Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Mirror symmetry for 4d $A_1$ class-$\mathcal{S}$ theories: modularity, defects and Coulomb branch

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read 4d mirror symmetry maps VOA modules to Coulomb-branch fixed points

desk verdict Systematic conjectural dictionary between A1 class-S VOA modules and Hitchin fixed manifolds, backed by strong examples and one honestly admitted irreducibility gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03155 v1 pith:CIUJBZAO submitted 2024-12-04 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.RT

Yiwen Pan , Wenbin Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.RT
keywords 4dmirrorsymmetryclass-StheoriesvertexoperatoralgebrasHitchinmodulispaceSchurindexflavoredmodulardifferentialequationsfixedmanifoldsmixedHodgepolynomials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a 4d mirror symmetry for A1 class-S theories: the representation theory of the Higgs-branch vertex operator algebra V_{g,n} is governed by the U(1)_r fixed points of the Coulomb-branch Hitchin moduli space M_{g,n}. Concretely, for each simple module the conformal weight and flavor Dynkin labels of its highest-weight state are determined by the moment-map value of the corresponding fixed manifold. The modular T-matrix has Jordan type specified by the dimensions of those fixed manifolds. A separate conjecture packages the same information in the renormalized mixed Hodge polynomial of the associated character variety. If correct, these statements provide a complete geometric dictionary for the representation theory of these VOAs, and give a systematic way to predict module data from Hitchin geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair (V_{g,n}, M_{g,n}) with the U(1)_r fixed-point stratification. V_{g,n} is the chiral quantization of the Higgs branch, the vertex operator algebra obtained from T_{g,n} through the 4d/VOA correspondence; M_{g,n} is the SU(2)/Z2 Hitchin moduli space describing the Coulomb branch. The machinery has three ingredients: defect Schur indices and flavor modular differential equations, which produce q-series interpreted as characters; the classification of fixed manifolds M_a with moment-map values mu(M_a); and the renormalized pure part of the mixed Hodge polynomial P_{g,n}(q). The identity h(L_a) = mu(M_a) - mu_max - (1/2) delta_{mu(M_a),0} carries the dictionary: it converts geometric critical values into representation-theoretic weights and, through the Jordan-type formula, converts dimensions of fixed manifolds into the structure of modular representations.

