metric and correlated states in two- dimensional systems, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science25, 100952 (2021)

E. Rossi, Quantum metric and correlated states in two- dimensional systems, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science25, 100952 (2021)

2021
[22]

S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Ginzburg-landau theory of flat-band superconductors with quantum metric, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026002 (2024)

2024
[23]

V. A. J. Pyykk¨ onen, S. Peotta, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Suppres- sion of nonequilibrium quasiparticle transport in flat- band superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216003 (2023)

2023
[24]

Zhang, Y

S. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Sun, X. Chen, B. Li, S. Moore, S. Liu, Z. Wang, S. Rossi, R. Jing, et al., Visu- alizing moir´ e ferroelectricity via plasmons and nano- photocurrent in graphene/twisted-wse2 structures, Na- ture communications14, 6200 (2023)

2023
[25]

Daido, T

A. Daido, T. Kitamura, and Y. Yanase, Quantum geometry encoded to pair potentials, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.15558 (2023), arXiv:2310.15558 [cond- mat.supr-con]

2023 arXiv
[26]

Cr´ epel, N

V. Cr´ epel, N. Regnault, and R. Queiroz, Chiral limit and origin of topological flat bands in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Communications Physics7, 146 (2024)

2024
[27]

D. D. Dai and L. Fu, Strong-coupling phases of trions and excitons in electron-hole bilayers at commensurate densities, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 196202 (2024)

2024
[28]

Kitamura, A

T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Spin-triplet superconductivity from quantum-geometry-induced fer- romagnetic fluctuation, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036001 (2024)

2024
[29]

Cr´ epel, P

V. Cr´ epel, P. Ding, N. Verma, N. Regnault, and R. Queiroz, Topologically protected flatness in chiral moir´ e heterostructures, Phys. Rev. X15, 021056 (2025)

2025
[30]

J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als (2025), arXiv:2501.00098 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2025 arXiv
[31]

Verma, P

N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry: Revisiting electronic scales in quan- tum matter (2025), arXiv:2504.07173 [cond-mat.mtrl- sci]

2025
[32]

H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, W. Li, C. Wang, C. Hu, Y. Zhao, et al., Ferromagnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a fractional chern insulator, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

2025
[33]

Y. Dong, Y. Zhao, L. Klebl, T. Handa, D. Xu, C. Trovatello, C. He, D. Sun, T. P. Darlington, K. W. C. Kwock, J. A. Tulyagankhodjaev, Y. Bai, Y. Shao, M. Fu, R. Queiroz, M. Delor, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, T. O. Wehling, S. Jin, E. J. Mele, and D. N. Basov, Flat band excitons in a ...

2025 arXiv
[34]

Peotta and P

S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

2015
[35]

Julku, S

A. Julku, S. Peotta, T. I. Vanhala, D.-H. Kim, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Geometric origin of superfluidity in the lieb- lattice flat band, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 045303 (2016)

2016
[36]

T¨ orm¨ a, L

P. T¨ orm¨ a, L. Liang, and S. Peotta, Quantum metric and effective mass of a two-body bound state in a flat band, Phys. Rev. B98, 220511 (2018)

2018
[37]

Tovmasyan, S

M. Tovmasyan, S. Peotta, L. Liang, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and S. D. Huber, Preformed pairs in flat bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B98, 134513 (2018)

2018
[38]

X. Hu, T. Hyart, D. I. Pikulin, and E. Rossi, Geo- metric and Conventional Contribution to the Superfluid Weight in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237002 (2019)

2019
[39]

F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology-Bounded Superfluid Weight in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 167002 (2020)

2020
[40]

Julku, T

A. Julku, T. J. Peltonen, L. Liang, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluid weight and berezinskii- kosterlitz-thouless transition temperature of twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 060505 (2020)

2020
[41]

V. A. J. Pyykk¨ onen, S. Peotta, P. Fabritius, J. Mohan, T. Esslinger, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Flat-band transport and josephson effect through a finite-size sawtooth lattice, Phys. Rev. B103, 144519 (2021)

2021
[42]

Verma, T

N. Verma, T. Hazra, and M. Randeria, Optical spectral weight, phase stiffness, andT c bounds for trivial and topological flat band superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2106744118 (2021)