What would settle it

Compute the full solution space of the flavor modular differential equations for a small case such as (g,n) = (1,2), where the conjectures predict exactly four simple modules and an eight-dimensional modular representation. If an independent non-logarithmic solution appears beyond the four q-series listed, or if any of those q-series decomposes as a sum of two characters of smaller modules, the conjectured bijection is counting the wrong set of modules.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is a conjectural mirror symmetry for A1 class-S theories: the simple modules of the Higgs-branch VOA V_{g,n} are in bijection with the fixed manifolds of the Coulomb-branch Hitchin moduli space under the U(1)_r action. For n=0 the conformal weight obeys h(L_a) = mu(M_a) - mu_max - (1/2) delta_{mu(M_a),0}. For n>0 the flavor-refined identities (49)--(50) read both the conformal weight and the Dynkin labels from the moment-map expansion in the fundamental weights. The modular T-matrix (or STS-matrix when n is odd) has Jordan type given by [(1-delta_{mu(M_a),0})(dim M_a + 1) + g], so the dimensions of fixed manifolds determine the size and shape of the logarithmic sector. A third conjecture says the renormalized pure part of the mixed Hodge polynomial P_{g,n}(q) encodes the number of simple modules, the dimension of the modular representation, and the Jordan type of the modular matrix. The paper verifies these statements in a series of examples, including (g,n) = (0,4), (1,1), (1,2), and general g with n=0 or n=1.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the q-series built from vortex and Wilson-line defect indices are characters of irreducible simple modules of the vertex operator algebra, and that together they exhaust all simple modules; the paper says explicitly that it cannot prove irreducibility and proceeds on this assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For unpunctured theories T_{g,0}, the g simple modules are matched to the g fixed manifolds, and the order of the modular differential equation equals g(2g-1), reproducing a previously conjectured dimension.
  • For punctured theories, the complete list of simple modules---including non-ordinary ones---is predicted by the fixed manifolds, so new VOA modules can be discovered by enumerating Hitchin fixed manifolds.
  • Ordinary modules correspond to a specific subset of fixed manifolds M^{ord}_{g,n}; their characters span the unflavored modular representation and reproduce the conjectured dimensions of the ordinary-module space.
  • The Jordan type of the modular T matrix (or STS matrix for odd n) is determined by dim M_a + 1 plus g, giving a geometric explanation for logarithmic modules as elements of the cohomology of fixed manifolds.
  • The renormalized mixed Hodge polynomial P_{g,n}(q) computes three VOA invariants at once: the number of simple modules, the dimension of the modular representation, and the Jordan type of the modular matrix.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dictionary is taken as a design principle, the modular representation V^{mod}_{g,n} should be isomorphic to some cohomological object built from the fixed manifolds; the paper's Jordan-type formula hints that logarithmic modules are the higher cohomology classes, though the precise isomorphism is not constructed.
  • The same moment-map read-off could be tested on the associated variety of V_{g,n}: for small (g,n), comparing the associated variety with the fixed-point cohomology of M_{g,n} would promote the conjectures from statements about characters to statements about coordinate rings.
  • A direct extension to higher-rank class-S theories would require classifying fixed manifolds of higher-rank Hitchin systems and checking whether the polynomial sum_i a_i d_i still matches the modular-representation dimension; the paper's SU(3) example suggests the pattern may persist.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a conjectural 4d mirror symmetry for A1 class-S theories T_{g,n}, relating the representation theory of the Higgs-branch VOA V_{g,n} to the geometry of the U(1)_r fixed manifolds of the Hitchin moduli space M_{g,n}. Conjectures 1 and 2 state a bijection between simple modules of V_{g,n} and fixed manifolds, with the highest-weight conformal dimension and flavor Dynkin labels read off from the moment-map values; Conjecture 3 asserts that a renormalized mixed Hodge polynomial P_{g,n}(q) of the character variety encodes the number of simple modules, the dimension of the modular representation, and the Jordan type of the modular matrix. The evidence comes from defect Schur indices, vortex and Wilson-line indices, FMDEs, modular orbit constructions, and explicit fixed-manifold data from the mathematical literature. The paper works through a series of examples, including g=0,n=4, g=1,n=1, g=1,n=2, and g=2,3 with n=1, finding consistent matches in each case.