2021
[43]

Huhtinen, J

K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. Bernevig, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Revisiting flat band supercon- ductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings, Phys. Rev. B106, 014518 (2022)

2022
[44]

Herzog-Arbeitman, V

J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V. Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Hu- ber, and B. A. Bernevig, Superfluid Weight Bounds from Symmetry and Quantum Geometry in Flat Bands, Phys. 8 Rev. Lett.128, 087002 (2022)

2022
[45]

Kitamura, A

T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Quantum geo- metric effect on fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov supercon- ductivity, Phys. Rev. B106, 184507 (2022)

2022
[46]

T¨ orm¨ a, S

P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 528 (2022)

2022
[47]

T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys

P. T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240001 (2023)

2023
[49]

R. P. Penttil¨ a, K.-E. Huhtinen, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Flat- band ratio and quantum metric in the superconductivity of modified lieb lattices, Communications Physics8, 50 (2025)

2025
[50]

D ´ ıez-Carl´ on, J

A. D ´ ıez-Carl´ on, J. D ´ ıez-M´ erida, P. Rout, D. Sedov, P. Virtanen, S. Banerjee, R. P. S. Penttil¨ a, P. Altpeter, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S.-Y. Yang, K. T. Law, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, P. T¨ orm¨ a, M. S. Scheurer, and D. K. Efetov, Probing the flat-band limit of the super...

2025
[51]

C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Josephson cur- rent through a superconducting quantum point contact shorter than the coherence length, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3056 (1991)

1991
[52]

univer- sal

C. W. J. Beenakker, Three “univer- sal” mesoscopic josephson effects, in Transport Phenomena in Mesoscopic Systems, edited by H. Fukuyama and T. Ando (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992)

1992
[54]

Tafuri, Fundamentals and Frontiers of the Josephson Effect, Vol

F. Tafuri, Fundamentals and Frontiers of the Josephson Effect, Vol. 286 (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2019)

2019
[55]

Z. C. F. Li, Y. Deng, S. A. Chen, D. K. Efetov, and K. T. Law, Flat band josephson junctions with quantum metric, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023273 (2025)

2025
[56]

X. Guo, X. Ma, X. Ying, and K. T. Law, Majorana zero modes in the lieb-kitaev model with tunable quantum metric, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 076601 (2025)

2025
[57]

See Supplemental Material for: (i) Lattice Green’s Func- tion of Lieb Lattice, (ii) The Bound States in an Isolated Flat Band, (iii) Conductance and Critical Current of Iso- lated Flat Band with Nontrivial Quantum Metric, (iv) Details of the six-band TBG model
[58]

De Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2018)

P.-G. De Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2018)

2018
[59]

Bardeen and J

J. Bardeen and J. L. Johnson, Josephson current flow in pure superconducting-normal-superconducting junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B5, 72 (1972)

1972
[60]

J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Communications in Math- ematical Physics76, 289 (1980)

1980
[61]

J.-X. Hu, S. A. Chen, and K. T. Law, Anomalous co- herence length in superconductors with quantum metric, Communications Physics8, 20 (2025)

2025
[62]

S. M. Girvin and K. Yang, Modern condensed matter physics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cornwall, Padstow, UK, 2019)

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [48]

Jiang, P

G. Jiang, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and Y. Barlas, Superfluid weight cross-over and critical temperature enhancement in sin- gular flat bands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2416726122 (2025)

work page 2025

[2] [53]

Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Mi- croelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995)

S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Mi- croelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995)

work page 1995

[3] [1]

Department of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China and

[4] [2]

Fakult¨ at f¨ ur Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨ at, Schellingstrasse 4, M¨ unchen 80799, Germany In well-established theories of Josephson junctions, the superconducting critical currentI c in- creases as the normal state conductanceGincreases. However, in a recent experiment in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) based Josephson junctions, unexpectedly...

work page Pith review arXiv 2026

[5] [3]

Bistritzer and A

R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Science108, 12233 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [4]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture (London)556, 43 (2018)

2018

[7] [5]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [6]

X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature (London)574, 653 (2019)

work page 2019