Significance. If the conjectures are correct, the paper provides a broad and systematic dictionary between VOA representation theory and Hitchin-system geometry, with predictive power for VOAs whose module categories are not yet classified. A notable strength is that the VOA-side ingredients (characters from defect indices, FMDEs, modular orbits) and the Hitchin-side ingredients (fixed manifolds, moment maps, mixed Hodge polynomials) are computed independently and agree in all worked examples. The relation between renormalized mixed Hodge polynomials and modular Jordan types, if established, would be a new bridge between character varieties and quasi-lisse VOA representation theory. However, the central claims remain conjectural and rest on an explicitly admitted unproven assumption about irreducibility of the index-derived modules; the paper is therefore a strong evidence-gathering contribution rather than a proof of the proposed mirror symmetry.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Conjectures 1 and 2; footnote 46] The central bijection between simple modules of V_{g,n} and fixed manifolds rests on the unproven assumption in footnote 46 that the q-series extracted from vortex and Wilson-line defect indices are characters of irreducible simple modules. If any of these q-series is the character of a reducible but indecomposable module, its leading term still determines a highest weight, so the read-off of h and Dynkin labels in Section VI would be unchanged, but the object would not be a simple module; the bijection would then map a fixed manifold to a reducible object, and the count P_{g,n}(1) as well as the Jordan-type predictions would be statements about the wrong module list. The examples with independent VOA classifications, such as g=0,n=4 and g=1,n=1, do not remove this gap for the general claims. Please either prove irreducibility for the modules in question, or restate Conjectures 1-3 as a dictionary for the defect-index modules with irreducibility formulated as a separate conjecture.
  2. [Section II.B, Eqs. (13) and (108)] The set in (13)/(108) is repeatedly called a basis of V^ord_{g,n}, but linear independence and spanning are not established in this paper; the property is asserted via reference [23]. Hidden linear dependencies would change dim V^ord and hence the Jordan types in Eqs. (109)-(110) and in Conjecture 3. The explicit small examples compute modular matrices and verify dimensions, so they are internally consistent, but the general claim lacks support. Please supply a proof or explicitly state the basis property as an additional assumption.
  3. [Section V, Conjecture 3 and Eq. (46)] Conjecture 3 asserts that the renormalized pure part of the mixed Hodge polynomial P_{g,n}(q) encodes the number of fixed manifolds, the dimension of V^mod_{g,n}, and the Jordan type of the modular matrix. The evidence in the examples is strong, but no mechanism is offered for why the cohomological grading of the character variety should match the logarithmic-module grading of the modular representation. As written, the conjecture is an unexplained numerical coincidence except in the checked cases. A derivation or at least a precise conjecture identifying the relevant cohomological filtration with the Jordan-block filtration would considerably strengthen the claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section VI.B, example g=0,n=4] The notation '[2,14]' for the Jordan type should read '[2,1^4]', and similarly '[3,22,1]' should read '[3,2,2,1]'; the exponent convention used in Conjecture 3 is not carried through consistently in the examples.
  2. [Section II.A, Eq. (4)] The residue in Eq. (4) is written 'Res_{b_{n+1}→ q^{1+κ/2}}' but the superscript formatting is lost in the displayed formula; please fix the exponent to q^{(1+κ)/2}.
  3. [Section VI.B, Eqs. (82)-(85)] The q-series expansions are given without stating the normalization convention (for example, whether the leading power includes the q^{-c/24} factor). Stating the convention would make the read-off of conformal weights h unambiguous.
  4. [Section III and Tables II-VI] The symbol M_0 is used both for the fixed point with µ=0 and for fixed manifolds labeled M_{0,e} with e a tuple; in tables this can be confusing. Distinguishing the fixed point from the family M_{0,e} by a clearer notation would improve readability.
  5. [Section II.A, Eq. (6)] The rational coefficients c_ℓ(κ) appearing in the closed form of I^{vortex}_{g,0}(κ) are not defined in the text; please define them or provide a reference where they are specified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the VOA and Hitchin-side data are computed independently, and the dictionary replacements are conventions rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The central conjectures (Conjectures 1–3) compare two independently computed sets of data. The VOA-side input consists of q-series extracted from Schur, vortex-defect, and Wilson-line indices (Section II.A) and from FMDE/MDE solutions; the Hitchin-side input consists of fixed manifolds, moment-map critical values, and renormalized mixed Hodge polynomials taken from [24]–[27] and [40]. The matching in eqs. (47), (49), (50), and (51) uses the substitutions α_i → −ω(i) or α_1 → 1/2+ω(1) as a dictionary between parabolic parameters and flavor weights; these are fixed conventions, not parameters fitted to the target representation-theoretic data. The most serious admitted gap is footnote 46: 'we are unable to show the modules here to be irreducible. Nevertheless, we proceed by assuming irreducibility.' This is an unproven assumption that could invalidate the bijection if a candidate q-series were reducible or if modules were missing, but it is not a circular reduction: the characters and moment-map values are not defined in terms of each other. The modular-orbit basis (13)/(108) is imported from the authors' prior work [23], but it is used as a computational tool for examples, and the Jordan-type predictions are also checked against the independent mixed-Hodge polynomial P_{g,n}(q); no load-bearing argument reduces to an unverified self-citation. The paper's own caveats concern correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the lambda and c coefficients in index formulas are fixed by recursion, the parabolic alpha_i are physical inputs, and the dictionary replacements alpha_i -> -omega(i) or 1/2+omega(i) are fixed map choices rather than fitted values. The paper's novelty rests on conjectured structural identifications, not on extra entities or tuned constants. The axioms above collect the background theorems and domain assumptions the matching depends on; the leading fragility is the unproven irreducibility and completeness of index-derived modules.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Fixed manifolds of the SU(2)/Z2 Hitchin moduli space M_{g,n} and their moment map values are as classified by Hitchin for n=0 and by Boden-Yokogawa and Nasatyr-Steer for n>0.
    Invoked throughout Section III to define M_{g,n}, the fixed manifolds M_{d,e}, moment map values mu_{d,e}, and dimensions; Conjectures 1-2 and all example tables rely on this classification.
  • standard math The mixed Hodge polynomial formulas of Hausel-Rodriguez-Villegas and Hausel-Letellier-Rodriguez-Villegas correctly compute H_c and P H_c for SU(2)/Z2 character varieties.
    Section IV uses equations (37)-(46), especially the H-polynomials (44)-(45) and renormalization (46), to define P_{g,n}(q) used in Conjecture 3.
  • domain assumption The 4d/VOA correspondence holds: the Schur index is the vacuum character, defect Schur indices are linear combinations of simple module characters, and solutions of quasi-modular FMDEs form a finite-dimensional representation of the modular group.
    Section II uses these statements to construct V^{mod}_{g,n} and V^{ord}_{g,n}; the modularity of FMDEs is explicitly described as highly non-trivial in Section II.B.
  • domain assumption The Coulomb branch of T_{g,n} is described by the SU(2)/Z2 Hitchin moduli space M_{g,n}.
    Section III opens by following Gaiotto-Moore-Neitzke; this identification is the geometric side of the mirror symmetry statement.
  • ad hoc to paper For general g,n, the q-series read off from vortex and Wilson line defect indices are characters of irreducible simple modules of V_{g,n}.
    Footnote 46 states 'we are unable to show the modules here to be irreducible. Nevertheless, we proceed by assuming irreducibility.' This assumption is needed to match modules one-to-one with fixed manifolds.
  • ad hoc to paper The modular orbit basis (13)/(108) built from T(2) and S(2) spans the full modular representation V^{ord}_{g,n} for all g,n.
    Equation (13) is stated as a basis; the paper verifies dimensions in examples but does not prove spanning or completeness for large g,n.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mirror symmetry for 4d $A_1$ class-$\mathcal{S}$ theories: modularity, defects and Coulomb branch." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CIUJBZAO

@misc{pith2026241203155,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mirror symmetry for 4d $A_1$ class-$\mathcalS$ theories: modularity, defects and Coulomb branch},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CIUJBZAO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03155}
}
abstract

This is the companion paper of the letter arXiv:2410.15695, containing all the details and series of examples on a 4d mirror symmetry for the class-$\mathcal{S}$ theories which relates the representation theory of the chiral quantization of the Higgs branch and the geometry of the Coulomb branch. We study the representation theory by using the 4d/VOA correspondence, (defect) Schur indices and (flavor) modular differential equations, and match the data with the fixed manifolds of the Hitchin moduli spaces. This correspondence extends the connection between Higgs and Coulomb branch of Argyres-Douglas theories, and can provide systematic guidance for the study of the representation theory of vertex operator algebras by exploiting results from Hitchin systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03155 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: A Wilson line operator in the genus-one theory with two punctures. Each long [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Pan and P

    Y. Pan and P. Yang, Modularity of Schur index, modular differential equations, and high- temperature asymptotics, (2024), arXiv:2403.12127 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    K. A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 387, 513 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9607207

    arXiv 1996

  3. [2]

    Braden, N

    T. Braden, N. Proudfoot, and B. Webster, Quantizations of conical symplectic resolutions I: local and global structure, (2022), arXiv:1208.3863 [math.RT]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [3]

    Braden, A

    T. Braden, A. Licata, N. Proudfoot, and B. Webster, Quantizations of conical symplectic resolutions II: category O and symplectic duality, (2022), arXiv:1407.0964 [math.RT]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 336, 1359 (2015), arXiv:1312.5344 31 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [5]

    Beem and L

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli, Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations, JHEP 08, 114, arXiv:1707.07679 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    J. Song, D. Xie, and W. Yan, Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5-branes, JHEP 12, 123, arXiv:1706.01607 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Arakawa, Chiral algebras of class S and Moore-Tachikawa symplectic varieties, (2018), arXiv:1811.01577 [math.RT]

    T. Arakawa, Chiral algebras of class S and Moore-Tachikawa symplectic varieties, (2018), arXiv:1811.01577 [math.RT]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    P. Shan, D. Xie, and W. Yan, Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4d N = 2 SCFTs, (2023), arXiv:2306.15214 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    P. Shan, D. Xie, and W. Yan, Modularity for W-algebras and affine Springer fibres, (2024), arXiv:2404.00760 [math.RT]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Fredrickson, D

    L. Fredrickson, D. Pei, W. Yan, and K. Ye, Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters, JHEP 01, 150, arXiv:1701.08782 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Fredrickson and A

    L. Fredrickson and A. Neitzke, From S1-fixed points to W-algebra representations, (2017), arXiv:1709.06142 [math.DG]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Pan and W

    Y. Pan and W. Yan, Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4d A1 class-S theories, (2024), arXiv:2410.15695 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Gaiotto, N=2 dualities, JHEP 08, 034, arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    D. Gaiotto, N=2 dualities, JHEP 08, 034, arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation, Adv. Math. 234, 239 (2013), arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [15]

    G. W. Moore and Y. Tachikawa, On 2d TQFTs whose values are holomorphic symplectic varieties, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 85, 191 (2012), arXiv:1106.5698 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Zheng, Y

    H. Zheng, Y. Pan, and Y. Wang, Surface defects, flavored modular differential equations, and modularity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 105020 (2022), arXiv:2207.10463 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Pan and Y

    Y. Pan and Y. Wang, Flavored modular differential equations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085027 (2023), arXiv:2306.10569 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Arakawa and K

    T. Arakawa and K. Kawasetsu, Quasi-lisse vertex algebras and modular linear differential equations, (2016), arXiv:1610.05865 [math.QA]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, Surface Defects and Chiral Algebras, JHEP 05, 140, arXiv:1704.01955 [hep-th]. 32

    arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, Infrared Computations of Defect Schur Indices, JHEP 11, 106, arXiv:1606.08429 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Pan and W

    Y. Pan and W. Peelaers, Exact Schur index in closed form, Phys. Rev. D 106, 045017 (2022), arXiv:2112.09705 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Z. Guo, Y. Li, Y. Pan, and Y. Wang, N=2 Schur index and line operators, Phys. Rev. D 108, 106002 (2023), arXiv:2307.15650 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    N. J. Hitchin, The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 3, 59 (1987)

    1987

  17. [25]

    H. U. Boden and K. Yokogawa, Moduli spaces of parabolic higgs bundles and parabolic k (d) pairs over smooth curves: I, International Journal of Mathematics 7, 573 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    Nasatyr and B

    B. Nasatyr and B. Steer, Orbifold riemann surfaces and the yang-mills-higgs equations, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Classe di Scienze 22, 595 (1995)

    1995

  19. [27]

    Hausel and F

    T. Hausel and F. Rodriguez-Villegas, Mixed Hodge polynomials of character varieties: with an appendix by Nicholas M. Katz, Inventiones mathematicae 174, 555 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, The 4d Superconformal Index from q- deformed 2d Yang-Mills, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241602 (2011), arXiv:1104.3850 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polyno- mials, Commun.Math.Phys. 319, 147 (2013), arXiv:1110.3740 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gaiotto, L

    D. Gaiotto, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, Bootstrapping the superconformal index with surface defects, JHEP 1301, 022, arXiv:1207.3577 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    L. F. Alday, M. Bullimore, M. Fluder, and L. Hollands, Surface defects, the superconformal index and q-deformed Yang-Mills, JHEP 10, 018, arXiv:1303.4460 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nishinaka, S

    T. Nishinaka, S. Sasa, and R.-D. Zhu, On the Correspondence between Surface Operators in Argyres-Douglas Theories and Modules of Chiral Algebra, JHEP 03, 091, arXiv:1811.11772 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    We only concern ourselves with the one of the lowest order

    There may be multiple MDEs annihilating χ0. We only concern ourselves with the one of the lowest order

  26. [34]

    As a meromorphic function of the complex structure moduli τ , ϕn(τ ) may contain poles. 33

  27. [35]

    The modular group Γ in the flavored case may be different from the one relevant in the unflavored case of the same theory: in general, flavor refinement results in a subgroup of the latter

  28. [36]

    Γ is SL(2, Z) when n is even, is Γ 0(2) ⊂ SL(2, Z) when n odd

  29. [37]

    Garc ´ ıa-Prada, P

    O. Garc ´ ıa-Prada, P. B. Gothen, and V. Mu˜ noz, Betti numbers of the moduli space of rank 3 parabolic Higgs bundles, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 187, viii+80 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    Deligne, Th´ eorie de hodge: Ii, Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES 40, 5 (1971)

    P. Deligne, Th´ eorie de hodge: Ii, Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES 40, 5 (1971)

    1971

  31. [39]

    Deligne, Th´ eorie de hodge: Iii, Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES 44, 5 (1974)

    P. Deligne, Th´ eorie de hodge: Iii, Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES 44, 5 (1974)

    1974

  32. [40]

    Hausel, E

    T. Hausel, E. Letellier, and F. Rodriguez-Villegas, Arithmetic harmonic analysis on character and quiver varieties, Duke Mathematical Journal 160, 10.1215/00127094-1444258 (2011)

    2011 doi

  33. [41]

    A. M. Garsia and M. Haiman, A remarkable q, t-catalan sequence and q-lagrange inversion, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 5, 191 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    I. G. Macdonald, Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials(Oxford university press, 1998)

    1998

  35. [43]

    Additionally, there is an additional accidentalU Sp(4) symmetry at the level of associated VOA [44, 45]

    There is an U (1)f flavor symmetry discussed in [4] that is not visible in the class- S construc- tion. Additionally, there is an additional accidentalU Sp(4) symmetry at the level of associated VOA [44, 45]. However, in this paper we will only consider flavor symmetry from th...

  36. [44]

    Kiyoshige and T

    K. Kiyoshige and T. Nishinaka, The Chiral Algebra of Genus Two Class S Theory 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)199 (2020), arXiv:2009.11629 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Beem and C

    C. Beem and C. Meneghelli, Geometric free field realization for the genus-two class S theory of type a1, Phys. Rev. D 104, 065015 (2021), arXiv:2104.11668 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    However, we are unable to show the modules here to be irreducible

    For Argyres-Douglas theories, these vortex type defects do correspond to irreducible modules of the associated VOA. However, we are unable to show the modules here to be irreducible. Nevertheless, we proceed by assuming irreducibility

  39. [47]

    C. Beem, S. S. Razamat, and P. Singh, Schur indices of class S and quasimodular forms, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085009 (2022), arXiv:2112.10715 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Perse, A note on representations of some affine vertex algebras of type D, Glasnik matem- aticki 48, 81 (2013), arXiv:1205.3003 [math.QA]

    O. Perse, A note on representations of some affine vertex algebras of type D, Glasnik matem- aticki 48, 81 (2013), arXiv:1205.3003 [math.QA]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Arakawa and A

    T. Arakawa and A. Moreau, Joseph Ideals and Lisse Minimal W -algebras, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 17, 397 (2018), arXiv:1506.00710 [math.RT]. 34

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    B. Li, H. Li, and W. Yan, Spectral flow, twisted modules and MLDE of quasi-lisse vertex algebras, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2304.09681 (2023), arXiv:2304.09681 [math.QA]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Adamovic, A Realization of Certain Modules for the n = 4 Superconformal Algebra and the Affine lie Algebra A2(1), Transform

    D. Adamovic, A Realization of Certain Modules for the n = 4 Superconformal Algebra and the Affine lie Algebra A2(1), Transform. Groups 21, 299 (2016), arXiv:1407.1527 [math.QA]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bonetti, C

    F. Bonetti, C. Meneghelli, and L. Rastelli, VOAs labelled by complex reflection groups and 4d SCFTs, JHEP 05, 155, arXiv:1810.03612 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Arakawa, T

    T. Arakawa, T. Kuwabara, and S. M¨ oller, Hilbert Schemes of Points in the Plane and Quasi- Lisse Vertex Algebras with N = 4 Symmetry, (2023), arXiv:2309.17308 [math.RT]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Beem and S

    C. Beem and S. Nair, Twisted Chiral Algebras of Class S and Mixed Feigin–Frenkel Gluing, Commun. Math. Phys. 399, 295 (2023), arXiv:2201.13435 [hep-th]

    2023

  47. [55]

    Beem and S

    C. Beem and S. Nair, Free Field Realisation of the Chiral Universal Centraliser, Annales Henri Poincare 24, 4343 (2023), arXiv:2208.09343 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    C. Beem, A. Deb, M. Martone, C. Meneghelli, and L. Rastelli, Free field realizations for rank-one SCFTs, (2024), arXiv:2407.01674 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Costello, T

    K. Costello, T. Creutzig, and D. Gaiotto, Higgs and Coulomb branches from vertex operator algebras, JHEP 03, 066, arXiv:1811.03958 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Beem and A

    C. Beem and A. E. V. Ferrari, Free field realisation of boundary vertex algebras for Abelian gauge theories in three dimensions, (2023), arXiv:2304.11055 [hep-th]. 35

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.